Perineoplasty for anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury repair: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The rectal and vaginal walls are typically sutured if severe perineal lacerations with rectal mucosal damage occur during vaginal delivery. In case of anal incontinence after the repair, re-suturing of the anal sphincter muscle is standard procedure. However, this procedure may not result in sufficient improvement of function. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old woman underwent suture repair of the vaginal and rectal walls for fourth-degree perineal laceration at delivery. She was referred to our department after complaining of flatus and fecal incontinence. Her Wexner score was 15 points. Examination revealed decreased anal tonus and weak contractions on the ventral side. We diagnosed anal incontinence due to sphincter dysfunction after repair of a perineal laceration at delivery. We subsequently performed sphincter re-suturing with perineoplasty to restructure the perineal body by suturing the fascia located lateral to the perineal body and running in a ventral-dorsal direction, which filled the space between the anus and vagina and increased anal tonus. One month after surgery, the symptoms of anal incontinence disappeared (the Wexner score lowered to 0 points), and the anorectal manometry values increased compared to the preoperative values. According to recent reports on the anatomy of the female perineal region, bulbospongiosus muscle in women does not move toward the midline to attach to the perineal body, as has been previously believed. Instead, it attaches to the ipsilateral surface of the external anal sphincter. We consider the fascia lateral to the perineal body to be the fascia of the bulbospongiosus muscle. CONCLUSIONS: In a case of postpartum anal incontinence due to sphincter dysfunction after repair of severe perineal laceration, perineoplasty with re-suturing an anal sphincter muscle resulted in improvement in anal sphincter function. Compared to conventional simple suture repair of the rectal wall only, this surgical technique may improve sphincter function to a greater degree.

Reflux Esophagitis After Laparoscopic Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG) is performed for cT1N0 gastric cancer as a function-preserving surgery, but reflux esophagitis can develop as a mid- to long-term complication postoperatively. We aimed to clarify the incidence rate of this complication and the factors correlated with it. METHODS: Patients with gastric cancer who underwent LPPG between 2005 and 2017 were analyzed. Postoperative reflux esophagitis was evaluated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy; patients were diagnosed as having reflux esophagitis with erosive esophagitis using the modified Los Angeles classification. The incidence rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis was estimated; factors correlated with postoperative reflux esophagitis were analyzed using the logistic regression model. RESULTS: During the study period, 813 patients underwent LPPG for gastric cancer, and 127 (15.6%) of them developed grade B or more severe postoperative reflux esophagitis. The factors correlated with postoperative reflux esophagitis were male sex (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-4.05; P < 0.001), preoperative grade A reflux esophagitis (odds ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-7.27; P = 0.012), body mass index of ≥ 23 kg/m2 at 1 year postoperatively (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.53; P = 0.002), postoperative hiatal hernia (odds ratio, 4.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-8.04; P < 0.001), and long-term stasis (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.47; P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Careful attention should be paid in performing LPPG and in postoperative management after LPPG for gastric cancer patients with those risk factors.

Clinical effect of home enteral tube feeding supplementation on nutritional status after esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction.

Body weight loss and poor nutritional status are frequently observed after esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to pilot an investigation on the impact of home enteral tube feeding supplementation (HES) for up to 3 months after esophageal cancer surgery. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 67 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We started HES from April 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Among 67 patients, 40 patients underwent HES between April 2017 and November 2020 (HES group). Other 27 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2012 and March 2017 were not administered HES (C group). Thereafter, multiple factors concerning patient nutritional status at long-term follow-up were evaluated. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in nutritional status scores before esophagectomy. The percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group both at 3 months and 1 year after surgery: 7.3% (-7.6 to 15.2), 7.7% (-4 to 13.9) in the HES group and 10.6% (-3.6 to 29.1), 10.8% (-5.8 to 20.0) in C group (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). In the patients with anastomotic stenosis, the percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group: 7.2% (2.0-14.9) and 14.6% (6.2-29.1), P < 0.05. HES may improve early weight loss in postesophagectomy patients.

[A Case of Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage with Septic Shock after Esophageal Cancer Surgery Treated by Two Stage Operation Using Ileocolic Reconstruction].

