Nailing of proximal ulna fractures: biomechanical comparison of a new locked nail with angular stable plating.

PURPOSE: Proximal ulna fractures are common injuries and frequently treated with angular stable plating. This surgical option shows good functional results. Relevant drawbacks such as large soft tissue exposure, compromised blood supply of fracture fragments and disturbing osteosynthetic material are described. The aim of this study was to compare a new locked proximal ulna nail with angular stable plating in a biomechanical testing setup for extraarticular proximal ulna fractures. METHODS: Ten pairs of sawbones with a Jupiter type IIB proximal ulna fracture (OTA 2U1A3.1) were tested after osteosynthesis with the mentioned implants in a servo-pneumatic testing machine. The testing setup simulates physiological joint motion (0°-90°) under cyclic loading (30-300 N). Primary stability and loosening of both constructs were quantified using micromotion video-analysis after 608 test cycles. RESULTS: The micromotion analysis showed significantly higher primary stability of the locked nail (0.29 ± 0.13 mm) compared to the angular stable plate (0.97 ± 0.30 mm, p < 0.001). Both implants showed a low amount of loosening after completion of the test cycles. The construct with the locked nail (0.08 ± 0.06 mm) showed significantly lower dislocation of the fragments measured at the anterior cortex (plate 0.24 ± 0.13 mm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nailing of proximal ulna fractures shows significantly higher primary stability and lower loosening compared to angular stable plating in our testing setup.

Nailing of diaphyseal ulna fractures in adults-biomechanical evaluation of a novel implant in comparison with locked plating.

BACKGROUND: Adult forearm fractures require surgical treatment in most cases. Open reduction and internal fixation with plate osteosynthesis is the therapy of choice. Intramedullary fixation offers several advantages compared to plate fixation but is not routinely used. The aim of our study was to compare a newly designed ulna nail with angular stable plating in a biomechanical testing setup of an ulna shaft fracture with a diaphyseal defect. METHODS: Ten pairs of sawbones with a defect osteotomy of the ulna shaft (OTA 2U2C3) were fixed with an interlocked nail or locked plate osteosynthesis. The constructs were tested under four-point bending, torsional loading and axial loading in a servo-pneumatic testing machine to compare the stiffness of both stabilization methods. RESULTS: The nail constructs show lower yet sufficient bending stiffness (62.25 ± 6.64 N/mm) compared to the plate constructs (71.2 ± 5.98 N/mm, p = 0.005). The torsional loading test shows superior stiffness of the plate constructs (0.24 ± 0.03 Nm/deg vs. 0.1 ± 0.01 Nm/deg; p < 0.001), while the axial loading shows superior stiffness of the nail constructs (1028.9 ± 402.1 N/mm vs. 343.9 ± 112.6 N/mm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary nailing of ulna shaft fractures obtains sufficient but lower stability in bending and torsional loading when compared to rigid angular stable plating and could be an alternative technique to plate fixation. The lower stability and the closed stabilization technique allow for a rapid periosteal healing, which is not present in stiffer constructs.

Modes of periacetabular load transfer to cortical and cancellous bone after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using computed tomography-assisted osteodensitometry.

Stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be clinically relevant for high-demand patients. Analysis of cortical and cancellous bone density (BD) changes in vivo after THA is of interest to basic science researchers and joint reconstruction surgeons. An insufficient periprosthetic bone stock may predispose to migration, early mechanical failure, and major problems in revision surgery. We used computed tomography (CT)-assisted osteodensitometry in two prospectively analyzed cohorts after cemented (n = 21) versus noncemented (n = 23) cup fixation. Periacetabular BD (mgCaHa/mL) was determined in five CT scans cranial and five CT scans at the level of the cup 10 days and 26 months postoperatively. For press-fit cups BD decreased significantly in all CT cans except in four out of the five scans of cortical bone cranial to the cup. The decrease was highest for cancellous bone ventral to the cup (-45 to -53%). After cemented cup fixation, significant cortical BD decrease was seen ventral to the cup (-11 to -20%). Cancellous BD decrased only ventral (-21 to -31%) and in two scans cranial (-11 and -12%) to the cup. The modes of load transfer between cemented and uncemented cups differ fundamentally. Cemented cups especially prevent the loss of cancellous bone of the acetabulum while also cortical BD loss was significantly lower in most CT scans surrounding the cemented cup compared to the press-fit component. Long-term results are required to prove whether third-generation cementing technique protects periprosthetic BD and thereby improve implant survival.

Acetabular cortical and cancellous bone density and radiolucent lines after cemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using computed tomography and plain radiography.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate load-transfer mechanisms and stress patterns of periacetabular cortical and cancellous bone after cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) in vivo using computed tomography (CT) assisted osteodensitometry. In addition we analyzed the efficacy of CT in detecting radiolucent lines around the acetabular component compared to plain radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two cemented acetabular cups were investigated using conventional sequential axial CT scans (Ø 8 days and 26 months post-OP) and plain radiography (Ø 5 days and 40 months post-OP). CT assisted osteodensitometry was used to determine cancellous and cortical bone bone density (BD). Radiolucent lines were evaluated using both CT and plain radiography. RESULTS: Significant BD loss at the time of follow-up was only detectable ventral to the cup (cortical bone: -16%, P = 0.001; cancellous bone: -31%, P = 0.001). The BD changes dorsal and cranial to the cup were not significant. Postoperatively no radiolucent lines were observed in the cement-bone interface by CT, while on plain radiography acetabular lucent lines were seen in 12 out of 22 cases. CONCLUSION: CT-osteodensitometry has the technical ability to discriminate between cortical and cancellous bone structures with respect to strain-adapted remodeling: sufficient cancellous and cortical bone stock remained dorsal and cranial to the cup indicative of a balanced load transfer to these regions. CT-osteodensitometry has the potential to become an effective instrument for quality control in THA and the method of choice for in vivo determination of periprosthetic BD. In contrast, plain radiography is more suitable for the early detection of radiolucent lines compared to axial CT scans.

Inter- and intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION: This study was initiated to evaluate the reproducibility of a novel method for measuring the periacetabular bone density after insertion of cemented and uncemented acetabular cups using CT in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans were obtained from 20 patients after cemented polyethylene cup implantation (ZCA, Zimmer, USA) and 20 patients after uncemented titanium alloy cup fixation (Cerafit, Ceraver, France). A manual segmentation of cancellous and cortical pelvic bone ventral, dorsal and cranial to the cup was undertaken. Values are given in Hounsfield units. Inter- and intraobserver studies were conducted using a special analysis software tool. To define the reproducibility of the method, all measurements were evaluated according to Bland and Altman. RESULTS: For both cemented and uncemented acetabular cups, reproducibility of bone density measurement for cortical and cancellous bone cranial, ventral and dorsal to the cup was high. There was no significant difference between the intraobsever study (two repeated measurements) and the interobserver study (two investigators), indicating the reproducibility of the method independent of the investigator. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the periacetabular bone density measurement as conducted in this CT study is a new reproducible method for in vivo evaluation of cortical and cancellous pelvic bone after cemented and uncemented acetabular cup implantation. In vivo CT measurements will allow a thorough assessment of periacetabular stress-shielding phenomena.