Shared decision-making support program for older patients with advanced cancer using a question prompt list and geriatric assessment: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients with cancer are less likely to express their treatment preferences than younger patients. Question prompt lists (QPLs) facilitate communication between patients and physicians. Geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended when older patients with cancer make treatment decisions. This study estimated the effect size of a shared decision-making (SDM) support program combining QPLs with GA in terms of patients' subjective evaluation of the SDM process for a future definitive randomized controlled trial. We also evaluated the number and quality of aging-related communication during consultations, and feasibility and acceptability of the study for exploratory purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a pilot study with randomized allocation and blind evaluation. Patients aged 65 years or older at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, scheduled to discuss the changes of their treatment, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SDM support program or usual care. This program consisted of 30-60 min of face-to-face coaching, with QPLs and GA provided before the coaching. As the primary endpoint, the decisional conflict scores given by the patients immediately after the consultation were compared between the two groups. For the secondary endpoints, the number and quality of aging-related communications during the consultations were assessed by evaluators (blinded) using audio-recordings. Adherence, burden, and usefulness were assessed for evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the SDM support program. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. All patients completed the GA questionnaire, for which 70% did not require any individual assistance. Answering the questionnaires took approximately 11 min. The decisional conflict scores were mean [standard deviation (SD)]: 19.3 [10.8] vs. 18.0 [11.1] (effect size: Cohen's d = 0.12) for the SDM support program and usual care groups, respectively. The number of aging-related communications during the consultation for the new treatment was higher in the SDM support program group than the usual care (mean [SD]: 3.3 [1.2] vs. 2.2 [1.5], effect size: cohen's d = 1.32). Patients felt that the SDM support program was useful but not burdensome or difficult. DISCUSSION: The SDM support program was considered useful and feasible for older patients and able to facilitate communication regarding aging-related concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study protocol was registered on September 23, 2020, in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041867).

Effectiveness of a facilitation programme using a mobile application for initiating advance care planning discussions between patients with advanced cancer and healthcare providers: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (J-SUPPORT 2104).

INTRODUCTION: Timely implementation of the discussion process of advance care planning (ACP) is recommended. The communication attitude of healthcare providers is critical in ACP facilitation; thus, improving their communication attitudes may reduce patient distress and unnecessary aggressive treatment while enhancing care satisfaction. Digital mobile devices are being developed for behavioural interventions owing to their low space and time restrictions and ease of information sharing. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention programme using an application intended to facilitate patient questioning behaviour on improving communication related to ACP between patients with advanced cancer and healthcare providers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a parallel-group, evaluator-blind, randomised controlled trial design. We plan to recruit 264 adult patients with incurable advanced cancer at the National Cancer Centre in Tokyo, Japan. Intervention group participants use a mobile application ACP programme and undergo a 30 min interview with a trained intervention provider for discussions with the oncologist at the next patient visit, while control group participants continue their usual treatment. The primary outcome is the oncologist's communication behaviour score assessed using audiorecordings of the consultation. Secondary outcomes include communication between patients and oncologists and the patients' distress, quality of life, care goals and preferences, and medical care utilisation. We will use a full analysis set including the registered participant population who receive at least a part of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Japan Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Oncology Group (Registration No. 2104) and the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Centre Hospital (registration No. 2020-500). Written informed consent is obtained from the patients. The results of the trial will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: UMIN000045305, NCT05045040.

Geriatric assessment and management with question prompt list using a web-based application for elderly patients with cancer (MAPLE) to communicate ageing-related concerns: J-SUPPORT 2101 study protocol for a multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly cancer patients often have ageing-related physical and psychosocial problems that should be fully shared with their oncologists. Geriatric assessment (GA) can assess these ageing-related problems and guide management. Communication support might also facilitate implementation of GA-guided management. We will conduct a multicentre, randomised controlled trial to examine the efficacy of a programme that combines a GA summary, management recommendations and communication support to facilitate ageing-related communications between elderly Japanese patients with cancer and their oncologists, and thus to implement programme-guided management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to recruit a total of 210 patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with incurable cancers of gastrointestinal origin, and referred for first-line or second-line chemotherapy. In the intervention arm, a summary of management recommendations based on a GA and question prompt list (QPL) will be provided to patients and shared with their oncologists at the first outpatient visit after randomisation by trained intervention providers. For 5 months after the initial intervention, implementation of GA-guided management recommendations will be reviewed monthly with the patients and their oncologists to implement management as needed. The GA and QPL will be re-evaluated at 3 months, with a summary provided to patients and their oncologists. Those participants allocated to the usual care arm will receive usual oncology care. The primary endpoint is the number of conversations about ageing-related concerns at the first outpatient visit after randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center Japan on 15 April 2021 (ID: 2020-592). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000045428.

