Prospective validation of a brief questionnaire for predicting the severity of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is diagnosed and stratified by polysomnography. However, due to cost and inaccessibility, up to 90% of children undergo tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) solely based on clinical criteria. We previously developed a data-driven brief screening questionnaire ('Selected Features,' SF) that predicted OSA severity than alternatives. The SF asks the parent whether a child: (i) has had breath-holding spells at night over the past 4 weeks, (ii) is a mouth-breather during the day, (iii) has stopped growing at a normal rate any time since birth, and (iv) is overweight. This study sought prospectively validate the SF questionnaire. METHODS: We conducted a prospective assessment of the predictive accuracy of SF compared to the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire-Sleep Related Breathing Disorder (PSQ-SRBD) scale in otherwise healthy children with sleep disordered breathing referred for T&A. We compared the model fits of PSQ-SRDB and SF for (i) a linear regression model for the prediction of OSA, and (ii) a logistic regression model for severe OSA, defined as apnea hypopnea index (AHI) > 10. P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were included. The average age was 7.3 years (95% confidence interval, 6.6-8.0) and 66 (54%) were male. The racial composition was 54 (44%) black, 41 (33%) white, and 28 (23%) other. The median AHI was 4.8 (interquartile range 12) and 43 (35%) of patients had severe OSA. In linear and logistic regression models, SF outperformed the PSQ-SRBD and null models as measured by Akaike Information Criteria. The overall accuracy in predicting AHI >10 for PSQ-SRBD was 0.65 (0.56-0.73, P = 0.54) compared to 0.73 (0.64-0.80, P = 0.04) for SF. CONCLUSION: By eliminating redundancy, we have developed a questionnaire with improved prediction of OSA and its severity, in children with high pre-test probability of the condition. While multi-site validation is necessary, SF demonstrates value in screening children prior to T&A in resource-limited environments.

Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device After Descending Aortic Stent Graft for Mural Thrombus.

In patients with intraluminal thrombus, commonly applied temporary circulatory support modalities are contraindicated secondary to concern regarding distal or proximal (specifically veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) embolization of the thrombus. Therefore, in patients with cardiogenic shock and synchronous intraluminal descending aortic thrombus, support options are quite limited. We report a case of a 66-year-old man in cardiogenic shock, due to an ischemic cardiomyopathy, who also had intramural thrombus with an intraluminal component in the descending thoracic aorta. An endovascular stent graft was inserted inside the aorta over the location of the mural thrombus. This allowed for the placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) for pre-operative optimization. After 3 days, a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was implanted via left anterolateral thoracotomy with hemi-sternotomy, and the IABP was removed. Post-operatively, he had a relatively uncomplicated course without signs of embolic phenomena and ultimately was discharged home. Surveillance computed tomography imaging at 6 months showed no endovascular leak or migration of the stent. This case demonstrates the feasibility of aortic stent graft placement to allow safe insertion of an IABP in the setting of aortic mural thrombus.  Furthermore, it demonstrates the safety and feasibility of LVAD implantation after recent aortic stent graft placement.