Impact of Nerve-Sparing Status on Positive Surgical Margin Location and Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Prostate Cancer Post Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the relationship between nerve-sparing (NS) status, positive surgical margin (PSM) location, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) based on a multicenter, radical prostatectomy (RP) database. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 726 patients who underwent RP without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment between 2010 and 2014. We statistically assessed the impact of NS sides on PSM location and BCR. RESULTS: PSM rates were 21.9% in the 726 patients studied, 13.2% in patients with ≤pT2, and 46.8% in patients with ≥pT3. Regarding PSM locations, the anterior-apex (AA) was the most common site for PSM (43.3%). After adjusting for confounding factors, bilateral nerve sparing (BNS) had a significantly higher odds ratio of PSM than the absence of NS did (odds ratio [OR] 3.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-4.99). In the UNS RP in patients with ≤pT2, non-AA PSM on the non-NS side was significantly higher than that on the NS side (92.9% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.009). In all patients, 5.8% experienced BCR during a median follow-up of 43.5 months. PSM was significantly associated with BCR-free survival in patients with ≤pT2 (p = 0.013), but not in patients with ≥pT3 (p = 0.185). Non-AA PSM at the non-NS side was an independent risk factor for BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-5.85), whereas AA PSMs, including NS/non-NS sides and non-AA PSM at the NS side, were not associated with BCR-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of non-AA PSM on the non-NS side may be rather important for maintaining BCR-free survival after RP.

Aberrant Hypermethylation-Mediated Suppression of PYCARD Is Extremely Frequent in Prostate Cancer with Gleason Score ≥ 7.

Epigenetic gene silencing by aberrant DNA methylation leads to loss of key cellular pathways in tumorigenesis. In order to analyze the effects of DNA methylation on prostate cancer, we established LNCaP-derived human prostate cancer cells that can pharmacologically induce global reactivation of hypermethylated genes by the methyl-CpG targeted transcriptional activation (MeTA) method. The MeTA suppressed the growth of LNCaP-derived cells and induced apoptosis. Microarray analysis indicated that PYCARD (PYD and CARD domain containing) encoding an apoptosis-inducing factor was upregulated by 65-fold or more after treatment with MeTA. We analyzed DNA methylation statuses using 50 microdissected primary prostate cancer tissues and found an extremely high frequency of tumor-specific promoter hypermethylation of PYCARD (90%, 45/50). Moreover, DNA methylation status was significantly associated with Gleason score (P = 0.0063); the frequency of tumor-specific hypermethylation was 96% (44/46) in tumors with Gleason score ≥ 7, whereas that in tumors with Gleason score 6 was 25% (1/4). Immunohistochemical analyses using these 50 cases indicated that only 8% (4/50) of cancerous tissues expressed PYCARD, whereas 80% (40/50) of corresponding normal prostate epithelial and/or basal cells expressed PYCARD. In addition, there was no relationship between PYCARD immunostaining and the Gleason score in cancerous tissue and surrounding normal tissue. Inducible expression of PYCARD inhibited cell proliferation by induction of apoptosis. These results suggest that aberrant methylation of PYCARD is a distinctive feature of prostate cancers with Gleason score ≥ 7 and may play an important role in escaping from apoptosis in prostatic tumorigenesis.

Systemic treatment for coexisting mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma is a rare and progressive cancer of the prostatic urethra. Reports on palliative systemic treatment for mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma are few. We present a case of coexisting mucinous urethral and prostate adenocarcinomas managed with systemic treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old man presented with gross hematuria and urinary retention. Prostate-specific antigen level was elevated, at 99 ng/mL, and prostate biopsy revealed moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Hormone therapy and standard chemotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma were ineffective. Prostate re-biopsy revealed coexisting mucinous urethral and prostate adenocarcinomas. Gemcitabine + cisplatin chemotherapy and folinic acid + 5-fluorouracil + irinotecan chemotherapy temporarily suppressed the cancer, but 14 months after presentation, he developed liver metastasis and died. Autopsy revealed metastasis of both mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma. CONCLUSION: Mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma is difficult to diagnose in coexistence with prostate adenocarcinoma. This was an extremely rare case showing chemoresistance due to epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Clinical significance of the LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen assay for prostate cancer detection.

To reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies (Pbx), better discrimination is needed. To identify clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) we determined the performance of LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen (LDN-PSA) and LDN-PSA normalized by prostate volume (LDN-PSAD). We retrospectively measured LDN-PSA, total PSA (tPSA), and free PSA/tPSA (F/T PSA) values in 718 men who underwent a Pbx in 3 academic urology clinics in Japan and Canada (Pbx cohort) and in 174 PC patients who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy in Australia (preop-PSA cohort). The assays were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and decision curve analyses to discriminate CSPC. In the Pbx cohort, LDN-PSAD (AUC 0.860) provided significantly better clinical performance for discriminating CSPC compared with LDN-PSA (AUC 0.827, P = 0.0024), PSAD (AUC 0.809, P < 0.0001), tPSA (AUC 0.712, P < 0.0001), and F/T PSA (AUC 0.661, P < 0.0001). The decision curve analysis showed that using a risk threshold of 20% and adding LDN-PSA and LDN-PSAD to the base model (age, digital rectal examination status, tPSA, and F/T PSA) permitted avoidance of even more biopsies without missing CSPC (9.89% and 18.11%, respectively vs 2.23% [base model]). In the preop-PSA cohort, LDN-PSA values positively correlated with tumor volume and tPSA and were significantly higher in pT3, pathological Gleason score ≥ 7. Limitations include limited sample size, retrospective nature, and no family history information prior to biopsy. LacdiNAc-glycosylated PSA is significantly better than the conventional PSA test in identifying patients with CSPC. This study was approved by the ethics committee of each institution ("The Study about Carbohydrate Structure Change in Urological Disease"; approval no. 2014-195).

Two years of bicalutamide monotherapy in patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Salvage treatments for biochemical relapse (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) have several problems in terms of indications or adverse events. We studied the possibility of 2 years of bicalutamide monotherapy for BCR after RP. METHODS: Patients who showed BCR (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/ml) after RP were recruited. Protocol treatment was planned as 2 years of bicalutamide (80 mg/day) followed by observation. Protocol treatment failure was defined as PSA re-elevation of ≥0.2 ng/ml, clinical progression, any other treatments, or discontinuation or restart of bicalutamide. Primary endpoint of this study is time to protocol treatment failure from initiation of bicalutamide. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients were registered between 2003 and 2009. Median age and PSA at initiating bicalutamide were 68 (range, 55-78) years and 0.32 (range, 0.19-7.91) ng/ml. Twenty-four (26.4%) patients could not complete 2 years of bicalutamide mainly due to progression of disease. Of the 91 patients, 2- and 5-year protocol treatment failure-free survivals were 74.6% and 33.0%, with a median follow-up of 76 (range, 11-118) months. Median time from initiating bicalutamide to treatment failure was 43 (95% confidence interval, 33-47) months. High-risk status at RP and time to BCR after RP < 6 months were significant predictors of second BCR. CONCLUSIONS: Two years of bicalutamide monotherapy should not be recommended as standard management for BCR after RP, but might be feasible for selected patients who do not have high-risk status at RP and short time to BCR.