Risk Factors for Postoperative Refractive Error in New-Generation Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas.

Purpose: We examined differences in the accuracy of three intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas: the traditional Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) formula; the Barrett Universal II (BU II) formula, which is a new-generation IOL calculation formula; and the postoperative spherical equivalent prediction using artificial intelligence and linear algorithms developed by Debellemanière, Gatinel, and Saad formula (PEARL-DGS [PEARL]) formula, and evaluated factors that cause postoperative refractive error (PE). Patients and Methods: The study included 205 patients (205 eyes) with a mean age of 75.2 ± 8.7 years who underwent cataract surgery at our institution from December 2018 to October 2023. The PE of the three IOL calculation formulas was calculated and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with a PE higher than ±0.50 D as the dependent variable, and age, sex, axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) as independent variables. Results: The mean PE (ME) ± standard deviation of the SRK/T, BU II, and PEARL formulas was 0.11 ± 0.52, 0.11 ± 0.50, and 0.21 ± 0.50 D, respectively. MEs of the three IOL calculation formulas were significantly different from 0 (p < 0.01). The median absolute error (MedAE) was not significantly different among the three IOL calculation formulas (p = 0.83). The percentage of PE within ±0.50 D was not significantly different among the three IOL calculation formulas (p = 0.13). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the significantly associated factors with PE higher than ±0.50 D were AL, ACD, and LT for the SRK/T formula, sex and LT for the BU II formula, and LT for the PEARL formula (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the BU II and PEARL formulas, AL was excluded as a factor affecting PE, indicating that LT was a risk factor.

Medication reconciliation by pharmacists for pre-admission patients improves patient safety.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors related to the pre-admission medication history obtained on admission are a major cause of medication error during hospitalization. Medication reconciliation (MR) improves patient safety through the detection of inadvertent medication discrepancies at transitions of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MR by pharmacists for patients prior to hospital admission on the incidence of medication errors in the early post-admission period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to the orthopedic ward for surgery between April 2012 and March 2020 were included. Pharmacist-led MR for pre-admission patients was started on April 1, 2017. The incidence of medication errors related to pre-admission medications that occurred during hospitalization were compared between the pre- and post-initiation of pharmacist-led MR (pre-initiation: April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2015, post-initiation: April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2020). RESULT: In the post-initiation group, 94.2% (1245/1321) of patients who were taking medications on admission had a pharmacist-led MR before admission. The proportion of patients whose physicians ordered the prescription of their pre-admission medications at the time before hospitalization to continue from admission was significantly higher in the post-initiation group than in the pre-initiation group (47.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). The incidence of medication errors related to pre-admission medications during hospitalization was significantly lower in the post-initiation group than in the pre-initiation group (1.83% vs. 0.85%, p = 0.025). Pharmacist-led MR prior to admission was a significant protective factor against incidents related to pre-admission medication (odds ratio (OR), 0.3810; 95% confidence interval (CI); 0.156-0.9320, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-led MR for patients prior to hospital admission led to a reduction in medication errors related to pre-admission medications during hospitalization. Patient safety during hospitalization can be improved by accurate medication histories provided early by pharmacists.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy analyzed using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

BACKGROUND: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has been reported as the development of drugs with immunomodulatory properties, such as anticancer, immunosuppressive, and biological agents, has accelerated. To clarify an incidence profile of drug-associated PML in real-world clinical practice, we analyzed reported patients with PML using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. METHODS: We analyzed PML reports extracted from the JADER database based on the preferred term of "progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy" from between 2004 and 2021. This was a retrospective, observational study. We evaluated the effects of causative drugs, underlying diseases, and the age of the patients on the annual number of PML reports. RESULTS: The JADER database contained 773,966 reports published between April 2004 and March 2022, from which we identified 361 PML events. These PML events may include multiple counts of the same case reported by different pathways and patients diagnosed with probable or possible PML. The number of PML reports and reporting ratios have gradually increased over the past decade. The annual number of PML reports associated with biologics, immunosuppressants, and antineoplastic drugs showed an increasing trend. Females aged ≥30 years showed an increase in PML reports; in contrast, there the number of reports for males aged ≥50 years increased. CONCLUSIONS: The number of PML reports and reporting ratios have gradually increased in the past decade in Japan, and it considered that it was related to change in the treatment of malignancies and autoimmune diseases, and the increasing use of biologics, immunosuppressive agents, and antineoplastic agents.

