Using the RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate Implementation of Male Involvement Strategies to Optimize the PMTCT Program in Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Involvement of male partners has been shown to be key for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT). Despite the recorded success, uptake and implementation of strategies to involve men in PMTCT continues to be low in Malawi. In this study, we used the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation science framework to explore the implementation of male involvement (MI) strategies in Lilongwe, Malawi. We used a cross-sectional mixed-methods complementary-concurrent design from September to October 2020 in two health facilities. Qualitatively, we used a phenomenological approach and conducted seven focus group discussions (FGDs), three with women and four with men. We further conducted four key informant interviews (KIIs) among health care workers. Quantitatively, we conducted a cross-sectional study comprising 138 men presenting at an antenatal clinic (ANC). We used univariate analysis in Stata for the quantitative data, whereas a manual thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data. Implementation and adoption of the strategies was high among health providers and there were indications of maintenance of the strategies. Provider's attitude, coordinated service provision, integrated training and service provision, information provision, and baby's HIV outcomes were driving factors in implementing the MI strategies. These factors have contributed to the sustained implementation of the strategies over time. In contrast, financial and time constraints, inadequate human resources, and male-friendly spaces impede the implementation of MI strategies. Improving MI will require a systems approach considering health system and individual-level factors for both providers and consumers.

Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys.

OBJECTIVES: We examined age, residence, education and wealth inequalities and their combinations on cervical precancer screening probabilities for women. We hypothesised that inequalities in screening favoured women who were older, lived in urban areas, were more educated and wealthier. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment data. SETTING: Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Differences in screening rates were analysed using multivariable logistic regressions, controlling for age, residence, education and wealth. Inequalities in screening probability were estimated using marginal effects models. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 25-49 years, reporting screening. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported screening rates, and their inequalities in percentage points, with differences of 20%+ defined as high inequality, 5%-20% as medium, 0%-5% as low. RESULTS: The sample size of participants ranged from 5882 in Ethiopia to 9186 in Tanzania. The screening rates were low in the surveyed countries, ranging from 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% to 4.0%) in Rwanda to 17.1% (95% CI 15.8% to 18.5%) and 17.4% (95% CI 16.1% to 18.8%) in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Inequalities in screening rates were low based on covariates. Combining the inequalities led to significant inequalities in screening probabilities between women living in rural areas aged 25-34 years, with a primary education level, from the lowest wealth quintile, and women living in urban areas aged 35-49 years, with the highest education level, from the highest wealth quintile, ranging from 4.4% in Rwanda to 44.6% in Zimbabwe. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical precancer screening rates were inequitable and low. No country surveyed achieved one-third of the WHO's target of screening 70% of eligible women by 2030. Combining inequalities led to high inequalities, preventing women who were younger, lived in rural areas, were uneducated, and from the lowest wealth quintile from screening. Governments should include and monitor equity in their cervical precancer screening programmes.