Drug Survival of Upadacitinib and Predicting Factors of Discontinuation in Adult Patients Affected by Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Italian Multicenter Analysis.

Background: Limited real-world data are available on upadacitinib drug survival in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate upadacitinib drug survival, and the reasons and predictors of drug discontinuation in AD patients. Methods: All consecutive patients aged 18-75 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD, and treated with upadacitinib for more than 1 month at dermatological clinics were included during November 2020-August 2023. Upadacitinib survival was investigated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 325 adult AD patients (mean (SD) age, 38.6(15.6) years) had a 1-year and 1.5-year upadacitinib drug survival of 91.5% and 80.2%, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation (25/325, 7.7%) were adverse events (4.9%), including cutaneous or infectious diseases (1.5%), such as acne and herpes zoster; blood test changes (1.2%), including hypercholesterolemia, creatine phosphokinase or liver enzyme elevation, and lymphopenia; urinary or respiratory infections (0.9%); deep venous thrombosis (0.3%); malignancies (0.3%); loss of consciousness (0.3%); and arthralgias (0.3%); followed by ineffectiveness (0.6%). No specific characteristic was significantly associated with an increased risk of upadacitinib discontinuation. Conclusions: Our findings show that upadacitinib was effective in moderate-to-severe AD after more than 1 year of continuous treatment but point to the need for clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients.

Real-world clinical, psychosocial and economic burden of atopic dermatitis: Results from a multicountry study.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a relapsing, inflammatory skin disease, is associated with pruritus that can negatively affect patients' quality of life. Understanding the burden of AD is critical for informing and tailoring treatment and disease management to improve patient outcomes. This study characterized global treatment patterns and the clinical, psychosocial and economic burden of moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: MEASURE-AD was a cross-sectional 28-country study in patients with physician-confirmed moderate-to-severe AD who were either receiving or eligible for systemic therapy for AD. Patients ≥12 years were enrolled between December 2019 and December 2020 while attending routine office or clinic visit. Primary outcomes included Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (WP-NRS; range: 0-10) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; range: 0-30) and Children's DLQI (CDLQI; range: 0-30). Secondary outcomes included physician- and patient-reported clinical, psychosocial and economic burden. RESULTS: Of the 1591 patients enrolled, 1558 (1434 adults and 124 adolescents) fulfilled all patient selection criteria and were included in this analysis. Almost all patients (98.4%) in the total population were using AD medications and more than half (56%) were receiving systemic medication (15% systemic monotherapy). The most used systemic therapies were dupilumab (56.3%), systemic glucocorticoids (18.1%) and methotrexate (16.2%). Mean WP-NRS was 5.3 in the total population, and most patients (≥55%) reported moderate-to-severe pruritus (WP-NRS ≥4). Mean DLQI was 10.8 and mean CDLQI was 9.6. Secondary endpoints demonstrated substantial clinical, psychosocial, and economic burden of disease. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients receiving systemic therapy had lower disease burden than those not taking systemic medications. CONCLUSIONS: While systemic therapy lowers overall disease burden, patients with moderate-to-severe AD continue to have substantial multidimensional disease burden and uncontrolled disease. Overall, there is a need for effective disease management, including effective treatments that improve patients' psychosocial outcomes and reduce the economic burden of AD.

Implementation of regulatory guidance for JAK inhibitors use in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: An international appropriateness study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) proposed measures to address severe side effects linked to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Use of these medications in individuals aged 65 and older, those at high cardiovascular risk, active or former long-term smokers, and those with increased cancer risk should be considered only if no alternatives exist. Caution is advised when administering JAKi to patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. We aim to implement recommendations from regulatory guidelines based on areas of uncertainty identified. METHODS: A two-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology study was conducted. A panel of 21 gastroenterologists, dermatologists and rheumatologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of administering a JAKi for each proposed clinical scenario. Scores for appropriateness were categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. Two rounds were performed, each with online surveys and a virtual meeting to enable discussion and rating of each best practice. RESULTS: Round 1 involved participants rating JAKi appropriateness and suggesting descriptors to reduce uncertainty. Survey results were discussed in a virtual meeting, identifying areas of disagreement. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, and the level of uncertainty and disagreement reduced. Age flexibility is recommended in the absence of other risk factors. Active counseling on modifiable risks (e.g., overweight, mild hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and smoking cessation is advised. Uncertainty persists regarding cancer risk due to various factors. CONCLUSIONS: We outlined regulatory guidance without a personalized evaluation of the patient's risk profile might lead to uncertainty and become an arid technicality. Therefore, we identified gaps and implemented PRAC recommendations to help health professionals in clinical practice.

