Targeted proteomics and metabolomics for biomarker discovery in abdominal aortic aneurysm and post-EVAR sac volume.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergo uniform surveillance programs both leading up to, and following surgery. Circulating biomarkers could play a pivotal role in individualizing surveillance. We applied a multi-omics approach to identify relevant biomarkers and gain pathophysiological insights. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 108 AAA patients and 200 post-endovascular aneurysm repair (post-EVAR) patients were separately investigated. We performed partial least squares regression and ingenuity pathway analysis on circulating concentrations of 96 proteins (92 Olink Cardiovascular-III panel, 4 ELISA-assays) and 199 metabolites (measured by LC-TQMS), and their associations with CT-based AAA/sac volume. RESULTS: The median (25th-75th percentile) maximal diameter was 50.0 mm (46.0, 53.0) in the AAA group, and 55.4 mm (45.0, 64.2) in the post-EVAR group. Correcting for clinical characteristics in AAA patients, the aneurysm volume Z-score differed 0.068 (95 %CI: (0.042, 0.093)), 0.066 (0.047, 0.085) and -0.051 (-0.064, -0.038) per Z-score valine, leucine and uPA, respectively. After correcting for clinical characteristics and orthogonalization in the post-EVAR group, the sac volume Z-score differed 0.049 (0.034, 0.063) per Z-score TIMP-4, -0.050 (-0.064, -0.037) per Z-score LDL-receptor, -0.051 (-0.062, -0.040) per Z-score 1-OG/2-OG and -0.056 (-0.066, -0.045) per Z-score 1-LG/2-LG. CONCLUSIONS: The branched-chain amino acids and uPA were related to AAA volume. For post-EVAR patients, LDL-receptor, monoacylglycerols and TIMP-4 are potential biomarkers for sac volume. Additionally, distinct markers for sac change were identified.

Aneurysm Sac Dynamics and its Prognostic Significance Following Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess aneurysm sac dynamics and its prognostic significance following fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS: Patients undergoing F/BEVAR for degenerative complex aortic aneurysm from 2008 to 2020 at two large vascular centres with two imaging examinations (30 day and one year) were included. Patients were categorised as regression and non-regression, determined by the proportional volume change (> 5%) at one year compared with 30 days. All cause mortality and freedom from graft related events were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Factors associated with non-regression at one year and aneurysm sac volume over time were examined for FEVAR and BEVAR independently using multivariable logistic regression and linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five patients were included: 122 FEVAR, of whom 34% did not regress at one year imaging (20% stable, 14% expansion); and 43 BEVAR, of whom 53% failed to regress (26% stable, 28% expansion). Following F/BEVAR, after risk adjusted analysis, non-regression was associated with higher risk of all cause mortality within five years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 - 5.37; p = .032) and higher risk of graft related events within five years (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.10 - 5.26; p = .029). Following multivariable logistic regression, previous aortic repair (odds ratio [OR] 2.56, 95% CI 1.11 - 5.96; p = .029) and larger baseline aneurysm diameter (OR/mm 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.09; p = .037) were associated with non-regression at one year, whereas smoking history was inversely associated with non-regression (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.96; p = .045). Overall following FEVAR, aneurysm sac volume decreased significantly up to two years (baseline vs. two year, 267 [95% CI 250 - 285] cm3vs. 223 [95% CI 197 - 248] cm3), remaining unchanged thereafter. Overall following BEVAR, aneurysm sac volume remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: Like infrarenal EVAR, non-regression at one year imaging is associated with higher five year all cause mortality and graft related events risks after F/BEVAR. Following FEVAR for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm, aneurysm sacs generally displayed regression (66% at one year), whereas after BEVAR for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm, aneurysm sacs displayed a concerning proportion of growth at one year (28%), potentially suggesting a persistent risk of rupture and consequently requiring intensified surveillance following BEVAR. Future studies will have to elucidate how to improve sac regression following complex EVAR, and whether the high expansion risk after BEVAR is due to advanced disease extent.