Early specialized palliative care for patients with metastatic lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a feasibility study of a nurse-led screening-triggered programme.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to implement early specialized palliative care have not yet been established. The present study investigated the feasibility of a nurse-led, screening-triggered early specialized palliative care intervention programme and obtained data to design a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with metastatic lung cancer undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. The intervention consisted of (1) a questionnaire-based screening programme and (2) advanced-level nurse counselling and care coordination with interdisciplinary team approach. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of the assessment questionnaire after the second course of first-line chemotherapy (T2). Secondary endpoints included changes in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scores, depression and anxiety rates based on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the contents of specialized palliative care. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled between August 2012 and March 2014. Median age was 66 years (range, 40-78 year) and 84% were male. A total of 38 patients had stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma and 12 had extensive disease small-cell lung carcinoma. The completion rate was 70% (95% confidence interval 56.0-81.0). The median duration between baseline and T2 was 53 days. Improvement from baseline were observed at T2 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scores (86.0 ± 18.1 vs 94.9 ± 18.2, P = 0.057), depression (16.0 vs 5.7%; P = 0.26) and anxiety (32.0 vs 22.9%; P = 0.65); however, these results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This early specialized palliative care intervention is feasible and could be useful in improving patients' quality of life. The present results justify the initiation of a randomized control trial.

Dexamethasone 8 mg for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Inpatients with Advanced Cancer Undergoing Palliative Care: A Multicenter Phase II Trial.

Objective: No standard treatment for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) for inpatients in a palliative care setting exists. The aim of this study was to validate the previous study-derived efficacy of dexamethasone 8 mg for CRF among inpatients in a palliative care setting. Methods: Inpatients with moderate fatigue (≥4/10) were enrolled in a multicenter phase II trial. Dexamethasone 8 mg p.o. or 6.6 mg i.v. was administered for seven days and 4 mg p.o. or 3.3 mg i.v. for seven consecutive days. The primary endpoint was a threshold average change of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue subscale score of 3. The secondary endpoints were evaluated with the anorexia-cachexia subscale (ACS), and the Edmonton symptom assessment scale-revised Japanese version. Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled. On day 8, the mean change of FACIT-fatigue subscale from day 1 was 5.2 (95% confidence interval 0.8-10.0), in which the lower bound was above 0 but not above the prespecified threshold value of 3.0 (p = 0.72). Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS)-fatigue was significantly improved by day 3 (p = 0.02), but not on day 8 or day 15. ACS, physical well-being, and ESAS-lack of appetite significantly improved by day 8 and day 15. Adverse events were tolerable. Conclusion: This study showed that dexamethasone 8 mg failed to achieve the preset efficacy for CRF among inpatients in a palliative care setting. However, this treatment improved fatigue and would be an option for CRF. jRCT (jRCTs031180068).

A Japanese translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic and content validity confirmation of the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment.

PURPOSE: The Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a globally recognized and used nutritional screening, assessment, monitoring, and triaging tool. The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the original English PG-SGA for the Japanese speaking populations and to assess its linguistic validity (i.e., comprehensibility, difficulty) and content validity, as perceived by Japanese patients and healthcare professionals. METHODS: In accordance with methodology used in previous Dutch, Thai, German, and Norwegian PG-SGA studies, we followed the ten steps of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for Translation and Cultural Adaptation for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. The study enrolled 50 patients and 50 healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the comprehensibility and difficulty of the translated and culturally adapted PG-SGA. The HCPs also evaluated the content validity of the translation. We evaluated each item and quantified scale indices for content validity (item content validity index (I-CVI), scale content validity index (S-CVI)), comprehensibility (item comprehensibility index (I-CI), scale comprehensibility index (S-CI)), and difficulty (item difficulty index (I-DI), scale difficulty index (S-DI)). RESULTS: Patients evaluated the comprehensibility and difficulty of the patient component as excellent (S-CI = 0.97, S-DI = 0.96). The professionals rated the Japanese version of both components of the PG-SGA as very relevant (S-CVI = 0.94). The professionals evaluated the comprehensibility of the professional component as being acceptable (S-CI = 0.88) but difficult (S-DI = 0.69), based predominantly on items related to physical examination (I-DI = 0.33-0.67). CONCLUSION: The PG-SGA was systematically translated and culturally adapted for the Japanese setting according to the ISPOR process. The Japanese version of the PG-SGA was perceived as comprehensive, easy to use, and relevant. Perceived difficulty in professional components, specifically in the context of metabolic demand and physical examination, will require appropriate training for professionals in order to optimize implementation.