The patient was a 60s male. He underwent esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for Barrett's esophageal cancer( pT3N1M0, pStage Ⅲ). Postoperatively, anastomotic leakage and mediastinitis resulted in septic shock. On the 8th day after first surgery, he transferred to our hospital. At the time of admission, qSOFA was 3 points. We judged to be difficult to treat with conservative treatment. Emergency right thoracotomy drainage underwent with resection of the esophagogastric anastomosis and cervical esophagostomy construction. He was discharged on the 55th postoperative day with home enteral nutrition. He underwent presternal ileocolic reconstruction on the 97th day after right thoracotomy drainage. On the 19th day after reconstruction, oral intake was started. The general condition is good without recurrence, and oral intake is sufficient at 1 year after reconstruction. We report a case of anastomotic leakage with septic shock after esophageal cancer surgery successfully treated by 2 stage ileocolic reconstruction.

[Clinical Outcomes of Treatment for Esophageal Cancer Recurrence after Surgery].

Many cases with esophageal cancer recurrence have worse clinical survival. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)has been reported to result in significantly longer overall survival. We investigated the clinical outcomes in 30 patients with esophageal cancer recurrence who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy. Results: Of the 30 patients investigated, 25 were men. Median patient age was 70(range 52-84)years. The recurrence sites are as follows: 17 in locoregional, 5 in lung, 2 in bone, 3 in liver, and 5 in others. The overall survival in early recurrence(within 6 months after surgery)cases and multiple recurrence cases were significantly shorter than that in later recurrence(>6 months after surgery)and single recurrence(p=0.031, p<0.01). Of 30 recurrence cases, 9 cases (30%)achieved complete response(CR). Five of CR cases were treated by chemotherapy with ICI. In esophageal cancer recurrence, treatment with ICI showed good response and survival benefit. In future, the indication of ICI is evaluated for adjuvant therapy after surgery.

Adverse impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications on cancer recurrence-related survival after curative gastric cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications (PICs) on survival after surgery for gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 152 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer were included. The effect of clinicopathological features and PICs on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated. RESULTS: The median age was 67 years. The pathological stage was stage I (61), II (40), and III (51). Thirty-two patients (21.1%) had PICs: 9, pancreatic fistula; 14, anastomotic leakage; and 17, intra-abdominal abscess. The five-year RFS and OS rates were significantly lower in patients with PICs than in those without PICs (63.4 vs. 85.6%; p < 0.01 and 56.4 vs. 80.3%; p < 0.01, respectively). In multivariate analysis, intraoperative blood loss was an independent prognostic factor for PICs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PICs had worse clinical outcomes. Reducing intraoperative bleeding may improve the prognosis of gastric cancer.

Long-term Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Drug Costs of Japanese Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common type of bariatric surgery in Japan, and it is the only such procedure covered by national health insurance. The long-term cost of bariatric surgery in Japan has not yet been analyzed. We aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of LSG on the drug treatment costs of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 230 patients who had undergone LSG at our institution for their obesity and T2DM between 2007 and 2018. The clinicopathological data included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), as well as preoperative and postoperative medications for T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. We then calculated the drug treatment costs for T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia before and after LSG; and we evaluated the remission rates of these obesity-related diseases. RESULTS: The median preoperative body weight and BMI of the 230 patients who underwent LSG were 115 kg and 40.6 kg/m2, respectively. Preoperative drug treatment costs per month per patient for T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were ¥3795 (¥0-40285), ¥3269 (¥0-14577), and ¥1428 (¥0-19464). Post-operation, the median drug treatment costs for all these diseases became nil. The remission rates of T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia 5 years after LSG were 82.8%, 50%, and 43.8%, respectively. In Japan, the cost of an LSG operation corresponds to 4.75 years of median drug costs to treat T2DM and hypertension. CONCLUSION: In the long term, LSG in Japan is effective both physically and cost-wise for patients with obesity and T2DM.

