Outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement among solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among solid-organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Temporal trends in hospitalizations for aortic valve replacement among solid-organ transplant recipients were determined using the National Inpatient Sample database years 2012-2017. Propensity matching was conducted to compare admissions who underwent TAVR versus SAVR. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The analysis included 1,730 hospitalizations for isolated AVR; 920 (53.2%) underwent TAVR and 810 (46.7%) underwent SAVR. TAVR was increasingly utilized for solid-organ transplant recipients (Ptrend = 0.01), while there was no change in the number of SAVR procedures (Ptrend = 0.20). The predictors of undergoing TAVR for solid-organ transplant recipients included older age, diabetes, and prior coronary artery bypass surgery, while TAVR was less likely utilized in small-sized hospitals. TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality after matching (0.9 vs. 4.7%, odds ratio [OR] 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.35, p < .001) and after multivariable adjustment (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.03-0.21, p < .001). TAVR was associated with lower rate of acute kidney injury, acute stroke, postoperative bleeding, blood transfusion, vascular complications, discharge to nursing facilities, and shorter median length of hospital stay. There was no difference between both groups in the use of mechanical circulatory support, hemodialysis, arrhythmias, or pacemaker insertion. CONCLUSION: This contemporary observational nationwide analysis showed that TAVR is increasingly performed among solid-organ transplant recipients. Compared with SAVR, TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, complications, and shorter length of stay.

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Mediastinal Radiation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the trends and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among patients with prior mediastinal radiation from a national database. BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data about the temporal trends and outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR in patients with prior mediastinal radiation. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database years 2012 to 2017 was queried for hospitalizations of patients with prior mediastinal radiation who underwent isolated AVR. Using multivariable analysis, the study compared the outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR. The main study outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The final analysis included 3,675 hospitalizations for isolated AVR; of whom 2,170 (59.1%) underwent TAVR and 1,505 (40.9%) underwent isolated SAVR. TAVR was increasingly performed over time (ptrend = 0.01), but there was no significant increase in the rates of utilization of SAVR. The following factors were independently associated with TAVR utilization: older age, chronic lung disease, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, prior cerebrovascular accidents, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and larger-sized hospitals, while women were less likely to undergo TAVR. Compared with SAVR, TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs. 2.0%, adjusted odds ratio: 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.09 to 0.79; p = 0.02). TAVR was associated with lower rates of acute kidney injury, use of mechanical circulatory support, bleeding and respiratory complications, and shorter length of hospital stay. TAVR was associated with higher rates of pacemaker insertion. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide observational analysis showed that TAVR is increasingly performed among patients with prior mediastinal radiation. TAVR provides an important treatment option for this difficult patient population with desirable procedural safety when using SAVR as a benchmark.

Outcomes of Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the United States.

Background There is a paucity of data on the trends and outcomes of reoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during the current decade in the United States. Methods and Results We queried the National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2016) for all hospitalizations with isolated CABG procedure. We reported the temporal trends and outcomes of reoperative CABG versus primary CABG procedures. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. Among 3 212 768 hospitalizations with CABG, 46 820 (1.5%) had reoperative CABG. Over the 15-year study period, there were no changes in the proportion of reoperative CABG (1.8% in 2002 versus 2.2% in 2016, Ptren=0.08), and the related in-hospital mortality (3.7% in 2002 versus 2.7% in 2016, Ptrend=0.97). Reoperative CABG was performed in patients with increasingly higher risk profile. Compared with primary CABG, hospitalizations for reoperative CABG were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.2% versus 1.9%, P<0.001), cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, vascular complications, and respiratory complications. Among hospitalizations for reoperative CABG, the predictors of higher mortality included history of heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Conclusions In this 15-year nationwide analysis, reoperative CABG procedures were increasingly performed in patients with higher risk profile. In-hospital mortality rates were relatively low and did not change during the examined period. Compared with primary CABG, reoperative CABG is associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Age-Stratified Sex Disparities in Care and Outcomes in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Women are undertreated and have worse clinical outcomes than men after acute myocardial infarction. It remains uncertain whether the sex disparities in treatments and outcomes persist in the contemporary era and whether they affect all age groups equally. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) registry, we evaluated 1,260,200 hospitalizations for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 2010 and 2016, of which 32% were for women. The age-stratified sex differences in care measures and mortality were examined. Stepwise multivariable adjustment models, including baseline comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and reperfusion and revascularization therapies, were used to compare measures and outcomes between women and men across different age subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, women with STEMI were older than men and had more comorbidities. Women were less likely to receive fibrinolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass surgery across all age subgroups. Women with STEMI overall experienced higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.039, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.077), which persisted after multivariable adjustments. However, when stratified by age, the difference in mortality became non-significant in most age groups after stepwise multivariable adjustment, except among the youngest patients 19-49 years of age with STEMI (women vs men: 3.9% vs 2.6%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.259, 95% confidence interval: 1.083-1.464). CONCLUSIONS: Women with STEMI were less likely to receive reperfusion and revascularization therapies and had higher in-hospital mortality and complications compared with men. Younger women with STEMI (19-49 years of age) experienced higher in-hospital mortality that persisted after multivariable adjustment.

Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the contemporary era. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2016) for hospitalizations with acute myocardial infarction. We described the trends and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis compared with acute myocardial infarction-no rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: The analysis included 9,359,546 hospitalizations with acute myocardial infarction, of whom 123,783 (1.3%) had rheumatoid arthritis. There was an increase in the number of hospitalizations with acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis (Ptrend < .001). There was an observed downtrend in mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis (5.8% in 2002 vs 5.2% in 2016, Ptrend = .01) corresponding to an increase in the utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (Ptrend < .001). In the overall cohort of acute myocardial infarction, rheumatoid arthritis was independently associated with lower rate of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.99, P = .03). Compared with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-no rheumatoid arthritis, STEMI-rheumatoid arthritis was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and cardiac arrest, while it was associated with higher discharges to nursing facilities. No difference in mortality was observed among non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)-rheumatoid arthritis and NSTEMI-no rheumatoid arthritis, while NSTEMI-rheumatoid arthritis was associated with lower cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and hemodialysis, at the expense of higher bleeding events and discharges to nursing facilities. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide analysis, we found an increase in hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction-rheumatoid arthritis. Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, rheumatoid arthritis was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality, particularly in cases of STEMI.

Outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for patients with metastatic cancer and acute pulmonary embolism.

INTRODUCTION: Malignancy is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and around the world and the second leading cause of death in the United States. There is little data on the impact of metastatic cancer on the risk of hemorrhagic stroke or mortality among patients undergoing fibrinolytic therapy (FT) for acute PE. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we extracted admissions with a primary diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism that underwent FT from 2010 to 2014. We performed a case control matched analysis between patients with and without metastatic cancer. Our primary outcome of interest was Mortality and our secondary outcome of interest was hemorrhagic stroke (HS). RESULTS: Of the 883,183 patients with a primary diagnosis of acute PE between 2010 and 12014, 23,690 patients (2.7%) underwent FT. After exclusion, 22,592 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 941 patients (4.2%) were reported to have metastatic cancer. There was a higher incidence of cerebrovascular accidents and intubation/mechanical ventilation in the metastatic cancer arm. Mortality was significantly higher in the metastatic cancer arm with no difference in the incidence of HS. In multivariate regression analysis, among all patients that underwent FT for acute PE, metastatic cancer was associated with a significant odds for mortality (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.11-5.82, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The presence of metastatic cancer in patients undergoing fibrinolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism is associated with increase mortality.

