Improved diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue sarcoma patients after implementation of national guidelines: a population-based study.

AIM: The majority of clinicians, radiologists and pathologists have limited experience with soft tissue sarcomas. In 2004, national guidelines were established in The Netherlands to improve the quality of diagnosis and treatment of these rare tumours. This study evaluates the compliance with the guidelines over time. PATIENTS: Population-based series of 119 operated patients with a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) diagnosed in 1998-1999 (79 before implementation of new guidelines) and in 2006 (40 after implementation). METHODS: Coded information regarding patient and tumour characteristics as well as (the results of) pathology review was collected from the medical patient file by two experienced data-managers. RESULTS: Diagnostic imaging of the tumour was performed according to the guidelines in 75-100% depending on the site of the tumour (abdominal versus non-abdominal) as well as the time of diagnosis. Adherence to the guidelines with respect to invasive diagnostic procedures in patients with non-abdominal STS improved over time. A pre-operative histological diagnosis was obtained in 42% of the patients in 1998-1999 and in 72% of the patients in 2006 (p<0.001). The guidelines for reporting on pathology were increasingly adhered to. In 2006, (nearly) all pathology reports mentioned tumour size, morphology, tumour grade, resection margins and radicality. This represents a major improvement compared to the pathology reports in 1998-1999, where these aspects were not mentioned in 14-40% of the cases. The proportion of prospective pathology reviews by (a member of) the expert panel increased from 60% in 1998-1999 to 90% in 2006 (p=0.001). DISCUSSION: The compliance with the guidelines has been optimised by the increased attention to this group of patients. Most important factors have been the reporting of the results of the first evaluation and (discussions about) the centralisation of treatment. Further improvements could be reached by the prospective web based registry monitoring logistic aspects as well as parameters useful for the evaluation of the quality of care.

Family history is neglected in the work-up of patients with colorectal cancer: a quality assessment using cancer registry data.

In the diagnostic work-up of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome), high-risk patients can be identified using information from the family history on cancer ('Amsterdam criteria' and 'Bethesda guidelines'). To investigate to what extent the medical specialists apply these criteria to patients with colorectal carcinoma and a suspicion of HNPCC, we collected information on diagnostic work-up of 224 patients of seven hospitals in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre West in Leiden, The Netherlands. These patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2001 and satisfied at least one of the Bethesda guidelines. A complete family history was recorded for 38 of the 244 patients (16%). Patients with a complete family history were more likely to be referred to the Clinical Genetic Centre than those with an incomplete or absent family history (53% vs. 13% and 4%, respectively; P < 0.0001), and more likely to be analyzed for microsatellite instability (MSI), which is a characteristic of HNPCC (34% vs. 6% and 1%, respectively; P < 0.0001). We conclude that the family history is neglected in the majority of patients with colorectal cancer and MSI-analysis is only performed in a small proportion of the patients that meet the guidelines for this analysis.

Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of venous thrombosis (VT) for cancer patients is increased compared with patients without cancer, but estimations of the incidence for different types of cancer have rarely been made because of the low incidence of various types of cancer. Large registries offer an opportunity to study the risk of VT in large cohorts of cancer patients, which is essential in decisions on prophylactic anti-coagulant treatment. METHODS: This cohort study estimates the incidence of VT in cancer patients by using record linkage of a Cancer Registry and an Anticoagulation Clinic database in the Netherlands. Cumulative incidences in patients with different types of malignancies were estimated. We calculated relative risks (RRs) in relation to the presence of distant metastases and treatment. RESULTS: Tumors of the bone, ovary, brain, and pancreas are associated with the highest incidence of VT (37.7, 32.6, 32.1, and 22.7/1000/0.5 year). Patients with distant metastases had a 1.9-fold increased risk [RRadj: 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-2.3]. Chemotherapy leads to a 2.2-fold increased risk (RR(adj): 2.2; 95% CI: 1.8-2.7) and hormonal therapy leads to a 1.6-fold increased risk (RRadj: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3-2.1) compared with patients not using these treatment modalities. Patients with radiotherapy or surgery did not have an increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: We compared the overall incidences of VT in the first half year in our study to the risk of major bleeding as described in the literature. For patients with distant metastases, for several types of cancer, prophylactic anti-thrombotic treatment could be beneficial.

Monoclonal proteinaemia and solid tumours.

A higher prevalence of solid tumours in patients with M(onoclonal) proteinaemia without a co-existing haematological malignancy has been reported. We investigated this association by linking a population-based registry of patients with newly diagnosed M-proteinaemia (n = 1464) with the Regional Cancer Registry. Patients were followed for a median of 7.4 years for those still alive. In total 167 (11%) patients with 173 solid tumours were compared with 861 patients with 'M-proteinaemia only' (without a haematological malignancy). The M-protein isotype or level or clinical parameters did not differ between the groups. M-protein isotype was not associated with a specific tumour type. Standardised Morbidity Ratios (SMR) for nearly all solid tumours were elevated in the year of the M-protein discovery, but the excess risk disappeared during follow-up suggesting selection through diagnostic investigations rather than a causal role. In this large series of patients with both newly diagnosed M-proteinaemia and a solid tumour no relationship could be established.

Developing a population-based registry for patients with paraproteinemias or multiple myeloma.

The development of a population-based registry on paraproteinemia and multiple myeloma is described. A unique feature of this registry is the multidisciplinary approach to obtain and collect new cases. Clinical chemists, internists, hematologists, and pathologists could all enter patients. All patients newly diagnosed in the mid-western part of The Netherlands (1.7 million inhabitants in 1992) with a paraproteinemia or multiple myeloma in 1991, 1992, and 1993 were included. The project was composed of a registry of clinical and laboratory data extracted from the patient's records, storage of 1 ml serum at diagnosis, and a yearly follow-up. A total of 1832 entries was received, of which 83% met the inclusion criteria. Comparison of this database with the Regional Cancer Registry showed that the paraprotein registry was successful as far as registration of myeloma patients was concerned. We conclude that the multidisciplinary approach used in this paraprotein registry is feasible and has resulted in a unique collection of patients for studying potential pre-malignant conditions such as paraproteinemia.

[Cancer incidence in persons with a mental handicap; possibly increased risk of esophageal cancer]. / Incidentie van kanker bij mensen met een verstandelijke handicap; mogelijk verhoogd risico op slokdarmkanker.

OBJECTIVE: Prompted by a British study which revealed a raised frequency of oesophageal cancer as the cause of death among the mentally handicapped, a study was made of the cancer incidence among an institutionalized population with a mental handicap, which incidence was compared with that among the population in general. DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up study. METHODS: An inventory was made of the cytologically or histologically confirmed cancer diagnoses among persons living in an institute for the mentally handicapped during 1 January 1974 through 1 January 1994 (n = 1020). The incidence figures were compared with those for the general population (Netherlands Cancer Registration 1989) after indirect standardization. RESULTS: The total cancer risk among the population with a mental handicap was the same as that among the general population where women, and lower where men were concerned. This study brought to light a decreased risk of lung cancer (standardized morbidity rate (SMR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.97), while the SMR of oesophageal cancer showed no statistically significant increase. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer is not more frequent among the mentally handicapped than among the general population. Nevertheless, increased attention for occurrence of oesophageal cancer appears to be still indicated.