Treatment strategies and outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: A multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is required to achieve prolonged survival. We aimed to clarify the differences in treatment strategies for locally advanced ESCC and the outcomes of elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) vs. younger patients (aged < 75 years). METHODS: We compared the treatment strategy selection and the outcomes of 40 elderly and 160 younger patients with cStage II/III ESCC diagnosed between January, 2014 and December, 2016. RESULTS: Nineteen (47.5%) of the elderly patients and 144 (90.0%) of the younger patients underwent esophagectomy and 9 (22.5%) of the elderly patients and 131 (81.9%) of the younger patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ivor-Lewis or transhiatal esophagectomy was performed more frequently in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.0096). The survival rate after esophagectomy was higher in the younger group than in the elderly group. The overall survival rate of the elderly patients who underwent esophagectomy was significantly higher than that in those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy is a practical choice for elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC, although reduced treatment intensity may impact long-term survival.

[Short- and Long-Term Effects of Palliative Stoma Creation on Quality of Life].

Palliative stoma creation for malignant gastrointestinal obstruction improves quality of life, and advances in chemotherapy have resulted in long-term survival after stoma creation. We reviewed early and late complications in 24 patients treated with palliative stoma creation. Results: 14 men(58%)and 10 women(42%)had a median age of 60 years. Twenty-three patients(96%)were able to eat more than a porridge diet postoperatively, and the median The ColoRectal Obstruction Scoring System(CROSS)improved from 1(0-3)to 4(2-4)(p<0.001). Postoperative complications(all Clavien-Dindo grades)were observed in 10 patients(42%), with a longer postoperative hospital stay in the complication group than in the group without complication(median 34 days: 17 days, p=0.026). When divided into long-term survivors and short- term survivors based on a median overall survival of 101 days, more stoma prolapse occurred in the long-term survivors(4 cases 33% vs 0 cases 0%, p=0.028), one of which required repair surgery. Conclusion: Long-term survivors after exploratory stoma creation are more likely to develop a stoma prolapse. Careful surgical manipulation and postoperative support system including stoma care are important.

Successful transition from open to minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience in Japan.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates surgical outcomes of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) in our institution, with the transition from open ILE to hybrid or totally minimally invasive ILE (MI-ILE). METHODS: Selected patients who underwent ILE for esophageal cancer between 2013 and 2020 were included. We retrospectively investigated the patients' background characteristics and the short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: In this period, among a total of 858 esophagectomies, selected seventy-one patients (8.3%) underwent ILE, consisted of 17 cases with completely open procedures, 27 with hybrid MI-ILE, and 27 with total MI-ILE. The major indications for ILE were adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction (33.8%) and patients with prior treatment of head and neck cancer (31.0%). Among these approaches, there were no significant differences in the characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, preoperative therapy, and clinical TNM stage, except for histology. Compared to the completely open and hybrid groups, incidences of both total and severe complications in the total MI-ILE group were significantly lower (total 70.6 vs. 66.6 vs. 37.0%, p=0.036; severe 35.3 vs. 44.4 vs. 11.1%, p=0.023), and also, those of pneumonia (41.2 vs. 29.6 vs. 7.4%, p=0.026) and postoperative stricture (11.8 vs. 18.5 vs. 0%, p=0.001) were significantly fewer in the total MI-ILE group. CONCLUSIONS: We have been able to achieve the transition from completely open to total MI-ILE with better short-term outcomes. Total MI-ILE with linear-stapled anastomosis can be a good alternative to open procedures for the selected patients with reducing the incidence of postoperative pneumonia and anastomotic stricture.

