Endosutured aneurysm repair (ESAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms with short necks achieves acceptable mid-term outcomes - results from the PERU registry.

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to describe midterm outcomes following treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with short necks by endosutured aneurysm repair (ESAR) using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor system. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from nine vascular surgery departments between June 2010 - December 2019, including treated AAAs with neck lengths ≤ 10mm. The decision for the use of EndoAnchors was made by the treating surgeon or multidisciplinary aortic committee according to each centre's practice. There were two subgroups further assessed according to neck length, A (≥4 and < 7mm) and B (≥7 and ≤10mm). The main outcomes analysed were technical success, freedom from type Ia endoleaks (TIaEL), sac size increase, all-cause (ACM) and aneurysm related mortality (ARM). RESULTS: 76 patients were included in the study, 17 fell into Subgroup A and 59 into subgroup B. Median follow-up for the cohort was 40.5 (IQR 12-61) months. A median of 6 (IQR 3) EndoAnchors were deployed in each subject. Technical success was 86.8% for the total group, 82.4% and 88.1% (p=0.534) for subgroups A and B respectively. Six out of ten (60%) of TIaELs at the completion angiographies showed spontaneous resolution. Cumulative freedom from TIaEL at 3 and 5 years for the total group was 89% and 84% respectively; this was 93% and 74% for subgroup A and 88% at both intervals in subgroup B (p=0.545). In total, there were 7 (9.2%) patients presenting with type Ia endoleaks over the entire study period. Two (11.8%) in subgroup A and 5 (8.5%) in subgroup B (p=0.679). There were more patients with sac regression in subgroup B (subgroup A=6 - 35.3% versus subgroup B=34 - 57.6%, p=0.230) with no statistical significance. ACM was 19 (25%) patients, with no difference (4 - 23.5% versus 15 - 25.4%, p=0.874) between subgroups; whereas ARM occurred in one patient from subgroup A and 3 from subgroup B. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates reasonable outcomes for patients with short-necked AAAs treated by ESAR in terms of type Ia endoleaks up to 5 year follow up. EndoAnchor use should be judiciously evaluated in short necks and may be a reasonable option when anatomical constraints are encountered, mainly for those with 7-10mm neck lengths. Shorter neck length aspects, as indicated by the results from Group A, may be an alternative when no other options are available or feasible.

Wound healing and hernia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - Onlay self-gripping polyester mesh reinforcement compared with small bite sutured closure.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic mesh implantation following open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a debatable subject. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a self-gripping polyester mesh used in on-lay technique to prevent incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 495 patients who underwent aortic surgery between May 2017 and May 2021. Patients included in the study underwent open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with closure of the abdominal wall with either small bite suture technique or prophylactic mesh reinforcement. Primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of incisional hernia during a two-year follow-up period. Secondary endpoints were mesh-related complications. RESULTS: Mesh implantation with the on-lay technique was successful in all cases. No patient in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia during the 24-month follow-up period. Two patients in the non-mesh group developed a symptomatic incisional hernia during the follow-up period at 6 months. Three cases of post-operative access site complications were observed in the mesh group. CONCLUSIONS: Application of a self-gripping polyester mesh using the on-lay technique demonstrates acceptable early-durability after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, it appears to be associated with a number of post-operative access site complications.