Outcomes of Surgical Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Cardiac Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Surgical ablation procedure is commonly performed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac surgeries; however, the evidence regarding its impact on in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes is controversial. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database for patients with AF who underwent cardiac surgeries from 1998 to 2013. We performed a propensity-score matching including 21 various baseline characteristics to compare those who underwent surgical ablation with those who had not. RESULTS: A total of 47,964 hospitalizations were included in our final analysis. On propensity matching, 23,975 were in the surgical ablation group and 23,990 in the control group. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality was lower in the surgical ablation group compared with the control group (3.6% versus 4.2%, p < 0.001). The surgical ablation group was associated with lower in-hospital cerebrovascular accident (2.0% versus 2.8%, p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (2.6% versus 3.6%, p < 0.001), use of intraaortic balloon pump (5.1% versus 5.8%, p = 0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (12.3 ± 10.1 versus 12.5 ± 10.3 days, p = 0.008). There was no difference between the surgical ablation and control groups in the incidence of cardiac tamponade (0.4% versus 0.3%, p = 0.296). The surgical ablation group was associated with a higher rate of complete heart block (5.2% versus 4.3%, p < 0.001) and permanent pacemaker insertion (8.6% versus 8.0%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this large analysis of almost 50,000 patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery, surgical ablation appears to be safe in the short term. Future studies should focus on evaluating the long-term effectiveness of this procedure.

Trends in the Incidence and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Complicated by Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) can present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The incidence, characteristics, outcomes, and treatment of this subgroup of patients with AF remains poorly studied. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample database, we (1) compared baseline characteristics of patients with AF with/without NSTEMI, (2) evaluated their outcomes and associated trends over the study period (2004-2013), and (3) evaluated revascularization (by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) and the impact on patient outcomes. Of the 3 923 436 patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of AF, 47 785 (1.2%) had a secondary diagnosis of NSTEMI. In this subgroup with AF and NSTEMI, there was a significant trend toward a decrease in mortality ( P = .002), stroke ( P < .001), and gastrointestinal bleeding ( P < .001) during the study period. Compared to unrevascularized patients, revascularized patients were more likely to be younger (72.2 ± 10.2 vs 77.0 ± 11.8 years old, P < .001), male (57.8 vs 42.7%, P < .001), and had a much higher incidence of coronary risk factors. Revascularization was associated with increased survival in multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.562, 95% confidence interval: 0.334-0.946, P = .03). In conclusion, among patients admitted with AF, 1.2% were diagnosed with NSTEMI. A minority of patients with AF and NSTEMI underwent revascularization and had better in-hospital outcomes.

Characteristics of and current practice patterns of pacing for high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the current practice patterns of permanent pacing, especially the timing of implantation, for high-degree AV block (HDAVB) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). BACKGROUND: Comparative data regarding current practice patterns of permanent pacing for HDAVB between TAVI and SAVR is limited. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients who underwent TAVI or SAVR between 2012 and 2014. The incidence of HDAVB, the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation, and the timing of implantations were compared between TAVI and SAVR groups. RESULTS: We identified 33 690 and 202 110 patients who underwent TAVI and SAVR, respectively. HDAVB occurred in 3480 patients (10.3%) in the TAVI group and 11 405 patients (5.6%) in the SAVR group (P < 0.001). Among the patients who developed HDAVB, patients in the TAVI group were more likely to undergo permanent pacemaker implantation than those in the SAVR group (74.1% vs 64.7%; P < 0.001). The median interval from TAVI to pacemaker implantation was 2 days (interquartile range 1-3 days) vs 5 days (interquartile range 3-7 days) from SAVR to pacemaker implantation (P < 0.001). Among the patients who developed HDAVB, TAVI was associated with higher rates of permanent pacemaker implantation after adjusting for other comorbidities (odds ratio 1.41:95% confidence interval 1.13-1.77; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: HDAVB occurred more commonly after TAVI compared to SAVR. HDAVB after TAVI compared to SAVR was associated with a higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation at an earlier timing from the index procedure.

Sex differences in complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results on 85,977 patients.

