Does capsule endoscopy impact clinical management in established Crohn's disease?

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has developed a relevant role in patients with established Crohn's Disease (CD). However, evaluation of the impact in clinical management has been scarce. AIMS: To evaluate therapeutic impact of SBCE in an 11-year real-life cohort of known CD patients. METHODS: Retrospective single center study including all patients with established CD submitted to SBCE procedure from 01/01/2008 to 31/12/2019. Patency capsule was used in selected patients. Small bowel mucosal inflammation was quantified using Lewis score. Therapeutic impact was defined as a change in CD-related treatment recommended based on SBCE results. Patients were assigned to four groups regarding SBCE indication: staging, flare, post-op and remission. RESULTS: From the 432 SBCE performed 87.5% were conclusive. Active disease was present in 63.7 of patients; 41.6% mild inflammation and 21.9% moderate-to-severe activity. A change of management was guided by SBCE in 51.3% of procedures: 199 (46.1%) escalation and 23 (5.3%) de-escalation, with significant changes in all groups. Escalation increased with disease activity: 57.8% in mild and 89.5% in moderate-to-severe disease. De-escalation was conducted in 13.9% procedures with mucosal healing and 1.1% with mild disease. CONCLUSION: SBCE is a useful tool for guiding therapeutic management in CD patients both for treatment escalation and de-escalation.

High incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia during endoscopic surveillance in serrated polyposis syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Accordingly, intensive surveillance with annual colonoscopy is advised. The aim of this multicenter study was to describe the risk of advanced lesions in SPS patients undergoing surveillance, and to identify risk factors that could guide the prevention strategy. METHODS: From March 2013 to April 2015, 296 patients who fulfilled criteria I and/or III for SPS were retrospectively recruited at 18 centers. We selected patients in whom successful clearing colonoscopy had been performed and who underwent subsequent endoscopic surveillance. Advanced neoplasia was defined as CRC, advanced adenoma, or advanced serrated lesion that were ≥ 10 mm and/or with dysplasia. Cumulative incidence of advanced neoplasia was calculated and independent predictors of advanced neoplasia development were identified. RESULTS: In 152 SPS patients a total of 315 surveillance colonoscopies were performed (median 2, range 1 - 7). The 3-year cumulative incidence of CRC and advanced neoplasia were 3.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0 - 6.9) and 42.0 % (95 %CI 32.4 - 51.7), respectively. Fulfilling both I + III criteria and the presence of advanced serrated lesions at baseline colonoscopy were independent predictors of advanced neoplasia development (odds ratio [OR] 1.85, 95 %CI 1.03 - 3.33, P  = 0.04 and OR 2.62, 95 %CI 1.18 - 5.81, P  = 0.02, respectively). During follow-up, nine patients (5.9 %) were referred for surgery for invasive CRC (n = 4, 2.6 %) or because of polyp burden (n = 5, 3.3 %). After total colectomy, 17.9 % patients developed advanced neoplasia in the retained rectum. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SPS have a substantial risk of developing advanced neoplasia under endoscopic surveillance, whereas CRC incidence is low. Personalized endoscopic surveillance based on polyp burden and advanced serrated histology could help to optimize prevention in patients with SPS.

Colorectal cancer risk factors in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome: a large multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is associated with an increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, although the magnitude of the risk remains uncertain. Whereas intensive endoscopic surveillance for CRC prevention is advised, predictors that identify patients who have high CRC risk remain unknown. We performed a multicentre nationwide study aimed at describing the CRC risk in patients with SPS and identifying clinicopathological predictors independently associated with CRC. DESIGN: From March 2013 through September 2014, patients with SPS were retrospectively recruited at 18 Spanish centres. Data were collected from medical, endoscopy and histopathology reports. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify CRC risk factors. RESULTS: In 296 patients with SPS with a median follow-up time of 45 months (IQR 26-79.7), a median of 26 (IQR 18.2-40.7) serrated polyps and 3 (IQR 1-6) adenomas per patient were detected. Forty-seven patients (15.8%) developed CRC at a mean age of 53.9±12.8, and 4 out of 47 (8.5%) tumours were detected during surveillance (cumulative CRC incidence 1.9%). Patients with >2 sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) proximal to splenic flexure and ≥1 proximal SSA/P with high-grade dysplasia were independent CRC risk factors (incremental OR=2, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.24, p=0.006). Patients with no risk factors showed a 55% decrease in CRC risk (OR=0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.86, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SPS have an increased risk of CRC, although lower than previously published. Close colonoscopy surveillance in experienced centres show a low risk of developing CRC (1.9% in 5 years). Specific polyp features (SSA/P histology, proximal location and presence of high-grade dysplasia) should be used to guide clinical management.

Serrated polyposis: prospective study of first-degree relatives.

INTRODUCTION: Serrated polyposis (SP) is an infrequent colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition syndrome. An unidentified genetic defect is believed to play a role in this condition. The risk of SP and/or CRC for first-degree relatives (FDRs) is not yet well known. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of both SP and/or CRC by studying the FDRs of our index SP cases and to propose an appropriate interval for colonoscopy surveillance in this group. METHODS: From 2005 to December 2011, we prospectively included all patients from our hospital who fulfilled the SP diagnostic criteria. We interviewed FDRs face to face and offered a colonoscopy to those who were 35 years old or older. The study was carried out with conventional and high-definition colonoscopes and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine at the discretion of a single endoscopist. The samples were assessed by two pathologists. We reviewed the clinical data for CRC diagnosed previously in FDRs. RESULTS: From 2005, we collected all the new cases of SP and offered a colonoscopy to 95 FDRs of 34 pedigrees. We performed colonoscopies on 78 FDRs (82.1%). The incidence of SP in the FDRs was 32% (25 patients). Seventy-six percent of patients were diagnosed with SP as they had any number of serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon. Only one patient was diagnosed with CRC as a result of the screening colonoscopy. 44.1% of our index cases had an FDR with a diagnosis of CRC. CONCLUSION: Our series, which is the largest prospective cohort of FDRs published, reports an elevated incidence of SP in FDRs, thus supporting the need for screening colonoscopy in FDR and its inclusion in the guidelines.

Spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the actual frequency of spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature published during 1978-2007 has been carried out to identify randomized clinical trials of hepatocellular carcinoma that included a control arm receiving either placebo or best supportive care, and in which patients were followed prospectively for tumor response using predefined criteria. Data extraction was conducted independently by two investigators. A meta-analysis to provide a global estimation of regressions in the control arms was performed using an empiric Bayesian random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 16 cases of regression (including minor and partial responses) in 10 phase III clinical trials. The rate of spontaneous objective partial regression among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was 0.406% [95% confidence interval: 0.067-1.043%]. CONCLUSION: Although very infrequent, spontaneous regression is not an extraordinary event among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, individual responses to any given therapy should be assessed with caution and this fact may be considered at the time of calculating sample size of pilot clinical trials of new agents.