Association Between Loneliness and the Frequency of Using Online Peer Support Groups Among Cancer Patients With Minor Children: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Study.

CONTEXT: Cancer patients with minor children are increasing; however, they do not receive sufficient support. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between loneliness and the frequency of using online peer support groups among cancer patients with minor children. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted from April to May 2019. Cancer patients with minor children were recruited from an online peer support group called "Cancer Parents." Individuals diagnosed with cancer and whose youngest children were younger than 18 years were enrolled. Materials included: the UCLA Loneliness Scale version 3 (UCLA-LS), K6 scale, abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale, and the sociodemographic/clinical characteristics questionnaire. Multivariate logistics regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with the high loneliness group (defined as those above the median score on the UCLA-LS). RESULTS: A total of 334 patients participated (79.9% female; mean age 43.1 years, standard deviation 5.8). The most common primary cancer type was breast (34.1%). The median score of the UCLA-LS was 45 (interquartile range 37-53). The multivariate logistics regression analysis revealed that the high loneliness group was significantly associated with the frequent use of online peer support group less than once a week (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.26-0.85; P = 0.012), with a smaller social network (OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.73-0.83; P < 0.001), and higher psychological distress (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.09-1.23; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent use of online peer support groups was associated with less loneliness among cancer patients with minor children.

Nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialised palliative care intervention programme for patients with advanced lung cancer: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that palliative care integrated into standard cancer treatment from the early phase of the disease can improve the quality of life of patients with cancer. In this paper, we present the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialised palliative care intervention programme for patients with advanced lung cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 206 patients will be randomised (1:1) to the intervention group or the control group (usual care). The intervention, triggered with a brief self-administered screening tool, comprises comprehensive need assessments, counselling and service coordination by advanced-level nurses. The primary outcome is the Trial Outcome Index of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes include participants' quality of life (FACT-Lung), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), illness perception (Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire), medical service use and survival. A mixed-method approach is expected to provide an insight about how this intervention works. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center Japan (approval number: 2016-235). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations and will be reflected on to the national healthcare policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000025491.

The association between health-related quality of life and achievement of personalized symptom goal.

PURPOSE: The aim of study was to explore the potential association between patient's self-reported physical symptom management goals as personalized symptom goal (PSGs) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients. The secondary outcome was to investigate the relationship between number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs and HRQOL in cancer patients. METHODS: This single-center prospective observational study comprised 140 consecutive outpatients. We evaluated the PSGs and HRQOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Patients were administered a self-report questionnaire, including reports on their physical symptom intensity and PSGs using Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) scores. We investigated the correlation between PSGs achievement (ESAS-r score ≤ PSG score) and FACT-G total scores, and relationship between and number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs (ESAS-r score > PSG score) and FACT-G total scores. RESULTS: The patients who did not achieve PSGs of pain, tiredness, lack of appetite, and shortness of breath had a lower FACT-G total score (p < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression showed that higher number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs correlated with lower FACT-G scores (decreasing by 1.826 points for each such symptom, p < 0.01). Predictors of increased number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs were younger age and a higher symptom intensity of anxiety. CONCLUSION: PSGs achievement was associated with HRQOL in cancer patients. Additionally, the number of unachieved PSGs were independent determinant of poor HRQOL, particularly in younger cancer patients and those with higher symptom intensity of anxiety.

Usefulness of painDETECT and S-LANSS in identifying the neuropathic component of mixed pain among patients with tumor-related cancer pain.

PURPOSE: Tumor-related cancer pain often comprises mixed pain with both nociceptive and neuropathic components. Whether tumor-related cancer pain includes a neuropathic component impacts the therapeutic strategy. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the usefulness of two screening tools for neuropathic pain, painDETECT and Self-Report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS), in identifying the neuropathic component of mixed pain among patients with tumor-related cancer pain. METHOD: This cross-sectional study recruited consecutive inpatients and outpatients at a single site. The diagnostic accuracy of painDETECT and S-LANSS was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and classification probability. RESULTS: Of the study group, 106 patients had tumor-related cancer pain. Analyses of the nociceptive and mixed pain groups (n = 104) showed that neither painDETECT nor S-LANSS had satisfactory areas under the curve (AUCs) for identifying the neuropathic component of mixed pain (0.59 for painDETECT and 0.56 for S-LANSS). By pain intensity, the AUC for painDETECT was significantly higher in the mild pain group than in the moderate or severe pain group (0.77 vs. 0.43, P = 0.002). All parameters of classification probability for both tools were higher in the mild pain group than in the moderate or severe pain group. CONCLUSIONS: painDETECT and S-LANSS could not identify the neuropathic component of mixed pain among patients with tumor-related cancer pain, especially when pain was moderate or severe. Contrarily, these screening tools might be useful for identifying the neuropathic component of mixed pain for mild pain.

Low Phase Angle Is Correlated With Worse General Condition in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Phase angle (PA) is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to identify possible correlations between PA and symptoms, quality of life, fluid retention, and laboratory data in cancer patients in palliative care settings. METHODS: Individuals who visited the outpatient clinic or were admitted to the palliative care unit were eligible. Patients with a performance status of 4 and/or those unable to complete questionnaires were excluded. PA was evaluated using a bioanalyzer device. The correlation coefficient between PA and the variables of interest was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were analyzed. PA was weakly correlated with age (ρ = -0.22), performance status (ρ = -0.30), functional well-being (ρ = 0.20), anorexia/cachexia subscale (ρ = 0.22), and Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy trial outcome index (ρ = 0.26). PA was also correlated with fluid retention (ρ = -0.34) and albumin (ρ = 0.32), C-reactive protein (ρ = -0.31), and hemoglobin (ρ = 0.41) levels. Sub-analysis stratified according to sex revealed that males demonstrated the same results; however, female sex demonstrated a correlation between PA and social well-being (ρ = -0.43). CONCLUSIONS: PA was correlated with physical condition, but not with psychological well-being.

Breakthrough Cancer Pain Influences General Activities and Pain Management: A Comparison of Patients with and without Breakthrough Cancer Pain.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a predictor of interference with general activities and poor pain management. The extent of this influence has not yet been determined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the influence of BTcP on general activities, and pain management in patients with controlled background pain. DESIGN: Single-center prospective observational study. SETTING/SUBJECTS: The study cohort comprised 258 consecutive patients (female, 40.0%; mean age, 64.5 years) who had received opioid medication for cancer pain for over 2 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: A recommended diagnostic algorithm was used to quantitate and compare interference with general activities, average background pain intensity over the previous 24 hours (24h-PI), and achievement of personalized pain goals (PPGs) (24h-PI≤PPG) of 119 patients with and 139 patients without BTcP. RESULTS: Interference with general activities, 24h-PI, and PPG scores [mean (standard deviation)] in patients with BTcP were 2.8 (2.2), 3.0 (1.7), and 1.8 (1.4), respectively, which are all significantly higher than for those without BTcP [1.3 (2.0), p < 0.01; 1.7 (1.6), p < 0.01; 1.5 (1.3), p = 0.03], respectively. A significantly smaller percentage of patients with BTcP than without BTcP achieved their PPGs (36.1% vs. 67.6%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BTcP has a negative impact on general activities and pain management. Healthcare providers should recognize that management of BTcP is important in improving general activities and management of cancer pain.

Comparison of Indicators for Achievement of Pain Control With a Personalized Pain Goal in a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

CONTEXT: The achievement of a personalized pain goal (PPG) is advocated as an individualized pain relief indicator. OBJECTIVES: Pain relief indicators, including PPG, pain intensity (PI), and interference with daily activities (interference), were compared herein. METHODS: This was a single-center cross-sectional study. Adult patients with cancer on opioid medications who visited the outpatient clinic at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between March and September 2015 were consecutively enrolled. Patients conducted a self-report questionnaire, including reports of average PI, interference, PPG, and the need for further analgesic treatment. We compared the proportion of patients achieving PPG (PI ≤ PPG) and other pain relief indicators including PI ≤3 or interference ≤3 and the percentage of patients who did not need further analgesic treatment among those who fulfilled each pain relief indicator. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients (median age 64; 38% females) were analyzed. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) of PPG, PI, and interference was 2 (IQR 1-3), 2 (IQR 1-4), and 2 (IQR 0-5), respectively. The proportion of patients achieving PPG was 45.3% and significantly lower than those with PI ≤3 (69.0%; P < 0.001) and interference ≤3 (70.2%; P < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients achieving PPG did not need further analgesic treatment, whereas 70.8% of patients with PI ≤3 (P < 0.001) and 73.3% with interference ≤3 did need further analgesic treatment (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The achievement of PPG was a stricter pain relief indicator than PI and interference and may reflect a real need for pain control.