Can You Feel it? - Correlation Between Intraoperatively Perceived Bone Quality and Objectively Measured Bone Mineral Density.

STUDY DESIGN: clinical study. OBJECTIVES: Loosening of pedicle screws is a frequent complication in patients with osteoporosis. The indication for additional stabilization, such as cement augmentation, is more often based on the subjective intraoperative feeling of the surgeon than on a preoperative bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. Aim was to evaluate the correlation of the intraoperative perceived bone quality in comparison to the objectively measured BMD. METHODS: A total of 62 patients undergoing dorsal stabilization using pedicle screws at a level-1 trauma center were analyzed. The preoperative CT scan measured each instrumented vertebra's pedicle size and BMD. During the surgery, the perceived screw stability was graded by the respective surgeon for each screw. RESULTS: 204 vertebral bodies were evaluated. Looking at all implanted screws a significant correlation between the measured BMD and the perceived screw stability was found (Resident r = .450; R2 = .202; P < .001/Attending r = .364; R2 = .133; P < .001), but there was no significant correlation in the osteoporotic patients (Resident P = .148 / Attending P = .907). The evaluation of the screws implanted in osteoporotic vertebrae showed that the surgeons considered a total of 31% of these screws to be sufficiently stable. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant correlation between the measured BMD and the perceived pedicle screw stability in the group with osteopenic / osteoporotic bone (<100 mg/cm³). The results indicate that it is not possible to reliably determine the bone quality and the resulting screw stability in patients with reduced BMD. The preoperative measurement of the BMD should become a crucial part of preoperative planning.

[Does navigation still have a value in trauma surgery?] / Hat die Navigation in der Traumatologie noch einen Stellenwert?

BACKGROUND: Navigation systems are supposed to increase precision and support surgeons while they perform certain interventions. 2D, or nowadays 3D, systems are used in image-based approaches. Image-free navigation uses 3D printing. INDICATIONS: There are several studies on navigation procedures in trauma surgery. In contrast to limb surgery, the use of 3D navigation in pelvic and spine surgery is already well established. Navigation is especially regularly used to treat fractures of the posterior pelvic ring and for posterior stabilization of the cervical spine. REQUIREMENTS: To be able to utilize navigation systems optimally, the learning curve should be completed, and the technique should be used regularly. In addition, the surgeon should know the surgical technique without navigation in order to recognize potential errors of the navigation. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES: Advantages include increased patient safety, reduction in radiation exposure and less invasive surgical procedures. However, among other disadvantages, initial costs are high.

Long-term Quality of Life after Fusion of the Ventral Thoracic and Lumbar Spine.

BACKGROUND: Cage implantations and autologous pelvic bone grafts are common surgical procedures to fuse the spine in cases of spinal disorders such as traumatic fractures or degenerative diseases. These surgical methods are designed to stably readjust the spine and to prevent late detrimental effects such as pain or increasing kyphosis. Benefits of these surgical interventions have been evaluated, but the long-term well-being of patients after the respective treatments has not yet been examined. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome for patients who received iliac crest or cage implantations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with traumatic fractures after they obtained an anterior fusion in the thoracic or lumbar spine (12 cages; mean age: 54.08 years; 34 pelvic bone grafts; mean age: 42.18 years) were asked to participate in the survey using a precast questionnaire according the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Spine Score. Twenty-nine of them provided the data requested. RESULTS: Evaluation of the VAS scores of the patients, reporting at least 1 year after the surgery, revealed that cage implantations led to significantly better results with respect to all aspects of their daily life such as pain sensing, capability to undertake physical activities and exercise as compared with patients with autologous pelvic bone graft. Patients with autologous pelvic bone graft treatment reported a particularly poor overall satisfaction level concerning their long-term well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cage implantation reported a higher degree of long-term well-being. The data provide evidence for a positive impact on the postsurgery quality of life after cage implantation.

Cage or Pelvic Graft-Study on Bony Fusion of the Ventral Thoracic and Lumbar Spine in Traumatic Vertebral Fractures.

