Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(4): 274-282, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33393708

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Occupational sun protection is recommended by government health authorities. Sun safety policies and predictors of managers' reports of sun safety actions were assessed. METHODS: Written policies from 21 state departments of transportation (DOTs) enrolled in a randomized trial to test methods for scaling-up an occupational sun safety intervention were coded for sun safety content at baseline. Managers (n = 1113) supervising outdoor workers reported on sun safety actions in a baseline survey. RESULTS: Twenty state DOTs (95.2%) have a policy with at least one sun protection component. Sun safety training was increased at workplaces with a written sun safety policy (p < 0.001) and unwritten standard procedures on sun protection (p < 0.001). Reported sun safety actions were highest where there was a written sun safety policy (p < 0.001) and unwritten standard procedures on sun protection (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Policies are essential for the implementation of employee sun safety. There is room for improvement in existing policies of state DOTs.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional , Política Organizacional , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Meios de Transporte , Humanos , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos , Local de Trabalho/organização & administração
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 61(12): 978-983, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490321

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Economic evaluation of an intervention promoting adoption of occupational sun protection actions by Colorado public sector employers. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up conducted during 2010 to 2013. Thirty-three intervention and 30 attention-control worksites in final economic sample. Twenty-four-month intervention of personal contacts, training, and materials. Intervention delivery micro-costed. Costs of implemented actions from employer self-report. RESULTS: Twenty-four-month intervention costs: $121,789, 51.8% incurred by project staff (per-worksite mean=$1,732). Worksite costs: $58,631 (mean = $1,777). Per-employee costs: $118 project staff, $56 worksites. Materials cost: $5990 (mean = $181). Intervention worksites implemented 72 nontraining sun protection actions post-Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) (mean = 2.18). Control worksites implemented 39 actions (mean = 1.30). Total costs to intervention worksites of implementing the 72 post-SSW actions: $90,645 (mean = $2,747). Control worksite costs: $66,467 (mean = $2,216). Per-employee implementation costs are comparable to other worksite health interventions. CONCLUSION: SSW expanded adoption of sun protection actions at a reasonable per-employee cost.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/economia , Saúde Ocupacional , Política Organizacional , Queimadura Solar/prevenção & controle , Local de Trabalho , Colorado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA