Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine in virologically suppressed people with HIV-1 aged ≥ 50 years: week 48 pooled results from the TANGO and SALSA studies.

BACKGROUND: As the population of people with HIV ages, concerns over managing age-related comorbidities, polypharmacy, immune recovery, and drug-drug interactions while maintaining viral suppression have arisen. We present pooled TANGO and SALSA efficacy and safety results dichotomized by age (< 50 and ≥ 50 years). METHODS: Week 48 data from the open-label phase 3 TANGO and SALSA trials evaluating switch to once-daily dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) fixed-dose combination vs continuing current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) were pooled. Proportions of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 and < 50 copies/mL (Snapshot, intention-to-treat exposed) and safety were analyzed by age category. Adjusted mean change from baseline in CD4 + cell count was assessed using mixed-models repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: Of 1234 participants, 80% of whom were male, 29% were aged ≥ 50 years. Among those aged ≥ 50 years, 1/177 (< 1%) DTG/3TC participant and 3/187 (2%) CAR participants had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks; proportions with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL were high in both treatment groups (≥ 92%), consistent with overall efficacy and similar to observations in participants aged < 50 years (≥ 93%). Regardless of age category, CD4 + cell count increased or was maintained from baseline with DTG/3TC. Change from baseline in CD4 + /CD8 + ratio was similar across age groups and between treatment groups. One CAR participant aged < 50 years had confirmed virologic withdrawal, but no resistance was detected. In the DTG/3TC group, incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar across age groups. Proportions of AEs leading to withdrawal were low and comparable between age groups. Although drug-related AEs were generally low, across age groups, drug-related AEs were more frequent in participants who switched to DTG/3TC compared with those who continued CAR. While few serious AEs were observed in both treatment groups, more were reported in participants aged ≥ 50 years vs < 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with HIV-1, switching to DTG/3TC maintained high rates of virologic suppression and demonstrated a favorable safety profile, including in those aged ≥ 50 years despite higher prevalence of concomitant medication use and comorbidities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TANGO, NCT03446573 (February 27, 2018); SALSA, NCT04021290 (July 16, 2019).

Treatment challenges and health conditions among people living with HIV with or without substance use disorder in the Russian Federation.

We quantified treatment challenges faced by people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Russia. Cross-sectional data of 150 PLHIV in Russia were from the 2019 Positive Perspectives Survey. Mean age was 38.3 y. Two-thirds (68.0%[102/150]) had ever disguised their HIV pills, and 43.3%[65/150] said they would be stressed if someone saw their HIV pills. Overall, 14.7%[22/150] reported being ever diagnosed with substance use disorder (SUD). Self-rated optimal health was significantly lower among those with vs without a report of SUD on multiple health domains: sexual (40.9%[9/22] vs. 70.3%[90/128], p = 0.007), physical (22.7%[5/22] vs. 68.0%[87/128], p < 0.001), and overall health (27.3%[6/22] vs. 68.8%[88/128], p < 0.001). Those reporting SUD were more likely to miss HIV medication ≥ 1 time in the past month because they used recreational drugs (age and gender-adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] = 8.23, 95%CI = 6.99-9.68), could not afford their medication (APR = 3.28, 95%CI = 2.90-3.72), had to work (APR = 3.27, 95%CI = 2.97-3.60), or to avoid side effects (APR = 2.62, 95%CI = 2.37-2.89). Furthermore, self-reported SUD was strongly associated with numerous poor health conditions, including self-reported diagnosis of cancer (APR = 6.67, 95%CI = 5.24-8.48), mental illness (APR = 5.01, 95%CI = 4.53-5.55), and liver disease (APR = 4.29, 95%CI = 3.98-4.61). The distinct patterns of poorer health-related outcomes among PLHIV with SUD underscore the need to address behavioral and psychosocial challenges as part of holistic HIV care.

Relationship Between Polypharmacy and Quality of Life Among People in 24 Countries Living With HIV.

INTRODUCTION: People living with HIV (PLHIV) have greater risk of having multiple health conditions. We measured the relationship between increased medication and overall quality of life among PLHIV from 24 countries. METHODS: We analyzed data for 2,112 adult PLHIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 24 countries who completed the 2019 Positive Perspectives survey. Polypharmacy was defined as taking 5 or more pills a day or currently taking medications for 5 or more conditions. Outcomes were self-rated overall health, treatment satisfaction, and self-reported virologic control. New treatment concerns were issues not prioritized at ART initiation but now deemed paramount. Data were analyzed with descriptive and multivariable statistics. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of polypharmacy was 42.1%. People reporting polypharmacy had significantly poorer health outcomes independent of existing comorbidities; their odds of treatment satisfaction, optimal overall health, and virologic control were lower by 27.0% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91), 36.0% (AOR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53-0.78), and 46.0% (AOR = 0.54, 95% CI, 0.42-0.70), respectively, compared with those without polypharmacy (all P < .05). Most PLHIV (56.6%) were concerned about taking more medicines as they age, and 73.1% were interested in ARTs with fewer medicines. Top reasons for switching ART among those who had ever switched (n = 1,550) were to reduce severity and frequency of side effects (45.3%), number of pills (35.0%), or number of medicines (26.8%). People reporting polypharmacy had significantly higher odds of having new concerns relative to when they initiated ART, regarding risks of drug-drug interactions (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.71) and side effects (AOR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.68). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy was associated with poorer health-related outcomes among PLHIV. Many PLHIV expressed concerns about side effects of ART. Clinicians should carefully consider patient preferences, comorbidities, and drug profiles when prescribing ART.