Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Disease in Diabetics: The BEST Extended Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is associated with more complex coronary artery diseases. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a preferred revascularization strategy over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetics with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the different prognostic effects of revascularization strategies according to the diabetes status from the randomized BEST (Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease) trial. METHODS: Patients (n = 880) with MVD were randomly assigned to undergo PCI with an everolimus-eluting stent vs CABG stratified by diabetics (n = 363) and nondiabetics (n = 517). The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization during a median follow-up of 11.8 years (IQR: 10.6-12.5 years). RESULTS: In diabetics, the primary endpoint rate was significantly higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group (43% and 32%; HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.12-2.08; P = 0.008). However, in nondiabetics, no significant difference was found between the groups (PCI group, 29%; CABG group, 29%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.67-1.39; P = 0.86; Pinteraction= 0.009). Irrespective of the presence of diabetes, no significant between-group differences were found in the rate of a safety composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke and mortality rate. However, the rate of any repeat revascularization was significantly higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetics with MVD, CABG was associated with better clinical outcomes than PCI. However, the mortality rate was similar between PCI and CABG irrespective of diabetes status during an extended follow-up. (Ten-Year Outcomes of Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease [BEST Extended], NCT05125367; Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease [BEST], NCT00997828).

Trial of everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for coronary disease.

BACKGROUND: Most trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) have not made use of second-generation drug-eluting stents. METHODS: We conducted a randomized noninferiority trial at 27 centers in East Asia. We planned to randomly assign 1776 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to PCI with everolimus-eluting stents or to CABG. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization at 2 years after randomization. Event rates during longer-term follow-up were also compared between groups. RESULTS: After the enrollment of 880 patients (438 patients randomly assigned to the PCI group and 442 randomly assigned to the CABG group), the study was terminated early owing to slow enrollment. At 2 years, the primary end point had occurred in 11.0% of the patients in the PCI group and in 7.9% of those in the CABG group (absolute risk difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 6.9; P=0.32 for noninferiority). At longer-term follow-up (median, 4.6 years), the primary end point had occurred in 15.3% of the patients in the PCI group and in 10.6% of those in the CABG group (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.13; P=0.04). No significant differences were seen between the two groups in the occurrence of a composite safety end point of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. However, the rates of any repeat revascularization and spontaneous myocardial infarction were significantly higher after PCI than after CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was higher among those who had undergone PCI with the use of everolimus-eluting stents than among those who had undergone CABG. (Funded by CardioVascular Research Foundation and others; BEST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00997828.).

Outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in end stage renal disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have a much higher rate of cardiac disease and cardiac mortality as compared with the general population. Revascularisation such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may also carry a higher rate of complications and morbidity. We compared our ESRD patients who underwent CABG with the general population and ESRD population. METHODS: This is an observational study of ESRD patients who underwent CABG in our centre from 2003-2009 with case-control matching comparison with non-ESRD patients for ICU and hospital stay; and ESRD patients without CABG for survival. Patients with concomitant valvular operation were excluded. The primary outcomes were peri-operative complications and survival. RESULTS: Eleven patients with mean age of 57.5 +/- 8.5 were included. All except 1 were diabetics. One patient had excessive haemorrhage requiring immediate re-thoracotomy, and this was complicated with thrombosed AVF. Four patients experienced intradialytic hypotension postoperatively but all resolved within 1 week. Both ESRD and non-ESRD patients had equal number of ICU stay (3.1 versus 3.2 days, p = 0.906) and hospital stay (7.6 versus 6.9 days, p = 0.538). With average of 3.3 years follow-up (range from 1 to 7 years), 4 deaths were observed but only one from cardiac cause. Both ESRD cohorts with or without CABG have compatible left ventricular mass: 295 +/- 86 vs 343 +/- 113 g (p=0.226) and left ventricular mass: 174 +/- 54 vs. 206 +/- 63 g/m2 (p = 0.157). The outcome of CABG ESRD patients was comparable to matched ESRD patients without CABG with 90.9 % versus 91.9% 1 year survival, 95.5% versus 77.7% 2 year survival, 71.4% versus 70.3% 3 year and 40.0% versus 40.3% at 5 year survival (p = 0.627, 0.386, 0.659 and 0.683 respectively). CONCLUSION: CABG in ESRD patients carries an acceptable perioperative complication rate. They have acceptable ICU and hospitalization duration in comparison to non-ESRD patients. Their long term survival was at least as good as matched ESRD patients without CABG.

Vessel density ratio: A novel approach to identify "culprit" coronary lesion by spiral computed tomography.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a "culprit" lesion in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should have low overall vessel lumen and plaque density on multidetector computed tomography-assisted coronary angiography (MDCTA) because of lower calcification and the presence of occlusive thrombus. However, thrombi and calcification both can themselves blur the demarcation between vessel wall and lumen. If we calculated a "vessel density ratio" (VDR) obtained by measuring the mean density of contrast-enhancement within a region of interest (ROI), which includes the vessel wall, lumen, plaque, and thrombus, and comparing that with the aortic root mean density acting as a reference point, this ratio may be more convenient, standardized, and reproducible to test the feasibility of VDR in identifying "culprit" lesions in ACS. METHODS: Sixty-four patients-21 exertional angina; 17 unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI); 26 ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-provided 188 diseased segments on conventional angiography. All underwent MDCTA within a week of angiography. ROI was mapped out from maximum intensity projections of diseased segments in planar view. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four segments were evaluated. Patients who presented with ACS (STEMI and unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction) had lower mean VDR compared to patients with exertional angina (0.58 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.81; P < 0.001). Culprit lesions in ACS patients also had the lowest mean VDR when compared to nonculprit lesions and lesions in patients without ACS (0.51 vs. 0.68 vs. 0.81; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VDR is a new, convenient, and standardized approach in identifying "culprit" lesions by MDCTA.

Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification.

BACKGROUND: The new 64-row multidetector computed tomography (CT)-assisted angiography can now detect coronary artery disease with shorter breath-hold time and at faster heart rates for symptomatic patients. We aim to determine if the 64-row scanner can also overcome limitations due to mild to moderate calcification. METHODS: Scheduled for conventional coronary angiography, 134 symptomatic patients underwent multidetector CT-assisted angiography within 3 months. Patients were divided into those with low or high calcium score (median score 142) by modified Agatston formula: group A calcium score <142 Agatston score (68 patients, mean age 53 years, heart rate 62 beat/min) and group B calcium score > or = 142 Agatston score (66 patients, mean age 57 years, heart rate 62 beat/min). Eleven major coronary segments were evaluated. RESULTS: In group A, 93.6% of segments were evaluable with 97.3% correlation. Segment-by-segment analyses for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 85.4%, 98.1%, 76.7%, and 99.2%, respectively. For group B, 86.9% of segments were evaluable with 90.5% correlation. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 79.9%, 92.8%, 78.8%, and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography can reliably detect the presence of significant coronary stenosis in symptomatic patients with mild calcification, but remains limited by moderate to heavy calcification.