Long Term Outcomes of Post-Implantation Syndrome After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between post-implantation syndrome (PIS) and long term outcomes, with emphasis on cardiovascular prognosis. METHODS: One hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients undergoing EVAR in a tertiary institution were previously included in a study investigating the risk factors and short term consequences of PIS (defined as tympanic temperature ≥ 38°C and CRP > 10 mg/L, after excluding complications with an effect on inflammatory markers). This study was based on a prospectively maintained database. Survival status was derived from inquiry of civil registry database information and causes of death from the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular events. Secondary endpoints were overall and specific cause mortality (cardiovascular, ischaemic heart disease, AAA, and cancer related mortality). Aneurysm sac dynamics and occurrence of endoleaks were also analysed. Survival estimates were obtained using Kaplan-Meier plots and a multivariable model was constructed to correct for confounders. RESULTS: The PIS incidence was 39% (58/149). At the time of surgery, patients had a mean age of 73 ± 7 years and were predominantly male. There were no baseline differences between the PIS and non-PIS groups. The median follow up was 6.4 years (3.2 - 8.3), similar in both groups (p = .81). There was no difference in cardiovascular events for PIS and non-PIS patients (p = .63). However, Kaplan-Meier plots suggest a trend towards a higher rate of cardiovascular events in PIS patients during the first years: freedom from cardiovascular events at one year was 94% vs. 89% and at three years 90% vs. 82%. No differences were found in overall and specific cause mortality. There was a higher rate of type II endoleaks for non-PIS patients (28% vs. 9%, p = .005). Sac dynamics were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that PIS is not associated with a statistically significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events. PIS had no impact on mortality. Lastly, PIS patients had fewer type II endoleaks, but sac dynamics were analogous.

Risk Factors, Dynamics, and Clinical Consequences of Aortic Neck Dilatation after Standard Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic neck dilatation (AND) occurs after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with self expanding stent grafts (SESs). Whether it continues, ultimately exceeding the endograft diameter leading to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture, remains uncertain. Dynamics, risk factors, and clinical relevance of AND were investigated after EVAR with standard SESs. METHODS: All intact EVAR patients treated from 2000 to 2015 at a tertiary institution were included. Demographic, anatomical, and device related characteristics were investigated as risk factors for AND. Outer to outer diameters were measured at a single standardised aortic level on reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients were included (median follow up 5.2 years, interquartile range [IQR] 3.0, 7.7 years; CT imaging follow up 3.3 years, IQR 1.3, 5.4). Baseline neck diameter was 24 mm (IQR 22, 26) and increased 11.1% (IQR 1.5%, 21.9%) at last CT imaging. Endograft oversizing was 20.0% (IQR 13.6, 28.0). AND was greater during the first year (5.2% [IQR 0, 11.7]) decreasing subsequently (two to four years to 1.4%/year [IQR 0.0, 4.5%], p ≤ .001) and was associated with suprarenal fixation endografts (t value = 7.9, p < .001) and oversizing (t value = 4.4, p < .001). AND exceeding the endograft was 3.5% (95% CI 2.2% - 4.8%) and 14.4% (95% CI 11.0% - 17.8%) at five and eight years, respectively. Excessive AND was associated with baseline neck diameter (OR 1.2/mm, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.41) while the Excluder endograft had a protective effect (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.58). Excessive AND was associated with type 1A endoleak (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 - 9.7) and endograft migration > 5 mm (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4 - 6.9). CONCLUSION: AND after EVAR with SES is associated with endograft oversizing and radial force but decelerates after the first post-operative year. Baseline aortic neck diameter and suprarenal stent bearing endografts were associated with an increased risk of AND beyond nominal stent graft diameter. However, it remains unclear whether patient selection, differences in endograft radial force or the suprarenal stent are accountable for this difference.

THE IMPACT OF NEUTROPHIL-TOLYMPHOCYTE RATIO AND PLATELETTO- LYMPHOCYTE RATIO IN CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammation is a common underlying feature of atherosclerosis. Several inflammatory biomarkers have been reported to have prognostic value, in several areas, including in vascular surgery. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may permit to identify patients at greater risk for cerebrovascular events, tailor patient management, improve preoperative status and possibly develop target anti-atherosclerotic therapy. However, studies reporting usefulness of these hematological biomarkers in the context of carotid artery disease are still scarce. The aim of this study was to review the literature concerning the prognostic ability of NLR and PLR in the subpopulation of vascular patients with carotid artery disease. METHODS: A Medline search was performed in order to identify publications focused on the physiopathology of NLR and PLR and their impact in the management of patients with carotid artery disease. RESULTS: The study identified 18 articles with a total of 5339 patients. NLR is associated with carotid intima-media thickness, carotid plaques, carotid stenosis, symptomatic stenosis and intra-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting and cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy. PLR is associated with carotid stenosis, symptomatic stenosis and predicts post-operative outcomes after carotid artery revascularization, including post-operative stroke, acute coronary syndrome and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have the ability to predict sub-clinic atherosclerosis, atherosclerosis progression in carotid artery disease and propensity for carotid stenosis to become symptomatic along with morbidity following CEA and carotid stenting. Consequently, these parameters may be considered to tailored therapy and improve patient management.