Effectiveness of countermeasure for polypharmacy by multidisciplinary team review in patients with diabetes mellitus.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy in diabetes patients is related to worse clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of our countermeasure for polypharmacy, which combines a pharmacist check followed by a multidisciplinary team review in diabetic patients with polypharmacy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at Gifu University Hospital. Study participants included diabetic patients taking six or more drugs on admission to the diabetes ward between July 2021 and June 2022. Drugs which were discontinued by the present countermeasure were examined, and the number of drugs being taken by each patient was compared between admission and discharge. RESULTS: 102 of 308 patients were taking six or more drugs on admission. The drugs being taken by these patients were evaluated by pharmacists using a checklist for polypharmacy. Eighty-four drugs which were evaluated as inappropriate or potentially inappropriate medications by pharmacists were discontinued following the multidisciplinary team review. The median and mean number of drugs taken by the 102 patients significantly decreased from 9.0 (IQR: 8-12) and 9.26 ± 2.64 on admission to 9.0 (IQR: 6-10) and 8.42 ± 2.95 on discharge (P = 0.0002). We followed up with these patients after discontinuation of the drugs and confirmed that their clinical status had not deteriorated. CONCLUSION: The present countermeasure for polypharmacy, which combines a pharmacist check based on a checklist for evaluating polypharmacy followed by a multidisciplinary team review, was useful for reducing the number of inappropriate or potentially inappropriate medications taken by diabetes patients with polypharmacy.

One-Day Versus Three-Day Dexamethasone with NK1RA for Patients Receiving Carboplatin and Moderate Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing strategy, which limits administration of DEX to day one, is reportedly non-inferior to conventional antiemetic regimens comprising multiple-day DEX. However, the usefulness of the DEX-sparing strategy in triplet antiemetic prophylaxis (neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist [NK1RA] + serotonin receptor antagonist [5HT3RA] + DEX) for carboplatin and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) has not been clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of antiemetics for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with carboplatin and MEC. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the antiemesis efficacy of three-day DEX with NK1RA (3-DEX + NK1RA) and one-day DEX with NK1RA (1-DEX + NK1RA). The primary outcome was complete response during the delayed phase (CR-DP). The secondary outcome was no nausea during the delayed phase (NN-DP). RESULTS: Seventeen trials involving 4534 patients were included. The proportion who experienced CR-DP was 82.5% (95% credible interval [CI], 73.9-88.6) and 73.5% (95% CI, 62.8-80.9) among those who received 3-DEX + NK1RA and 1-DEX + NK1RA, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two regimens. However, 3-DEX + NK1RA tended to be superior to 1-DEX + NK1RA, with an absolute risk difference of 9.0% (95% CI, -2.3 to 21.1) in CR-DP and 24.7% (95% CI: -14.9 to 54.6) in NN-DP. 3-DEX + NK1RA also tended to be superior to 1-DEX + NK1RA in patients who received carboplatin-based chemotherapy, for whom the absolute risk difference was 12.3% (95% CI, -3.2 to 30.7). CONCLUSIONS: Care is needed when administering the DEX-sparing strategy in combination with NK1RA to patients receiving carboplatin and non-carboplatin MEC.

