The mutation nrpb1-A325V in the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II suppresses compromised growth of Arabidopsis plants deficient in a function of the general transcription factor IIF.

The evolutionarily conserved 12-subunit RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is a central catalytic component that drives RNA synthesis during the transcription cycle that consists of transcription initiation, elongation, and termination. A diverse set of general transcription factors, including a multifunctional TFIIF, govern Pol II selectivity, kinetic properties, and transcription coupling with posttranscriptional processes. Here, we show that TFIIF of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) resembles the metazoan complex that is composed of the TFIIFα and TFIIFß polypeptides. Arabidopsis has two TFIIFß subunits, of which TFIIFß1/MAN1 is essential and TFIIFß2/MAN2 is not. In the partial loss-of-function mutant allele man1-1, the winged helix domain of Arabidopsis TFIIFß1/MAN1 was dispensable for plant viability, whereas the cellular organization of the shoot and root apical meristems were abnormal. Forward genetic screening identified an epistatic interaction between the largest Pol II subunit nrpb1-A325V variant and the man1-1 mutation. The suppression of the man1-1 mutant developmental defects by a mutation in Pol II suggests a link between TFIIF functions in Arabidopsis transcription cycle and the maintenance of cellular organization in the shoot and root apical meristems.

High REDOX RESPONSIVE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR1 Levels Result in Accumulation of Reactive Oxygen Species in Arabidopsis thaliana Shoots and Roots.

Redox Responsive Transcription Factor1 (RRTF1) in Arabidopsis is rapidly and transiently upregulated by H2O2, as well as biotic- and abiotic-induced redox signals. RRTF1 is highly conserved in angiosperms, but its physiological role remains elusive. Here we show that inactivation of RRTF1 restricts and overexpression promotes reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in response to stress. Transgenic lines overexpressing RRTF1 are impaired in root and shoot development, light sensitive, and susceptible to Alternaria brassicae infection. These symptoms are diminished by the beneficial root endophyte Piriformospora indica, which reduces ROS accumulation locally in roots and systemically in shoots, and by antioxidants and ROS inhibitors that scavenge ROS. More than 800 genes were detected in mature leaves and seedlings of transgenic lines overexpressing RRTF1; ∼ 40% of them have stress-, redox-, ROS-regulated-, ROS-scavenging-, defense-, cell death- and senescence-related functions. Bioinformatic analyses and in vitro DNA binding assays demonstrate that RRTF1 binds to GCC-box-like sequences in the promoter of RRTF1-responsive genes. Upregulation of RRTF1 by stress stimuli and H2O2 requires WRKY18/40/60. RRTF1 is co-regulated with the phylogenetically related RAP2.6, which contains a GCC-box-like sequence in its promoter, but transgenic lines overexpressing RAP2.6 do not accumulate higher ROS levels. RRTF1 also stimulates systemic ROS accumulation in distal non-stressed leaves. We conclude that the elevated levels of the highly conserved RRTF1 induce ROS accumulation in response to ROS and ROS-producing abiotic and biotic stress signals.

Two RNA editing sites with cis-acting elements of moderate sequence identity are recognized by an identical site-recognition protein in tobacco chloroplasts.

The chloroplast genome of higher plants contains 20-40 C-to-U RNA editing sites, whose number and locations are diversified among plant species. Biochemical analyses using in vitro RNA editing systems with chloroplast extracts have suggested that there is one-to-one recognition between proteinous site recognition factors and their respective RNA editing sites, but their rigidness and generality are still unsettled. In this study, we addressed this question with the aid of an in vitro RNA editing system from tobacco chloroplast extracts and with UV-crosslinking experiments. We found that the ndhB-9 and ndhF-1 editing sites of tobacco chloroplast transcripts are both bound by the site-specific trans-acting factors of 95 kDa. Cross-competition experiments between ndhB-9 and ndhF-1 RNAs demonstrated that the 95 kDa proteins specifically binding to the ndhB-9 and ndhF-1 sites are the identical protein. The binding regions of the 95 kDa protein on the ndhB-9 and ndhF-1 transcripts showed 60% identity in nucleotide sequence. This is the first biochemical demonstration that a site recognition factor of chloroplast RNA editing recognizes plural sites. On the basis of this finding, we discuss how plant organellar RNA editing sites have diverged during evolution.