PURPOSE: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). The differences in complication rates and outcomes between women and men remain poorly studied. We aimed to study the sex differences in morbidity and mortality associated with CA in AF. METHODS: Using weighted sampling from the National Inpatient Sample database, women and men with a primary diagnosis of AF and a primary procedure of CA (2004-2013) were identified. We compared the following outcomes based on the sex: (1) major complications [post-procedure transfusion, cardiac drain or surgery, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, major cardiac events, kidney failure requiring dialysis, and sepsis], (2) overall complications (minor and/or major complications), and (3) in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 85,977 patients who underwent CA for AF, 27821 (32.4%) were women. Overall complications were more frequent among women versus among men (12.4% versus 9.0%; p < 0.001), as well as major complications (4.7% versus 2.7%; p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in mortality (0.3% versus 0.2%; p = 0.22). After adjusting for other factors, women were more likely than men to have major complication (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.21-1.82; p < 0.001). Prior CABG was associated with lower risk of major complications in both sexes (odds ratio in the overall cohort 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.61; p = 0.002), mostly driven by the reduction in tamponade and pericardial drain. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF, the female sex was associated with higher rate of complications compared to male but no difference in mortality. Prior CABG was associated with a significant reduction of major complications in both sexes.

Prognostic Value of Anatomical SYNTAX Score and SYNTAX Score II in Veterans With Left Main and/or Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.

Anatomical SYNTAX score (SS1) and SYNTAX score II (SS2) are often utilized to determine the optimal revascularization strategy. Although US veterans have unique characteristics that may affect outcomes after revascularization, the prognostic values of SS1 and SS2 in veterans have not yet been validated. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive veteran patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main and/or 3-vessel disease from 2009 to 2014. SS1 and SS2 were calculated for each patient. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The prognostic values of SS1 and SS2 were compared by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The predicted 4-year mortality derived from SS2 was compared with the observed 4-year mortality estimated from Kaplan-Meier analysis. After exclusion, 286 patients (99% male) were included. Among 286 patients, 79 patients (27.6%) had left main disease, 151 (52.8%) underwent PCI, and 135 (47.2%) underwent CABG. Overall mortality was 27.6% at a median follow-up of 5.0 years. SS2 had better discriminative ability for all-cause mortality than SS1 (c-index 0.79 vs 0.52, p <0.001). Observed and predicted 4-year mortality correlated well in patients with low and intermediate SS2 in both PCI and CABG cohorts, but observed mortality was higher than predicted in the PCI cohort with high SS2 (observed 54.7% vs predicted 40.5%). In conclusion, observed and predicted 4-year mortality derived from SS2 correlated well in patients with low and intermediate SS2, but SS2 underestimated mortality in the PCI cohort with high SS2.

Sex differences in the contemporary management of HIV patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported sex differences in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the general population. This observational study is designed to evaluate whether sex differences exist in the contemporary management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients admitted for diagnosis of AMI. HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference in management of HIV patients with AMI. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI and a secondary diagnosis of HIV. We described baseline characteristics and outcomes using NIS documentation. Our primary areas of interest were revascularization and mortality. RESULTS: Among 2 977 387 patients presenting from 2010 to 2014 with a primary diagnosis of AMI, 10907 (0.4%) had HIV (mean age, 54.1 ± 9.3 years; n = 2043 [18.9%] female). Females were younger, more likely to be black, and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and anemia. Although neither males nor females were more likely to undergo coronary angiography in multivariate analysis, revascularization was performed less frequently in females than in males (45.4% vs 62.7%; P < 0.01), driven primarily by lower incidence of PCI. In a multivariate model, females were less likely to undergo revascularization (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.78, P < 0.01), a finding driven solely by PCI (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49-0.83, P < 0.01). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: AMI was more common in males than females with HIV. Females with HIV were more likely to be younger and black and less likely to be revascularized by PCI.

National Trends and Outcomes of Endomyocardial Biopsy for Patients With Myocarditis: From the National Inpatient Sample Database.