Significance of D-dimer-based screening for detecting pre-operative venous thromboembolism in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have evaluated the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for esophageal cancer and the efficacy of a D-dimer (DD)-based VTE screening (DBS). In the present study, we aimed to clarify the changes in DD levels and the effectiveness of DBS. METHODS: We included 234 patients who underwent esophagectomy between August 2017 and July 2019 and evaluated the changes in DD levels before and after NAC. We had introduced the DBS strategy in August 2018, in which we recommended ultrasound (US) of the leg or computed tomography (CT) with the deep vein thrombosis (DVT) protocol. We then evaluated the incidence of VTE detected by DBS compared with that in the clinical practice as a control. RESULTS: The DD levels were significantly increased after NAC. After the introduction of DBS, the proportion of patients who underwent US and CT after NAC was significantly increased. VTE was more frequently detected in the DBS group than in the control group (16.7% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.02) among patients who underwent NAC. Pulmonary embolism (PE) during NAC was also more frequent in the DBS than in the control group (7.6% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.06). The DD levels after NAC were significantly higher in patients with VTE than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: NAC for patients with esophageal cancer increases the risk of developing VTE. DBS is useful in identifying asymptomatic DVT and may contribute to improving patient safety.

Comparison of the outcomes between total eversion and conventional triangulating stapling technique in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage and stenosis remain major problems after esophageal reconstruction. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes between the total eversion (TE) triangulating stapling technique (TST) and conventional (C) TST. METHODS: The study included 404 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy by TST between January 2013 and December 2018. The postoperative outcomes were compared between TE-TST and C-TST using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Before matching, the cT stage and the cTNM stage were different between the groups. After matching, each group consisted of 128 patients. The patients' background characteristics were similar between the groups. Although the incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar between the groups (p = 0.216), anastomotic stricture occurred in 19 (14.8%) and 7 (5.5%) patients in the C-TST and the TE-TST groups, respectively (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was significantly lower in the TE-TST group than in the C-TST group. TE-TST decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture and can improve the quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with positive circumferential resection margin.

BACKGROUND: The significance of postoperative radiotherapy for residual disease after esophageal cancer surgery remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with positive circumferential resection margin (CRM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1190 patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC at our hospital from 2005 to 2018, of whom 61 (5.1%) patients were diagnosed with positive CRM of ESCC. Overall survival (OS), progression-specific survival (PSS), local progression-specific survival (LPSS), and clinicopathological factors were compared between patients with and without postoperative radiotherapy. The efficacy of additional radiotherapy on patient outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 61 patients analyzed, 29 (47.5%) underwent radiotherapy (RT group) and 32 (52.5%) did not (NRT group). In the RT group, 22 patients (75.9%) received radiotherapy and 7 patients (24.1%) received chemoradiotherapy. The RT group included younger patients, a greater number of upper-esophageal tumors, and a greater rate of R2 resections than the NRT group. The LPSS and PSS of the RT group were significantly better than those of the NRT group (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, postoperative radiotherapy was an independent factor for LPSS [P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.46] and PSS (P < 0.001; HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiotherapy contributed to the control of residual tumor and was significantly associated with better LPSS and PSS among patients with positive CRM after esophagectomy for ESCC.

The Optimal Feeding Enterostomy Creation During Esophagectomy to Reduce the Long-Term Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is commonly created during esophagectomy for postoperative enteral nutrition, it can be a cause of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO). We introduced a technique of feeding enterostomy using the round ligament of the liver (FERL) to reduce SBO. In this study, we aimed to clarify the efficacy of FERL in reducing the postoperative SBO compared with FJ. METHODS: We assessed 400 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction between 2011 and 2016, before and after the introduction of FERL (FJ, n = 200; FERL, n = 200). The cumulative incidences of postoperative SBO and SBO associated with feeding enterostomy were compared between the FJ and the FERL groups. RESULTS: Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery was more frequent in the FERL group than in the FJ group (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of postoperative SBO and SBO associated with feeding enterostomy in the FERL group were significantly less frequent than those in the FJ group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). When stratifying by the abdominal surgical approach, the cumulative incidences of postoperative SBO and SBO associated with feeding enterostomy in a laparoscopic approach were less frequent in the FERL group than those in the FJ group (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The FERL technique can reduce the incidences of postoperative SBO and SBO associated with feeding enterostomy in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