In vitro RNA editing systems from higher plant chloroplasts.

RNA editing in higher plant chloroplasts involves C-to-U conversion at ~30 specific sites. In vitro systems supporting accurate editing have been developed from tobacco and pea chloroplasts. mRNA substrates labeled with 32P at C residues to be edited provide sensitive detection of editing activity in vitro. The present systems allow the rapid identification of cis-elements using mutated mRNA substrates and trans-acting factors by ultraviolet crosslinking.

A site-specific factor interacts directly with its cognate RNA editing site in chloroplast transcripts.

RNA editing involves a variety of genetic systems and occurs by different mechanisms. In higher plant chloroplasts, specific sites of some transcripts are subject to C-to-U conversion. We have previously shown that site-specific trans-acting factors for psbE and petB mRNA editing bind corresponding cis-elements, which are located 5 nucleotides upstream from the editing site. Here we report that, by using mRNAs labeled either at the center of the upstream cis-element or at the editing site, the site-specific factors can be cross-linked with nucleotides at both positions. Mutations of nucleotides in the proximal region of the editing site revealed a correlation between editing activity and cross-linking efficiency of factors with the editing site, even though cross-linking with the upstream cis-element was unaffected. These observations suggest that the site-specific factor binds stably to the upstream ciselement, whereas it interacts weakly with the editing site. This finding raises the intriguing possibility that the site-specific factor is involved in both site-determination and C-to-U conversion in chloroplast RNA editing.

Array-based analysis on tobacco plastid transcripts: preparation of a genomic microarray containing all genes and all intergenic regions.

The plastid genome of higher plants includes about 120 genes. We adopted genomic array technologies to the tobacco plastid genome. A microarray was constructed, consisting of 220 DNA fragments that cover the whole genome sequence. Each DNA fragment corresponds to a single known gene or an intergenic region. We evaluated reliability of this microarray by comparing the plastid RNA level in light- or dark-grown tobacco seedlings. The transcripts encoding photosynthetic subunits increased significantly in light-grown tissues as expected. Furthermore, we found unexpected signals in several intergenic regions, suggesting the existence of novel transcripts in tobacco plastids.

Identification of RNA editing sites in chloroplast transcripts from the maternal and paternal progenitors of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum): comparative analysis shows the involvement of distinct trans-factors for ndhB editing.

RNA editing alters genomic nucleotide sequences at the transcript level. In higher plant chloroplasts, C-to-U conversion is known to occur at around 30 specific sites. The tobacco cultivar Nicotiana tabacum is an amphidiploid derived from ancestors of N. sylvestris (maternal) and N. tomentosiformis (paternal). The chloroplast genome of N. tabacum is believed to originate from an ancestor of N. sylvestris. To study the evolution of RNA editing in higher plant chloroplasts, editing sites in the two likely progenitors have first been identified based on those found in N. tabacum. Altogether 34, 33, and 32 editing sites have been found in the chloroplast transcripts from N. tabacum, N. sylvestris, and N. tomentosiformis, respectively. Thirty-one sites are conserved among the three species, whereas remarkable differences are observed in the editing of ndhB and ndhD transcripts. Sites 7 and 8 in ndhB mRNAs are separated only by five nt, and both are edited in N. tabacum and N. sylvestris. However, site 8 is not edited in N. tomentosiformis, indicating that distinct trans-factors are involved in the two editing events. The first site in ndhD mRNAs is edited to produce an AUG start codon in N. sylvestris as well as in N. tabacum but not in N. tomentosiformis, suggesting that a distinct mechanism operates for the translational initiation of N. tomentosiformis ndhD mRNAs. Four to six sites are edited partially in green leaves. Some of these sites may represent evolutionary intermediates in the process of losing editing events.

