Surgical outcomes in people with hemophilia A taking emicizumab prophylaxis: experience from the HAVEN 1-4 studies.

Many people with hemophilia A (PwHA) undergo surgery in their lifetime, often because of complications of their disease. Emicizumab is the first bispecific monoclonal antibody prophylactic therapy for PwHA, and its efficacy and safety have been previously demonstrated; however, there is a need to build an evidence base on the management of PwHA on emicizumab undergoing surgery. Data from the HAVEN 1-4 phase 3 clinical trials were pooled to provide a summary of all minor and major surgeries in PwHA with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors who were receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Overall, 233 surgeries were carried out during the HAVEN 1-4 trials: 215 minor surgeries (including minor dental and joint procedures, central venous access device placement or removal, and endoscopies) in 115 PwHA (64 with FVIII inhibitors) and 18 major surgeries (including arthroplasty and synovectomy) in 18 PwHA (10 with FVIII inhibitors). Perioperative hemostatic support was at the discretion of the treating physician. Overall, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 33.5 (13.0-49.0) years and the median (IQR) emicizumab exposure time before surgery was 278.0 (177.0-431.0) days. Among the 215 minor surgeries, 141 (65.6%) were managed without additional prophylactic factor concentrate, and of those, 121 (85.8%) were not associated with a postoperative bleed. The majority (15 of 18 [83.3%]) of major surgeries were managed with additional prophylactic factor concentrate. Twelve (80.0%) of these 15 surgeries were associated with no intraoperative or postoperative bleeds. The data demonstrate that minor and major surgeries can be performed safely in PwHA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. These trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02622321, #NCT02795767, #NCT02847637, and #NCT03020160.

Efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis versus factor VIII prophylaxis for treatment of hemophilia A without inhibitors: network meta-analysis and sub-group analyses of the intra-patient comparison of the HAVEN 3 trial.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis with that of factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors using two approaches: network meta-analyses (NMA) and additional sub-group analyses from the HAVEN 3 trial.Methods: The NMA used data from trials identified using a systematic literature review and compared bleed rates in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and patients receiving FVIII prophylaxis using a Bayesian, random effects generalized linear model with log link Poisson likelihood. Additional sub-groups of the HAVEN 3 trial included here were defined as patients whose dose-taking behavior met either European label or World Federation of Hemophilia guidelines. A negative binomial regression model was used to conduct an intra-patient comparison of bleed rates within the sub-groups, during treatment with FVIII prophylaxis before entering HAVEN 3 and treatment with emicizumab prophylaxis during HAVEN 3.Results: Four studies were included in the base-case NMA. Evidence showed that the total treated bleed rate was lower with emicizumab prophylaxis compared with FVIII prophylaxis (rate ratio [RR] = 0.36 [95% credible interval (CrI) = 0.13-0.95]). Similar associations were observed in sensitivity analyses. The additional HAVEN 3 analyses also showed lower rates of treated bleeds with emicizumab prophylaxis than with FVIII prophylaxis (RRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.380 [0.186-0.790] and 0.472 [0.258-0.866] in two sub-groups). These results confirm the original HAVEN 3 intra-patient comparison findings.Conclusions: Combined findings from NMA and additional sub-group analyses of HAVEN 3 support the superiority of emicizumab prophylaxis over FVIII prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors.

Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions between Taspoglutide, a Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist, and Drugs Commonly Used in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of Five Phase I Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Taspoglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, like native glucagon-like peptide-1, delays gastric emptying time and prolongs intestinal transit time, which may alter the pharmacokinetics of concomitantly administered oral drugs. The effect of taspoglutide on the pharmacokinetics of five oral drugs commonly used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was assessed in healthy subjects. METHODS: Five clinical pharmacology studies evaluated the potential drug-drug interaction between multiple subcutaneous taspoglutide doses and a single dose of lisinopril, warfarin, and simvastatin and multiple doses of digoxin and an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel. The extent of interaction was quantified using geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve. In addition to pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic effects were assessed for warfarin and the oral contraceptive. RESULTS: Among the tested drugs, the effect of taspoglutide on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin was most pronounced, on the day of taspoglutide administration, the average exposure to simvastatin was decreased by - 26% and - 58% for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration, respectively, accompanied by an increase in average exposure to its active metabolite, simvastatin ß-hydroxy acid (+ 74% and + 23% for area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration, respectively). Although statistically significant changes in exposure were observed for other test drugs, the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratio for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were within the 0.7-1.3 interval. No clinically relevant changes on coagulation (for warfarin) and ovulation-suppressing activity (for the oral contraceptive) were apparent. CONCLUSION: Overall, multiple doses of taspoglutide did not result in changes in the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel, lisinopril, warfarin, and simvastatin that would be considered of clinical relevance. Therefore, no dose adjustments are warranted upon co-administration.

Effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of taspoglutide.

AIM: To evaluate single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of taspoglutide in people with varying degrees of renal impairment and matched healthy participants. METHODS: Participants in the present study were people with mild renal impairment (n = 10), moderate impairment (n = 10), severe impairment (n = 9), and a matched healthy control group (n = 10). Participants received a single subcutaneous injection of taspoglutide (10 mg) on day 1. Plasma and urine drug concentration, antibody formation, vital signs, ECGs and routine laboratory variables were measured frequently and adverse events (AEs) were monitored for 9 weeks. RESULTS: Taspoglutide exposure was higher among participants with moderate and severe renal impairment compared with participants with normal renal function. Mean AUClast was 13% and 38% higher in participants with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively compared with participants with normal renal function. Likewise, mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) was 57% and 93% higher in participants with moderate and severe renal function impairment, respectively, compared with participants with normal renal function. Linear regression analyses showed a statistically significant inverse relationship between taspoglutide exposure parameters (AUC and Cmax ) and creatinine clearance. Higher incidences of gastrointestinal (GI) AEs were reported in participants with severe renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment altered the pharmacokinetics of taspoglutide. The degree of renal impairment was associated with an increased exposure to taspoglutide and an increased risk of GI AEs.