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) in EVAR patients: a retrospective single-centered study.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) stands for myocardial injury due to ischemia that occurs during or within 30-days after non-cardiac surgery. Although MINS is known to be independently associated with 30-day mortality after intervention, little is described about the impact of MINS after vascular procedures, particularly after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective, single-centered study. All patients underwent elective standard EVAR between January 2008 and June 2017, and them with at least one postoperative measurement of troponin I in the first 48 h after surgery, were retrospectively included. MINS was defined as the value exceeding the 99th percentile of a normal reference population with a coefficient of variation <10%. Primary outcomes include the prevalence of MINS in this subset of EVAR patients, as well as its impact in mid-term all-cause mortality. As secondary aim, the preoperative predictors of MINS were also assessed. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-six patients with postoperative troponin measurements were included (95.6% male; mean age 75.51years). MINS was diagnosed in 16.2% (N.=22) of the patients, and in 86.4% of the cases (N.=19) it was completely asymptomatic. Heart failure (31.8% vs. 10.5%, P=0.016), ASA Score ≥3 (95.5% vs. 67.5%, P=0.004), pre-operative (P=0.036) and postoperative (P=0.04) hemoglobin concentrations ≤12 g/dL were found to be significantly associated with MINS. Regarding remaining baseline characteristics, anesthesia and femoral access, no further differences were observed. Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 92% (95% CI: 4.6-6.9, standard error [SE] 0.023), 81% (95% CI: 5.6-7.6, SE=0.034) and 71% (95% CI: 6.9-8.7, SE=0.04), with two deaths reported at 30 days follow-up. MINS was found to be significantly associated with increased mid-term all-cause mortality after EVAR at 24 months follow-up (84.2±3.4% vs. 63.6±10.3%, P=0.001), with a 2.12-fold risk increase of death. CONCLUSIONS: MINS is a common complication after EVAR and negatively impacts the mid-term prognosis of such interventions. In the majority of cases, it is asymptomatic and, therefore, not detectable unless routine postoperative troponin measurements are performed.

Symptomatic Distal Anastomotic Pseudo-aneurysm After the Bentall Procedure Successfully Treated by Supra-aortic Trunk Debranching and Zone 0 Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Post-operative anastomotic pseudo-aneurysms are rare but potentially lethal complications after the Bentall procedure. When symptomatic or ruptured, expedited repair is warranted, and open surgery may carry significant bleeding risk, particularly when these lesions project anteriorly. As totally endovascular techniques are frequently limited owing to hostile anatomies, complex hybrid interventions are an alternative option in such scenarios. REPORT: A 53 year old man with a previous Bentall procedure performed 10 years previously for DeBakey type 1 dissection was admitted with chest pain. Computed tomography angiography revealed a distal anastomotic pseudo-aneurysm. Percutaneous pseudo-aneurysm occlusion with a septal occluder plug was performed initially, with significant clinical improvement but without total sac thrombosis. The patient was discharged under strict surveillance, but six months later was re-admitted owing to hoarseness and new onset of chest pain. As the patient developed acute pain and compressive symptoms, urgent treatment was required. As the pseudo-aneurysm projected anteriorly into the posterior aspect of sternum, significantly bleeding risk was anticipated with redo sternotomy. A hybrid repair was then planned, with a full supra-aortic trunk debranching (carotid-carotid and left carotid-subclavian bypass) and zone 0 TEVAR with a single parallel graft to the brachiocephalic trunk. The patient was discharged 10 days later. Total aneurysm exclusion was achieved, with no complications reported after six months follow up. DISCUSSION: Hybrid procedures may represent a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in symptomatic ascending aortic pseudo-aneurysms. However, long term follow up studies are required to confirm the durability of these procedures.