Albumin-bilirubin score for predicting neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients receiving ifosfamide-based chemotherapy.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Ifosfamide, an alkylating agent, is widely used in the treatment of malignant diseases. However, these treatments are often limited due to the incidence of neuropsychiatric symptoms such as delirium, seizures, hallucinations and agitation. In this study, we examined risk factors for neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients receiving ifosfamide-based chemotherapy. METHODS: The study cases were patients with cancer receiving ifosfamide-based chemotherapy between April 2007 and March 2018. Risk analysis for ifosfamide-related neuropsychiatric symptoms was determined by time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 183 eligible patients, 32 patients (17.5%) experienced ifosfamide-related neuropsychiatric symptoms. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model showed that the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was significantly correlated with the incidence of ifosfamide-related neuropsychiatric symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] =1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-2.01, p = 0.025). Additionally, there were correlations between the predicted risk of neuropsychiatric symptoms and ifosfamide-dose per cycle (HR =0.51, 95% CI = 0.27-0.94, p = 0.030) and creatinine clearance (Ccr) (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.28-1.00, p = 0.050). In contrast, neither serum albumin nor total bilirubin was a significant risk factor for neuropsychiatric symptoms. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that ALBI score may be a useful biomarker for predicting neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients receiving ifosfamide-based chemotherapy.

Adverse event profiles of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy analyzed using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report databases.

PURPOSE: Ifosfamide is extensively used to treat several malignant conditions. Administration of ifosfamide can cause encephalopathy and other neurotoxic effects. The aim of this study was to obtain novel information on the onset profiles of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy (IIE) considering other associated clinical factors using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) databases. METHODS: We analyzed the reports of encephalopathy between 2004 and 2018 from the FAERS and JADER databases. To define IIE, we used the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms and standardized queries. The reporting odds ratios (ROR) at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to detect the signal for IIE and adjusted for covariates using a multivariate logistic regression technique. We evaluated the time-to-onset profile of IIE and used the association rule mining technique to discover undetected associations, such as potential risk factors. RESULTS: In the FAERS database, the ROR (CI) for encephalopathy (preferred term, PT) and encephalopathy (standardized MedDRA queries, SMQ) was 56.58 (51.69-61.93) and 1.57 (1.48-1.67), respectively. In the JADER database, the ROR (95% CI) for encephalopathy (PT) and encephalopathy (SMQ) was 13.54 (9.91-18.50) and 1.24 (1.01-1.53), respectively. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant contribution in IIE signal in the ≥ 60 year group (p = 0.00094; vs. < 60 year group) and ≥ 2000 mg/m2 dosage group (p = 0.00045; vs. < 2000 mg/m2 dosage group). The association rules of {ifosfamide, aprepitant} → {encephalopathy (SMQ)} demonstrated high lift values. The average dose of ifosfamide in patients with encephalopathy (PT) and without encephalopathy (PT) was 2022.8 ± 592.8 (mean ± standard deviation) and 1568.5 ± 703.2 mg/m2, respectively (p < 0.05). Encephalopathy within the first 7 days of ifosfamide administration was 94.1% for encephalopathy (PT) and 87.7% for encephalopathy (SMQ), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis demonstrated that the incidence of encephalopathy with ifosfamide should be closely monitored for a short onset (within 7 days). The patients who are administered a high dose of ifosfamide or co-administrated aprepitant should be carefully monitored for the development of encephalopathy.

Relationship between number of drugs and duration of hospital stay in older patients with neuromuscular diseases.

AIM: Older patients are considered to be at high risk for developing adverse drug reactions (ADR), because they commonly receive multidrug therapy despite changes in pharmacokinetic function with age. In the present study, we assessed the relationship between the number of prescribed drugs and the incidence of ADR or the time to discharge in older patients with neuromuscular disease. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out among 135 older patients (aged ≥65 years) who were admitted to the neurology ward from October 2007 through December 2011. Drugs that possess a high risk for initiation of grade ≥2 ADR were determined using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (28.1%) experienced grade ≥2 ADR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that corticosteroids, antibiotics, enteric nutrients and insulin were significant risks for grade ≥2 ADR. Notably, the time to discharge extended as the grade of ADR increased, with mean values of 24.4 days for grade 0, 38.3 days for grade 1, 47.5 days for grade 2 and 73.1 days for grade 3-4 events. Furthermore, the number of high-risk drugs for grade ≥2 ADR correlated well with the incidence of grade ≥2 events (R = 0.964, P = 0.008), as well as with the time to discharge (R = 0.473, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients receiving multidrug therapy using corticosteroids, antibiotics, enteric nutrients, or insulin were at high risk for grade ≥2 ADR and prolongation of hospital stay. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1018-1024.