Efficacy And Cost-Effectiveness, Comparison Of 7-Days Vonoprazan Versus 14-Days Esomeprazole Based Triple Therapies For Treating Helicobacter Pylori Infection In Pakistani Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a gram-negative bacterium which usually resides in the mucoid lining of the stomach and may cause different gastric pathologies e.g., Gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, adenocarcinoma of the gastric system and mucoid associated lymphoma (MALT). The Objective was to compare the effect of 7-days Vonoprazan based triple therapy and 14-days Esomeprazole based triple therapy on eradication rate, compliance and cost effectiveness in Helicobacter pylori infected patients. Methods: This clinical trial was performed in the Department of Pharmacology Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) in collaboration with the Gastroenterology Department, Pak Emirates Military Hospital (PEMH) Rawalpindi from December 2022 to March 2023. A total of one hundred and twenty-two patients with dyspepsia symptoms and yielding lab results positive for Helicobacter pylori by stool antigen test were enrolled in the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups. The Esomeprazole group received 14 days of triple therapy orally with Esomeprazole 20 mg twice a day; Amoxicillin 1000 mg twice a day; and Levofloxacin 500 mg one time a day. The comparative Vonoprazan group was given 7-days triple therapy orally with Vonoprazan 20 mg twice a day; Amoxicillin 1000 mg twice a day; and Levofloxacin 500 mg one time a day. Eradication success was evaluated by stool antigen test four weeks later, as counted from the start of treatment. compliance and cost-effectiveness of both therapies were also assessed. Results: The eradication rate was (95.1%) in the Vonoprazan group with 58 out of 61 patients negative for H. pylori and (93.1%) in Esomeprazole group with 54 patients out of 58 yielding a negative result demonstrating p-value of 0.64. Compliance was 95.0% in the Esomeprazole group with p-value of 0.07. Cost effective ratio for Vonoprazan triple therapy was lower (731.8PKR) than the Esomeprazole group. Conclusion: One two-week Vonoprazan regimen demonstrated improved eradication rate, good compliance, and better tolerability in patients with less cost and a half duration of treatment in comparison with two weeks Esomeprazole regimen, attesting that one week Vonoprazan therapy is more cost efficacious in producing better results.

Evaluation Of Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy Of Ascorbic Acid After Third Molar Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Abstraction of wisdom teeth or impacted third molar under local anaesthesia is one of the most frequent interventions by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon. The abstraction of the third molar is usually followed by the release of liberation and consequent trismus, pain, and swelling due to the area of the third molar being highly vascularized and rich in loose connective tissue. Objective of the study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of ascorbic acid following surgical extraction of the third molar. METHODS: The current study was carried out Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, from October to December 2022. This was a cross-sectional observational study. Fifty participants who required surgical extraction of the impacted third molar were included in the study via non-probability purposive sampling and were segregated equally into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B, comprising twenty-five participants in each group. Group A received amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (625 mg) thrice a day and metronidazole (400 mg) twice daily. In comparison, Group B received amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (625 mg) thrice daily, ascorbic acid (500 mg) twice daily, and metronidazole (400 mg) twice daily. Both groups received naproxen sodium as per requirement (550 mg). Pain, facial swelling, and C reactive protein concentration were evaluated until the 7th postoperative day. RESULTS: There was a reduction in pain and facial swelling in both groups, but in the ascorbic acid group, there was more reduction in pain and facial swelling compared to the control group. However, the difference between the two groups in reducing pain and facial swelling was statistically significant (p<0.01). There was a reduction in CRP in both groups, but in the ascorbic acid group, there was more reduction in CRP 2.35 (1.60-5.30) compared to the control group 2.6 (0.86-5.03). However, the difference between the two groups in reducing C reactive protein concentration was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study concluded that ascorbic acid significantly reduced inflammation and C reactive protein, so ascorbic acid should be used as an adjuvant supplement with other conventional drugs.