RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide updated data on oncologic outcomes following definitive surgical treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the hand in a cohort of 109 patients, as well as to characterize risk factors for poor oncologic and functional outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from 109 consecutive patients who had definitive surgical treatment for soft tissue sarcoma of the hand performed between 1996 and 2019 by a single surgeon at a sarcoma center. Primary outcomes included functional outcome (assessed by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). We compiled descriptive data and used a multivariable linear model to identify factors associated with functional outcomes. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate 5- and 10-year DFS and OS. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 36 years at presentation. Median follow-up was 6.1 years among patients alive at the end of follow-up. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 29; functional outcome was worse among patients with high-grade tumors or complications. Among the 107 patients who became disease-free, there were four local recurrences (one with metastasis), six distant recurrences, and one death without recurrence. All local recurrences were deep tumors (two myxofibrosarcoma and two myxoinflammatory fibrosarcoma). Estimated 5- and 10-year DFS rates were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83% to 96%) and 88% (95% CI: 80% to 95%). There were seven deaths, and the estimated 5- and 10-year OS rates were 95% (95% CI: 90% to 100%) and 92% (95% CI: 84% to 100%). Larger tumor size and higher stage at diagnosis were associated with shorter DFS and OS in univariable analyses; low event rates precluded multivariable analysis of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive disease-specific surgical and multidisciplinary treatment can yield long DFS and OS, and good functional outcomes. However, complications and high-grade tumors are associated with worse functional scores. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Trochlear dysplasia is a well-described risk factor for patellar instability. Trochleoplasty has emerged as a procedure within the surgical armamentarium for patellar instability, yet its role is unclear. A variety of trochleoplasty procedures have emerged. The purpose of this review is to clarify indications for trochleoplasty, outline the technical steps involved in performing common trochleoplasties and report the published outcomes and potential complications of these procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Patellar instability with severe trochlear dysplasia is the main indication for trochleoplasty. Three types of trochleoplasty have emerged: (1) lateral facet elevation; (2) sulcus deepening; and (3) recession wedge. Deepening and recession wedge trochleoplasties are the most commonly performed. Trochleoplasty is a surgical option for addressing patellar instability in patients with severe trochlear dysplasia. Deepening and recession wedge trochleoplasties that address Dejour B and D dysplastic trochleas are the most studied, with both short- and midterm outcomes reported. Long-term outcomes are lacking and comparative studies are needed.