Myocardial injury after aortoiliac revascularization for extensive disease: A survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the incidence of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery for an extensive disease pattern (TASC II type D) and to examine its prognostic value. METHODS: This prospective study included a total of 66 consecutive patients (62 males, 4 females; mean age 62.5±8.2 years) who underwent elective revascularization for aortoiliac TASC II type D lesions in the tertiary setting between January 2013 and March 2019. The patients were scheduled for revascularization either by open surgery or endovascular approach. Cardiac troponins were routinely measured in the postoperative period. Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery was defined as the elevation of cardiac troponin for at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit. Myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events, and all-cause mortality were assessed both postoperatively and during follow-up. RESULTS: The incidence of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery was 25.8%. In the multivariate analysis, chronic heart failure was found to be a significant risk factor for myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (odds ratio: 10.3; 95% confidence interval 1.00-106.8, p=0.018). At 12 months after revascularization, the diagnosis of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery was significantly associated with myocardial infarction, stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events, and all-cause mortality. At 12 months after revascularization, the diagnosis of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery was significantly associated with myocardial infarction (log-rank p=0.002), stroke (log-rank p=0.007), major adverse cardiovascular events (log-rank p=0.000), major adverse limb events (log-rank p=0.007), and all-causemortality (log-rank p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery plays a role as a predictor of significant cardiovascular comorbidities and mortality after complex aortoiliac revascularization. The presence of chronic heart failure is also associated with a higher incidence of myocardial injury after aortoiliac TASC II type D revascularization. Therefore, preemptive strategies should be adopted to identify and treat these patients.

Endovascular versus open repair for popliteal aneurysm: a review on limb salvage and reintervention rates.

INTRODUCTION: Open repair remains the gold standard technique for popliteal aneurysm repair. However, the endovascular approach has gained increased popularity. Comparison between these techniques remain crucial to aid the physician choice, yet, data on mid-term outcomes lack in the literature. The present review aims to compare the limb salvage and reintervention rates in these different approaches. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify publications on endovascular treatment or open repair of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs). Primary endpoints were reintervention and limb salvage. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven studies were selected for analysis describing a total of 5425 patients: 1651 PAAs underwent endovascular repair and 4166 PAAs were treated with open surgery. The technical success rates varied between 83.3% to 100% in the endovascular group and 79% to 100% in the open repair. For endovascular repair, the limb salvage at 1 year ranged between 84.2% and 100%, at 3 years between 88.9% and 100%; and at 5 years between 64.7% and 100%. The reintervention rate at 1 year ranged between 3.7% and 21%, at 3 years between 18.9% and 28%, and at 5 years between 34.5% and 38%. For open repair, the limb salvage varied between 94.3% and 100% at 1 year, 94.5% and 99% at 3 years, and 86.4% to 97% at 5 years. Regarding the reintervention rate, at 1 year was 12.8% and 13%, at 3 years 3.6% and 12%, and at 5 years varied between 15.7% and 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Both endovascular and open repair of popliteal aneurysms represent safe options for popliteal aneurysm repair. Yet, on mid-term, open repair is associated with greater limb salvage and fewer reintervention rates. Still, further studies are needed to access the long-term durability of this technique and its suitability in emergency settings.

Total Luminal Volume Predicts Risk after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Large aneurysm diameter represents a well known predictor of late complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). However, the role of the thrombus free lumen inside the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac is not clear. It was hypothesised that greater luminal volume represents a relevant risk factor for late complications after EVAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed including all patients undergoing EVAR from 2005 to 2016 at a tertiary referral institution. Pre-operative AAA lumen volume was measured in centre lumen line reconstructions and patients were stratified into quartiles according to luminal volume. The primary endpoint was freedom from AAA related complications. Secondary endpoints were freedom from neck events (type 1A endoleak, migration >5 mm or any pre-emptive neck related intervention), iliac related events (type 1B endoleak or pre-emptive iliac related intervention), and overall survival. RESULTS: Four hundred and four patients were included: 101 in the first quartile (Q1; <61 cm3). Patients with higher luminal volumes had wider, shorter, and more angulated proximal necks. There were more ruptured AAAs, more aorto-uni-iliac implanted devices and patients outside neck instructions for use in the 4th quartile. Five year freedom from AAA related complications was 79%, 66%, 58% and 56%, respectively (p = .007). At five years, freedom from neck related events was 86%, 84%, 73%, and 71%, respectively, for the four groups (p = .009), and freedom from iliac related events was 96%, 91%, 88%, and 88%, respectively (p = .335). On multivariable analysis, luminal volume was an independent predictor of late complications (Q4 vs. Q1 - hazard ratio: 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.6, p = .046). Overall survival at five years was not affected by lumen volume (p = .75). CONCLUSION: AAA luminal volume represents an important risk factor for AAA related complications. This information may be considered when deciding tailoring surveillance protocols after EVAR. However, larger studies are needed to validate this hypothesis.

