Advancements in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for fedratinib: updating dose guidance in the presence of a dual inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19.

PURPOSE: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for fedratinib was updated and revalidated to bridge a gap between the observed drug-drug interaction (DDI) of a single sub-efficacious dose in healthy participants and the potential DDI in patients with cancer at steady state. The study aimed to establish an appropriate dose for fedratinib in patients coadministered with dual CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitors, providing quantitative evidence to inform dosing guidance. METHODS: The original minimal PBPK model was developed using Simcyp® Simulator v17. The model was updated by substituting a single distribution rate (Qsac) with 2 separate rates (CLin/CLout) and transitioning to v20. Model parameter updates were further informed with 3 clinical studies, and 3 more studies served as independent validation data. The validated model was applied to simulate potential DDIs between fedratinib and a known dual inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 (fluconazole). RESULTS: Coadministration of fedratinib with fluconazole in patients was predicted to increase fedratinib exposure by < 2-fold in all simulated scenarios. For patients with cancer receiving the approved dose of fedratinib 400 mg once daily along with fluconazole 200 mg daily, the model predicted an approximate 50% increase in fedratinib exposure at steady state. CONCLUSIONS: The updated PBPK model improved description of the observed pharmacokinetics and predicted a low risk of clinically significant DDIs between fedratinib and fluconazole. The quantitative evidence serves as a primary foundation for providing dose guidance in clinical practice for the coadministration of fedratinib with dual CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 inhibitors.

Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.

What is this summary about? People diagnosed with a disease called large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may experience return, or early relapse, of their disease within the first year after receiving and responding to their first (first-line) treatment regimen. Others may have primary refractory disease, meaning that the disease either did not respond to first-line treatment at all or only responded for a very brief period. Second (second-line) treatment includes immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, which has the potential to cure LBCL. However, if the disease does not respond to immunotherapy, people cannot receive ASCT, and less than 30% of people are cured.Therefore, new second-line treatment options are required, such as CAR T cell therapy, which uses a person's own genetically engineered lymphocytes, also called T cells, to fight their lymphoma. In this article, we summarize the key results of the phase 3 TRANSFORM clinical study that tested if liso-cel, a CAR T cell treatment, can safely and effectively be used as a second-line treatment for people with early relapsed or primary refractory (relapsed/refractory) LBCL.A total of 184 adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL who were able to receive ASCT were randomly treated with either liso-cel or standard of care (SOC) as second-line treatment. SOC included immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.What were the key takeaways? Almost all (97%) people in the liso-cel group completed treatment, whereas 53% of people in the SOC group did not complete treatment, mostly due to their disease not responding or relapsing, and therefore they were not able to receive ASCT. People who received liso-cel as a second-line treatment lived longer without the occurrence of an unfavorable medical event or worsening of the disease and had a better response to treatment than those who received SOC as second-line treatment. People who received liso-cel reported side effects that researchers considered to be manageable, and that were known to occur with CAR T cell treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the TRANSFORM study support the use of liso-cel as a more effective second-line treatment compared with SOC that is safe for people with relapsed/refractory LBCL.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03575351 (TRANSFORM study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).