Estrogen Receptors and Endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a frequent and chronic inflammatory disease with impacts on reproduction, health and quality of life. This disorder is highly estrogen-dependent and the purpose of hormonal treatments is to decrease the endogenous ovarian production of estrogens. High estrogen production is a consistently observed endocrine feature of endometriosis. mRNA and protein levels of estrogen receptors (ER) are different between a normal healthy endometrium and ectopic/eutopic endometrial lesions: endometriotic stromal cells express extraordinarily higher ERß and significantly lower ERα levels compared with endometrial stromal cells. Aberrant epigenetic regulation such as DNA methylation in endometriotic cells is associated with the pathogenesis and development of endometriosis. Although there is a large body of data regarding ERs in endometriosis, our understanding of the roles of ERα and ERß in the pathogenesis of endometriosis remains incomplete. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the links between endometriosis, ERs and the recent advances of treatment strategies based on ERs modulation. We will also attempt to summarize the current understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of ERs and how this could pave the way to new therapeutic strategies.

Effects of conjugated estrogen and bazedoxifene on hemostasis and thrombosis in mice.

Estrogen-progestin therapy was previously considered as the standard of care for managing bothersome symptoms associated with menopause, but it increases risks of breast cancer and of thromboembolism. The combination of conjugated estrogen (CE) with bazedoxifene (BZA) named tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) was designed to minimize or even abrogate the undesirable effects on breast, while maintaining the beneficial effects such as prevention of osteoporosis and suppression of climacteric symptoms. The risk on thromboembolism associated with TSEC is unknown, although the clinical available data are reassuring. The aim of this study was to define the impact of a chronic administration of CE, BZA or CE + BZA on hemostasis and thrombosis in ovariectomized mice. As expected, CE, but not BZA neither CE + BZA, induced uterine and vagina hypertrophy. As previously demonstrated for 17ß-estradiol (E2), we found that CE (i) increased tail-bleeding time, (ii) prevented occlusive thrombus formation in injured carotid artery and (iii) protected against collagen/epinephrine-induced thromboembolism. Thus, whereas BZA antagonized CE action on reproductive tissues, it had no impact on the effect of CE on hemostasis, thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis in mice. CE + BZA shared the anti-thrombotic actions of CE in these mouse models. If a similar process is at work in women, CE combined with BZA could contribute to minimize the risk of thrombosis associated with hormone replacement therapy.

The antagonist properties of Bazedoxifene after acute treatment are shifted to stimulatory action after chronic exposure in the liver but not in the uterus.

A promising alternative to conventional hormone therapy for postmenopausal symptoms is treatment combining Bazedoxifene (BZA), a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), and conjugated equine estrogen (CE). This combination is also known as a tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC). Understanding the tissue-specific actions of SERMs and the TSEC remains a major challenge to try to predict their clinical effects. The aim of this study was to compare acute versus chronic treatment with BZA, CE or CE + BZA in two major targets of estrogens, the uterus and the liver. In these two tissues, acute treatment with CE, but not with BZA, induced similar gene expression change than the most important endogenous estrogen, 17-ß estradiol (E2). Acute induction of gene expression by E2 or by CE was antagonized by the addition of BZA. Concomitantly, BZA alone or in combination with E2 or CE induced a partial degradation of ERα protein after acute exposure. In uterus, chronic treatment of BZA alone had no impact on tissue weight gain or on epithelial cell proliferation, and also antagonized CE-effect in uterus, thereby mimicking the acute effect. By contrast, in the liver, chronic BZA and CE + BZA elicited agonistic transcriptional effects similar to those of CE alone. In addition, at variance to BZA acute effect, no change in ERα protein abundance was observed after chronic treatment in this tissue. These experimental in vivo data highlight a new aspect of the time-dependent tissue-specific action of BZA or TSEC, i.e. they can act acutely as antagonists but become agonists after chronic treatment. This shift was observed in liver tissue, but not in proliferative sex target such as the uterus.