Advantages and Disadvantages of Two In Vitro Assays in Evaluating Aromatase Activity: "A Cell-Based and a Cell-Free Assay".

Objectives: Aromatase is an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens. While inhibition of aromatase is a useful approach for treating breast cancer, it may also have toxicological consequences due to its endocrine disrupting/modulating effect. In this study, sensitivity and performance of two in vitro assays -a cell free and a cell-based- for evaluating aromatase activity were investigated by testing known aromatase inhibitors and partial validation of the methods was performed. Advantages and disadvantages of these methods are also discussed. Materials and Methods: Aromatase activity was evaluated via two in vitro models; direct measurement with a cell-free assay using a fluorescent substrate and recombinant human enzyme and indirect evaluation with a cell-based assay where cell proliferation was determined in estrogen receptor positive human breast cancer cells (MCF-7 BUS) in the absence of estrogen and the presence of testosterone. Results: In the cell-free direct measurement assay, reference compounds ketoconazole and aminoglutethimide have been shown to inhibit the aromatase enzyme with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values concordant with literature. In cell-based indirect measurement assay, only ketoconazole dose-dependently inhibited cell proliferation with 3.47 x 10-7 M IC50. Inter-assay and intra-assay reproducibility of both methods was found to be within acceptable deviation levels. Conclusion: Both methods can be successfully applied. However, to evaluate the potential aromatase activity of the novel compounds in vitro, it seems better to perform both the cell-based and the cell-free assays that allows low-moderate biotransformation and eliminate cytotoxicity potential, respectively.

Aromatase inhibition by 2-methyl indole hydrazone derivatives evaluated via molecular docking and in vitro activity studies.

A causal association is reported between prolonged exposures to elevated levels of estrogen and breast cancer. Therefore inhibiting aromatase (CYP19A), which catalyses the conversion of androgens to estrogens, is an important approach in prevention and treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Melatonin, a natural indolic hormone, is reported to prevent free radical induced carcinogenesis and block local estrogen synthesis in breast tissue via aromatase inhibition. However several features of melatonin limit its therapeutic use. In the present study aromatase inhibiting potential of 2-methyl indole hydrazones are investigated, and compared with melatonin, by two in vitro models; a cell-free assay using a fluorescence substrate and a cell-based assay where cell proliferation was determined in ER + human breast cancer cells (MCF-7 BUS) in the absence of estrogen and the presence of testosterone. Aromatase inhibitory effect is also explored by molecular modelling studies. In biological activity assays monochloro substituted indole hydrazones were found to have stronger aromatase inhibitory activity among all tested derivatives and were more active than melatonin. This finding is further confirmed by molecular modelling. These results may be useful in the design and synthesis of novel melatonin analogues with higher inhibitory potency against aromatase.