Quantitative differences in volumetric calculations for radiation dosimetry in segmental Y90 treatment planning using hybrid angiography-CT compared with anatomic segmentation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment volumes reconstructed from hybrid Angio-CT catheter-directed infusion imaging and Couinaud anatomic model as well as the implied differences in Y-90 radiation dosimetry. METHODS: Patients who underwent transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using Y-90 glass microspheres with pretreatment CT or MRI imaging as well as intraprocedural angiography-CT (Angio-CT) were analysed. Treatment volumes were delineated using both tumoural angiosomes (derived from Angio-CT) and Couinaud anatomic landmarks. Segmental and lobar treatment volumes were calculated via semi-automated contouring software. Volume and dose differences were compared by the two-tailed Student t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Factors affecting volume and dose differences were assessed via simple and/or multiple variable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: From September 2018 to March 2021, 44 patients underwent 45 lobar treatments and 38 patients received 56 segmental treatments. All target liver lobes and all tumours were completely included within the field-of-view by Angio-CT. Tumour sizes ranged between 1.1 and 19.5 cm in diameter. Segmental volumes and treatment doses were significantly different between the Couinaud and Angio-CT volumetry methods (316 vs 404 mL, P < .0001 and 253 vs 212 Gy, P < .01, respectively). Watershed tumours were significantly correlated with underestimated volumes by the Couinaud anatomic model (P < .001). There was a significant linear relationship between tumour diameter and percent volume difference (R2 = 0.44, P < .0001). The Couinaud model overestimated volumes for large tumours that exhibited central hypovascularity/necrosis and for superselected peripheral tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Angio-CT may confer advantages over the Couinaud anatomic model and enable more accurate, personalized dosimetry for TARE. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Angio-CT may confer advantages over traditional cross-sectional and cone-beam CT imaging for selective internal radiation therapy planning.

Hybrid CT-angiography (Angio-CT) for combined CT and fluoroscopic procedures in interventional radiology enhances utilization.

PURPOSE: To investigate the utilization of an angiography-CT (Angio-CT) system and its advantages for single patient encounters. METHODS: Interventions utilizing both CT and fluoroscopy to perform multiple procedures in a single encounter or single interventions using both were identified. Cases were stratified by complexity (defined by RVUs). Comparative analyses of room (TRoom) and total encounter (TEncounter) times were performed between non-complex bundled cases and controls. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and August 2019, 1108 procedures were performed via the Angio-CT system; 10% (114/1108) used both fluoroscopy and CT. 21% (24/114) Involved more than one procedure in a single encounter that required a CT-only and fluoroscopy-only bundled procedure. 59% (67/114) were non-complex, and 70% (80/114) were non-oncologic. 82.5% (14/17) of non-complex bundled procedures demonstrated TRoom below the mean of their respective controls; 52.8% (9/17) were 2 standard deviations below the control means. Pleural catheter placement following post-lung biopsy pneumothorax was the most common non-complex bundled case with a significant reduction in TRoom when performed via Angio-CT compared to control (99 vs. 163 min, p < 0.0001). There was a significant reduction in TEncounter for abdominopelvic drain placement procedures bundled with either (1) percutaneous nephrostomy tube evaluation with or without replacement, or (2) central venous catheter placement (211 min vs. 344 min, p < 0.001 and 231 min vs. 347 min, p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The primary use for the hybrid Angio-CT system was to perform non-oncologic and non-complex cases with potential reduction in TRoom and TEncounter for specific non-complex bundled cases.

Implementation of a hybrid angiography-CT system: increased short-term revenue at an academic radiology department.

PURPOSE: To analyze the financial impact following implementation of a hybrid Angio-CT system at a tertiary care academic medical center. METHODS: Aggregate case types and volumes were compared 24 months before and 12 months after a hybrid Angio-CT system replaced a traditional interventional C-arm angiography suite at an academic medical center. Procedure revenues from this 36-month study period were derived from five payors mixes (Medicare, Medicaid, commercial insurance, out-of-pocket and managed care program) and Medicare-rate adjusted to each individual payor types. RESULTS: Average case volume per month increased 12% in the hybrid Angio-CT suite when compared to the previous traditional angiography suite (P < 0.05). The variety of IR procedures in the hybrid Angio-CT suite also expanded to include more complex interventional radiology and interventional oncology procedures; the breadth of cases performed in the hybrid Angio-CT suite were associated with CPT codes of higher rates (average CPT value/case increased from $2,334.61 to $2,567.25). The estimated average annual revenue of the hybrid Angio-CT suite increased 23% as compared to previous traditional angiography suite. CONCLUSION: A hybrid Angio-CT system is a financially feasible endeavor at a tertiary care academic medical center that facilitated higher complexity procedure codes and increased procedure-related revenue.