Sex disparities in popliteal artery aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Only 5% of patients with popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are female. Evidence on PAA treatment and outcomes in women is therefore scarce. The POPART Registry provides one of Europe's largest data collections regarding PAA treatment. Data on clinical presentation, aneurysm morphology, and perioperative outcomes after open surgical PAA repair in women will be presented. METHODS: POPART is a multicenter, noninterventional registry for open and endovascular PAA repair, with 42 participating centers in Germany and Luxembourg. All patients aged >18 years who have been treated for PAA since 2010 are eligible for study inclusion. Data collection is based on an online electronic case report form. RESULTS: Of the 1236 PAAs, 58 (4.8%) were in women. There were no significant differences in age or cardiopulmonary comorbidities. However, female patients had a lower prevalence of contralateral PAAs and abdominal aortic aneurysms (P < .05). PAAs in women were more likely to be symptomatic before surgery (65.5% vs 49.4%; P = .017), with 19% of women presenting with acute limb ischemia (vs 11%; P = .067). Women had smaller aneurysm diameters than men (22.5 mm vs 27 mm; P = .004) and became symptomatic at smaller diameters (20 mm vs 26 mm; P = .002). Only 8.6% of women and 11.6% of men underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (P > .05); therefore, the perioperative outcome analysis focused on open surgical repair. In total, 23.5% of women and 16.9% of men developed perioperative complications (P > .05). There were no differences in major cardiovascular events (P > .05), but women showed a higher incidence of impaired wound healing (15.7% vs 7.2%; P = .05) and major amputation (5.9% vs 1.1%; P = .027). Female sex was significantly associated with the need for nonvascular reinterventions within 30 days after surgery (odds ratio: 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.88), whereas no significant differences in the odds for vascular reinterventions were observed (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-5.77). In the multiple logistic regression model, female sex, symptomatic PAAs, poor quality of outflow vessels, and graft material other than vein graft were independently associated with perioperative reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: Women have smaller PAAs, are more likely to be symptomatic before treatment, and are more often affected by nonvascular reinterventions in the perioperative course. As our understanding of aneurysmatic diseases in women continues to expand, sex-specific treatment strategies and screening options for women in well-selected cohorts with modified screening protocols should be continuously re-evaluated.

Influence of Patient Anatomy on Intraoperative Radiation Exposure and Operation Time during Standard EVAR.

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is the primary treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). To optimise patient safety during the standard EVAR procedure, we aimed to investigate the influence of patient anatomy on intraoperative radiation exposure and surgical time. This retrospective study comprised 90 patients (mean age 73.4 ± 8.2 years; 92.2% male) with an infrarenal aortic aneurysm who underwent a standard EVAR procedure. The relationships between dose area product, operating time, and anatomical conditions were investigated in preoperative computed tomography angiography using open-source software. Logistic regression analysis indicated that only body mass index (BMI) had predictive value for radiation exposure. The accuracy of the model was 98.67%, with an area under the curve of 0.72. The duration of surgery was significantly correlated with an increased BMI (odds ratio (OR) = 1.183; p < 0.05), the tortuosity of AAAs (OR = 1.124; p < 0.05), and the left common iliac artery (OR = 1.028; p < 0.05). Thus, BMI impacts the prediction of intraoperative radiation exposure more significantly than the anatomical characteristics of the infrarenal aorta and iliac arteries, and the duration of surgery significantly correlates with both BMI and the tortuosity of the infrarenal aorta and iliac arteries.

Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Intervention in Patients With Connective Tissue Disease.

Importance: Endovascular treatment is not recommended for aortic pathologies in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) other than in redo operations and as bridging procedures in emergencies. However, recent developments in endovascular technology may challenge this dogma. Objective: To assess the midterm outcomes of endovascular aortic repair in patients with CTD. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this descriptive retrospective study, data on demographics, interventions, and short-term and midterm outcomes were collected from 18 aortic centers in Europe, Asia, North America, and New Zealand. Patients with CTD who had undergone endovascular aortic repair from 2005 to 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to November 2022. Exposure: All principal endovascular aortic repairs, including redo surgery and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta. Main Outcomes and Measures: Short-term and midterm survival, rates of secondary procedures, and conversion to open repair. Results: In total, 171 patients were included: 142 with Marfan syndrome, 17 with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 12 with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS). Median (IQR) age was 49.9 years (37.9-59.0), and 107 patients (62.6%) were male. One hundred fifty-two (88.9%) were treated for aortic dissections and 19 (11.1%) for degenerative aneurysms. One hundred thirty-six patients (79.5%) had undergone open aortic surgery before the index endovascular repair. In 74 patients (43.3%), arch and/or visceral branches were included in the repair. Primary technical success was achieved in 168 patients (98.2%), and 30-day mortality was 2.9% (5 patients). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 96.2% and 80.6% for Marfan syndrome, 93.8% and 85.2% for Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 75.0% and 43.8% for vEDS, respectively. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 years (1.9-9.2), 91 patients (53.2%) had undergone secondary procedures, of which 14 (8.2%) were open conversions. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that endovascular aortic interventions, including redo procedures and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta, in patients with CTD had a high rate of early technical success, low perioperative mortality, and a midterm survival rate comparable with reports of open aortic surgery in patients with CTD. The rate of secondary procedures was high, but few patients required conversion to open repair. Improvements in devices and techniques, as well as ongoing follow-up, may result in endovascular treatment for patients with CTD being included in guideline recommendations.

