Brachial plexopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy in apical lung malignancies: A dosimetric pooled analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to establish dosimetric constraints for the brachial plexus at risk of developing grade ≥ 2 brachial plexopathy in the context of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from 349 patients with 356 apical lung malignancies who underwent SBRT were extracted from 5 articles. The anatomical brachial plexus was delineated following the guidelines provided in the atlases developed by Hall, et al. and Kong, et al.. Patient characteristics, pertinent SBRT dosimetric parameters, and brachial plexopathy grades (according to CTCAE 4.0 or 5.0) were obtained. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were used to estimate the risk of developing grade ≥ 2 brachial plexopathy through maximum likelihood parameter fitting. RESULTS: The prescription dose/fractionation schedules for SBRT ranged from 27 to 60 Gy in 1 to 8 fractions. During a follow-up period spanning from 6 to 113 months, 22 patients (6.3 %) developed grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy (4.3 % grade 2, 2.0 % grade 3); the median time to symptoms onset after SBRT was 8 months (ranged, 3-54 months). NTCP models estimated a 10 % risk of grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy with an anatomic brachial plexus maximum dose (Dmax) of 20.7 Gy, 34.2 Gy, and 42.7 Gy in one, three, and five fractions, respectively. Similarly, the NTCP model estimates the risks of grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy as 10 % for BED Dmax at 192.3 Gy and EQD2 Dmax at 115.4 Gy with an α/ß ratio of 3, respectively. Symptom persisted after treatment in nearly half of patients diagnosed with grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy (11/22, 50 %). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes dosimetric constraints ranging from 20.7 to 42.7 Gy across 1-5 fractions, aimed at mitigating the risk of developing grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy following SBRT. These findings provide valuable guidance for future ablative SBRT in apical lung malignancies.

Dosimetric analysis of brachial plexopathy after stereotactic body radiotherapy: Significance of organ delineation.

OBJECTIVES: Examine the significance of contouring the brachial plexus (BP) for toxicity estimation and select metrics for predicting radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with planning target volume (PTV) ≤ 2 cm from the BP were eligible. The BP was contoured primarily according to the RTOG 1106 atlas, while subclavian-axillary veins (SAV) were contoured according to RTOG 0236. Apical PTVs were classified as anterior (PTV-A) or posterior (PTV-B) PTVs. Variables predicting grade 2 or higher RIBP (RIBP2) were selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 137 patients with 140 BPs (median follow-up, 32.1 months), 11 experienced RIBP2. For patients with RIBP2, the maximum physical dose to the BP (BP-Dmax) was 46.5 Gy (median; range, 35.7 to 60.7 Gy). Of these patients, 54.5 % (6/11) satisfied the RTOG limits when using SAV delineation; among them, 83.3 % (5/6) had PTV-B. For patients with PTV-B, the maximum physical dose to SAV (SAV-Dmax) was 11.2 Gy (median) lower than BP-Dmax. Maximum and 0.3 cc biologically effective doses to the BP based on the linear-quadratic-linear model (BP-BEDmax LQL and BP-BED0.3cc LQL, α/ß = 3) were selected as predictive variables with thresholds of 118 and 73 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Contouring SAV may significantly underestimate the RIBP2 risk in dosimetry, especially for patients with PTV-B. BP contouring indicated BP-BED0.3cc LQL and BP-BEDmax LQL as potential predictors of RIBP2.

Can low-dose intravenous bevacizumab be as effective as high-dose bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis?

Although intravenous bevacizumab (IVBEV) is the most promising treatment for cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN), there is no conclusion on the optimal dosage. Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose with low-dose IVBEV in treating CRN associated with radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs). This paper describes 75 patients who were diagnosed with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, treated with low-dose or high-dose IVBEV and followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The clinical data collected for this study include changes in brain MRI, clinical symptoms, and corticosteroid usage before, during, and after IVBEV treatment. At the 3-month mark following administration of IVBEV, a comparison of two groups revealed that the median percentage decreases in CRN volume on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced image (T1CE), as well as the signal ratio reduction on T1CE, were 65.8% versus 64.8% (p = 0.860), 41.2% versus 51.9% (p = 0.396), and 37.4% versus 35.1% (p = 0.271), respectively. Similarly, at 6 months post-IVBEV, the median percentage reductions of the aforementioned parameters were 59.5% versus 62.0% (p = 0.757), 39.1% versus 31.3% (p = 0.851), and 35.4% versus 28.2% (p = 0.083), respectively. Notably, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was higher in the high-dose group (n = 4, 9.8%) than in the low-dose group (n = 0). Among patients with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, the administration of high-dose IVBEV did not demonstrate superiority over low-dose IVBEV. Moreover, the use of high-dose IVBEV was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events compared with low-dose IVBEV.