Risankizumab shows high efficacy and maintenance in improvement of response until week 52.

Risankizumab has been recently approved for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis; however, real-life studies are scarce. Analysis of possible predictor factors of treatment response are limited to body mass index (BMI) and previous biologic experience. Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Risankizumab and to investigate on possible predictor factors response. We retrospectively analyzed 166 patients from two centers in Italy who undergone Risankizumab for psoriasis. The proportion of patients achieving a 100%, 90%, 75% of improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and PASI <3 were collected at weeks 16, 28, 40, and 52. Study population was analyzed in subgroups to investigate possible predictors of response to Risankizumab since week 40. At the time of analysis 165, 103, 30, and 11 patients had completed 16, 28, 40, and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. The mean PASI score decreased from 12.5 ± 5.1 at baseline to 1.9 ± 2.4 at week 16. Similar reductions were observed when considering PASI <3, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100. Previous biologics failure, different smoking habits, obesity, and joint involvement resulted in a lower response to risankizumab. In particular, significant differences in mean PASI at any time-points was observed between psoriatic arthritis (PSA) and non-PSA patients: 2.7 versus 1.7 (p = 0.036), 1.9 versus 0.4 (p = 0.006), and 4.1 versus 0.5 (p = 0.016) at 16, 28, and 40 weeks, respectively. No difference in response to risankizumab occurred in the case of involvement of difficult-to-treat areas. In this population, Risankizumab was effective and safe. Smoking habits, joint involvement, obese status, and previous biologic experience may negatively affect treatment response, while difficult body sites involvement have minor impact.

Efficacy, safety, and drug survival of IL-23, IL-17, and TNF-alpha inhibitors for psoriasis treatment: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Real-life studies in psoriasis are lacking. Many monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor-necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin 17, and 23 are approved drugs for psoriasis treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare the short and long-term efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anti TNF-alpha, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL-23 in a large case series. METHODS: Psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and retention rates for adalimumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab were analised. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients were randomly selected among the five drugs register of the patients attending the Psoriasis Unit at the Turin University Hospital. The mean PASI at baseline was 14.3. Ixekizumab showed a significantly higher efficacy profile compared to other drugs in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 at week 12, 24, and week 48 even when adjusted for other confounding factors. This superiority was not followed by an expected higher drug survival. On the contrary, secukinumab was the only drug that showed a higher drug survival among bio-naïve patients.

Low-dose intermittent alemtuzumab in the treatment of Sézary syndrome: clinical and immunologic findings in 14 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Alemtuzumab may be effective in Sézary syndrome (SS), an aggressive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, but is associated with severe hematologic toxicity and infections. This study investigated whether low-dose subcutaneous alemtuzumab can induce hematologic, immunologic, and clinical responses similar to those obtained with the standard regimen, but with less toxicity. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen SS patients were enrolled: 11 had relapsed/refractory disease and three had untreated SS with high counts of circulating Sézary cells (SC). Four received 3 mg alemtuzumab on day 1, 10 mg on day 3, then 15 mg on alternating days; circulating SC were evaluated after the fourth 15 mg dose and treatment was interrupted in the presence of counts <1,000/mm (3). A reduced dosage (3 mg on day 1, then 10 mg on alternating days) was administered to the remaining patients, with SC counted before every injection, until a reduction to values of <1,000/mm (3). RESULTS: The median SC count decreased by 95.5%. Overall, 12/14 patients (85.7%) achieved a clinical response, with three complete responses (21.4%). After a median follow-up of 16 months, the median time-to-treatment failure is 12 months. Infectious complications occurred in 28.6% of patients, all included in the group treated with 15 mg. No patient in the group treated with 10 mg developed hematologic toxicity or infections. An early recovery of circulating NK, B and CD3+CD8+ cells occurred after the first cycle. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous alemtuzumab at very low doses (10 mg maximum per administration), given for a short period based on SC levels, has a good toxicity profile, high response rate and causes durable remissions in SS patients with high tumor burden in the peripheral blood.