BACKGROUND: The utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in the management of myocarditis in the era of advanced cardiac imaging has been challenged. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database (years 1998-2013) was queried to identify hospitalization records with a primary diagnosis of myocarditis, and underwent EMB procedure. We identified 22,299 hospitalization records with a diagnosis of myocarditis during the study period. Of those, 798 (3.6%) underwent EMB procedures. There was an average decrease in the incidence of EMB for myocarditis by 0.15% (P < .01) over the study period. Younger patients, women, and those with chronic kidney disease were more likely to undergo EMB. On multivariate analysis, patients with myocarditis who underwent EMB had higher in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-2.74) and longer median hospital stay (9 days vs 3 days; P < .001). EMB was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac tamponade (odds ratio [OR] 5.21, 95% CI 2.76-9.82), cardiogenic shock (OR 4.66, 95% CI 3.75-5.78), need for intra-aortic balloon pump (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.49-4.97), and need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR 4.26, 95% CI 2.78-6.53). CONCLUSIONS: The use of EMB in hospitalizations with myocarditis has decreased over time. The use of EMB was associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Whether these findings represent a causative association from the procedure or a consequence of more severe disease in this group could not be confirmed in this study.

In-Hospital Cerebrovascular Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer (from the National Inpatient Sample Database).

Limited data are available regarding the impact of cancer on cerebrovascular accidents in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Survey Database to identify patients who have diagnostic code for AF. We performed a 1:1 propensity matching based on the CHA2DS2VASc score and other risk factors between patients with AF who had lung, breast, colon, and esophageal cancer, and those who did not (control). The final cohort included a total of 31,604 patients. The primary outcome of in-hospital cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) was lower in the cancer group than in the control group (4% vs 7%, p < 0.001), but with only a weak association (ф = -0.067). In-hospital mortality was higher in the cancer group than in the control group (18% vs 11%, p < 0.001; ф = -0.099). A subgroup analysis according to cancer type showed similar results with a weak association with lower CVA in breast cancer (4% vs 7%; ф = -0.066, p < 0.001), lung cancer (4% vs 6%; ф = -0.062, p < 0.001), colon cancer (4% vs 6%; ф = -0.062, p < 0.001), and esophageal cancer (3% vs 7%; ф = -0.095, p < 0.001) compared with the control groups. A weak association with higher in-hospital mortality was demonstrated in lung cancer (20% vs 11%; ф = -0.127, p < 0.001), colon cancer (16% vs 11%; ф = -0.076, p < 0.001), and esophageal cancer (20% vs 12%; ф = -0.111, p < 0.001) compared with the control groups, but no significant difference between breast cancer and control groups in mortality (11% vs 11%; ф = -0.002, p = 0.888). In conclusion, in patients with AF, cancer diagnosis may not add a predictive role for in-hospital CVA beyond the CHADS2VASc score.

Early versus delayed coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Although coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has been proven to have mortality and morbidity benefits in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, the appropriate timing of this procedure remains unclear. Therefore, we proposed a propensity score-matched analysis comparing the clinical outcomes between patients who underwent CABG within the first 48 h of admission (early CABG) and patients who underwent CABG after 48 h of admission (delayed CABG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the largest inpatient care database in the USA, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction using the ICD 9-DM diagnosis codes. We then performed propensity score-matching analysis to control for 24 possible confounders. RESULTS: We identified 31 969 patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction who underwent CABG. The mean age of the cohort was 64.5±11.5 years and 33.4% were female. After performing propensity-matching analysis, we obtained a subset of 1555 patients in each group, with a mean age of 64.7±10.1 years; the male to female ratio was ~4 : 1. The incidence of hemorrhage, shock, and cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications was comparable between the two groups. The incidence of mortality was not statistically significant between the two groups (2% in the early CABG vs. 1.8% in the delayed CABG, P=0.695). The mortality risk factors were as follows: age more than 70 years [odds ratio (OR): 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.85-6.34, P<0.001]; cardiogenic shock (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.35-7.67, P=0.008); and mechanical circulatory support with balloon counterpulsation (OR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.45-5.90, P=0.003). CONCLUSION: CABG performed within 48 h of admission does not significantly increase the risk for in-hospital mortality compared with undergoing the procedure after 48 h of admission in propensity-matched patients.

