Short-term high-fat and high-carbohydrate diets increase susceptibility to liver injury by inducing hepatic procoagulant and proinflammatory conditions with different balances.

OBJECTIVES: High-fat diet (HFD) and high-carbohydrate diet (HCD) are strongly linked to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. The mechanism of pathologic progression from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, which is a more severe form associated with inflammation and fibrosis, remains poorly understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate and compare the inflammatory and coagulative state of the liver in short-term HFD- or HCD-fed mice with acute liver injury induced by concanavalin A (Con A). METHODS: Histopathologic evaluation, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistochemical evaluation were performed on the liver of mice fed HFDs and HCDs for 4 d before and after Con A administration. RESULTS: The liver of the HFD-fed mice had larger fibrinogen/fibrin depositions than those fed the HCD. HCD induced the expression of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α in the liver. Moreover, the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines was further enhanced after Con A stimulation in HCD (e.g., interleukin-1α, interleukin-6 at 1 h), with a strong tendency for inflammatory cell infiltration also found (24 h). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term HCD and HFD increased susceptibility to liver injury. HCD tended to induce more intense inflammation, whereas HFD tended to induce more intense hypercoagulation, suggesting that HCD and HFD may have different mechanisms of pathologic progression to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

[Risk Communication of Radiation Exposure for Diagnosis: A Questionnaire Survey].

PURPOSE: We investigated how a radiologic technologist explains to a patient about the risk of radiation exposure involved by the radiological examination. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire link was emailed to 650 radiological technologists who are members of the National Hospital Kanto Koshinetsu Radiological Technologist Association. The questions to survey risk communication included the ideal and reality explanation for radiation exposure to patients, the respondent's educational background, and years of experience. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni correction as a multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Among the 650 radiological technologists, 245 (37.7%) completed the online questionnaire. The most common response was to compare and convey the doses of radiation during examination and background radiation when asked by a patient about risk. In the cross-analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference in what was explained according to educational background. According to years of experience, a significant difference in the content was found about explanation of the risk to patients. CONCLUSIONS: We clarified the actual condition of risk communication related to the exposure in radiological examinations. In the future, development of risk communication is expected by improving the knowledge and information of "risk" and giving explanations requested by patients.

Cardioprotection via Metabolism for Rat Heart Preservation Using the High-Pressure Gaseous Mixture of Carbon Monoxide and Oxygen.

The high-pressure gas (HPG) method with carbon monoxide (CO) and oxygen (O2) mixture maintains the preserved rat heart function. The metabolites of rat hearts preserved using the HPG method (HPG group) and cold storage (CS) method (CS group) by immersion in a stock solution for 24 h were assessed to confirm CO and O2 effects. Lactic acid was significantly lower and citric acid was significantly higher in the HPG group than in the CS group. Moreover, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels as well as some pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) metabolites and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) were significantly higher in the HPG group than in the CS group. Additionally, reduced glutathione (GSH), which protects cells from oxidative stress, was also significantly higher in the HPG group than in the CS group. These results indicated that each gas, CO and O2, induced the shift from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism, maintaining the energy of ischemic preserved organs, shifting the glucose utilization from glycolysis toward PPP, and reducing oxidative stress. Both CO and O2 in the HPG method have important effects on the ATP supply and decrease oxidative stress for preventing ischemic injury. The HPG method may be useful for clinical application.

Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Musculoskeletal Properties.

PURPOSE: Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) has been reported to improve joint range of motion (flexibility). However, it is not clear whether this change in the joint range of motion is accompanied by any alterations in the mechanical and/or neural properties. This study aimed to investigate the effects of IASTM in plantarflexors and Achilles tendon on the mechanical and neural properties of them. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, crossover study included 14 healthy volunteers (11 men and 3 women, 21-32 yr). IASTM was performed on the skin over the posterior part of the lower leg for 5 min and targeted the soft tissues (gastrocnemii, soleus, and tibialis posterior muscles; overlying deep fascia; and Achilles tendon). As a control condition, the same participants rested for 5 min between pre- and postmeasurements without IASTM on a separate day. The maximal ankle joint dorsiflexion angle (dorsiflexion range of motion), the peak passive torque (stretch tolerance), and the ankle joint stiffness (slope of the relationship between passive torque and ankle joint angle) during the measurement of the dorsiflexion range of motion and muscle stiffness of the triceps surae (using shear wave elastography) were measured before and immediately after the interventions. RESULTS: After IASTM, the dorsiflexion range of motion significantly increased by 10.7% ± 10.8% and ankle joint stiffness significantly decreased by -6.2% ± 10.1%. However, peak passive torque and muscle stiffness did not change. All variables remained unchanged in the repeated measurements of controls. CONCLUSION: IASTM can improve joint range of motion, without affecting the mechanical and neural properties of the treated muscles.