Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of a first cancer is associated with a decreased incidence of second primary cancer.

BACKGROUND: Second primary cancers (SPCs) are diagnosed in over 5% of patients after a first primary cancer (FPC). We explore here the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) given for an FPC on the risk of SPC in different age groups, cancer types and treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The files of the 46 829 patients diagnosed with an FPC in the Centre Léon Bérard from 2013 to 2018 were analyzed. Structured data were extracted and electronic patient records were screened using a natural language processing tool, with validation using manual screening of 2818 files of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the incidence of SPC according to patient characteristics and treatment were conducted. RESULTS: Among the 46 829 patients, 1830 (3.9%) had a diagnosis of SPC with a median interval of 11.1 months (range 0-78 months); 18 128 (38.7%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) and 1163 (2.5%) received ICIs for the treatment of the FPC in this period. SPCs were observed in 7/1163 (0.6%) patients who had received ICIs for their FPC versus 437/16 997 (2.6%) patients receiving CC and no ICIs for the FPC versus 1386/28 669 (4.8%) for patients receiving neither CC nor ICIs for the FPC. This reduction was observed at all ages and for all histotypes analyzed. Treatment with ICIs and/or CC for the FPC are associated with a reduced risk of SPC in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy with ICIs alone and in combination with CC was found to be associated with a reduced incidence of SPC for all ages and cancer types.

Risk of relapse after anti-PD1 discontinuation in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL) experience high response rates upon anti-PD1 therapy. In these patients, the optimal duration of treatment and the risk of relapse after anti-PD1 discontinuation are unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with R/R HL who responded to anti-PD1 monotherapy and discontinued the treatment either because of unacceptable toxicity or prolonged remission. A machine learning algorithm based on 17 candidate variables was trained and validated to predict progression-free survival (PFS) landmarked at the time of discontinuation of anti-PD1 therapy. RESULTS: Forty patients from 14 centers were randomly assigned to training (n = 25) and validation (n = 15) sets. At the time of anti-PD1 discontinuation, patients had received treatment for a median duration of 11.2 (range, 0-time to best response was not statistically significant in discriminating patients with PFS lesser or greater than 12 months). Considering PFS status as a binary variable (alive or dead) at a specific time point (12 months) is convenient, intuitive and allows for comparing the value of potential predicting variables in these two groups of patients. Nonetheless, this approach has two drawbacks: first, it binarizes outcome; second, it excludes patients alive with a time to last follow up lesser 12 months. Therefore, it is less powerful to demonstrate statistically significant association with PFS even if it exists 5 months. Patients discontinued anti-PD1 treatment either because of prolonged remission (N = 27, 67.5%) or unacceptable toxicity (N = 13, 32.5%). Most patients were in CR (N = 35, 87.5%) at the time of anti-PD1 discontinuation. In the training set, the machine learning algorithm identified that the most important variables to predict PFS were patients' age, time to best response, and presence or absence of CR. The performance observed in the training set was validated in the validation set. CONCLUSION: In this pilot, proof of concept study using a machine learning algorithm, we identified biomarkers capable of predicting the risk of relapse after anti-PD1 discontinuation (age, time to best response, quality of response). Once confirmed, these simple biomarkers will represent useful tools to guide the management of these patients.

Ibrutinib monotherapy for relapse or refractory primary CNS lymphoma and primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: Final analysis of the phase II 'proof-of-concept' iLOC study by the Lymphoma study association (LYSA) and the French oculo-cerebral lymphoma (LOC) network.

BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) are mainly diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) of the non-germinal centre B-cell subtype, with unmet medical needs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ibrutinib in DLBCL-PCNSL PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, phase II study involved patients with relapse or refractory(R/R) DLBCL-PCNSL or primary vitreoretinal lymphoma. The treatment consisted of ibrutinib (560 mg/day) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary outcome was the disease control (DC) rate after two months of treatment (P0 < 10%; P1 > 30%). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were recruited. Forty-four patients were evaluable for response. After 2 months of treatment, the DC was 70% in evaluable patients and 62% in the intent-to-treat analysis, including 10 complete responses (19%), 17 partial responses (33%) and 5 stable diseases (10%). With a median follow-up of 25.7 months (range, 0.7-30.5), the median progression-free and overall survivals were 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]; 2.8-12.7) and 19.2 months (95% CI; 7.2-NR), respectively. Thirteen patients received ibrutinib for more than 12 months. Two patients experienced pulmonary aspergillosis with a favourable (n = 1) or fatal outcome (n = 1). Ibrutinib was detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The clinical response to ibrutinib seemed independent of the gene mutations in the BCR pathway. CONCLUSION: Ibrutinib showed clinical activity in the brain, the CSF and the intraocular compartment and was tolerated in R/R PCNSL. The addition of ibrutinib to standard methotrexate-base induction chemotherapy will be further evaluated in the first-line treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02542514.

