Proton radiotherapy as a treatment strategy to increase survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer in the body and tail: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of proton radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) in the body and tail are still unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors after proton radiotherapy in a large group of patients with LAPC in the body and tail. METHODS: The medical records of 200 patients with LAPC in the body and tail who underwent proton radiotherapy between February 2009 and January 2021 at the Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed to identify prognostic factors that contribute to long-term survival. RESULTS: The overall survival rate at 1- and 2-year after PT was 69.6% and 35.4% with a median overall survival of 18.4 months. The 1- and 2-year local progression-free, and progression-free survival rates were 84.3% and 68.0%, and 44.3% and 19.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, superior mesenteric artery (SMA) invasion (SMA only invasion vs. celiac artery only invasion; P = 0.049: SMA and celiac artery invasion vs. celiac artery only invasion; P = 0.017), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level ≥ 231.9 U/mL (P = 0.001), anterior peripancreatic invasion (P = 0.006), and incomplete scheduled concurrent chemotherapy (P = 0.009) were statistically significant prognostic factors for overall survival. There was no significant difference in local progression-free survival; however, distant metastasis-free survival was statistically worse in patients with prognostic factors than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: Proton radiotherapy for LAPC in the body and tail may be a valuable multidisciplinary treatment option. Patients with SMA invasion, higher pre-proton radiotherapy serum CA 19-9 level, anterior peripancreatic invasion, or incomplete scheduled concurrent chemotherapy had worse overall survival because of worse distant metastasis-free survival, suggesting that distant metastases have a significant impact on overall survival in such patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

[A Case of Synchronous-Metachronous Cancer of the Rectum, Stomach, Pharynx, Esophagus and Small Intestine].

A 71-year-old man presented with the chief complaint of fecal occult blood. Based on imaging studies, the patient was diagnosed advanced rectal cancer. He received laparoscopic low anterior resection. Three months after the rectal cancer operation, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed gastric cancer. The patient had a diagnosis of synchronous cancer of the rectum and stomach, and received laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Two years after the rectal cancer operation, liver metastasis(S4)was detected and resected. Three years after the rectal cancer operation, esophageal cancer and laryngeal cancer were detected synchronously and chemoradiotherapy was performed. Five years after the rectal cancer operation, small intestinal cancer with infiltration of descending colon and esophagus cancer were detected synchronously. Small intestinal resection and Hartmann procedure were performed for small intestinal cancer. ESD was performed for esophageal cancer. Six years after the rectal cancer operation, FDG-PET showed the peritracheal lymph node metastasis, lumbar spine metastasis and local recurrence in the pelvis. Currently, systemic chemotherapy is undergoing. We report a rare case of synchronous- metachronous cancer of the rectum, stomach, pharynx, esophagus and small intestine.

[A Case of Double Lung and Gastric Cancer Involving Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis with Difficult Preoperative Diagnosis].

A man in his 60s was admitted to our hospital with anemia. An endoscopic examination revealed advanced gastric cancer. CT revealed peri-gastric and para-aortic lymphadenopathy, and a nodular shadow(20mm)in the lower lobe of the right lung. PET-CT revealed abnormal uptake in the para-aortic lymph node and stomach wall and the nodular shadow in the right lung. A bronchoscopy revealed pulmonary adenocarcinoma. From the above, he was diagnosed with gastric cancer(cT4a, cN2, cM1, cStage IV )and lung cancer(cT2a, cN0, cM0, cStage I B). Because of gastric bleeding, we decided to operate on the gastric cancer before the lung cancer. First, total gastrectomy, splenectomy, and cholecystectomy were performed and then dissection of lymph node No. 16was performed. Histopathological examination indicated that lymph node No. 16was common to lung cancer, so the final diagnosis was gastric cancer(pT4a, pN0, cM0, fStage II A)and lung cancer(cT2a, cN0, pM1, fStage IV ). In this case, lymphadenectomy of No. 16in the first and pathological diagnosis during surgery could help us avoid splenectomy and cholecystectomy, and could reduce invasion.