Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 37: 183-187, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432804

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures are one of the most common lower extremity fractures. After surgery, the ankle joint is often immobilized in a plantar flexion position, and there have been many reported cases of limited ankle joint range of motion. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of regular massage interventions on ankle joint range of motion after removal of fixation. METHODS: The massage group comprised 30 patients who had sustained an ankle fracture and had undergone surgical fixation, physical therapy, and massage between November 2020 and March 2022. These subjects received a 3-min massage twice daily, five times a week. The control group consisted of 38 patients who had sustained an ankle fracture between January 2015 and September 2020 and had undergone surgical fixation as well as regular physical therapy. RESULTS: The respective ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ranges of motion after cast removal were 2.50 ± 7.2° and 42.3 ± 7.2° in the massage group and -8.62 ± 2.9° and 34.8 ± 8.3° in the control group. An unpaired t-test showed that the ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ranges of motion in the massage group were significantly greater than those in the control group (p = 0.036 and p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that regular 3-min massage interventions of the plantar flexors could prevent the progression of a range of motion limitations in postoperative patients with an ankle fracture more effectively than regular physical therapy alone.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo , Humanos , Fraturas do Tornozelo/terapia , Massagem , Articulação do Tornozelo , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Músculos
2.
J Orthop Sci ; 2023 Oct 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37838597

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psychosexual factors are one of the preoperative factors influencing acute postoperative pain. Because of gender differences in pain, the preoperative factors that influence acute postoperative pain may also differ between males and females. However, there have been no reports on such factors in patients with spinal disorders that focused on gender differences. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the preoperative factors that influence acute postoperative pain, focusing on gender differences. METHODS: The subjects were 75 males and 60 females admitted for surgery for lumbar spinal disorders. Preoperatively, the following were assessed: low back pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); anxiety and depression using the Japanese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); catastrophic thinking using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS); psychiatric problems using the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP); and neurological assessments. Acute postoperative pain was also assessed using the NRS within 48 h, postoperatively. Based on these data, we analyzed gender differences in preoperative factors affecting acute postoperative pain in patients with lumbar spinal disorders. RESULTS: Postoperative NRS and preoperative PCS scores were higher in females compared to males. In the males, the coefficient of determination of the multiple regression equation was 0.088, and PCS (ß = 0.323, p = 0.015) was extracted as a significant factor. In the females, the coefficient of determination of the multiple regression equation was 0.075, and BS-POP (ß = 0.300, p = 0.019) was extracted as a significant factor. CONCLUSION: Preoperative factors influencing acute postoperative pain for patients with lumbar spinal disorders vary by gender. It was suggested that males should be screened using PCS. In females, on the other hand, PCS alone is not sufficient for evaluation. It was suggested that evaluation using BS-POP should be considered in addition to PCS.

3.
Foot Ankle Orthop ; 8(1): 24730114231154211, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36817021

RESUMO

Background: Treatment of osteonecrosis of the talus is challenging. Nonoperative management includes nonweightbearing treatment. Various types of hindfoot fusion procedures have been performed, but delayed union and shortening of the operated leg have reportedly occurred. In contrast, talar body prosthesis is a surgical procedure with potential that relieves pain, restores ankle joint function, and is not associated with leg-length discrepancy. The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative pain, clinical outcomes, activities of daily living (ADL), and quality of life (QOL) after total talar replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the talus. Methods: Ten ankles in 10 patients with idiopathic osteonecrosis of the talus who were treated with a total talar replacement between 2007 and 2015 were included in the investigation. Scores according to the visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle-hindfoot scale, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) were assessed. Results: The VAS score significantly improved from a mean of 80 ± 8 points before surgery to 18 ± 22 points after surgery (P < .01). The JSSF ankle-hindfoot scale score significantly improved from a mean of 53 ± 12 points before surgery to 89 ± 7 points after surgery (P < .01). The FIM score significantly improved from a mean of 122 ± 1 points before surgery to 125 ± 1 points after surgery (P < .01). The mean postoperative SAFE-Q scores were as follows: 81 ± 10.3 points for pain, 78 ± 14.7 points for physical function, 90 ± 12.4 points for social function, and 83 ± 15.4 points for shoe-related. Conclusion: Total talar replacement is a useful treatment for patients with osteonecrosis of the talus. This replacement surgery preserves the function of the ankle and subtalar joints, and improves pain, ADL, and QOL. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA