A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transanal Irrigation Versus Conservative Treatment in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal Cancer Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate transanal irrigation (TAI) as a treatment for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). BACKGROUND: LARS is a bowel disorder that is common after sphincter preserving rectal cancer surgery. Despite symptomatic medical treatment of LARS many patients still experience bowel symptoms that may have a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). TAI is a treatment strategy, of which the clinical experience is promising but scientific evidence is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter randomized trial comparing TAI (intervention) with conservative treatment (control) was performed. Inclusion criteria were major LARS, age above 18 years, low anterior resection with anastomosis and a defunctioning stoma as primary surgery, >6 months since stoma reversal, anastomosis without signs of leakage or stricture, and no signs of recurrence at 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was differences in bowel function at 12-month follow-up measured by LARS score, Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score, and 4 study-specific questions. The secondary outcome was QoL. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were included, 22 in the TAI group and 23 in the control group. Follow-up was available for 16 and 22 patients, respectively. At 12 months, patients in the TAI group reported significantly lower LARS scores (22.9 vs 32.4; P =0.002) and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (6.4 vs 9.2; P =0.050). In addition, patients in the TAI group also scored significantly higher QoL [8 of 16 European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) QoL aspects] compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm our clinical experience that TAI reduces symptoms included in LARS and improves QoL.

Perirenal Fat Surface Area and Oncologic Outcome in Elective Colon Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Central obesity is associated with surgical difficulties, but few studies explore the relationship with long-term results after colon cancer surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between perirenal fat surface area, a proxy for total visceral fat, and oncologic outcome after intestinal resection for colon cancer. DESIGN: We investigated the association between perirenal fat surface area (exposure) on recurrence and death (outcome) in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for colon cancer. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at Stockholm South General Hospital, serving a population of 600,000. PATIENTS: Patients (N = 733) without metastases at diagnosis who had a preoperative CT and had undergone elective colon resection between 2006 and 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cause-specific survival by perirenal fat surface area. RESULTS: Patients with high perirenal fat surface area (fourth quartile) had more often left-sided tumors (45% vs 32% in the first quartile) and experienced more postoperative complications (29% vs 13%), but there were no differences in pathologic T and N stage, radicality of surgery, or adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Overall survival decreased by increasing cancer stage but was not different between perirenal fat surface area categories. The HR for recurrence-free survival per centimeter squared increase in perirenal fat surface area was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.01) adjusted for age, sex, ASA category, tumor location, and postoperative complication Clavien-Dindo ≥2. The cumulative incidence of recurrence with death as a competing risk was not statistically different between perirenal fat surface area categories (p = 0.06). Subgroup analyses showed a nonsignificant tendency for men with low perirenal fat surface area to have a lower risk of recurrence and women a higher risk. LIMITATIONS: In all register-based studies there can be randomly distributed errors. The results can only be generalized to colon resections. Our cohort ranged over a large year span. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between perirenal fat surface area and overall survival, recurrence-free survival, or cause-specific cumulative incidence of recurrence in patients undergoing colon resection for cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B326. LA SUPERFICIE DE GRASA PERIRRENAL Y EL RESULTADO ONCOLGICO EN CIRUGA ELECTIVA DE CNCER DE COLON: ANTECEDENTES:La obesidad central está asociada con dificultades quirúrgicas, pero pocos estudios exploran la relación de los resultados a largo plazo después de cirugía de cáncer de colon.OBJETIVO:Investigar la asociación entre la superficie de la grasa perirrenal, como un indicador de la grasa visceral total y el resultado oncológico después de una resección intestinal por cáncer de colon.DISEÑO:Se estudió la asociación entre el área de la superficie de la grasa perirrenal (expuesta) con la recurrencia y la muerte (resultado) de pacientes sometidos a cirugía con intención curativa por cáncer de colon.AJUSTES:Atención brindada por el Hospital General del Sur de Estocolmo a una población de 600,000 habitantes.PACIENTES:Aquellos pacientes sin metástasis (n = 733) en el momento del diagnóstico que tuvieron una tomografía computada preoperatoria y que se sometieron a una resección electiva de colon entre 2006-2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Comparamos la sobrevida general, la sobrevida libre de recurrencia y la sobrevida específica de la causa, por área de superficie de grasa perirrenal.RESULTADOS:Los pacientes con una mayor área de superficie de grasa perirrenal (cuarto cuartil) tuvieron más frecuentemente tumores del lado izquierdo (45% frente a 32% en el primer cuartil) y sufrieron más complicaciones postoperatorias (29% frente a 13%), pero no hubieron diferencias en el Estadío patológico T y N, ni en lo radical de la cirugía o del tratamiento de quimioterapia adyuvante. La supervivencia general disminuyó al aumentar el estadio del cáncer, pero no fue diferente entre las categorías de área de superficie grasa perirrenal. La razón de riesgo para la sobrevida libre de recurrencia por aumento de cm2 en el área de la superficie grasa perirrenal fue de 1.00 (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0.99-1.01) ajustada por edad, sexo, categoría de la Sociedad Americana de Anestesiólogos, ubicación del tumor y complicación postoperatoria según Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2) La incidencia acumulada de recurrencia con muerte como un riesgo competitivo no fue estadísticamente diferente entre las categorías de área de superficie grasa perirrenal (p = 0.06). Los análisis de subgrupos mostraron una tendencia no significativa para que los hombres con un área de superficie menor en grasa perirrenal tengan un menor riesgo de recurrencia y las mujeres un mayor riesgo.LIMITACIONES:En todos los estudios basados en registros puede haber errores distribuidos aleatoriamente. Los resultados solo pueden generalizarse a resecciones de colon. Nuestra cohorte osciló durante un gran lapso de años.CONCLUSIONES:No se encontró asociación entre el área de superficie de la grasa perirrenal y la sobrevida general, ni con la sobrevida libre de recurrencia o la incidencia acumulada de recurrencia específica de la causa en pacientes sometidos a resección de colon por cáncer. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B326. (Traducción-Dr Xavier Delgadillo).