Deciphering Factors Linked With Reduced Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Susceptibility in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain to be resolved. Using data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study on 6270 people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and serologic assessment for SARS-CoV-2 and circulating human coronavirus (HCoV) antibodies, we investigated the association of HIV-related and general parameters with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test results, COVID-19-related hospitalizations, and deaths reported to the Swiss HIV Cohort Study between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021. Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and HCoVs were determined in prepandemic (2019) and pandemic (2020) biobanked plasma samples and compared with findings in HIV-negative individuals. We applied logistic regression, conditional logistic regression, and bayesian multivariate regression to identify determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infection and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in people with HIV. RESULTS: No HIV-1-related factors were associated with SARS-CoV-2 acquisition. High prepandemic HCoV antibodies were associated with a lower risk of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection and with higher SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses on infection. We observed a robust protective effect of smoking on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46 [95% confidence interval, .38-.56]; P < .001), which occurred even in previous smokers and was highest for heavy smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of 2 independent protective factors, smoking and HCoV antibodies, both affecting the respiratory environment, underscore the importance of the local immune milieu in regulating susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2.

"We treat humans, not herds!": A qualitative study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers' individualized approaches to vaccination in Switzerland.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers' roles in parents' decision-making about vaccinations for their children have only recently begun receiving research attention, despite studies showing CAM to be used by 25-50% of the population in Western countries. This article examines how CAM practitioners discuss vaccinations with parents in Switzerland, with a focus on childhood vaccinations and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations. We describe how the CAM providers we interviewed (N = 17) and observed during vaccination consultations (N = 18 observations with 5 providers) employed individualized approaches to vaccination. Triangulation of qualitative evidence from interviews and observations allowed us to analyze their discourses and descriptions of experiences (i.e. what they said) and their practices in situ (i.e. what they did). Evidence gathered shows that practitioners framed vaccination decisions as choices at individual and family levels rather than focusing on public health benefits and consequences. They articulated their perspectives in terms of personal clinical experiences and parents' wishes, concerns, and contexts. Such findings challenge recurring narratives depicting CAM providers as categorically anti-vaccination and suggest that approaches to address vaccine hesitancy in clinical practice could benefit from communication and relational approaches similar to those demonstrated by participants in this study. Such approaches include taking time to understand parents' wishes, involving them in vaccination decisions, and taking their concerns seriously.

Nevirapine in HIV maintenance therapy - can "old drugs" survive in current HIV management?

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Nevirapine has an exceptional record for long-term tolerability with few side effects in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). Owing to relatively frequent hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) (15–25%) in the first 3 months after treatment initiation (especially in patients with a high CD4 count (>250/µl in women, >400/µl in men)), it is being used less and less. However, the rate of adverse events is lower when patients are already under suppressive cART. We present the results of a single centre strategy to offer the switch to a nevirapine-containing regimen and evaluate the potential role nevirapine could play in current antiretroviral treatment. METHODS: All adult HIV-positive patients starting nevirapine at our centre since 2010 were evaluated in this retrospective analysis. We examined the proportion of patients on cART containing nevirapine, as well as the number of starts and stops every 6 months. Nevirapine discontinuation rates were analysed by sex, age, hepatitis C virus (HCV) status, time on nevirapine, ethnicity, CD4 nadir as well as CD4 count, HIV-RNA and ART backbone at nevirapine start. RESULTS: Since 2014, more than a third of our treated HIV patients have been on nevirapine-containing therapy, with a stable percentage in the following years; 277 patients starting nevirapine for the first time were analysed. Thirty-three percent (92/277) of these first nevirapine therapies were discontinued, with 16 cases (17%) resuming nevirapine later during follow-up. Of the patients who continued nevirapine for more than 90 days (n = 221), 80% maintained nevirapine until their last follow-up. The nevirapine stop rate after the first 90 days was 15-fold lower (5.4 per 100 patient years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0–7.2) than in the first 90 days. Overall, nevirapine was used for a median of 2.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.5–5.6). In HCV co-infected patients, the treatment stop rate was 4-fold higher than in HIV mono-infected patients, but this difference was mainly due to treatment interruptions caused by drug-drug interactions with intermittent HCV therapy. Six out of seven Asian patients experienced HSR (hepatotoxicity / skin rash). In a population with 74% 3TC/ABC backbone, 81% fully suppressed, median CD4 nadir 240/µl (IQR 120–360) and median CD4 count at nevirapine start 590/µl (IQR 400–840), both high CD4 nadir and high CD4 count at nevirapine start were associated with lower rather than higher discontinuation rates. In fully suppressed patients with high CD4 count at nevirapine start, high CD4 nadir was not a risk factor for HSR. Major reasons for the discontinuation of nevirapine were HSR (liver, skin rash) in 38 cases (41% of all discontinuations) followed by other adverse drug reactions (n = 17) and non-adherence (n = 14). In patients who stopped nevirapine after more than 90 days, the major cause was non-adherence or other adverse drug reaction (both n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, two thirds of the patients continued nevirapine with favourable long-term tolerability and efficacy. Thus, this low-cost “old drug” may still represent a valid treatment switch option for maintenance therapy in selected patients with a fully suppressed viral load. However, further evaluation is needed.  .