Lenalidomide in combination with intravenous rituximab (REVRI) in relapsed/refractory primary CNS lymphoma or primary intraocular lymphoma: a multicenter prospective 'proof of concept' phase II study of the French Oculo-Cerebral lymphoma (LOC) Network and the Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA)†.

BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) are mainly diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) of the non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) subtype. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of rituximab plus lenalidomide (R2) in DLBCL-PCNSL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) DLBCL-PCNSL or primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) were included in this prospective phase II study. The induction treatment consisted of eight 28-day cycles of R2 (rituximab 375/m2 i.v. D1; lenalidomide 20 mg/day, D1-21 for cycle 1; and 25 mg/day, D1-21 for the subsequent cycles); in responding patients, the induction treatment was followed by a maintenance phase comprising 12 28-day cycles of lenalidomide alone (10 mg/day, D1-21). The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) at the end of induction (P0 = 10%; P1 = 30%). RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. Forty-five patients (PCNSL, N = 34; PVRL, N = 11) were assessable for response. The ORR at the end of induction was 35.6% (95% CI 21.9-51.2) in assessable patients and 32.0% (95% CI 21.9-51.2) in the intent-to-treat analysis, including 13 complete responses (CR)/unconfirmed CR (uCR; 29%) and 3 partial responses (PR; 7%). The best responses were 18 CR/uCR (40%) and 12 PR (27%) during the induction phase. The maintenance phase was started and completed by 18 and 5 patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19.2 months (range 1.5-31), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.8 months (95% CI 3.9-11.3) and 17.7 months (95% CI 12.9 to not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. The peripheral baseline CD4/CD8 ratio impacted PFS [median PFS = 9.5 months (95% CI, 8.1-14.8] for CD4/CD8 ≥ 1.6; median PFS = 2.8 months, [95% CI, 1.1-7.8) for CD4/CD8 < 1.6, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The R2 regimen showed significant activity in R/R PCNSL and PVRL patients. These results support assessments of the efficacy of R2 combined with methotrexate-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment of PCNSL. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT01956695.

Role of up-front autologous stem-cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma for patients in response after induction: an analysis of patients from LYSA centers.

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remains a therapeutic challenge. Due to the rarity and the heterogeneity of PTCL, no consensus has been achieved regarding even the type of first-line treatment. The benefit of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is, therefore, still intensely debated. Patients and methods: In the absence of randomized trials addressing the role of ASCT, we performed a large multicentric retrospective study and used both a multivariate proportional hazard model and a propensity score matching approach to correct for sample selection bias between patients allocated or not to ASCT in intention-to-treat (ITT). Results: Among 527 patients screened from 14 centers in France, Belgium and Portugal, a final cohort of 269 patients ≤65 years old with PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS) (N = 78, 29%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (N = 123, 46%) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-ALCL) (N = 68, 25%) with partial (N = 52, 19%) or complete responses (N = 217, 81%) after induction was identified and information about treatment allocation was carefully collected before therapy initiation from medical records. One hundred and thirty-four patients were allocated to ASCT in ITT and 135 were not. Neither the Cox multivariate model (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.69-1.50 for PFS and HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.68-1.69 for OS) nor the propensity score analysis after stringent matching for potential confounding factors (logrank P = 0.90 and 0.66 for PFS and OS, respectively) found a survival advantage in favor of ASCT as a consolidation procedure for patients in response after induction. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any further difference for patients according to response status, stage disease or risk category. Conclusions: The present data do not support the use of ASCT for up-front consolidation for all patients with PTCL-NOS, AITL, or ALK-ALCL with partial or complete response after induction.