Uterine Leiomyomas and Infertility: A Comparison of National and International Guidelines.

Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of the female genital track, causing various symptoms and problems, including a possible impact on fertility. The relationship between fibroids and infertility has long been a debate among gynecologists. Management of fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained infertility worldwide lacks standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Therefore, a review of guidelines from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français, and the American Society of Reproductive Medicine was conducted. There is agreement among all guidelines that the effect of fibroids on fertility is related to their position in the uterus and the alteration of the endometrial cavity. However, whether surgical intervention (laparotomy, laparoscopy, or hysteroscopy) is required varies among committees. More specifically, for submucous myomas, all guidelines agree that surgical intervention is needed. On the other hand, regarding intramural myomas, there is no consensus on what the approach may be. Novel treatments such as uterine artery embolization (UAE) and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) should only be used in clinical trial settings. Nevertheless, all guidelines agree that medical management of fibroids further delays efforts to conceive and has no role as a stand-alone treatment of fibroids; though, the use of GnRH analogues preoperatively can be useful to improve anemia and/or reduce fibroid volume. There is a need for updated international protocols to be introduced, in order to help clinicians dealing with fibroids and infertility to better suggest the optimal treatment.

The Ongoing Evolution of Abdominal Aortic Surgery.

Abdominal aortic surgery has witnessed significant paradigm shifts in recent years with the introduction of structured screening programs, as well as the evolution of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), which has allowed physicians to promptly identify and successfully treat an increasing number of patients, even including those previously considered unfit for open repair [...].

Revascularization of occluded renal artery stent grafts after complex endovascular aortic repair and its impact on renal function.

BACKGROUND: Acute occlusion of renal bridging stent grafts after fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) is an acknowledged complication with high morbidity that often results in chronic dialysis dependence. The feasibility and effect of timely or late (≥6 hours of ischemia) renal artery revascularization has not been adequately reported. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study across 11 tertiary institutions of all consecutive patients who had undergone revascularization of renal artery stent graft occlusions after complex EVAR. The end points were technical success, association between ischemia time and renal function salvage, interventional complications, mortality, and mid-term outcomes. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2019, 38 patients with 46 target vessels (TVs; eight bilateral occlusions) were treated for renal artery occlusions after complex EVAR (mean age, 63.5 ± 10 years; 63.2% male). Six patients had a solitary kidney (15.8%). Of the 38 patients, 16 (42.1%) had undergone FEVAR and 22 (57.9%) had undergone BEVAR. The technical success rate was 95.7% (44 of 46 TVs). The recanalization technique used was sole aspiration thrombectomy in 5.3%, aspiration thrombectomy and stent graft relining in 52.6%, and sole stent graft relining in 36.8%. The median renal ischemia time was 27.5 hours (range, 4-720 hours; interquartile range, 4-36 hours). Most patients (94.4%) had been treated after ≥6 hours of renal ischemia time, and 55.6% had been treated after 24 hours. In 14 patients (36.8%), renal function had improved after intervention (mean glomerular filtration rate improvement, 14.2 ± 9 mL/min/1.73 m2). However, 24 patients (63.2%) showed no improvement. Improvement of renal function did not correlate with the length of renal ischemia time. Of the 14 patients with bilateral renal artery occlusion or a solitary kidney, 9 experienced partial recovery of renal function and no longer required hemodialysis. In-hospital mortality was 2.6%. The cause of renal stent graft occlusion could not be identified in 50% of the TVs (23 of 46). However, in 19 (41.3%), significant stenosis or a kink of the renal stent graft was found. The median follow-up was 11 months (interquartile range, 0-28 months). The estimated 1-year patient survival and patency rate of the renal stent grafts was 97.4% and 83.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization of occluded renal bridging stent grafts after F/B-EVAR is a safe and feasible technique and can lead to significant improvement of renal function, even after long ischemia times (>24 hours) of the renal parenchyma or bilateral occlusion, as long as residual perfusion of the renal parenchyma has been preserved. Also, the long-term patency rates justify aggressive management of renal artery occlusion after F/B-EVAR.

