Clinical features of pneumothorax associated with COVID-19: A retrospective analysis of two centres.

BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax is a known sequela of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical features of pneumothorax associated with COVID-19 have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Patients who developed pneumothorax within 6 months of being diagnosed with COVID-19 were retrospectively analysed at two institutions. We investigated the background factors, COVID-19 severity and treatment, timing of pneumothorax onset, treatment modalities, treatment duration, and prognosis of these patients. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were diagnosed with pneumothorax within 6 months of COVID-19 diagnosis. The combined incidence rate of pneumothorax at two institutions was 0.89 %. The mean age of these patients was 72.5 years, and they were predominantly male (90.5 %), with a history of smoking (76.1 %). The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension, followed by type 2 diabetes mellitus, COPD, and malignancy. Approximately 76 % of the patients had moderate or severe disease requiring oxygenation. Moreover, 90.5 % of these patients were taking antiviral drugs; 52.4 %, immunosuppressant agents (baricitinib/tocilizumab); and 66.7 % were on dexamethasone. The median time to the onset of pneumothorax was 15.0 days, and 86 % of cases occurred within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. Bilateral pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum were noted in one patient each. Chest drainage was performed in 71.4 % of the patients. The mean treatment duration for pneumothorax was 14.1 days, and the 30-day mortality rate was 28.6 %. CONCLUSION: Pneumothorax associated with COVID-19 was more common in patients with moderate or severe disease requiring oxygenation, and occurred within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. Pneumothorax associated with COVID-19 is a serious complication with a high mortality rate and clinicians should pay attention to it.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trajectory of the number of bronchoscopies performed in a tertiary hospital in Kyoto city.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has restricted many medical practices. We aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of bronchoscopies, outpatients, and hospital admissions. We retrospectively analyzed the number of outpatients, admissions, and bronchoscopies performed between March 2020 and May 2022. We defined "Peak month of the pandemic," "Wave of the pandemic," "Month in the wave," and "Period of a state of emergency" for each analysis. In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, analysis of variance (ANOVA) in linear mixed models indicated significant effects of "month in each wave" on the number of bronchoscopies (P = .003), outpatients (P = .041), and admissions (P = .017). The number of outpatients, admissions, and bronchoscopies was significantly influenced by the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, a mixed-ANOVA indicated significant effects of "month in each wave" only on the number of outpatients (P = .020) but no significant effects on the number of bronchoscopies (P = .407) and admissions (P = .219). During the second year of the pandemic, the number of bronchoscopies and admissions was not significantly affected by the waves of the pandemic. There were no significant differences in the number of admissions and bronchoscopies between the fourth and sixth waves. Although the number of bronchoscopies was found to be significantly affected in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of the pandemic was much more limited thereafter.

Safety of Remdesivir for Patients 80 Years of Age or Older with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at the high risk of exacerbation that requires treatment with remdesivir, the safety of this medication is unclear in clinical practice, especially among older patients. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety of remdesivir in older patients with COVID-19 who required hospitalization in our institute. METHODS: We reviewed patients with COVID-19 who were treated with remdesivir at our institute between July 2020 and May 2021. We defined older patients as those aged 80 years or older at admission; all other patients were defined as younger patients. We evaluated the safety of remdesivir by examining the incidence of discontinuation of remdesivir treatment because of adverse events and the incidence of any adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were included in this study. Compared with younger patients, fewer older patients were treated with remdesivir for more than 5 days: 4 (15.4%) vs 23 (42.6%). Discontinuation of remdesivir because of adverse events occurred in one older patient (3.9%) and four younger patients (7.4%) [p > 0.99]. Remdesivir-induced liver dysfunction was the most frequent adverse event, which occurred in 29 (36.3%) patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence of remdesivir-induced liver dysfunction, renal dysfunction, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of remdesivir was suggested to be comparable between patients older than 80 years of age and patients younger than 80 years of age. The results of this study may encourage the administration of remdesivir to this older patient group.