Increased risk of diaphragmatic herniation following esophagectomy with a minimally invasive abdominal approach.

OBJECTIVE: Diaphragmatic herniation is a rare complication following esophagectomy, associated with risks of aspiration pneumonia, bowel obstruction, and strangulation. Repair can be challenging due to the presence of the gastric conduit. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with diaphragmatic herniation following esophagectomy, the timing and mode of presentation, and outcomes of repair. METHODS: A systematic search using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines was performed using four major databases. A meta-analysis of diaphragmatic herniation incidence following esophagectomies with a minimally invasive abdominal (MIA) approach compared with open esophagectomies was conducted. Qualitative analysis was performed for tumor location, associated symptoms, time to presentation, and outcomes of postdiaphragmatic herniation repair. RESULTS: This systematic review consisted of 17,052 patients from 32 studies. The risk of diaphragmatic herniation was 2.74 times higher in MIA esophagectomy compared with open esophagectomy, with pooled incidence of 6.0% versus 3.2%, respectively. Diaphragmatic herniation was more commonly seen following surgery for distal esophageal tumors. Majority of patients (64%) were symptomatic at diagnosis. Presentation within 30 days of operation occurred in 21% of cases and is twice as likely to require emergent repair with increased surgical morbidity. Early diaphragmatic herniation recurrence and cardiorespiratory complications are common sequelae following hernia repair. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of MIA esophagectomy, one has to be cognizant of the increased risk of diaphragmatic herniation and its sequelae. Failure to recognize early diaphragmatic herniation can result in catastrophic consequences. Increased vigilance and decreased threshold for imaging during this period is warranted.

Giant haemorrhagic hepatic cyst with flame-like morphology in a patient with polycystic kidney and liver disease.

INTRODUCTION: Intracystic haemorrhage is a rare complication of hepatic cysts, and is often mistaken for a malignant lesion. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old female with a history of polycystic kidney and liver disease presented with a six-month history of abdominal distension, abdominal pain, early satiety, shortness of breath and 5 kg of weight loss. Imaging revealed a 20 cm mixed solid-cystic hepatic lesion containing peripheral avascular mobile echogenic material with a flame-like morphology. After experiencing symptomatic relief from ultrasound-guided aspiration, the patient underwent cyst fenestration for more definitive treatment. DISCUSSION: Haemorrhagic hepatic cysts are uncommon and may present on imaging as having lace-like retractile clot, internal layering or shading of separating blood products or avascular mobile flame-like excrescences. The presence of avascular mobile flame-like excrescences appears to be a unique feature of haemorrhagic hepatic cysts. CONCLUSION: While haemorrhagic hepatic cysts are rare and commonly mistaken for biliary cystadenomas or adenocarcinomas, the identification of particular features on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound can lead to the correct diagnosis.

Management of bile leak following blunt liver injury: a proposed guideline.

BACKGROUND: Bile leak following blunt liver trauma is uncommon. Management is difficult due to complex vasculo-biliary and liver parenchymal injury and lack of consensus on optimal care compared with bile leak following elective hepatectomy especially in regards to endoscopic retrograde pancreaticocholangiography (ERCP) timing and patient selection. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study from a level 1-trauma centre of patients with bile leak following blunt liver injury between July 2010 and December 2019 identified from the trauma registry. Clinical data retrieved include patient demographics, injury severity score, liver injury grading and its associated complications and treatment. This was supplemented by surgical audit database and patients' electronic medical record. RESULTS: There were 31 bile leaks amongst 639 patients with blunt liver trauma (4.9%). Bile leak was associated with higher liver injury grade (odds ratio (OR) 36, P = 0.001), hepatic embolization (OR 16, P = 0.003) and need for trauma laparotomy (OR 14, P = 0.024). ERCP was performed in 58.1% (n = 18). This was complicated in 27.7% (n = 5) by mild pancreatitis (n = 1) and intra-abdominal sepsis (n = 4) requiring surgical drainage of abscess (n = 2) and liver resection (n = 1). Bile leak settled conservatively (including percutaneous drainage) without ERCP in the remaining patients (41.9%). Overall mortality was not increased in those with bile leak (P = 0.998). CONCLUSION: Bile leaks resolved conservatively in 41.9% of patients. Complications following ERCP were seen in 27.7%, frequently requiring intervention. Failure of conservative management was more likely in patients with hepatic embolization, in whom early ERCP remains appropriate. ERCP should otherwise be reserved for those who fail conservative management to minimize infective complications.

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on post-operative pancreatic fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic cancer is increasing, although its impact on post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is variably reported. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of NAT on POPF. METHODS: A systematic literature search until October 2019 identified studies reporting POPF following NAT (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) versus upfront resection. The primary outcome was overall POPF. Secondary outcomes included grade B/C POPF, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post-operative pancreatic haemorrhage (PPH) and overall and major complications. RESULTS: The search identified 24 studies: pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), 19 studies (n = 19 416) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), five studies (n = 477). Local staging was reported in 17 studies, with borderline resectable and locally advanced disease comprising 6% (0-100%) and 1% (0-33%) of the population, respectively. For PD, any NAT was significantly associated with lower rates of overall POPF (OR: 0.57, P < 0.001) and grade B/C POPF (OR: 0.55, P < 0.001). In DP, NAT was not associated with significantly lower rates of overall or grade B/C POPF. CONCLUSION: NAT is associated with significantly lower rates of POPF after PD but not after DP. Further studies are required to determine whether NAT should be added to POPF risk calculators.

Coagulation in liver surgery: an observational haemostatic profile and thromboelastography study.

BACKGROUND: International normalized ratio (INR) is used as a marker of the haemostatic status following liver resection. However, the impact of liver resection on haemostasis is complex and beyond what can be measured by INR. This study aimed to prospectively assess haemostatic profile following liver resection and determine if INR measurement can safely guide post-operative thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing liver resection had coagulation parameters (International normalised ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, d-dimer, von Willebrand factor antigen, procoagulant activity of phospholipids and clotting factors II, VII, VIIIc, IX and X) and thromboelastogram parameters assessed perioperatively. Clinical follow-up assessed for thromboembolism and haemorrhage. RESULTS: In the 41 patients included, INR was significantly (P < 0.0001) elevated post-operatively, and INR >1.5 was observed in seven of 41 (17.1%) on post-operative day 1 and one of 41 (2.4%) patients on post-operative day 3, respectively. Factor VII levels showed transient reduction but other factors, especially factors II and X, remained within normal range following liver resection. Thromboelastogram parameters remained normal or supranormal for all patients at all time points. One incident of post-hepatectomy haemorrhage occurred, despite a normal coagulation profile. Two patients suffered late pulmonary embolic episodes. CONCLUSION: Post liver resection haemostasis is complex and poorly reflected by INR, which should not guide initiation of chemical thromboprophylaxis in the immediate post-operative period.