A tRNA(Leu)-like sequence located immediately upstream of an Arabidopsis clock-regulated gene is transcriptionally active: efficient transcription by an RNA polymerase III-dependent in vitro transcription system.

A tRNA(Leu)-like sequence is located within a probable enhancer region of the RNA polymerase II-dependent gene encoding an RNA-binding protein, Atgrp7, in Arabidopsis (Mol. Gen. Genet. 261 (1999) 811). To examine whether this sequence is transcribed, we used our in vitro transcription system from tobacco cell nuclei. In vitro assays demonstrated that this tRNA-like sequence is transcribed by RNA polymerase III and its transcript is processed into tRNA-size molecules. Transcription starts at the CAA motif, a transcription initiation site for many plant tRNA genes. Mutation analyses indicated that transcription of this sequence depends on promoter elements typical for plant tRNA genes. We therefore concluded that this is a transcriptionally active tRNA(Leu)(AAG) gene. Mutation of a basic promoter element of the tRNA gene exerted no influence on the transcription of the downstream protein-coding gene, suggesting that no apparent interference occurs between the two adjacent genes.

Polyribosome loading of spinach mRNAs for photosystem I subunits is controlled by photosynthetic electron transport.

In light-, but not in dark-grown spinach seedlings, the mRNAs for the nuclear-encoded photosystem I subunits D, F and L are associated with polyribosomes and this association is prevented by the application of 3-(3',4'-dichlorophenyl)-1,1'-dimethyl urea (DCMU), an inhibitor of the photosynthetic electron transport. To identify the cis-elements which are responsible for this regulation, we generated a series of chimeric PsaD constructs and tested them in transgenic tobacco. The spinach PsaD 5'-untranslated region is sufficient to confer light- and photosynthesis-dependent polyribosome association onto the uidA reporter gene, while the tobacco PsaD 5'-untranslated region directs constitutive polyribosome association. These results are discussed with regard to signals from photosynthetic electron flow which control processes in the cytoplasm.

Recognition of RNA editing sites is directed by unique proteins in chloroplasts: biochemical identification of cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in RNA editing in tobacco and pea chloroplasts.

RNA editing in higher-plant chloroplasts involves C-to-U conversions at specific sites. Although in vivo analyses have been performed, little is known about the biochemical aspects of chloroplast editing reactions. Here we improved our original in vitro system and devised a procedure for preparing active chloroplast extracts not only from tobacco plants but also from pea plants. Using our tobacco in vitro system, cis-acting elements were defined for psbE and petB mRNAs. Distinct proteins were found to bind specifically to each cis-element, a 56-kDa protein to the psbE site and a 70-kDa species to the petB site. Pea chloroplasts lack the corresponding editing site in psbE since T is already present in the DNA. Parallel in vitro analyses with tobacco and pea extracts revealed that the pea plant has no editing activity for psbE mRNAs and lacks the 56-kDa protein, whereas petB mRNAs are edited and the 70-kDa protein is also present. Therefore, coevolution of an editing site and its cognate trans-factor was demonstrated biochemically in psbE mRNA editing between tobacco and pea plants.

Photosynthesis nuclear genes generally lack TATA-boxes: a tobacco photosystem I gene responds to light through an initiator.

The promoter architecture of the nuclear-encoded photosystem I genes was studied using a tobacco gene, psaDb, as a model case. Linker scanning mutations revealed that the psaDb promoter does not have a TATA box. Instead, pyrimidine-rich Initiator (Inr) elements that overlap the transcription start sites are essential for light-responsive transcription of this gene. When the psaDb promoter was mutated to have a TATA-box but no Inr, light-responsive transcription was impaired, indicating that the regulatory system of this gene prefers Inr to a TATA box. As very little is known about plant TATA-less promoters, we subsequently examined whether this promoter architecture is unique to psaDb. Computer analysis of 232 plant promoters revealed surprising features; the majority of photosynthesis nuclear genes lacked TATA boxes, although the frequency of the TATA-less promoters in non-photosynthesis genes was less than 10%. These results strongly suggest that TATA-independent transcription mechanisms play important roles in the regulated expression of photosynthesis nuclear genes.