International variation in physicians' attitudes towards prophylactic mastectomy - comparison between France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: Prophylactic mastectomy (PM) has proven to be the most effective method to reduce the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women. The present study aimed to present and compare the attitudes towards PM among physicians in France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (UK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An international sample of 1196 general practitioners (GPs) and 927 breast surgeons (BS) were surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: Only 30% of the French and 27% of the German GPs were of opinion that PM should be an option for an unaffected female BRCA1/2 mutation carrier, as compared to 85% and 92% of the GPs in the Netherlands and UK, respectively. Similarly, 78% of the French and 66% of the German BS reported a positive attitude towards PM, as compared to 100% and 97% of the BS in the Netherlands and UK, respectively. In the whole sample of GPs, a positive attitude towards PM was associated with country of residence, being female, and having more knowledge of breast/ovarian cancer genetics, while among BS there was a positive association with country of residence and having more knowledge of breast/ovarian cancer genetics as well, and, in addition, with a higher number of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients last year. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated the international variations in the attitude towards PM among physicians. This might reflect that different policies are adopted to prevent breast cancer in women at-risk.

Familial breast cancer: is it time to move from a reactive to a proactive role?

In 2004 the NICE guidelines on familial breast cancer advised Health Care Professionals that they should not actively seek to identify women with a family history of breast cancer. We have carried out a review of the evidence base and a large scale questionnaire survey of health professionals in four European countries. There is overwhelming support amongst GPs and surgeons against the premise that that health care professionals should not be proactive in identifying patients at risk of familial breast cancer. This that suggest the time is right to overturn the NICE decision.

Immunomodulating drugs in multiple sclerosis: compliance, satisfaction and adverse effects evaluation in a German multiple sclerosis population.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance, satisfaction and adverse effects of immunomodulating drugs in a German multiple sclerosis (MS) population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A standardised, anonymous questionnaire was sent to the 1985 members with MS of the Berlin section of the German Multiple Sclerosis Association. Patients were questioned with regards to sociodemographic data, MS-related topics, therapy, adverse effects and compliance. The response rate was 51.1%, from which 681 patients were selected who were experienced in therapy with interferon beta 1a or 1b or glatiramer acetate. RESULTS: Most participants were treated with beta-interferons and only one-third with glatiramer acetate. Patients were moderately satisfied with their medication. Approximately 75.5% of patients had used the medication for longer than 2 years, especially those with a relapsing-remitting course (RRMS). Around one-third of all participants had their immunomodulating drug changed, mostly only once. The main reasons for discontinuation of the therapy were adverse effects, physician's recommendation and lack of treatment effect. Mood-related adverse effects (e.g., depression), fever and pain were perceived as most disturbing. Regression analysis revealed that dependence on a wheelchair and a secondary progressive course predicted a low compliance to treatment. CONCLUSION: Treating MS is a challenge and to positively influence the course of the disease it is necessary to administer medication in a constant manner. Our data showed a moderate compliance and satisfaction with the immunomodulating medication. Adverse effects and perceived lack of treatment effect were reasons for discontinuation of therapy. To increase compliance and satisfaction with treatment, adequate information about MS, the therapeutic options, handling of medication, side-effects and their management are necessary. Additionally, realistic therapeutic aims should be discussed with the patients.

Cancer genetics service provision: a comparison of seven European centres.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a survey in seven European cancer genetics centres to compare service provision, organisation and practices for familial breast and colon cancer consultations and testing. Information was obtained on aspects of services both nationally and locally. METHODS: A detailed survey questionnaire was adapted collaboratively to obtain the required information. Initial survey data were collected within each centre and interim results were discussed at two European Workshops. Where differences in practice existed, details were clarified to ensure accuracy and adequacy of information. Participating centres were Haifa (Israel), Hannover (Germany), Leiden (The Netherlands), Leuven (Belgium), Manchester (UK), Marseille (France) and Milan (Italy), representing countries with populations ranging from 6.5 to 80 million. RESULTS: The European countries diverged in regard to the number of cancer genetics centres nationally (from 8 in Belgium to 37 in France), and the average population served by each centre (from 0.59 million in Israel to 3.32 million in Italy). All centres offered free care at the point of access, but referral to specialist care varied according to national health care provision. At a centre level, staff roles varied due to differences in training and health care provision. The annual number of counsellees seen in each participating centre ranged from 200 to over 1,700. Access to breast surveillance or bowel screening varied between countries, again reflecting differences in medical care pathways. These countries converged in regard to the wide availability of professional bodies and published guidelines promoting aspects of service provision. Similarities between centres included provision of a multidisciplinary team, with access to psychological support, albeit with varying degrees of integration. All services were dominated (70-90%) by referrals from families with an increased risk of breast cancer despite wide variation in referral patterns. Collection of pedigree data and risk assessment strategies were broadly similar, and centres used comparable genetic testing protocols. Average consultation times ranged between 45 and 90 min. All centres had access to a laboratory offering DNA testing for breast and bowel cancer-predisposing genes, although testing rates varied, reflecting the stage of service development and the type of population. Israel offered the highest number of genetic tests for breast cancer susceptibility because of the existence of specific founder mutations, in part explaining why the cancer genetics service in Haifa differed most from the other six. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable differences in service organisation, there were broad similarities in the provision of cancer genetic services in the centres surveyed.

Immediate and long-term applications of technology.

PIP: The study of human genetics and developments therein have truly made great strides in recent years. The tendency to immediately introduce new technology into medical practice, however, suggests the urgent need to consider the ethics of our recently developed and developing technological prowess, as well as the long- and short-term impacts of these changes. The authors therefore review and consider published field experiences specifically related to prenatal diagnosis. Noninvasive screening tests during pregnancy, the isolation of fetal cells from maternal circulation for prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, and molecular genetic techniques which analyze DNA are considered. In response to the increasing number of prospective parents who want to have a prenatal assessment of normal fetal well-being, voluntary ultrasound screening programs have developed. New available techniques make the diagnosis of fetal maldevelopments more frequent and more precise. The practice seems safe within the limits of current practice. As for the isolation of fetal cells from maternal circulation for prenatal diagnosis, large clinical pilot trials are needed to especially determine the method's sensitivity and specificity for use in either screening or diagnosis. This approach should be under tight control to avoid potential misuse.^ieng