Long-term results after standard endovascular aneurysm repair with the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Many endografts are currently available for standard endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison of long-term outcomes between devices might aid in this decision process, but comparative data are scarce. The purpose of this study was to report long-term clinical outcomes of two commercially available endoprosthesis, the Endurant (Medtronic Vascular, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) and the Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) stent grafts. METHODS: Patients undergoing standard endovascular repair from July 2004 to December 2011 in a single institution with the Endurant or the Low-Porosity Excluder endografts were eligible. Only patients treated for intact degenerative abdominal infrarenal aneurysms were included. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. The primary end point was primary clinical success, defined as clinical success without the need for an additional or secondary surgical or endovascular procedure. Neck-related events (a composite of type IA endoleak, neck-related secondary intervention, or migration of >5 mm), neck morphology changes, renal function, and overall survival were secondary end points. RESULTS: The study included 277 patients (156 Endurants; 121 Excluders). The median follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.1-12.4 years) and did not differ between groups (P = .18). Patients treated with the Endurant stent graft had wider (neck diameter of >28 mm, 27.3% vs 1.7% [P < .001]; neck diameter of 27 mm, [interquartile range (IQR), 24-29 mm] for Endurant and 24 mm [IQR, 22-25 mm] for Excluder; P < .001) and more angulated necks (ß-angle of >60°, 26.7% vs 12.5%; P = .004). Oversizing was greater in the Endurant group (16% [IQR, 12%-22%] vs 13% [IQR, 8%-17%], respectively; P < .001). Patients were treated outside device instructions for use regarding proximal neck: 16.7% in the Endurant and 17.3% in the Excluder group (P = .720). The 7-year primary clinical success was 54.7% for the Endurant and 58.1% for the Excluder groups (P = .53). Freedom from neck-related events at 7 years was 76.7% for the Endurant and 78.8% for Excluder group (P = .94). The Endurant stent graft (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.8; P = .009) was an independent predictor of significant renal function decline. Neck dilatation was greater in Endurant-implanted patients (13% [95% CI, 2%-22%] vs 4% [95% CI, 0%-10%]; P < .001). Overall survival at 7 years was 61.4% in the Endurant and 50.3% (n = 50; standard error, 0.047) in the Excluder group (P = .39). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that durable and sustainable results can be obtained with either of these late generation devices. This finding suggests that careful planning and a tailored device selection taking into account the patient's anatomy are more relevant determinants than the graft model itself to obtain clinical success. The Endurant endoprosthesis seems to be associated with a higher rate of neck dilatation and faster decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, but further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the clinical relevance of these findings.