The Design of and Rationale for the Effect of Perioperative Inhaled Tiotropium for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Esophageal Cancer Surgery (EPITOPE): an Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia is one of the most frequently occurring complications after esophagectomy and is associated with increased operative mortality. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is known to be a risk factor for pulmonary complications and operative mortality. However, in COPD patients preparing for esophagectomy, preventive measures against postoperative pneumonia have not yet been discovered. In this study, we evaluate the effect of perioperative inhaled tiotropium, a long-acting, antimuscarinic bronchodilator used in the management of COPD, on patients with COPD who undergo esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This study investigates the effect of perioperative inhaled tiotropium on patients with COPD who undergo esophagectomy. It is an open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in a single center (EPITOPE study). A total of 32 enrolled patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either conventional management or inhalation of tiotropium in addition to the conventional management. Patients included in the intervention group receive tiotropium Respimat 5 µg (two inhalations of 2.5 µg) for at least 2 weeks before the esophagectomy. Following the esophagectomy, tiotropium is re-delivered, starting as early as possible and continuing until the postoperative evaluation (between 30 and 44 days after the operation). The primary outcome is the incidence of pneumonia within 30 days after esophagectomy. Secondary outcomes are the incidence of cardiovascular complications within 30 days after esophagectomy, the incidence of any postoperative complications within 30 days after esophagectomy, pulmonary function (preintervention, preoperative, and postoperative), walking distance in the incremental shuttle walking test (preintervention, preoperative, and postoperative), the incidence of adverse events, and mortality within 30 days after esophagectomy. DISCUSSION: The EPITOPE study is the first pilot study on the effects of perioperative inhaled tiotropium on patients with COPD undergoing esophagectomy. After completing this study, we will plan a multicenter RCT with the appropriate outcomes in the future.

Correction to: Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.

The article Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer, written by Masayuki Watanabe, Reiko Otake, Ryotaro Kozuki, Tasuku Toihata, Keita Takahashi, Akihiko Okamura, Yu Imamura, was originally published Online First without Open Access.

Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal cancers. This review focuses on eight topics within the multidisciplinary approach for esophageal cancer. As esophagectomy is highly invasive and likely to impair quality of life, the development of less invasive strategies is expected. Endoscopic resection (ER) of early esophageal cancer is a less invasive treatment for early esophageal cancer. A recent phase II trial revealed that combined ER and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is efficacious as an esophagus-preserving treatment for cT1bN0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Esophagectomy and definitive CRT are equally effective for patients with clinical stage I SCC in terms of long-term outcome. For locally advanced resectable cancers, multidisciplinary treatment strategies have been established through several clinical trials of neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may improve the outcomes of patients and CRT is a curative-intent alternative to esophagectomy. CRT with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy combined with salvage surgery is a promising option to preserve the esophagus. Induction chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy may improve the outcomes of patients with locally advanced unresectable tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective for esophageal cancer, and their introduction to clinical practice is awaited.

Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer in a Patient with Left Pulmonary Artery Sling.

BACKGROUND: In esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients, the dissection of the lymph nodes around the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is essential for curative esophagectomy.1,2 Left pulmonary artery sling (LPAS) is a rare congenital anomaly, in which anomalous left pulmonary artery arises from the right pulmonary artery and reach the left pulmonary hilum.3-5 Because LPAS crosses between esophagus and trachea and the hemodynamics of LPAS could collapse when retracting the trachea anteriorly for left RLN node dissection, esophagectomy for patients with LPAS is technically challenging. In this video, we applied the cervicothoracoscopic approach in a patient with LPAS, in which we performed bilateral RLN node dissection from cervical operation field before thoracoscopic surgery.6,7 METHODS: A 44-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage II ESCC. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we planned to perform a three-stage esophagectomy. Preoperative-enhanced computed tomography revealed LPAS. During the cervical procedure, we identified the RLN, dissected the lymph nodes around the nerve, and mobilized the cervical esophagus. After the cervical procedures, we performed thoracoscopic surgery through the right thoracic cavity with the patient in a prone position. RESULTS: We achieved curative esophagectomy without any intraoperative adverse events. Total operation time was 419 min, with an estimated blood loss of 40 ml. There were no postsurgical complications, including RLN palsy. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LPAS in esophageal cancer surgery makes it difficult to dissect the left RLN nodes. We could safely perform curative esophagectomy for an ESCC patient with LPAS using the cervicothoracoscopic approach.