Midterm Results after Open Surgical and Endovascular Management of Arterioureteral Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Arterioureteral fistula refers to the anomalous fistulous connection between the iliac artery and the ureter. It is often associated with pelvic malignancy, abdominal surgery, and radiation. As it is a potentially life-threatening condition, prompt diagnosis and management is essential. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated for arterioureteral fistula in a single-vascular institution from January 2013 to March 2019. Preoperative assessment included physical and laboratory examinations and medical history, with diagnosis established through computed tomography angiography, digital subtraction angiography, or ureteroscopy. Parameters analyzed included perioperative mortality and morbidity as well as treatment durability during midterm follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients with ten arterioureteral fistulas were included in the study. Macroscopic hematuria was the main presenting symptom, with 2 patients admitted due to hemorrhagic shock. Endovascular treatment was carried out in 6 patients. In 4 cases, single stent-graft deployment inside the common iliac artery was performed, in one case in combination with plugging of the internal iliac artery. One patient underwent implantation of an iliac-branched device, whereas in another patient coiling of the internal iliac artery sufficed for management of the fistula. Open surgical repair was carried out in three cases. Perioperative mortality was zero; one patient had prolonged hospital stay due to superficial wound infection. Recurrent hematuria and stent-graft infection were observed during follow-up in three patients after endovascular repair, all of them treated through open surgery with no further complications. One patient developed an enterocutaneous fistula after open repair during follow-up and required redo surgery. DISCUSSION: Arterioureteral fistula is a challenging clinical scenario demanding prompt diagnosis and management. Open surgery remains the treatment of choice in cases of preexisting vascular reconstruction or manifest infection. Endovascular techniques offer a viable solution in significantly comorbid patients or in patients presenting with acute, life-threatening bleeding. Rigorous follow-up is required regardless of treatment modality due to the considerable rate of reinterventions.

Mid-Term Results of Fenestrated/Branched Stent Grafting to Treat Post-dissection Thoraco-abdominal Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Patients surviving acute aortic dissection are at risk of developing a post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (PD-TAAA) during follow up, regardless of the type of treatment in the acute setting. Fenestrated and branched stent grafting (F/B-TEVAR) has been used with success to treat PD-TAAA, albeit reported only with short-term results. The aim of this study was to report mid-term results in a cohort of 71 patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database including all patients with PD-TAAAs who underwent F/B-TEVAR within the period January 2010 - April 2017 at two vascular institutions experienced in endovascular techniques. RESULTS: A total of 71 consecutive patients (56 male, mean age 63.8 ± 10.6 years) were treated. Technical success was achieved in 68/71 (95.8%) patients. In hospital mortality was four (5.6%) patients. Peri-operative morbidity was 19.6%. Three (4.2%) patients developed severe spinal cord ischaemia, one of these patients 12 months post-operatively. Mean follow up was 25.3 months (1-77 months). Cumulative survival rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 84.7 ± 4.5%, 80.7 ± 5.1%, and 70.0 ± 6.7%, respectively. Estimated freedom from re-intervention at 12, 24, and 36 months was 80.7 ± 5.3%, 63.0 ± 6.9%, and 52.6 ± 8.0%, respectively. The main reasons for re-intervention were endoleak from visceral/renal arteries and iliac endoleak requiring extension. Target vessel occlusion occurred in 8/261 (3.1%) vessels (renal artery n = 4; superior mesenteric artery n = 2; coeliac artery n = 2). Mean aneurysm sac regression during follow up was 9.2 ± 8.8 mm, with a false lumen thrombosis rate of 85.4% for patients with a follow up longer than 12 months. No ruptures occurred during follow up. CONCLUSION: F/B-TEVAR for post-dissection TAAA is feasible and associated with low peri-operative mortality and peri-operative morbidity. Mid-term results demonstrate a high rate of aneurysm sac regression. Rigorous follow up is required because of the significant re-intervention rate. Longer bridging covered stents for target vessels are advised.

[Management of Visceral Artery Aneurysms with Preservation of Organ Perfusion: More Than Twenty Years Experience]. / Management von Viszeralarterienaneurysmen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Organperfusion ­ Erfahrungen über mehr als 20 Jahre.

BACKGROUND: Visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) are rare and often incidental findings. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients, pseudoaneurysms and a true aneurysm of diameter of ≥ 2.5 cm for mesenteric arteries and ≥ 3 cm for renal artery aneurysms. Pregnancy and liver transplantation play an important role in aneurysm rupture. Technical success after open or endovascular procedure and maintenance of organ perfusion are crucial. The aim of this review is to evaluate our data and experience of more than 20 years and to develop a strategy to deal with visceral artery aneurysm in elective and emergency cases. PATIENTS: Between 1995 and 2018, 179 patients (84 males, 95 females, median age 62 [18 - 87] years) were diagnosed with VAA at the Regensburg University Hospital. The site of aneurysm was the splenic artery in 113 (63%) patients (pts), hepatic and renal arteries in 22 and 21 pts (12% each), and gastropancreaticoduodenal artery in 14 (8%) and superior/inferior mesenteric artery in 9 (5%) cases. Surveillance without intervention occurred in 110 (62%) pts, and 34 (19%) pts underwent open and 35 (19%) endovascular repair. In all patients, preoperative imaging was performed, preferably by computed tomography angiography (CTA). RESULTS: A total of 69 patients underwent open or endovascular repair. 51 (74%) pts were treated electively, 18 (26%) pts presented urgently with acute bleeding. 16 emergency pts received endovascular treatment, and in 2 pts open surgery was performed. After emergency treatment, two pts exhibited segmental liver malperfusion without consequences. In one case, segmental bowel resection was necessary. 32/51 (63%) patients were treated electively by open surgery, 19/51 (37%) by endovascular procedures. There were no liver or bowel infarctions. Four splenectomies and one unilateral nephrectomy were necessary in patients with splenic or renal artery aneurysms. Moreover, three partial renal infarctions were noticed postoperatively (overall 8/21 [38%]). After endovascular repair of splenic or renal artery aneurysms, two cases of splenic and three cases of renal segmental infarction were observed. Splenectomy had to be performed twice (overall 7/14 [50%]). Organ perfusion was monitored by CTA, and preferentially by contrast enhanced ultrasound. CONCLUSION: The endovascular approach is the preferred option in an emergency to control bleeding in pseudoaneurysms. Patients for elective splenic or renal artery aneurysm repair have to be evaluated very carefully to achieve technical success with occlusion of the aneurysm and excellent organ perfusion. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound, especially CEUS, are strongly recommended in postoperative follow-up. Partial or complete splenic infarction leads to vaccination.

Techniques and outcomes of secondary endovascular repair for postdissection TAA/TAAA.

Postdissection aortic aneurysms (PDAA) affect 20-40% of patients with aortic dissection. Open repair remains the first line therapy of PDAA, but is still associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Endovascular repair is increasingly being used as a less invasive treatment option. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) covering only the proximal entry tear has proven to be insufficient in most patients with chronic PDAA and has a limited role only for PDAA with distal sealing zone in the thoracic aorta. In PDAA extending to the thoracoabdominal aorta, a more complex repair is needed to achieve aneurysm exclusion. Fenestrated and branched stent-grafts have been used lately in some expert centres to treat PDAA of the thoracoabdominal aorta with good preliminary results despite the technical difficulties in these patients (narrow true lumen, stiff chronic dissection flap, target vessels that originate from the false lumen [FL]). A subset of patients with aneurysmal degeneration mainly in the descending thoracic aorta, can be treated with TEVAR landing proximal to the celiac artery along with adjuvant techniques such as coils, plugs, glue or "Candy-Plug" and "Knickerbocker" concepts to occlude the FL, preventing retrograde flow and reducing the pressure in the aneurysm. Other options that have been used in limited numbers of patients with PDAA include the PETTICOAT (provisional extension to induce complete attachment) and STABILISE (Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair) techniques. This article aims to review the outcomes of different endovascular techniques and strategies available for the repair of PDAA.