Hybrid angiography-CT for transarterial radioembolization: a pictorial essay.

Although hybrid angiography-CT (Angio-CT) has a long history of use for interventional oncology procedures, its applications for transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are not as well described in the literature. This pictorial essay demonstrates a single-institution experience with the utilization of an Angio-CT system for TARE treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Procedural images and clinical data for twenty-four patients who underwent initial angiographic mapping with hepatopulmonary shunt fraction assessment and or administration of Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres using the Angio-CT system to date were reviewed. Cases were reviewed for examples that highlight the specific utility of Angio-CT. Three representative TARE cases were selected which illustrate unique advantages and applications of the Angio-CT system when performing TARE. These include the ability to optimally delineate hepatic vascular anatomy, accurately calculate liver volumes for dosimetry, and improve the detection and characterization of equivocal lesions. Angio-CT has unique advantages which can be applied to TARE treatment of patients with HCC. The technology has potential to be an especially effective tool for those who aim to be at the cutting edge of the rapidly growing field of interventional oncology.

Impact of Era, Type of Isomerism, and Ventricular Morphology on Survival in Heterotaxy: Implications for Therapeutic Management.

BACKGROUND: Heterotaxy has been demonstrated to reduce survival. There are several different subgroups of patients, however, and no single study has had a large number of patients and analyzed survival across the different subgroups such as patients born in different eras, patients with right and left isomerism, and patients with biventricular or functionally univentricular hearts. This study pools previously reported data from Kaplan-Meier curves and performs such subgroup analysis. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting survival of patients with the so-called "heterotaxy" by means of Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Data were extracted from these survival curves and then pooled together. A polynomial regression was then used to generate a pooled survival curve. This was done for all patients, those born in a more recent era, those with right and left isomerism, and those with biventricular or functionally univentricular hearts. RESULTS: Those born in the more recent era (after 2000) had increased survival compared to the overall cohort. Those with left isomerism tended to have a survival benefit compared to those with right isomerism until about 16 years of age, beyond which those with right isomerism developed a survival benefit. Those with biventricular hearts had a survival benefit compared to those with left isomerism. CONCLUSION: Survival in the so-called heterotaxy syndrome is based on several factors, which include era of birth, sidedness of isomerism, and whether the heart is biventricular or functionally univentricular.

Ibuprofen Versus Indomethacin for Medical Closure of the Patent Arterial Duct: A Pooled Analysis by Route of Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Preterm infants are at increased risk of having a patent arterial duct (PAD). PADs may cause congestive heart failure, respiratory distress, necrotizing enterocolitis, and renal impairment. Consequently, in some infants, it becomes necessary to attempt closure of the PAD. Surgical closure can be difficult in small infants and is not without its risks; thus, medical closure offers advantages. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors have been used for medical closure of the PAD with both ibuprofen and indomethacin having been used clinically. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all studies comparing ibuprofen and indomethacin. Studies comparing ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of the PAD in premature infants were included in the meta-analysis. A subanalysis was performed to compare the route of administration. Efficacy endpoints studied were PAD closure and surgical ligation while adverse effects studied were death in the first month of life, necrotizing enterocolitis, gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the first month of life, Grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, and change in the serum creatinine after treatment. RESULTS: Ibuprofen and indomethacin were equally effective in closing the PAD in premature infants and demonstrated no difference in the incidence of adverse events. In respect to the route of administration, oral ibuprofen was as effective as intravenous indomethacin. When comparing both drugs via the intravenous route, the only difference noted between the ibuprofen and indomethacin was that ibuprofen was associated with a lesser increase in serum creatinine after treatment. CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen and indomethacin are equally effective in PAD closure without any difference in the incidence of adverse events. Importantly, oral ibuprofen was as effective as intravenous indomethacin.