Salvage high-dose chemotherapy in female patients with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumors: a retrospective analysis of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation is a standard option for relapsed/refractory testicular germ-cell tumor (GCT), but only few data have been reported in female patients with GCT. We conducted a retrospective analysis of female patients with GCT treated with HDC and registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 2013, 60 registered female patients with GCT, median age 27 years (range 15-48), were treated with salvage HDC. Forty patients (67%) had primary ovarian GCT, 8 (13%) mediastinal, 7 (12%) retroperitoneal and 5 (8%) other primary sites/unknown. Twenty-two patients (37%) received HDC as second-line therapy, 29 (48%) as third-line, and 9 (15%) as fourth- to sixth-line. Nine of 60 patients (15%) received HDC as late-intensification with no evidence of metastasis before HDC. The conditioning HDC regimens comprised carboplatin in 51 of 60 cases (85%), and consisted of a single HDC cycle in 31 cases (52%), a multi-cycle HDC regimen in 29 (48%). RESULTS: Nine cases who underwent late intensification HDC were not evaluable for response. Of the other 51 assessable patients, 17 (33%) achieved a complete response (CR), 8 (16%) a marker-negative partial remission (PRm-), 5 (10%) a marker-positive partial remission, 5 (10%) stable disease, and 13 (25%) progressive disease. There were 3 toxic deaths (6%). With an overall median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-219), 7 of 9 (78%) patients with late intensification and 18 of the 25 patients (72%) achieving a CR/PRm- following HDC were free of relapse/progression. In total, 25 of 60 patients (42%) were progression-free following HDC at a median follow-up of 87 months (range 3-219 months). CONCLUSIONS: Salvage HDC based on carboplatin represents a therapeutic option for female patients with relapsed/refractory GCT.

Radioimmunotherapy-augmented BEAM chemotherapy vs BEAM alone as the high-dose regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL): a retrospective study of the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party.

Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure in patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding radioimmunotherapy or rituximab (R) to BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, ara-c, melphalan) high-dose therapy for ASCT in patients with relapsed FL. Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, we conducted a cohort comparison of BEAM (n=1973), Zevalin-BEAM (Z-BEAM) (n=207) and R-BEAM (n=179) and also a matched-cohort analysis of BEAM vs Z-BEAM including 282 and 154 patients, respectively. BEAM, Z-BEAM and R-BEAM groups were well balanced for age, time from diagnosis to ASCT and disease status at ASCT. The cumulative incidences of relapse (IR) at 2 years were 34, 34 and 32% for Z-BEAM, R-BEAM and BEAM, respectively. By multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences with Z-BEAM or R-BEAM compared with BEAM for IR, non-relapse mortality, event-free survival or overall survival. With the caveat that the limitations of registry analyses have to be taken into account, this study does not support adding radioimmunotherapy or R to BEAM in ASCT for relapsed FL. However, we cannot rule out the existence a particular subset of patients who could benefit from Z-BEAM conditioning that cannot be identified in our series, and this should be tested in a randomized trial.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: efficacy in the rituximab era and comparison to first allogeneic transplants. A report from the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party.

In the era of chemoimmunotherapy, the optimal treatment paradigm for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been challenged. We reviewed the outcome of standard salvage therapy with an autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT) over the last two decades and the outcome of allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) in the most recent decade. AutoSCT recipients diagnosed between 1992 and 2002 (n=2737) were compared with those diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 (n=3980). Patients diagnosed after 2002 had a significantly lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) and a superior PFS and overall survival (OS). A total of 4210 patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 underwent either an autoSCT or an alloSCT as their first transplant procedure. Two-hundred and thirty patients received an alloSCT (myeloablative (MACalloSCT) n=132, reduced intensity (RICalloSCT) n=98). The 4-year NRM rates were 7%, 20% and 27% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year RI was 45%, 40% and 38% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively (NS). The 4-year PFS were 48%, 52% and 35% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year OS was 60%, 52% and 38% for autoSCT, RIC alloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors NRM was significantly worse for patients undergoing alloSCT whilst there was no difference in the RI.

[Association of lymphoma and granulomatosis: A case series]. / Association lymphome et granulomatose : à propos d'une série de cas.