Comparison of outcomes for double fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus triple or quadruple fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared outcomes of standard fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (St-FEVAR) with renal artery fenestrations only with more complex FEVAR (Co-FEVAR) with additional fenestrations for the superior mesenteric artery or the celiac trunk, or both. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with FEVAR for short-necked, juxtarenal, or suprarenal aortic aneurysms between January 2010 and July 2016 were included. Patients with stent grafts with a combination of fenestrations and branches were excluded. Data were collected prospectively. All stent grafts used were customized based on the Zenith system (William A. Cook Australia, Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia). RESULTS: A total of 384 patients (345 men; mean age, 72.7 ± 7.8 years) were treated. St-FEVAR was used in 199 patients (51.8%) and Co-FEVAR in 185 (48.2%), including 30 patients with a quadruple FEVAR. Overall technical success was 373 of 384 (97.1%), and the difference between the St-FEVAR group (195 of 199 [98%]) and the Co-FEVAR group (178 of 185 [96.2%]) was not statistically significant (P = .37). Mean operative time was 135 ± 46 minutes for St-FEVAR and 176 ± 53 minutes for Co-FEVAR (P < .001). Mean fluoroscopy time was 45 ± 17 minutes for St-FEVAR and 57 ± 21 minutes for Co-FEVAR (P < .001). Overall 30-day mortality was two of 384 (0.5%), and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (St-FEVAR: 1 of 199 [0.5%] vs Co-FEVAR: 1 of 185 [0.5%]; P = 1.0). Major perioperative complications between St-FEVAR group (22 of 199 [11.1%]) and Co-FEVAR group (24 of 185 [13%]) were similar (P = .64). Mean follow-up was 20 ± 17.1 months. Estimated survival at 1 and 3 years was 95% ± 1.7% and 83.4% ± 3.6% for St-FEVAR vs 94% ± 2.4% and 89.4% ± 3.5%, respectively, for Co-FEVAR (P = .96). Estimated freedom from reintervention at 1 and 3 years was 97.9% ± 1.2% and 90.5% ± 3.1% for St-FEVAR vs 95.4% ± 2.0% and 89.1% ± 4.2%, respectively, for Co-FEVAR (P = .5). Estimated target vessel patency at 1 and 3 years was 99.2% ± 0.4% and 98.6.0% ± 0.6% for St-FEVAR vs 98.6% ± 0.6% and 97.9% ± 0.9%, respectively, for Co-FEVAR (P = .48). CONCLUSIONS: Co-FEVAR is not associated with an increase in perioperative mortality and morbidity compared with St-FEVAR. Co-FEVAR requires longer procedure and fluoroscopy duration, but technical success rates are as high as in St-FEVAR. A liberal use of Co-FEVAR is therefore justified whenever a longer and higher proximal sealing zone is needed.

Incomplete Expansion of Chimney Stent Graft during Chimney-Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: To report a technical complication during a chimney-thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (Ch-TEVAR) procedure. METHODS: A 77-year-old female patient underwent Ch-TEVAR for a symptomatic thoracic aortic aneurysm with a short and angulated proximal neck. Deployment of the aortic stent graft over the left subclavian artery (LSA) was followed by placement of a balloon-expandable covered stent as a chimney for the LSA. RESULTS: Chimney deployment failed due to balloon perforation. Additional attempts with several balloons all failed, albeit gaining some additional expansion of the chimney stent graft. The technical complication was solved by deploying a self-expanding bare stent inside the chimney stent. This enabled additional ballooning and further expansion of the chimney stent graft leading to an acceptable end result. CONCLUSIONS: Ch-TEVAR with a balloon-expandable chimney stent graft can be complicated by incomplete chimney deployment due to balloon perforation. Relining of the chimney stent graft with a self-expanding stent improved the deployment with acceptable patency.

Hybrid Treatment of a Suprarenal Aortic Aneurysm with an Infrarenal Aortobifemoral Surgical Graft and a Fenestrated Stent Graft.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report a hybrid technique for the treatment of a suprarenal aortic aneurysm (SAA) in a patient with iliac occlusive disease. Initially, an infrarenal aortobifemoral surgical graft was implanted, followed by deployment of a fenestrated bifurcated stent graft at the suprarenal part of the aorta. METHODS: A 69-year-old man presented with a 51-mm saccular suprarenal aortic aneurysm and iliac occlusive disease with intermittent claudication. Both common iliac arteries had been previously treated with kissing stents. Both external iliac arteries were severely stenosed precluding a total endovascular approach. RESULTS: The patient was treated with an infrarenal aortobifemoral surgical graft, facilitating the implantation of a custom-made fenestrated stent graft with fenestrations for the renal arteries and the superior mesenteric artery and a scallop for the celiac artery. The procedure was uneventful. Postoperative computed tomography angiography confirmed complete exclusion of the aneurysm and patent target vessels. Postoperatively, the patient did not report claudication symptoms anymore. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid approach is a viable alternative to treat patients with complex aortic aneurysms and simultaneous peripheral occlusive disease, otherwise excluded from fenestrated stent grafting due to unsuitable access vessels.

