Estimated Doses to the Heart, Lungs and Oesophagus and Risks From Typical UK Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer During 2015-2023.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer radiotherapy can increase the risks of heart disease, lung cancer and oesophageal cancer. At present, the best dosimetric predictors of these risks are mean doses to the whole heart, lungs and oesophagus, respectively. We aimed to estimate typical doses to these organs and resulting risks from UK breast cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of planned or delivered mean doses to the whole heart, lungs or oesophagus from UK breast cancer radiotherapy in studies published during 2015-2023. Average mean doses were summarised for combinations of laterality and clinical targets. Heart disease and lung cancer mortality risks were then estimated using established models. RESULTS: For whole heart, thirteen studies reported 2893 doses. Average mean doses were higher in left than in right-sided radiotherapy and increased with extent of clinical targets. For left-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 2.0 Gy (range 1.2-8.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 2.7 Gy (range 0.6-5.6 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 2.9 Gy (range 1.3-4.7 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For right-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 1.0 Gy (range 0.3-1.0 Gy) breast/chest wall and 1.2 Gy (range 1.0-1.4 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes. There were no whole heart dose estimates from right internal mammary radiotherapy. For whole lung, six studies reported 2230 doses. Average mean lung doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 2.6 Gy (range 1.4-3.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 3.0 Gy (range 0.9-5.1 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 7.1 Gy (range 6.7-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For whole oesophagus, two studies reported 76 doses. Average mean oesophagus doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 1.4 Gy (range 1.0-2.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 5.8 Gy (range 1.9-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. CONCLUSIONS: The typical doses to these organs may be combined with dose-response relationships to estimate radiation risks. Estimated 30-year absolute lung cancer mortality risks from modern UK breast cancer radiotherapy for patients irradiated when aged 50 years were 2-6% for long-term continuing smokers, and <1% for non-smokers. Estimated 30-year mortality risks for heart disease were <1%.

International Variation in Criteria for Internal Mammary Chain Radiotherapy.

AIMS: Evidence has emerged that internal mammary chain (IMC) radiotherapy reduces breast cancer mortality, leading to changes in treatment guidelines. This study investigated current IMC radiotherapy criteria and the percentages of patients irradiated for breast cancer in England who fulfilled them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken for national guidelines published in English during 2013-2018 presenting criteria for 'consideration of' or 'recommendation for' IMC radiotherapy. Patient and tumour variables were collected for patients who received breast cancer radiotherapy in England during 2012-2016. The percentages of patients fulfilling criteria stipulated in each set of guidelines were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 111 729 women were recorded as receiving adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy in England during 2012-2016 and full data were available on 48 095 of them. Percentages of patients fulfilling IMC radiotherapy criteria in various national guidelines were: UK Royal College of Radiologists 13% (6035/48 095), UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 18% (8816/48 095), Germany 32% (15 646/48 095), Ireland 56% (26 846/48 095) and USA 59% (28 373/48 095). Differences between countries occurred because in Ireland and the USA, treatment may be considered in some node-negative patients, whereas in the UK, treatment is considered if at least four axillary nodes are involved or for high-risk patients with one to three positive nodes. In Germany, treatment may be considered for all node-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability between countries in criteria for consideration of IMC radiotherapy, despite guidelines being based on the same evidence. This will probably lead to large variations in practice and resource needs worldwide.

Improving the therapeutic index of anthracycline chemotherapy: focus on liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet).

Anthracyclines are valuable cytotoxic agents in cancer treatment. However, their usefulness is limited by cumulative dose-dependent cardiotoxicity that may manifest as life-threatening congestive heart failure. To avoid cardiotoxicity, the use of doxorubicin is typically capped at a safe cumulative dose. Liposomal formulations may reduce cardiac risks whilst maintaining anti-cancer efficacy. Efficacy and safety studies of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are reviewed, along with studies that examine efficacy and cardiac tolerability in combination with newer agents such as paclitaxel and trastuzumab. These show that cardiac safety of liposomal doxorubicin is similar to that of epirubicin in cumulative dose, but that the formulation, unlike epirubicin, has similar anti-cancer efficacy to doxorubicin at equimolar doses. Liposomal doxorubicin may have a better therapeutic index than non-liposomal anthracyclines. This justifies further studies in patients where cumulative cardiotoxicity is a concern, as does study of its use with other potentially cardiotoxic agents.

Re-defining rectal volume and DVH for analysis of rectal morbidity risk after radiotherapy for early prostate cancer.

Improved prostate cancer cure rates have been attributed to higher radiotherapy dose prescriptions delivered more safely by modern conformal/intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) methods. As the dose becomes more concentrated conformally on the prostate, the volume of the rectum "at risk" for damage becomes smaller and more focal on the anterior rectal wall between the upper and lower axial limits of the planning target volume (PTV). The rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) traditionally studies the whole volume of the rectum, and such definition for "avoidance" planning presupposes that rectal tolerance depends on "whole organ" radiation tolerance (as might, for example, lung or kidney). However, rectal morbidity with modern prostate radiotherapy is determined by anterior rectal wall tolerance between the superior and inferior limits of the PTV; this, we argue, is not dependent on whole organ tolerance. Recent published studies attempting to improve rectal DVH definition have studied the rectal wall only and concluded that rectal wall DVH is more relevant than whole rectum. In this manuscript, it is first demonstrated that a large and more relevant difference exists when comparing whole rectal DVH to "PTV limits" rectal DVH. Secondly, when considering "PTV limits" rectal DVH, the wall vs whole perimeter comparison differs little. Furthermore, by adopting a "PTV limits" DVH, the inferior right quartile of the DVH accurately reflects the dose distribution to the most vulnerable section of the anterior rectal wall. With improving IMRT technologies, scrutiny of this part of the rectal DVH will most accurately predict rectal sparing - reflected in this manuscript by the less precipitous decline of the TomoTherapy DVH vs the three-dimensional conformal DVH towards the maximum dose point received by the rectum.