Impact of Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (From the National Inpatient Sample Database).

Left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion is performed by some surgeons in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this procedure remains mixed. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Survey Database for the 10-year period from 2004 to 2013. Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes, we identified patients who had a diagnosis of AF and underwent a primary procedure of CABG with or without LAA exclusion. We then performed a 1:5 matching based on the CHA2DS2VASc score between patients who got LAA exclusion and those who did not (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital cerebrovascular events, whereas the secondary outcomes included in-hospital bleeding events, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, postoperative shock, and mortality. Our analysis included a total of 15,114 patients. Patients who underwent LAA exclusion had significantly less incidence of cerebrovascular events (2.0% vs 3.1%, p = 0.002). However, LAA exclusion group had higher incidences of bleeding events (36.4% vs 21.3%, p <0.001), pericardial effusion (2.7% vs 1.2%, p <0.001), cardiac tamponade (0.6% vs 0.2%, p <0.001), and postoperative shock (1.2% vs 0.4%, p <0.001). LAA exclusion was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (1.6% vs 0.3%, p <0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that LAA exclusion was significantly associated with lower cerebrovascular accident events and higher in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, LAA exclusion in patients with AF undergoing CABG might be associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital cerebrovascular events. This benefit is offset by a higher incidence of higher bleeding events, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, postoperative shock, and in-hospital mortality.

Use of adenosine to shorten the post ablation waiting period for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: Dormant conduction unmasked by adenosine predicts clinical recurrences of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter following catheter ablation. Conventional practice involves a waiting period of 20 to 30 minutes after achievement of a bidirectional line of block (BDB) to monitor for recovery of conduction. OBJECTIVE: Assess whether abolition of dormant conduction with adenosine immediately after CTI ablation and BDB can predict the lack of CTI conduction recovery during the following 30 minutes. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for CTI-dependent atrial flutter were studied. Following the completion of CTI ablation and documentation of BDB, adenosine (≥12 mg IV) was administered immediately. In cases of dormant conduction, the CTI was ablated again until its abolition. After the achievement of BDB without dormant conduction, spontaneous CTI reconnection during the following 30 minutes and dormant conduction with adenosine at 30 minutes were evaluated. RESULTS: A CTI block was achieved in 171 patients. Nine patients (5.3%) had dormant conduction across the CTI immediately after ablation and BDB, and required further ablation. Two patients (1.2%) had subsequent spontaneous time-dependent reconnection within 30 minutes. Two other patients (1.2%) developed late dormant conduction with adenosine at 30 minutes. All 4 patients underwent further ablation. CONCLUSION: A negative adenosine challenge immediately after CTI ablation with bidirectional block, or after abolition of dormant conduction with further ablation, strongly predicted the absence of subsequent spontaneous reconnection within 30 minutes. Based on these results, the conventional waiting period is unnecessary in 97.6% patients without dormant conduction after CTI-dependent flutter ablation.

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Underwent Valvular Heart Surgery (from the National Inpatient Sample Database).

Left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion is a commonly performed procedure to reduce the embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent cardiac surgeries. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes of LAA exclusion in patients with AF who underwent valvular heart surgeries. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database from 1998 to 2013 for patients with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification, diagnosis codes for AF and underwent any valvular heart surgery. We then performed a case-control matching based on the CHA2DS2VASc score for those who underwent LAA exclusion versus those who did not. Primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital cerebrovascular events, whereas the secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, and bleeding. Our analysis included 1,304 patients. Patients who underwent LAA exclusion had significantly less incidence of cerebrovascular events (2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.04), in-hospital death (1.5% vs 4.9%, p = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (10.5 vs 12.9 days, p <0.01). The LAA exclusion cohort had more incidence of pericardial effusion (1.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.04) but no difference in bleeding events (p = 0.55). In conclusion, in patients with AF who underwent valvular surgeries, LAA exclusion may be associated with lower in-hospital cerebrovascular events and mortality and shorter hospital stay.