Prognostic relevance of baseline and sequential peripheral blood tyrosinase expression in 200 consecutive advanced metastatic melanoma patients.

The relationship between the disease course and the prognostic relevance of sequential tyrosinase reverse transcription-PCR assay in the peripheral blood of advanced metastatic melanoma patients was ascertained. The clinical usefulness of tyrosinase in stage IV melanoma patients is still debated, owing to the wide range of variability (positive expression from 30 up to 100% of patients) and the possibility of a transient shedding of melanoma cells into the bloodstream. A total of 200 consecutive stage IV metastatic patients treated at our department were included, 149 with active metastatic disease undergoing systemic therapies (group A), and 51 disease free after surgery (group B). For each patient, a baseline sample was obtained within 3 weeks of either the clinical/radiological demonstration of metastatic disease or the surgical treatment; thereafter, tyrosinase determinations were performed at day 1 of each therapy course before chemotherapy administration or at each follow-up visit. Tyrosinase expression was determined using standard reverse transcription-PCR nested techniques. A baseline positive determination was obtained in 72.5% of the patients with active metastatic disease (group A) but not in any of the patients who were disease free after surgery (group B). Therapy administration induced an early clearance of circulating melanoma cells, from 72.5 to 44.9% at the second down to 29.5% at the third determination. Tyrosinase expression before the third cycle was significantly associated with the clinical response: 56/81 (69.1%) patients with a negative tyrosinase determination obtained a response or a stable disease, whereas 29/34 (85.3%) patients with a positive test developed a progressive disease (P<0.001). A clinical response was observed in all the patients who had a negative tyrosinase at the first three determinations, although all patients whose first three determinations were positive developed a progressive disease. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline tyrosinase status carries an independent prognostic value on both overall survival and time to progression; moreover, tyrosinase results during follow-up were entered as time-dependent covariates in a multivariate analysis and were shown to be the most significant prognostic parameter associated to both overall survival and time to progression. In particular, the presence of a constant positive expression during follow-up was associated with the development of new metastatic sites in 95.6% of patients with active metastatic disease. Our results demonstrate that the discrepancies in the positive tyrosinase rates reported in the literature are related to the disease status at the time of sampling and to chemotherapy administration. Tyrosinase expression in the peripheral blood both at baseline and during follow-up can be considered a reliable prognostic parameter associated with the response to treatment, development of new metastatic sites, time to progression and survival.

Expression pattern of chemokine receptors and chemokine release in inflammatory erythroderma and Sézary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Erythroderma can be caused by inflammatory dermatoses or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Even if chemokines and their receptors are involved in the skin-selective lymphocyte recruitment, their role in inflammatory erythroderma is yet unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the chemokine release (TARC, MDC, IP-10) and to define the expression pattern of Th1- (CCR5, CXCR3) and Th2-related (CCR4) chemokine receptors in inflammatory erythroderma and Sézary syndrome (SS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flow cytometry has been carried out on both circulating and skin-infiltrating T lymphocytes; serum chemokine levels have been evaluated using ELISA techniques. RESULTS: CCR4, CCR5 and CXCR3 were expressed on about 40% of peripheral blood lymphocytes and on the majority of skin-infiltrating lymphocytes in the inflammatory erythroderma patients, whereas the leukemic CD4+CD26- subpopulation in SS was characterized by a high CCR4 expression without a concurrent increase in CCR5 or CXCR3. TARC, MDC and IP-10 serum levels were significantly increased in both erythrodermic and SS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that SS is a Th2 disorder with a selective expression of CCR4, whereas inflammatory erythroderma shares an overexpression of both Th1- and Th2-related chemokine receptors, suggesting an activation of different pathways driving reactive lymphocytes to the skin.