Evaluation of prevalence and outcomes of serial tyrosine kinase inhibitor use in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) are increasingly utilized in the treatment of pediatric sarcomas and other solid tumors. It is unknown whether serial treatment with multiple TKIs provides a benefit and which patients are most likely to benefit from mTKI rechallenge. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric cancer patients who received serial mTKI therapy off-study between 2007 and 2020 as either monotherapy or combination therapy. We report patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, dosing patterns, and treatment-associated toxicity. RESULTS: The study cohort included 25 patients. The overall prevalence of serial mTKI therapy among all patients treated for sarcoma at our institution was 3.7%, and the response rate to second mTKI was 9%. Median 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start of second mTKI were 42.1% (95% CI: 20.4%-62.5%) and 79.1% (95% CI: 57.0%-90.8%), respectively. Patients who had received 4 months or more (n = 11) of therapy with first mTKI had significantly longer PFS versus those who received less than 4 months (n = 11; p = .001). Thirty-three percent of patients discontinued second mTKI due to toxicity. Six (40%) of 15 patients who discontinued the first mTKI due to progression had either a partial response or stable disease on the second mTKI. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a low response rate to mTKI rechallenge. However, we identified patients who had been treated with first mTKI for  ≥4 months as more likely to have prolonged stable disease with second mTKI. Several patients had a response or stable disease on the second mTKI despite having progressed on the first mTKI. Though toxicity was common, only a minority of patients discontinued the second mTKI due to toxicity.

Immunotherapy approaches for the treatment of diffuse midline gliomas.

Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) are a highly aggressive and universally fatal subgroup of pediatric tumors responsible for the majority of childhood brain tumor deaths. Median overall survival is less than 12 months with a 90% mortality rate at 2 years from diagnosis. Research into the underlying tumor biology and numerous clinical trials have done little to change the invariably poor prognosis. Continued development of novel, efficacious therapeutic options for DMGs remains a critically important area of active investigation. Given that DMGs are not amenable to surgical resection, have only limited response to radiation, and are refractory to traditional chemotherapy, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising alternative treatment modality. This review summarizes the various immunotherapy-based treatments for DMG as well as their specific limitations. We explore the use of cell-based therapies, oncolytic virotherapy or immunovirotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibition, and immunomodulatory vaccination strategies, and highlight the recent clinical success of anti-GD2 CAR-T therapy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) patients. Finally, we address the challenges faced in translating preclinical and early phase clinical trial data into effective standardized treatment for DMG patients.

Standard clinical approaches and emerging modalities for glioblastoma imaging.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary adult intracranial malignancy and carries a dismal prognosis despite an aggressive multimodal treatment regimen that consists of surgical resection, radiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiographic evaluation, largely informed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a critical component of initial diagnosis, surgical planning, and post-treatment monitoring. However, conventional MRI does not provide information regarding tumor microvasculature, necrosis, or neoangiogenesis. In addition, traditional MRI imaging can be further confounded by treatment-related effects such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and/or pseudoresponse(s) that preclude clinicians from making fully informed decisions when structuring a therapeutic approach. A myriad of novel imaging modalities have been developed to address these deficits. Herein, we provide a clinically oriented review of standard techniques for imaging GBM and highlight emerging technologies utilized in disease characterization and therapeutic development.

Targeting oncometabolism to maximize immunotherapy in malignant brain tumors.

Brain tumors result in significant morbidity and mortality in both children and adults. Recent data indicate that immunotherapies may offer a survival benefit after standard of care has failed for malignant brain tumors. Modest results from several late phase clinical trials, however, underscore the need for more refined, comprehensive strategies that incorporate new mechanistic and pharmacologic knowledge. Recently, oncometabolism has emerged as an adjunct modality for combinatorial treatment approaches necessitated by the aggressive, refractory nature of high-grade glioma and other progressive malignant brain tumors. Manipulation of metabolic processes in cancer and immune cells that comprise the tumor microenvironment through controlled targeting of oncogenic pathways may be utilized to maximize the efficacy of immunotherapy and improve patient outcomes. Herein, we summarize preclinical and early phase clinical trial research of oncometabolism-based therapeutics that may augment immunotherapy by exploiting the biochemical and genetic underpinnings of brain tumors. We also examine metabolic pathways related to immune cells that target tumor cells, termed "tumor immunometabolism". Specifically, we focus on glycolysis and altered glucose metabolism, including glucose transporters, hexokinase, pyruvate dehydrogenase, and lactate dehydrogenase, glutamine, and we discuss targeting arginase, adenosine, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, and toll-like receptors. Lastly, we summarize future directions targeting metabolism in combination with emerging therapies such as oncolytic virotherapy, vaccines, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines for pediatric malignancies: advances, challenges, and emerging technologies.

Though outcomes for pediatric cancer patients have significantly improved over the past several decades, too many children still experience poor outcomes and survivors suffer lifelong, debilitating late effects after conventional chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical treatment. Consequently, there has been a renewed focus on developing novel targeted therapies to improve survival outcomes. Cancer vaccines are a promising type of immunotherapy that leverage the immune system to mediate targeted, tumor-specific killing through recognition of tumor antigens, thereby minimizing off-target toxicity. As such, cancer vaccines are orthogonal to conventional cancer treatments and can therefore be used alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities to maximize efficacy. To date, cancer vaccination has remained largely understudied in the pediatric population. In this review, we discuss the different types of tumor antigens and vaccine technologies (dendritic cells, peptides, nucleic acids, and viral vectors) evaluated in clinical trials, with a focus on those used in children. We conclude with perspectives on how advances in combination therapies, tumor antigen (eg, neoantigen) selection, and vaccine platform optimization can be translated into clinical practice to improve outcomes for children with cancer.

Trends in conditional survival and predictors of late death in neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: Significant advances in the treatment of neuroblastoma have been made in the past several decades. There are scant data examining how these improvements have changed over time and differentially affected conditional survival among high-risk and non-high-risk patient groups. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We analyzed clinical characteristics and survival outcomes for 4717 neuroblastoma patients. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and conditional overall survival (COS) with estimates compared between groups using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Five-year OS was 41.46% (95% CI 38.77-44.13) for the high-risk group and 91.13% (95% CI 89.49-92.53) for the non-high-risk group. Both groups saw significant improvements in OS by decade (P < .001). Five-year COS among 1-year survivors was 52.69% (CI 49.54-55.73) for the high-risk group and 96.75% (95% CI 95.57-97.62) for the non-high-risk group. One-year survivors in the high-risk group showed a statistically significant improvement in COS over time. No difference in COS was observed among 5-year high-risk survivors. In the high-risk and non-high-risk groups, 82% and 32% of late deaths were attributable to cancer, respectively. Statistically significant adverse prognostic factors for late death were age ≥ 1 year at diagnosis, metastatic disease, and nonthoracic primary site (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in COS over time have largely benefited high-risk patients, though they are still at higher risk for late death due to cancer when compared to non-high-risk patients. Age, stage, and primary site, but not treatment decade, influence outcomes among 5-year survivors.