Comparison of the left ventricular dyssynchrony between stylet-driven and lumen-less lead technique in left bundle branch area pacing using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing method to reduce left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony due to ventricular pacing. Only lumen-less pacing leads (LLLs) with fixed helixes could achieve LBBAP previously, but recently, LBBAP has been performed using stylet-driven leads (SDLs). This study aimed to evaluate the LV dyssynchrony between SDLs and LLLs techniques in LBBAP. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent LBBAP with either SDLs or LLLs. We compared both groups' electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and LV dyssynchrony parameters derived from myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. LV dyssynchrony parameters consisted of phase analysis and regional wall motion analysis. We evaluated bandwidth, phase standard deviation (PSD), and entropy in the phase analysis. The time to the end-systolic frame (TES) was calculated in regional wall motion analysis using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). We also evaluated the maximum differences between segmental TES (MDTES), the standard deviation of TES (SDTES), and the difference in the TES between the lateral wall and septum (DTES-LS). Results: In total, 97 patients were enrolled. The success rate of LBBAP did not differ between the groups [SDLs: 47/48 patients (98%) vs. LLLs: 47/51 patients (92%), P=0.36]. The paced QRS duration and the stimulus to the peak LV activation time (stim-LVAT) also did not differ between SDL and LLL groups (122±10 vs. 119±12 ms, P=0.206; 69±12 vs. 66±13 ms, P=0.31, respectively). There were no differences in bandwidth, PSD, and entropy between SDL and LLL groups (73°±37° vs. 86°±47°, P=0.18; 19°±8.5° vs. 21°±9.7°, P=0.19; 0.57±0.08 vs. 0.59±0.08, P=0.17, respectively). The regional wall motion analysis parameters MDTES, SDTES, and DTES-LS also did not differ between SDL and LLL groups (19%±10% vs. 20%±10%, P=0.885; 5.0%±2.5% vs. 5.0%±2.5%, P=0.995; 5.0%±3.7% vs. 4.8%±4.2%, P=0.78, respectively). Conclusions: LBBAP using SDLs was comparable to LV electrical and mechanical synchrony with LLLs.

Concomitant Pulmonary and Cerebral Tumor Embolism and Intracardiac Metastasis from Bladder Cancer.

An 82-year-old woman with a history of bladder cancer presented with dyspnea and loss of consciousness. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed pulmonary embolism, and emergency thrombus aspiration therapy was performed, but the thrombus was not aspirated. Echocardiography showed mobile masses in the heart and a right-to-left shunt due to a patent foramen ovale (PFO). Magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple cerebral infarctions. Surgical thrombectomy and PFO closure were performed, and the patient was diagnosed with intracardiac metastasis of bladder cancer based on intraoperative histopathology. This is a rare case of concomitant pulmonary and cerebral tumor embolism and intracardiac metastasis from bladder cancer.

An Autopsy Case of Antibody-negative Immune-mediated Necrotizing Myopathy with Severe Cardiac Involvement.

A 41-year-old man was admitted with a chief complaint of dyspnea. Echocardiography showed diffuse severe hypokinesis in the left ventricle. Although his heart failure improved, high creatine kinase levels persisted. A muscle biopsy of the biceps brachii showed necrotic and regenerating fibers along with positive findings for major histocompatibility complex class I and membrane attack complex. He was diagnosed with antibody-negative immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Steroid therapy was started, but he died due to ventricular fibrillation. Autopsy findings revealed CD68-positive macrophages in the myocardium and quadriceps. To our knowledge, this is the first case of antibody-negative IMNM with cardiac involvement.