Comparison of midterm results of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured and elective abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became an increasingly preferred modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair both in elective AAA repair (el-EVAR) and EVAR of a ruptured AAA (r-EVAR) setting. Ruptured AAAs usually have more hostile anatomies and less time for planning. Consequently, more complications may arise after r-EVAR. The purpose of this study was to compare mi-term outcomes between r-EVAR and el-EVAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing EVAR from 2000 to 2015 at a tertiary institution was performed. Patients with previous aortic surgery, nonatherosclerotic AAA and isolated iliac aneurysms were excluded. In-hospital casualties or patients who were intraoperatively converted to open repair were also excluded. For the midterm outcome analysis, only patients with at least two postoperative examinations (a 30-day computed tomography scan and a second postoperative examination performed 6 months or later) were considered. The primary end point was freedom from aneurysm-related complications (a composite of type I or III endoleak, aneurysm sac growth, migration of more than 5 mm, device integrity failure, AAA-related death, late postimplant rupture, or AAA-related secondary intervention). Freedom from secondary interventions, neck-related events (defined as a composite of type IA endoleak, migration of more than 5 mm, or preemptive neck-related secondary intervention) and late survival were secondary end points. The impact of device instructions for use (IFU) compliance on neck events was also assessed. RESULTS: The study included 565 patients (65 r-EVAR and 500 el-EVAR). Eighty-two patients were treated outside proximal neck IFU, 13 in the r-EVAR group (21.3%) and 69 (14.5%) in the el-EVAR (P = .16). During the index hospitalization, there were more complications (12.3% vs 3.2%; P = .001) and reinterventions (12.3% vs 2.8%; P < .001) in the r-EVAR group. After discharge, median clinical follow-up time was 4.3 years (interquartile range, 2.1-7.0 years) without differences between both groups. Five-year freedom from AAA-related complications was 53.9% in the r-EVAR group and 65.4% in the el-EVAR (P = .21). In multivariable analysis the r-EVAR group was not at increased risk for late complications (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.61; P = .81). Five-year freedom from neck-related events was 74% in r-EVAR and 82% in the el-EVAR group (P = .345). Patients treated outside neck IFU were at greater risk for neck-related events both in r-EVAR (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.8-22.9; P = .004) and el-EVAR group (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.5; P < .001). Freedom from secondary interventions at 5 years was 63.0% for r-EVAR and 76.9% for el-EVAR (P = .16). Survival at 5 years was 68.8% in the r-EVAR group and 73.3% in the el-EVAR group (P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Durable and sustainable midterm outcomes were found for both r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients who survived the postoperative period. Patients treated outside the IFU are at greater risk for late complications. Surveillance protocols may be tailored according to individual anatomy and IFU compliance rather than timing of repair.

Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: State of the Art.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm has been increasingly advocated due to short term benefits. Most observational studies point towards survival advantage for endovascular aneurysm repair over open repair. However, randomized clinical trials already performed did not support this data. The aim of this review is to compare post-operative outcomes between endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgery for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE databases were searched to access outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and open repair for ruptured abdominal aneurysm repair. All the randomized controlled trials were included. Large and contemporary observational studies were also considered. RESULTS: Thirty day mortality ranged between 18% - 53% for endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and between 24% - 53% for open repair. Post-operative complications ranged between 33% - 77% for endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and 37% - 80% for open repair. In hospital stay ranged between 8.5 and 14.3 days for endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and between 12.2 and 20.5 days for open repair. Intensive care unit days ranged between 1.75 - 4.2 days for endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and 2.5 - 6.3 days for open repair. DISCUSSION: Survival benefit is found for endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in most observational studies, but those are not reproduced by randomized controlled trials data. However, endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm showed less post-operative complications and hospitalization days. CONCLUSION: Endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm should be considered as first line of treatment in centers with expertise and proper facilities.

Introdução: O tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto tem sido progressivamente preferido pelos potenciais benefícios de curto-prazo. A maioria dos estudos observacionais revela uma vantagem na sobrevida imediata para o tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto, relativamente à cirurgia convencional. Contudo, os ensaios clínicos randomizados até hoje realizados não suportam estes resultados. Esta revisão tem por objetivo comparar os resultados do tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto com cirurgia convencional no tratamento de aneurismas rotos. Materiais e Métodos: Bases de dados MEDLINE foram alvo de pesquisa no sentido de obter informação relativamente a resultados de curto prazo após correção de aneurisma roto por tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto ou cirurgia convencional. Todos os ensaios clínicos randomizados foram incluídos. Estudos observacionais relevantes e contemporâneos foram também considerados. Resultados: Mortalidade aos 30 dias variou entre 18% - 53% para o tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto e entre 24% - 53% para a cirurgia convencional. Complicações pós-operatórias variaram entre 33% - 77% para o tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto e entre 37% - 80% para a cirurgia convencional. Tempo de internamento variou entre 8,5 e 14,3 dias para o tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto e entre 12,2 e 20,5 para a cirurgia convencional. Número de dias em cuidados intensivos variou entre 1,75 - 4,2 para o tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto e entre 2,5 - 6,3 para a cirurgia convencional. Discussão: Vantagem na sobrevida é descrita para o tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto nos estudos observacionais, mas estes dados não foram reproduzidos nos ensaios clínicos randomizados realizados. Contudo, o tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto cursa com menos complicações pós-operatórias e dias de internamento. Conclusão: O tratamento endovascular do aneurisma da aorta abdominal roto deve ser considerado como primeira linha de tratamento em instituições de elevada experiência e com infra-estruturas adequadas.

