A Novel Approach to Shaping the Lateral Abdomen: Simultaneous Application of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) Therapy and Synchronized Radiofrequency at the Flanks: A Multicenter MRI Study.

BACKGROUND: An accumulation of adipose tissue on the lateral abdomen (flanks) coupled with muscle deconditioning negatively affects core stability, muscular balance, and the intrinsic strength essential for maintaining optimal body mechanics and posture. This lateral fat accumulation and diminution of muscle result in an unfavorable abdominal profile and present challenges in finding appropriately fitting attire. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of the simultaneous application of high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) therapy and synchronized radiofrequency for sculpting the lateral abdomen. METHODS: All patients were scheduled to undergo four 30-minute treatments at approximately weekly intervals and then subsequent follow-up visits at 1 month and 3 months after the last treatment. The primary evaluation assessed changes in the oblique muscles, adipose tissue thickness, and cross-sectional area (CSA) by MRI performed at baseline and follow-ups. The secondary outcomes included digital photographs of the treated areas, a Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire, and a Therapy Comfort Questionnaire. Adverse events and side effects were monitored throughout the study duration. RESULTS: The muscle tissue showed a substantial increase in thickness (+27.2%) and CSA (+29.0%). The adipose tissue measurements showed a decrease of -30.5% in CSA and -28.8% in thickness. As secondary outcomes, 81.8% of patients reported feeling more toned, and 84.9% of patients found the treatment comfortable and reported less than mild pain. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evaluation, the study suggests that the simultaneous application of HIFEM and synchronized radiofrequency is safe and effective for reducing adipose tissue and strengthening muscle in the area of the lateral abdomen.

Breast reduction trend among plastic surgeons: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: A number of breast reduction techniques have been developed over the years, but debate over which technique is better for patients continues to grow. The authors' goal was to survey members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons to identify their preferences and practices and report their opinion regarding issues related to the various breast reduction techniques. METHODS: In the fall of 2006, a one-page anonymous survey was sent to 5112 plastic surgeons who were members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. A follow-up survey was sent 2 weeks after the first mailing as a friendly reminder. The questionnaires were then collected over a 6-week period. RESULTS: Of the 5112 plastic surgeons surveyed, 2665 (52 percent) responded to the survey. The majority of the respondents (69 percent) use the inferior pedicle breast reduction technique. Ninety-two percent of the respondents use intraoperative deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. Sixty-one percent of respondents performed over 75 percent of their cases on an outpatient basis and 97 percent of respondents use general anesthesia. Ninety-three percent of the respondents use preoperative antibiotics. Over 70 percent of the respondents do not think breast reduction should be a cosmetic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the inferior pedicle technique has traditionally been the procedure of choice and remains so today. However, there has been an increase in the use of the newer techniques. Plastic surgeons are becoming more cognizant of the risk of deep venous thrombosis among their patients. The majority of breast reductions are now performed as outpatient procedures.

Abdominoplasty can be performed successfully as an outpatient procedure with minimal morbidity.

Since abdominoplasty has been shown to have a positive impact on patient's self-image and quality of life, it is no surprise that the annual number of these procedures performed has continued to increase. Historically, because of concerns with patient safety the majority of these operations have been performed on an inpatient basis. The breast reduction experience has shown that with proper patient selection and operative technique, this procedure can be performed on an outpatient basis without compromising safety. We retrospectively reviewed the senior author's experience to see if abdominoplasties can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure. Forty-five patients underwent abdominoplasties as an outpatient with only 1 patient required operative reexploration; the other complications were minor wound problems that did not require operative intervention. Proper patient selection and operative technique can allow a successful abdominoplasty with minimal morbidity.

Who needs the surgical headlight?

OBJECTIVE: The use of surgical headlights may lead to awkward posture and limit the mobility and visibility of the operating team. Despite the vast availability of fiber-optic instruments, many surgeons continue to use the surgical headlight, which may be harmful to their health and career. We report the use of the Lumitex LightMat surgical illuminator instead of the conventional surgical headlight in cleft palate surgery. METHODS: The LightMat is a disposable single-use device that is bright, flexible, and malleable and attaches easily to most retractors. Twenty cleft palate and five pharyngeal flaps cases were performed in which the LightMat was attached to the Dingman mouth retractor with biocompatible two-sided adhesive tapes. RESULTS: The LightMat was successfully used in all 25 cases. No cases required the surgeon to put on additional lighting such as a headlight. In addition, no cases required the LightMat surgical illuminator to be replaced. CONCLUSION: The LightMat provides excellent surgical light for cleft palate surgery and pharyngeal procedures. It affords the surgeon several advantages: it provides a cool operative light, flexibility in surgical position, and improved visibility and mobility; the surgeon avoids the delay in obtaining an appropriate working headlight; and, more importantly, it may prevent postural problems that could lead to spinal sprain and disability.

Outpatient extended abdominoplasty in the patient with massive weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Extended abdominoplasty in the patient with massive weight loss has traditionally been performed as an inpatient procedure. To date, there has been no report on the safety of outpatient extended abdominoplasty in the patient with massive weight loss. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate the safety of outpatient abdominoplasty in this growing population of patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all the senior author's (C.M.B.) patients with massive weight loss who underwent extended abdominoplasty from November 2004 to August 2006. Each case was evaluated for demographic information, patient weight (pre-gastric bypass, pre-contour), body mass index (pre-gastric bypass, pre-contour), weight of specimen, anesthesia type, estimated blood loss, operating room time, length of stay, and drain management. The complications were compared with historical control subjects. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients, 16 female and 3 male, underwent extended abdominoplasty after massive weight loss. The average weight loss was 142 pounds. The average pre-gastric bypass body mass index was 52 kg/m(2). The average pre-contour body mass index was 29 kg/m(2). The average operative findings were as follows: estimated blood loss, 130 mL; specimen weight, 3288 g; and operative time, 132 minutes. There was no perioperative blood transfusion. All patients (100%) were discharged the same day. Overall complications in 5 patients (26%) included stitch abscess (5%), partial umbilical necrosis (5%), superficial wound dehiscence (10%), and seroma and bleeding (5%) in the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection and operative techniques, outpatient extended abdominoplasty can be performed safely in the patient with massive weight loss.