Selective retina therapy (SRT) of chronic subfoveal fluid after surgery of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: three case reports.

BACKGROUND: Shallow subfoveal fluid accumulation after successful surgery for retinal detachment can be the reason for compromised visual acuity. To date, therapeutical options to tackle this problem have not been established. Selective retina therapy (SRT) is a new laser technology that uses a train of mus-laser pulses to selectively damage retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells while sparing retinal structures. METHODS: We treated three patients with chronic subfoveal fluid accumulation after retinal detachment surgery. The median period between retinal surgery and SRT treatment was 7 months. For SRT, we used a prototype frequency-doubled, Q-switched Nd:YLF laser (lambda = 527 nm). Each laser exposition contained 30 pulses (t = 1,7 micros, 100 Hz, E = 100-400 microJ). Two of the three patients were treated subfoveally. OCT III (optical coherence tomography) examinations were performed to evaluate changes in subretinal fluid accumulation. RESULTS: In all three patients, we observed complete resolution of subfoveal fluid within 1-5 months. Follow-up has been 16 months to 2 years. Visual acuity improved in all patients. In one patient, cystoid macular edema developed 3 months after treatment. Additional SRT treatments were not necessary. CONCLUSION: SRT is a safe treatment. Visual acuity improved after SRT, even in subfoveal irradiations. SRT is an option to support subretinal fluid reabsorption. In this situation where no other therapeutical options are established, SRT may be a beneficial treatment for chronic subfoveal fluid accumulation after retinal detachment surgery.

Anterior chamber angle measurement with optical coherence tomography: intraobserver and interobserver variability.

PURPOSE: To assess intraobserver and interobserver variability of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) as an objective diagnostic tool to quantify the anterior chamber angle and opening width. SETTING: University Eye Clinic, Lübeck, Germany. METHODS: The anterior chamber angle and opening width were assessed in 18 eyes of 9 healthy volunteers by 2 observers. Intraobserver reproducibility was evaluated by calculating an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in a mixed model. Each observer had a separate model using information from 5 scans. Interobserver variability was determined by Bland-Altman analysis. The ICC was calculated in a mixed model using a residual maximum likelihood method. The results of 3 and 5 repeated scans were evaluated to indicate the change to 1 measurement application. RESULTS: The mean anterior chamber angle measurement was 35.9 degrees +/- 5.7 (SD) for observer A and 36.2 +/- 5.7 degrees for observer B. The ICC was 0.94 and 0.91, respectively. The mean opening width was 315 +/- 62 microm for observer A and 317 +/- 60 microm for observer B. The ICC was 0.97 and 0.93, respectively. Interobserver comparisons showed a mean difference between anterior chamber angle measurements of -0.27 +/- 1.6 degrees, a limit of agreement (LOA) interval from -3.52 to 2.98 degrees, and an ICC estimate of 0.96. The mean difference in opening width measurements was 2.40 +/- 12.40 microm, the LOA from -27.20 to 22.40 microm, and the estimated ICC 0.96. Using 1 instead of the mean of 5 measurements, the LOA range increased by 3.46 degrees for the anterior chamber angle and 30.0 microm for the opening width. CONCLUSION: Anterior chamber angle and opening width measurements by OCT showed low intraobserver and interobserver variability, indicating OCT is a valuable technique for quantitative assessment that provides reproducible measurements and objective documentation by different examiners.