Maximizing Learning in the Operating Room: Residents' Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Few studies examine how residents can optimize their educational experience in the OR on their terms. This study aimed to examine residents' perceptions of how learners can maximize their education in the OR. METHOD: Using constructivist grounded theory methodology, the authors conducted focus groups with general surgery residents, PGY1-5, followed by semi-structured interviews with attending surgeons from a single, academic medical center. Constant comparison was used to identify themes and explore their relationships. Theoretical sampling was used until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Residents and attendings participated. Two phases of OR learning were identified, intra-operative and inter-operative. Characters that made optimized learning included control, struggling, and reflection. Residents who practiced self-reflection with their experiences, and were able to articulate this awareness to attendings, felt the OR was an ideal learning environment. Attendings echoed similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: Providing residents with a method of maximizing OR learning is critical to postgraduate clinical education. Currently, observation passively morphs into active learning and eventually independent operating in the OR. However, residents who practice self-regulated learning, and are able to discuss their educational goals with attendings, seem to find the OR a better learning environment and progress to independence more quickly. This was echoed by practicing attendings. Providing residents with a generalizable, self-regulated learning framework specific to operative educational experiences could maximize learning potential and expedite resident progression in the OR.

(En)trust me: Validating an assessment rubric for documenting clinical encounters during a surgery clerkship clinical skills exam.

BACKGROUND: The AAMC developed 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for graduating medical students. EPA 5 is: Document a clinical encounter in the patient record. Our goal was to develop an assessment rubric and gather evidence to support its validity in measuring progress towards entrustability. METHODS: A rubric was developed for EPA 5. During the 2017 surgery clerkship, 57 students wrote a note for each of two standardized patient (SP) encounters. These notes were prospectively collected and assessed by two physician raters. Messick's validity framework was used to gather validity data. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability with two raters was excellent, ICC = 0.86 (ICC 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.90) for overall note score. Correlation between note items and SP checklists ranged 0.39-0.46 (p < 0.05) and between note items and clinical evaluations 0.28-0.39 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is initial reliability evidence supporting the use of our rubric for assessing progress towards entrustability of EPA 5.

Selection bias: Examining the feasibility, utility, and participant receptivity to incorporating simulation into the general surgery residency selection process.

BACKGROUND: Opportunities exist to revise the current residency selection process to capture desirable candidate competencies. We examined the extent to which components of the American College of Surgeons/Association for Surgical Education simulation-based medical student curriculum combined with a teamwork activity could be used as potential screening method. METHODS: Students participated in a workshop consisting of training/evaluation of knot tying, suturing, airway management, gowning/gloving, and teamwork. Surveys were given to medical students (MS) and faculty/resident/staff (FRS) to examine their opinions about the residency screening process, the most critical competencies to assess, and the effectiveness of each station for candidate evaluation. RESULTS: Communication (FRS, 4.86 ± .35; MS, 4.93 ± .26), leadership (FRS, 4.41 ± .80; MS, 4.5 ± .76), judgment (FRS, 4.62 ± .74; MS, 4.67 ± .62), professionalism (FRS, 4.64 ± .73; MS, 5.00 ± .00), integrity (FRS, 4.71 ± .78; MS, 4.87 ± .35), and grit/resilience (FRS, 4.71 ± .78; MS, 4.53 ± .74) were considered most valuable for candidate screening. The simulation-based curriculum for evaluation of residency candidates was rated lowest by both groups. Open response comments indicated positive perceptions of this process. CONCLUSIONS: Employing simulation to assess candidates may be most beneficial for examining nontechnical attributes. Future work should continue to explore this area.

Reducing Oncology Unit Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: Initial Results of a Simulation-Based Educational Intervention.

