Vision transformer to differentiate between benign and malignant slices in 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is widely used for the detection, diagnosis, and clinical decision-making in oncological diseases. However, in daily medical practice, it is often difficult to make clinical decisions because of physiological FDG uptake or cancers with poor FDG uptake. False negative clinical diagnoses of malignant lesions are critical issues that require attention. In this study, Vision Transformer (ViT) was used to automatically classify 18F-FDG PET/CT slices as benign or malignant. This retrospective study included 18F-FDG PET/CT data of 207 (143 malignant and 64 benign) patients from a medical institute to train and test our models. The ViT model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90 [95% CI 0.89, 0.91], which was superior to the baseline Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models (EfficientNet, 0.87 [95% CI 0.86, 0.88], P < 0.001; DenseNet, 0.87 [95% CI 0.86, 0.88], P < 0.001). Even when FDG uptake was low, ViT produced an AUC of 0.81 [95% CI 0.77, 0.85], which was higher than that of the CNN (DenseNet, 0.65 [95% CI 0.59, 0.70], P < 0.001). We demonstrated the clinical value of ViT by showing its sensitive analysis of easy-to-miss cases of oncological diseases.

Bimodal artificial intelligence using TabNet for differentiating spinal cord tumors-Integration of patient background information and images.

We proposed a bimodal artificial intelligence that integrates patient information with images to diagnose spinal cord tumors. Our model combines TabNet, a state-of-the-art deep learning model for tabular data for patient information, and a convolutional neural network for images. As training data, we collected 259 spinal tumor patients (158 for schwannoma and 101 for meningioma). We compared the performance of the image-only unimodal model, table-only unimodal model, bimodal model using a gradient-boosting decision tree, and bimodal model using TabNet. Our proposed bimodal model using TabNet performed best (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.91) in the training data and significantly outperformed the physicians' performance. In the external validation using 62 cases from the other two facilities, our bimodal model showed an AUROC of 0.92, proving the robustness of the model. The bimodal analysis using TabNet was effective for differentiating spinal tumors.

Radiologists with and without deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis: comparison of performance and interobserver agreement for characterizing and diagnosing pulmonary nodules/masses.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of radiologists in characterizing and diagnosing pulmonary nodules/masses with and without deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). METHODS: We studied a total of 101 nodules/masses detected on CT performed between January and March 2018 at Osaka University Hospital (malignancy: 55 cases). SYNAPSE SAI Viewer V1.4 was used to analyze the nodules/masses. In total, 15 independent radiologists were grouped (n = 5 each) according to their experience: L (< 3 years), M (3-5 years), and H (> 5 years). The likelihoods of 15 characteristics, such as cavitation and calcification, and the diagnosis (malignancy) were evaluated by each radiologist with and without CAD, and the assessment time was recorded. The AUCs compared with the reference standard set by two board-certified chest radiologists were analyzed following the multi-reader multi-case method. Furthermore, interobserver agreement was compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The AUCs for ill-defined boundary, irregular margin, irregular shape, calcification, pleural contact, and malignancy in all 15 radiologists, irregular margin and irregular shape in L and ill-defined boundary and irregular margin in M improved significantly (p < 0.05); no significant improvements were found in H. L showed the greatest increase in the AUC for malignancy (not significant). The ICCs improved in all groups and for nearly all items. The median assessment time was not prolonged by CAD. CONCLUSIONS: DL-based CAD helps radiologists, particularly those with < 5 years of experience, to accurately characterize and diagnose pulmonary nodules/masses, and improves the reproducibility of findings among radiologists. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis improves the accuracy of characterizing nodules/masses and diagnosing malignancy, particularly by radiologists with < 5 years of experience. • Computer-aided diagnosis increases not only the accuracy but also the reproducibility of the findings across radiologists.

Use of artificial intelligence to identify data elements for The Japanese Orthopaedic Association National Registry from operative records.

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association National Registry (JOANR) was recently launched in Japan and is expected to improve the quality of medical care. However, surgeons must register ten detailed features for total hip arthroplasty, which is labor intensive. One possible solution is to use a system that automatically extracts information about the surgeries. Although it is not easy to extract features from an operative record consisting of free-text data, natural language processing has been used to extract features from operative records. This study aimed to evaluate the best natural language processing method for building a system that automatically detects some elements in the JOANR from the operative records of total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We obtained operative records of total hip arthroplasty (n = 2574) in three hospitals and targeted two items: surgical approach and fixation technique. We compared the accuracy of three natural language processing methods: rule-based algorithms, machine learning, and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT). RESULTS: In the surgical approach task, the accuracy of BERT was superior to that of the rule-based algorithm (99.6% vs. 93.6%, p < 0.001), comparable to machine learning. In the fixation technique task, the accuracy of BERT was superior to the rule-based algorithm and machine learning (96% vs. 74%, p < 0.0001 and 94%, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: BERT is the most appropriate method for building a system that automatically detects the surgical approach and fixation technique.