Treatment algorithms for patients with (sub)acute type B aortic dissections.

Aortic dissection is the most common acute aortic syndrome and constitutes a potentially catastrophic cardiovascular condition. Traditionally, complicated acute type B dissection has been considered an indication for surgical treatment, whereas patients with uncomplicated dissection have been treated medically. In recent years, there has been a clear paradigm shift towards endovascular treatment of complicated type B dissection. This is founded in numerous reviews and meta-analyses demonstrating a lower perioperative mortality and morbidity for TEVAR in comparison to open surgical repair. In uncomplicated patients, treatment options are still a matter of debate. Best medical therapy shows acceptable early results with respect to in-hospital mortality and morbidity but fails to address the issue of late aortic expansion and aortic-related adverse events in a significant number of patients. There is increasing evidence that early TEVAR promotes false lumen thrombosis, induces remodeling of the aortic wall and should be considered preventively in selected patients with suitable anatomy. This report gives an overview of current literature on treatment options and optimal time of intervention, and finally proposes a treatment algorithm for acute type B aortic dissection.

Radiation exposure to eye lens and operator hands during endovascular procedures in hybrid operating rooms.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiation exposure of vascular surgeons' eye lens and fingers during complex endovascular procedures in modern hybrid operating rooms. METHODS: Prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study design. One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients (138 male; median age, 72.5 years [interquartile range, 65-77 years]) underwent an endovascular procedure in a hybrid operating room between March 2012 and July 2013 in two vascular centers. The dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, operating time, and amount of contrast dye were registered prospectively. For radiation dose recordings, single-use dosimeters were attached at eye level and to the ring finger of the hand next to the radiation field of the operator for each endovascular procedure. Dose recordings were evaluated by an independent institution. Before the study, precursory investigations were obtained to simulate the radiation dose to eye lens and fingers with an Alderson phantome (RSD, Long Beach, Calif). RESULTS: Interventions were classified into six treatment categories: endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aneurysm (n = 65), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 32), branched endovascular aortic repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysms (n = 17), fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm, (n = 25), iliac branched device (n = 8), and peripheral interventions (n = 24). There was a significant correlation in DAP between both lens (P < .01; r = 0.55) and finger (P < .01; r = 0.56) doses. The estimated fluoroscopy time to reach a radiation threshold of 20 mSv/y was 1404.10 minutes (90% confidence limit, 1160, 1650 minutes). According to correlation of the lens dose with the DAP an estimated cumulative DAP of 932,000 mGy/m(2) (90% confidence limit, 822,000, 1,039,000) would be critical for a threshold of 20 mSv/y for the eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation protection is a serious issue for vascular surgeons because most complex endovascular procedures are delivering measurable radiation to the eyes. With the correlation of the DAP obtained in standard endovascular procedures a critical threshold of 20 mSv/y to the eyes can be predicted and thus an estimate of a potential harmful exposure to the eyes can be obtained.

Spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated and branched stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the incidence and associated risk factors of perioperative spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with fenestrated and branched stent grafts. METHODS: The study included consecutive patients with TAAA treated with fenestrated and branched stent grafts within the period January 2004 to December 2014. Suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with fenestrated and branched grafts, even if including all four visceral vessels, were excluded. Patients who died within 30 days after the procedure were excluded from the analysis for SCI. All data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients (167 men; mean age, 68.8 ± 7.5 years) were treated. Thirty-day mortality was 17 patients (7.8%). TAAA distribution among the 201 surviving patients was as follows: type I, n = 17 (8.5%); type II, n = 55 (27.4%); type III, n = 63 (31.3%); type IV, n = 54 (26.9%); and type V, n = 12 (5.9%). In the surviving patients, 21 (10.4%) developed perioperative SCI. At 30 days postoperatively, 13 (6.5%) of those patients had transient lower limb weakness, 5 patients (2.5%) had persistent lower limb weakness requiring assistance to stand or to walk, and 3 patients (1.5%) had persistent paraplegia. Five of the 21 patients awoke from anesthesia with a neurologic deficit. The remaining 16 patients had a later postoperative onset of SCI, with the majority of them (14 of 16) within 72 hours after the operation. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression identified operation time >300 minutes (odds ratio [OR], 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-21.1; P < .001), peripheral arterial disease (OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 2-21.9; P = .002), and baseline renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min; OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.1-16.1; P = .04) as independent risk factors for SCI. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, most SCI events after endovascular TAAA repair are transient, with persistent paraplegia being rare. Patients with prolonged procedure duration, peripheral arterial disease, and baseline renal insufficiency appear to be at higher risk for development of SCI after endovascular TAAA repair.