PURPOSE: The sarcoidosis-lymphoma syndrome is a recognised entity. However, the presence of granulomas in patients with a haematological disease should not lead too easily to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. The presence of granulomatous lesions during the follow-up of these patients raises diagnostic and therapeutic issues. METHODS: We included 25 patients followed by the department of haematology in a French hospital (Centre Léon-Bérard). These patients presented with granulomatous lesions. Patients with a history of sarcoidosis were excluded. We report the type of haematological disease, the time of onset of the granulomatous disease compared to that of lymphoma, associated symptoms, aetiology and outcome. Patients were divided into three groups according to the time of onset of the granulomatous lesions. RESULTS: Granulomatous lesions appeared before the haematological disease in 4 cases, was concomitant in 8 cases and appeared later in 13 remaining cases. The two main subtypes of lymphoma encountered were: diffuse large cell lymphoma (36%) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (28%). Granulomatous lesions were related to the progression of the hematological disease in 11 cases, to sarcoidosis in 4 cases, to infection in 3 cases, to drug allergy in one case, to inflammatory bowel disease in one case, to granuloma annulare in one case and was isolated in 4 cases (no identified etiology). In the group where granulomas appeared after the haematological disease, mean SUV was 11 for the haematological disease versus 6.4 for granulomas. CONCLUSION: Granulomatous diseases in lymphomas can be due to various aetiologies: infection, reaction to the haematological disease, or systemic sarcoidosis. It is an important challenge for clinicians, who can miss the diagnosis of lymphoma and or conclude to a treatment failure or a relapse. Computed tomography scan (CT-scan) or (18)F-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scan can help establish a diagnosis but do not replace biopsy.

Thiotepa-based high-dose therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a retrospective study from the EBMT.

Clinical information about thiotepa-based autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) outside the primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) field is sparse. In this registry-based retrospective study, we evaluated potential risks and benefits of thiotepa-based preparative regimens compared with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) in auto-SCT for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, excluding PCNSL), follicular lymphoma (FL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). A total of 14 544 patients (589 thiotepa and 13 955 BEAM) met the eligibility criteria, and 535 thiotepa- and 1031 BEAM-treated patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio for final comparison. No significant differences between thiotepa and BEAM groups for any survival end point were identified in the whole sample or disease entity subsets. For a more detailed analysis, 47 TEAM (thiotepa, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan)-treated patients were compared with 75 matched BEAM patients with additional collection of toxicity data. Again, there were no significant differences between the two groups for any survival end point. In addition, the frequency of common infectious and non-infectious complications including secondary malignancies was comparable between TEAM and BEAM. These results indicate that thiotepa-based high-dose therapy might be a valuable alternative to BEAM in DLBCL, HL and FL. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted.

ABVD (8 cycles) versus BEACOPP (4 escalated cycles ≥ 4 baseline): final results in stage III-IV low-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (IPS 0-2) of the LYSA H34 randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with escalated BEACOPP achieved a superior time to treatment failure over ABVD in patients with disseminated Hodgkin lymphoma. However, recent clinical trials have failed to confirm BEACOPP overall survival (OS) superiority over ABVD. In addition, the gain in low-risk patients is still a matter of debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly compared ABVD (8 cycles) with BEACOPP (escalated 4 cycles ≥ baseline 4 cycles) in low-risk patients with an International Prognostic Score (IPS) of 0-2. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). This parallel group, open-label phase 3 trial was registered under #RECF0219 at French National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were randomized in this trial (ABVD 80, BEACOPP 70): 28 years was the median age, 50% were male and IPS was 0-1 for 64%. Complete remission rate was 85% for ABVD and 90% for BEACOPP. Progression or relapses were more frequent in the ABVD patients than in the BEACOPP patients (17 versus 5 patients). With a median follow-up period of 5.5 years, seven patients died: six in the ABVD arm and one in the BEACOPP arm (HL 3 and 0, 2nd cancer 2 and 1, accident 1 and 0). The EFS at 5 years was estimated at 62% for ABVD versus 77%, for BEACOPP [hazards ratio (HR) = 0.6, P = 0.07]. The progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years was 75% versus 93% (HR = 0.3, P = 0.007). The OS at 5 years was 92% versus 99% (HR = 0.18, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Fewer progressions/relapses were observed with BEACOPP, demonstrating the high efficacy of the more intensive regimen, even in low-risk patients. However, additional considerations, balancing treatment-related toxicity and late morbidity due to salvage may help with decision-making with regard to treatment with ABVD or BEACOPP.