Predictors of long-term mortality following elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became the preferred modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, long term survival benefit may sometimes be questionable as many patients would die from other causes rather than aneurysm rupture. It is paramount to identify critical risk factors for late mortality after EVAR to understand its real benefit. The aim of this review is to identify most clinically relevant determinants of late mortality after elective EVAR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: English literature was searched to identify publications on long-term predictors of mortality following elective EVAR. A follow-up extending for at least 5 years was the minimum required as inclusion criteria. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. We addressed clinical and demographic variables and observe if they had any associations with long-term all-cause mortality following EVAR. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twelve studies were included describing more than 82306 patients, exploring at least one predictor of long-term mortality. All-cause mortality was associated to age (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.06-3.34), gender (HR: 1.07), aneurysm diameter (HR: 1.09-1.64), smoking habits (HR: 1.51-1.73), heart failure (HR: 1.60-7.34), ischemic heart disease (HR: 1.60), peripheral vascular disease (HR: 1.30), cerebrovascular disease (HR: 1.55), diabetes mellitus (HR: 6.35), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR: 1.50-2.06) and chronic renal disease (HR: 1.90-3.08). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors associated with long-term mortality following elective EVAR remain scarcely published. Several demographic, anatomical, cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal comorbidities seem to have an association with long-term mortality. Critical scrutiny of clinical patient status remains fundamental for a fair health resources allocation.

Review on management and outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.

Vascular procedures in general, and specifically abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, are associated with worse outcomes in female patients. However, how female gender influences outcomes in the setting of aneurysm-rupture remains unclear and may be even more pronounced when compared to elective operations. In this report, the authors aim to review the literature regarding ruptured AAA repair in women. Using the traditional threshold for AAA of 30 mm of maximum diameter, the prevalence in women is lesser than in men. However, the true prevalence may be underestimated due to gender discrepancies in normal aortic diameter. For females, aneurysmal disease seems to manifest later, have more associated comorbidities, and rupture occurs at smaller aortic diameters. This has obvious implications for management. There is still no consensus over the optimal treatment for ruptured AAA in women. They are less frequently treated by endovascular aneurysm repair, possibly due to anatomical restrains. When feasible, endovascular repair shows better outcomes, at least in the short-term, and there is new evidence suggesting a lasting benefit as well. For open repair the results are consensually worse when compared to male counterparts. Finally, despite benefitting of apparently similar healthcare, women have a lower relative survival after rAAA repair when compared to men. Further investigation to determine the reasons of these discrepancies is warranted.

Long-term results of outside "instructions for use" EVAR.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has progressively expanded to more complex anatomies, frequently outside manufacturer's instructions for use (IFU). However, the long term results of off-label use of EVAR remain largely undocumented. The aim of this paper is to examine the long term results of outside IFU EVAR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: English literature was searched to identify publications on long term results for outside IFU EVAR. A follow-up extending for at least 5 years was the minimum required as inclusion criteria. The outcomes measured were: overall mortality, aneurysm-related mortality (ARM), freedom from postimplant aneurysm rupture, aneurysm sac enlargement, type I endoleaks and secondary interventions. Results were compared to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with long term results published (EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE Trial). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirteen studies were included. 7 studies described outcomes associated to a specific breached IFU, while 6 studies presented general outside IFU results. In patients outside IFU, 3 to 8 years estimates of overall mortality ranged from 21.5% to 40% (RCTs:13.7-46%) and ARM from 0-11% (RCTs: 1.2-7%). Five-year estimates of sac enlargement was approximately 43%. Type I endoleak rates for outside IFU (follow-up 5-12 years) ranged from 3.8-15%, which is higher than found in RCT-derived data (6.6-6.9%). Comparable results are seen for postimplant rupture and secondary interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The long term results of off-label use of EVAR are scarcely published. Although overall mortality and ARM does not seem to differ significantly at long-term, higher rates of type I endoleaks may be expected, mainly in short necks. However, for patients with severe angulation or high thrombus load in the proximal neck, results of outside IFU EVAR seem to match the results of inside IFU.