Endovascular management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms.

Open repair is still the gold standard in acute type A dissection. Endovascular repair is advocated for complicated acute type B dissections. Recent evidence also supports the role of endovascular repair in a larger proportion of uncomplicated acute type B dissections. The role of endovascular repair in chronic post-dissection aneurysms, however, is still unclear. Most commonly, post-dissection aneurysms involve the thoracoabdominal aorta, making the use of fenestrated/branched stent-grafts to achieve complete aneurysm exclusion mandatory. These fenestrated/branched stent-grafts have been used with success in atherosclerotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). In chronic post-dissection aneurysms, however, additional technical challenges arise. The usually narrow true lumen makes the use of branches more tedious and overall planning difficult. A second technical challenge relates to the fact that visceral branches can also originate from the false lumen. In such cases, perforation of the stiff chronic dissection flap is required to obtain access to the vessel. During the period January 2010 to November 2013, 17 patients (13 males, mean age 65±7.8 years) with chronic thoracoabdominal aneurismal degeneration following acute dissection were treated in our department with the use of fenestrated/branched stent-grafts. Technical success was achieved in all cases (100%). Perioperative mortality was two (11.8%) patients. One patient died due to multiple organ failure and one due to cardiac failure. No case of paraplegia was observed. During a 12-month median follow-up (range, 4-28 months) no aneurysm-related deaths were observed. Reintervention was required in three cases to repair a type Ib endoleak from a side branch. Endovascular treatment with fenestrated/branched stent-grafts is feasible for chronic post-dissection aneurysms. Standard thoracic stent-grafting is an option in a minority of patients, when the aneurysm is limited to the thoracic segment. Fenestrated and branched devices can successfully be used for aneurysms extending to the thoracoabdominal aorta.

Fenestrated endografting of juxtarenal aneurysms after open aortic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Juxtarenal aneurysms after previous surgical aortic reconstruction constitute a complex clinical scenario. Open redo surgery is technically demanding and usually requires suprarenal or supraceliac clamping. Standard endovascular repair is prohibited due to the lack of a proximal landing zone. We present our experience with fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) in the treatment of juxtarenal aneurysms after previous open surgery. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database including all patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm after previous surgical reconstruction that underwent F-EVAR within the period from November 2003 to February 2013 under the instruction of the senior author. Evaluated outcomes included initial technical success and operative mortality and morbidity as well as late survival, target vessel patency, aneurysm diameter regression, renal function, and reintervention. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (33 male; mean age, 71.5 ± 6.2 years) were treated. Median interval from the primary surgical reconstruction was 126 months (range, 48-223 months). All patients had proximal anatomies precluding standard endovascular techniques and were considered high risk for open repair due to their comorbidities and redo nature of the operation. In total, 111 vessels were targeted: 77 with small fenestrations, 33 with scallops, and 1 vessel with a downward branch. The operation was completed by totally endovascular means in 34 patients (97.1%). In one patient, a retroperitoneal approach was needed to gain retrograde access to a renal artery. Operative target vessel perfusion success rate was 100%. Operative mortality was 0% and median hospital stay 6 days (range, 2-40 days). Mean follow-up (FU) was 37.5 ± 25 months. Mean aneurysm maximal diameter decreased from 60 ± 4 mm to 47 ± 8 mm (P < .05). No type I endoleak was diagnosed, and no reintervention was required during FU. There were eight late deaths, all unrelated to the aneurysm. Estimated survival rates at 1, 2, and 4 years were 92.0% ± 5.5%, 82.8% ± 7.9% and 76.9% ± 9.3%, respectively. Three target vessel occlusions occurred during FU. One patient suffered a bilateral renal artery occlusion resulting in dialysis. In a second patient, one renal artery occluded without clinical symptoms. No other cases of renal function deterioration were observed. CONCLUSIONS: F-EVAR is a valid treatment option for juxtarenal aneurysms after previous surgical reconstruction. F-EVAR represents a less morbid alternative to redo open surgery, has a high technical success rate, and shows durability in mid-term FU.