Background and Objectives: Stabilization of the spine by cage implantation or autologous pelvic bone graft are surgical methods for the treatment of traumatic spine fractures. These methods serve to stably re-adjust the spine and to prevent late detrimental effects such as pain or increasing kyphosis. They both involve ventral interventions using interbody fusion to replace the intervertebral disc space between the vertebral bodies either by cages or autologous pelvic bone grafts. We examined which of these methods serves the patients better in terms of bone fusion and the long-term clinical outcome. Materials and Methods: Forty-six patients with traumatic fractures (12 cages; mean age: 54.08/34 pelvic bone grafts; mean age: 42.18) who received an anterior fusion in the thoracic or lumbar spine were included in the study. Postoperative X-ray images were evaluated, and fusion of the stabilized segment was inspected by two experienced spine surgeons. The time to discharge from hospital and gender differences were evaluated. Results: There was a significant difference of the bone fusion rate of patients with autologous pelvic bone grafts in favor of cage implantation (p = 0.0216). Also, the stationary phase of patients who received cage implantations was clearly shorter (17.50 days vs. 23.85 days; p = 0.0089). In addition, we observed a significant gender difference with respect to the bony fusion rate in favor of females treated with cage implantations (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Cage implantations after spinal fractures result in better bony fusion rates as compared to autologous pelvic bone grafts and a shorter stay of the patients in the hospital. Thus, we conclude that cage implantations rather than autologous pelvic bone grafts should be the preferred surgical treatment for stabilizing the spine after fracture.

Of Cestodes and Men: Surgical Treatment of a Spinal Hydatid Cyst.

BACKGROUND: The cestode Echinococcus granulosus causes hydatid disease. In addition to manifestations in the liver and lung, it can lead to cystic lesions in the spine. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a 42-year-old male patient with primary hydatid disease in the eighth thoracic vertebra. The only clinical symptom was chronic back pain. Although laboratory findings were normal, imaging displayed lytic destruction that raised the suspicion of a metastatic disease. Diagnostics of the thoraces and abdomen did not reveal other pathologic abnormalities. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicted a progressive compression of the spinal cord and inhomogeneous structure in the fat-suppressed sequences. Because the Jamshidi biopsy was inconclusive, the tumor board recommended surgery. Dorsal decompression, spondylodesis of T6-T10, and vertebral column resection of T8 with complete cyst removal were performed. The resected vertebrae showed a mucous-like lesion with white granular tissue interfusing the whole vertebral body. A pathologic examination and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay confirmed E. granulosus. Thus chemotherapy with albendazole was initiated. A follow-up MRI of the whole spine confirmed complete remission and found no additional resettlements. The patient's back pain was resolved without neurologic deficits. CONCLUSIONS: For lytic manifestations of the vertebral column, hydatid cysts should be considered a differential diagnosis in addition to malignant metastasis, tuberculosis, and osteomyelitis. Thorough surgical resection and strict follow-up are necessary.

Which patellae are likely to redislocate?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for recurrent lateral patellar dislocations and to incorporate those factors into a patellar instability severity score. METHODS: Sixty-one patients [male/female 35/26; median age 19 years (range 9-51 years)] formed the study group for this investigation. Within the study group, 40 patients experienced a patellar redislocation within 24 months after the primary dislocation, whereas 21 patients, who were assessed after a median follow-up of 37 months (range 24-60 months), had not experienced a subsequent episode of lateral patellar instability. In all patients, age at the time of the primary dislocation, gender, the affected body side, body mass index, bilateral instability, physical activity according to Baecke's questionnaire, the grade of trochlear dysplasia, patellar height, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and patellar tilt were assessed. The odds ratio (OR) of each factor with regard to the patellar redislocation was calculated using contingency tables. Based on these data, a "patellar instability severity score" was calculated. RESULTS: The patellar instability severity score has six factors: age, bilateral instability, the severity of trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, TT-TG distance, and patellar tilt; the total possible score is seven. Reapplying this score to the study population revealed a median score of 4 points (range 2-7) for those patients with an early episode of patellar redislocation and a median score of 3 points (range 1-6) for those without a redislocation (p=0.0004). The OR for recurrent dislocations was 4.88 (95% CI 1.57-15.17) for the patients who scored 4 or more points when compared with the patients who scored 3 or fewer points (p=0.0064). CONCLUSION: Based on the individual patient data, the patellar instability severity score allows an initial risk assessment for experiencing a recurrent patellar dislocation and might help differentiate between responders and non-responders to conservative treatment after primary lateral patellar instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.