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer may be more vulnerable to infection because of impaired immune competence as a result of their disease or chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. In these patients, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) can result in significant morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and increased costs. METHODS: We developed a staff educational series to identify knowledge deficits and standardize the use, care, and maintenance of central lines, with the goal of reducing the rate of CLABSIs. The methodology used for this study employed a simulated central line care model, focused on the re-education of nursing staff from January 2012 to June 2012, and included a pretest, an educational blitz, and a post-test. The educational blitz content was tailored to specifically address the significant practice and knowledge deficits identified from the results of the pretest. RESULTS: On completion of the education program, the post-test demonstrated a 16.9% increase in nursing staff competence related to the care and maintenance of central lines. Six months before the educational series (June 2011 to January 2012), the CLABSI rate was 5.86 per 1,000 patient line-days. Throughout the educational series (February 2012 to May 2012), the CLABSI rate was 3.45. The data revealed a CLABSI rate of 3.43 for the 6-month period after the educational series (June 2012 to January 2013). CONCLUSION: A targeted educational intervention using a simulated central line care model improved competence in central line care and resulted in decreased CLABSI rates for inpatient oncology patients.

What is the future of training in surgery? Needs assessment of national stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: The Curriculum Committee of the American College of Surgeons-Accredited Educational Institutes conducted a need assessment to (1) identify gaps between ideal and actual practices in areas of surgical care, (2) explore educational solutions for addressing these gaps, and (3) shape a vision to advance the future of training in surgery. METHODS: National stakeholders were recruited from the committee members' professional network and interviewed via telephone. Interview questions targeted areas for improving surgical patient care, optimal educational solutions for training in surgery including simulation roles, and entities that should primarily bear training costs. We performed an iterative, qualitative analysis including member checking to identify key themes. RESULTS: Twenty-two interviewees included state/national board representatives, risk managers, multispecialty faculty/program directors, nurses, trainees, an industry representative, and a patient. Surgeons' communication with patients, families, and team members was raised consistently by stakeholders as a way to establish clear expectations regarding pre-, peri-, and postoperative care. Other comments highlighted the surgeon's development and demonstration and maintenance of cognitive and technical skills, including surgical judgment. Stakeholders also reiterated the critical need for surgeons to engage in on-going self-assessment and professional development to identify and remediate recognized limitations. Recommended learning modalities for meeting surgeons' needs included active learning (deliberate practice, diverse patient experiences), experiential learning (simulation), and peer and mentored learning (preceptorship). CONCLUSION: This first formal needs assessment of education for surgeons points to opportunities for educational programs in patient-centered communication, learning models that match preferences of new generations of trainees, and training in interprofessional/interdisciplinary team communication and teamwork.

Evaluation of simulation-based training model on vascular anastomotic skills for surgical residents.

INTRODUCTION: Reduced work hours and concerns over patient safety have encouraged surgical educators to find methods to advance resident skills more efficiently. Simulation provides the opportunity to improve technical surgical skills outside the operating room. We hypothesized that practice on surgical task simulators would improve residents' technical performance of vascular anastomotic technique. METHODS: Senior general surgery residents at an academic medical center completed pretests and posttests on 3 vascular surgery simulators: femoral-popliteal bypass, carotid endarterectomy, and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The initial training sessions began with a 15-minute instructional video on how to perform the procedures, followed by supervised sessions in anastomotic technique with attending vascular surgeons. Initial individual sessions were videotaped as a pretest, and the final attempt was videotaped as the posttest. Each test was evaluated by a single experienced attending vascular surgeon blinded to the examinees. Anastomoses were graded using a performance rating and a modified objective structured assessment of technical skill rating. Results were analyzed using mixed model P values. RESULTS: The residents showed statistically significant improvement between the pretest and the posttest in both their performance rating (1.9 vs. 2.4, P = 0.02) and the objective structured assessment of technical skill (2.6 vs. 3.1, P = 0.01), as well as in most subsets of each assessment scale. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that practice using simulated anastomotic models leads to measurable improvement in vascular anastomotic technique in senior general surgery residents.