Comparison of the efficacy and safety of SCD411 and reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

To compare the efficacy and safety of the proposed aflibercept biosimilar SCD411 and reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, this randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 14 countries from 13 August 2020 to 8 September 2022. Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. With subfoveal, juxtafoveal, or extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization were aged 50 years or older. Intravitreal injection of SCD411 or aflibercept (2.0 mg) were administered every 4 weeks for the first three injections and every 8 weeks until week 48. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to week 8 with an adjusted equivalence margin of ± 3.0 letters. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SCD411 (n = 288) or reference aflibercept (n = 288). A total of 566 participants (98.3%) completed week 8 of the study. The least-squares mean difference of change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to week 8 (SCD411-aflibercept) was - 0.4 letters (90% confidence interval = - 1.6 to 0.9). The incidence of ocular (69 of 287 [24.0%] vs. 71 of 286 [24.8%]) and serious ocular (5 of 287 [1.7%] vs. 3 of 286 [1.0%]) treatment-emergent adverse effects were similar between the SCD411 and aflibercept groups. Immunogenicity analysis revealed a low incidence of neutralizing antibody formation in both groups. In conclusion, SCD411 has equivalent efficacy compared with reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and has a comparable safety profile. The results support the potential use of SCD411 for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Randomized Trial of Biosimilar XSB-001 versus Reference Ranibizumab in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a ranibizumab biosimilar candidate (XSB-001) versus reference product (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with nAMD. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive intravitreal injections of XSB-001 or reference ranibizumab (0.5 mg [0.05 ml]) in the study eye once every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Efficacy and safety assessments continued through 52 weeks of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by ETDRS letters at week 8. Biosimilarity was concluded if the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) (United States) or 95% CI (rest of world) for the difference in least-squares (LS) mean change in BCVA at week 8 between treatment groups was within the predefined equivalence margin of ± 3.5 letters. RESULTS: In total, 582 patients (n = 292 XSB-001, n = 290 reference ranibizumab) were randomized. Mean age was 74.1 years, most patients (85.2%) were White, and 55.8% were women. Mean BCVA score at baseline was 61.7 and 61.5 ETDRS letters in the XSB-001 and reference ranibizumab groups, respectively. At week 8, the LS mean (standard error [SE]) change in BCVA from baseline was 4.6 (0.5) ETDRS letters in the XSB-001 group and 6.4 (0.5) letters in the reference ranibizumab group (LS mean [SE] treatment difference: -1.8 [0.7] ETDRS letters; 90% CI, -2.9 to -0.7; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.5). The 90% CI and 95% CI for LS mean difference in change from baseline were within the predefined equivalence margin. At week 52, LS mean (SE) change in BCVA was 6.4 (0.8) and 7.8 (0.8) letters, respectively (LS mean [SE] treatment difference, -1.5 [1.1] ETDRS letters; 90% CI, -3.3 to 0.4; 95% CI, -3.6 to 0.7). There were no clinically meaningful differences between treatments in anatomical, safety, or immunogenicity end points through week 52. CONCLUSIONS: XSB-001 demonstrated biosimilarity to reference ranibizumab in patients with nAMD. Treatment with XSB-001 for 52 weeks was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to the reference product. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Macular Hole Surgery in the Case of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with Intravitreal Aflibercept.

A 72-year-old male treated with aflibercept (Eylea) due to choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in his left eye developed a full-thickness macular hole (MH) after the second injection. The occurrence of MH in his left eye resulted in further visual acuity deterioration. As a consequence of having developed the MH, the patient was operated on. Phacoemulsification and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and 20% SF6 tamponade were performed. MH closure was achieved and best corrected visual acuity improved to the extent allowed by CNV. The patient continued anti-VEGF treatment with Eylea due to wet age-related macular degeneration in his left eye. The observation period of 2 years has been uneventful and visual acuity of 0.2 has remained stable.

[Complications of intravitreal injections--own experience]. / Powiklania po iniekcjach do komory ciala szklistego--doswiadczenia wlasne.

PURPOSE: Authors present complications associated with intravitreal injection perfomed in Ophthalmic Clinic CMKP MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective study, between January 2006 and July 2009 we performed intravitreal injections with triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog, 4 mg), ranibizumab (Lucentis, 0.5 mg), bevacizumab (Avastin, 1.25 mg) and pegaptanib (Macugen, 0.3 mg). We treated eyes with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, after retinal venous occlusion, with uveitis, Irvine-Gass syndrome, idiopathic juxtafoveolar teleangiectasia and central serous retinopathy. RESULTS: 943 eyes received intravitreal injections. The most common ocular complication was subconjunctival hemorrhage which was seen in 36% cases. Temporary elevated intraocular pressure above 21 mmHg was noticed in 18 eyes (5%) after anti-VEGF agents injections and in 30 eyes (23.4%) after Kenalog injection. Anterior uveitis developed in sixteen cases (1.7%) from the Avastin (5 eyes) and Lucentis (3 eyes) group. Anterior-posterior inflammation occurred in 8 eyes (0.8%), including four eyes (0.4%) with sterile endophthalmitis (3 following bevacizumab and 1 following ranibizumab injection), one eye (0.1%) with pseudoendophthalmitis (after triamcinolone). There were three cases of suspected endophthalmitis (2 following bevacizumab and 1 following triamcinolone injection). The infectious endophthalmitis after triamcinolone injection was culture-proven and revealed Staphylococcus epidermidis. Cataract formation or progression was noted in 34 eyes totally. In Kenalog group progression of cataract was seen in 23.4% of eyes (30 cases) during 2-years of follow-up and in anti-VEGF agents group--in two cases (0.6%) and 2 cases of iatrogenic cataract. Three diabetic patients suffered systemic adverse events: one patient developed renal insufficiency, one patient developed cerebrovascular accidents and one suffered a myocardial infarction resulting in death. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injections are associated with a low incidence of serious adverse events. The most common ocular complication was subconjunctival hemorrhage. There was one case of serious complication--the culture-proven infectious endophthalmitis after Kenalog injection. Cataract formation and increase of intraocular pressure were more often observed following intravitreal triamcinolone injection.

[Vitrectomy--absolute indication in case of intraocular foreign body localized in vitreous cavity or within vitreo-retinal interface]. / Witrektomia--wskazanie bezwzgledne w przypadku ciala obcego w galce ocznej z lokalizacja szklistkowa i szklistkowo-siatkówkowa.

Ocular trauma is the leading cause of visual loss in young adults. Open globe injuries with intraocular foreign bodies are an important part of this group, and in general an early surgery is required, in order to preserve the visual acuity and the eye globe. Primary surgical repair and foreign body removal may be performed using external magnet or vitrectomy. Based on published reports and our clinical experience we think that vitrectomy is safer procedure, giving better chance for good postoperative visual outcome.