Efficacy of bortezomib to intensify the conditioning regimen and the graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for high-risk myeloma patients undergoing transplantation.

This multicenter phase I trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib (Bz) as part of both the conditioning regimen and the graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Patients received fludarabine, melphalan and Bz (days -9 and -2). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of Bz (days +1, +4, and +7), sirolimus (Siro) from day -5 and tacrolimus (Tk) from -3 (except the first five patients that did not receive Tk). Twenty-five patients with poor prognostic multiple myeloma were included. Eleven out of the 19 patients had high-risk features. Out of the 21 patients evaluable at day +100, 14 were in CR (67%) and 7 (33%) in PR. Cumulative incidence (CI) of nonrelapse mortality at 1 year was 24%. CI of grades 2-4 and 3-4 acute GvHD was 35% and 10%, respectively; CI of chronic GvHD was 35% and 55% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall and event free survival at 2 years were 64% and 31%, respectively. Bz as part of the conditioning regimen and in the combination with Siro/tacrolimus for GvHD prophylaxis is safe and effective allowing an optimal disease control early after transplant and reducing the risk of GvHD.

Potential protective effect of Helicobacter pylori on the development of gastrointestinal GvHD.

Previous reports ascribe a modulating capacity of the immune response to Helicobacter pylori (HP). Our hypothesis was to demonstrate in a prospective study that HP infection could have a protective effect against development of gastrointestinal GvHD in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Presence of HP before transplant was determined using C(13) urea breath test. Seventy-nine patients receiving an allogeneic HCT were included and 93.7% of them received PBSC; in 51.9%, the donor was unrelated. Acute gastrointestinal GvHD was diagnosed in 51.9% (n=41). In the multivariable analysis, HP infection was associated with a lower frequency of gastrointestinal GvHD (odds ratio (OR)=0.19 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.67); in contrast, an unrelated donor was associated with a higher frequency of gastrointestinal GvHD (odds ratio=5.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.6-18.2). One year overall survival (OS) was 74%. In the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, stages 0-II gastrointestinal GvHD (hazards ratio (HR)=0.19), reduced intensity conditioning (HR=0.04) and tacrolimus-sirolimus GvHD prophylaxis (HR=0.06) were all associated with a better OS. In summary, HP infection could have a role in decreasing gastrointestinal GvHD in patients receiving allogeneic HCT from peripheral blood including related and unrelated donors.

Diagnostic utility of bone marrow examination for the assessment of patients with fever of unknown origin: a 10-year single-centre experience.

Bone marrow (BM) examination is included in the diagnostic algorithm of fever of unknown origin (FUO), although its role is not clearly determined. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of BM studies in patients with FUO. We retrospectively reviewed 45 consecutive patients (25% human immunodeficiency virus-positive) with FUO who underwent a BM study in the University Hospital of Salamanca from 2000 to 2010. We analysed the diagnostic role of BM smears, multiparameter flow cytometry analysis, histology and microbiological cultures. Five patients (11%) were finally diagnosed by BM study (three had an infectious disease and two were found to have haematological malignancies), all of whom were immunocompetent patients. Histology was the most useful study (diagnosis was obtained in 4/5 patients), while BM cultures did not establish the final diagnosis in any patient. Flow cytometry established the diagnosis in one patient, although this patient was also diagnosed by histology. In conclusion, BM study is useful for establishing the aetiology of FUO. BM biopsy for histological examination should be always mandatory if a BM examination is performed.

Risk factors for thrombotic microangiopathy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients receiving GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus plus MTX or sirolimus.

Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a feared complication of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) owing to its high mortality rate. The use of calcineurin inhibitors or sirolimus (SIR) for GVHD prophylaxis has been suggested as a potential risk factor. However, the impact of tacrolimus (TAC) and SIR combinations on the increased risk of TA-TMA is currently not well defined. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of TA-TMA in 102 allogeneic HSCT recipients who consecutively received TAC plus SIR (TAC/SIR) (n=68) or plus MTX (TAC/MTX)±ATG (n=34) for GVHD prophylaxis. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of TA-TMA between patients receiving TAC/SIR vs TAC/MTX±ATG (7.4% vs 8.8%, P=0.8). Only grade III-IV acute GVHD, previous HSCT and serum levels of TAC >25 ng/mL were associated with a greater risk of TA-TMA. Patients developing TA-TMA have significantly poorer survival (P<0.001); however, TA-TMA ceased to be an independent prognostic factor when it was included in a multivariate model. In conclusion, the combination of TAC/SIR does not appear to pose a higher risk of TA-TMA. By contrast, we identified three different risk groups for developing TA-TMA.