Extranodal localization of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in systemic sclerosis: A diagnostic challenge and review of the literature.

Background: Systemic sclerosis is associated with an increased incidence of malignancies, in particular solid neoplasms. Hematological cancers have been also observed in autoimmune diseases, though rarely present with lung involvement. The latter may be misdiagnosed in systemic sclerosis patients, due to the frequent concomitant interstitial lung disease. Case description: Here, we present the case of a 63-year-old man affected by systemic sclerosis presenting with an atypical lung imaging and splenomegaly, who was diagnosed with splenic marginal zone lymphoma, thus raising the suspicion of lung secondarism. We discuss the diagnostic challenge of differential diagnosis in interstitial lung presentation and briefly review the available literature on this topic. Conclusion: Several reports have demonstrated an increased risk of malignancy in patients with systemic sclerosis. Still, the lack of concretely defined guidelines for systemic sclerosis, along with systemic sclerosis multifaceted organ involvement at presentation, may challenge diagnosis and management. Here, we remark the importance of clinical work-up and a multidisciplinary approach in systemic sclerosis, to early detect and treat concomitant hematological malignancies, especially during the first years of the disease.

Role and Function of A2A and A3 Adenosine Receptors in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases that affect joints, causing debilitating pain and disability. Adenosine receptors (ARs) play a key role in the mechanism of inflammation, and the activation of A2A and A3AR subtypes is often associated with a reduction of the inflammatory status. The aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of ARs in patients suffering from early-RA (ERA), RA, AS and PsA. Messenger RNA (mRNA) analysis and saturation binding experiments indicated an upregulation of A2A and A3ARs in lymphocytes obtained from patients when compared with healthy subjects. A2A and A3AR agonists inhibited nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) activation and reduced inflammatory cytokines release, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-6. Moreover, A2A and A3AR activation mediated a reduction of metalloproteinases (MMP)-1 and MMP-3. The effect of the agonists was abrogated by selective antagonists demonstrating the direct involvement of these receptor subtypes. Taken together, these data confirmed the involvement of ARs in chronic autoimmune rheumatic diseases highlighting the possibility to exploit A2A and A3ARs as therapeutic targets, with the aim to limit the inflammatory responses usually associated with RA, AS and PsA.

A2A adenosine receptor upregulation correlates with disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine is a purine nucleoside implicated in the regulation of the innate and adaptive immune systems, acting through its interaction with four cell surface receptors: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. There is intense interest in understanding how adenosine functions in health and during disease, but surprisingly little is known about the actual role of adenosine-mediated mechanisms in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). With this background, the aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that dysregulation of A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs) in lymphocytes of patients with SLE may be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease and to examine the correlations between the status of the ARs and the clinical parameters of SLE. METHODS: ARs were analyzed by performing saturation-binding assays, as well as messenger RNA and Western blot analysis, with lymphocytes of patients with SLE in comparison with healthy subjects. We tested the effect of A2AAR agonists in the nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) pathway and on the release of interferon (IFN)-α; tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α; and interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-1ß, and IL-10. RESULTS: In lymphocytes obtained from 80 patients with SLE, A2AARs were upregulated compared with those of 80 age-matched healthy control subjects, while A1, A2B, and A3 ARs were unchanged. A2AAR density was inversely correlated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 score disease activity through time evaluated according to disease course patterns, serositis, hypocomplementemia, and anti-double-stranded DNA positivity. A2AAR activation inhibited the NF-kB activation pathway and diminished inflammatory cytokines (IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-6, IL-1ß), but it potentiated the release of anti-inflammatory IL-10. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the involvement of A2AARs in the complex pathogenetic network of SLE, acting as a modulator of the inflammatory process. It could represent a compensatory pathway to better counteract disease activity. A2AAR activation significantly reduced the release of proinflammatory cytokines while enhancing those with anti-inflammatory activity, suggesting a potential translational use of A2AAR agonists in SLE pharmacological treatment.

A(2A) adenosine receptors are differentially modulated by pharmacological treatments in rheumatoid arthritis patients and their stimulation ameliorates adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats.

A(2A) adenosine receptors (ARs) play a key role in the inhibition of the inflammatory process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the modulation of A(2A)ARs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after different pharmacological treatments and to investigate the effect of A(2A)AR stimulation in a rat model of arthritis. We investigated A(2A)AR density and functionality in RA progression by using a longitudinal study in RA patients before and after methotrexate (MTX), anti-TNFα agents or rituximab treatments. A(2A)ARs were analyzed by saturation binding assays in lymphocytes from RA patients throughout the 24-month study timeframe. In an adjuvant-induced arthritis model in rats we showed the efficacy of the A(2A)AR agonist, CGS 21680 in comparison with standard therapies by means of paw volume assessment, radiographic and ultrasonographic imaging. Arthritic-associated pain was investigated in mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia tests. IL-10 release following A(2A)AR stimulation in lymphocytes from RA patients and in serum from arthritic rats was measured. In lymphocytes obtained from RA patients, the A(2A)AR up-regulation was gradually reduced in function of the treatment time and the stimulation of these receptors mediated a significant increase of IL-10 production. In the same cells, CGS 21680 did not affected cell viability and did not produced cytotoxic effects. The A(2A)AR agonist CGS 21680 was highly effective, as suggested by the marked reduction of clinical signs, in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis and associated pain. This study highlighted that A(2A)AR agonists represent a physiological-like therapeutic alternative for RA treatment as suggested by the anti-inflammatory role of A(2A)ARs in lymphocytes from RA patients. The effectiveness of A(2A)AR stimulation in a rat model of arthritis supported the role of A(2A)AR agonists as potential pharmacological treatment for RA.

Obesity and reduction of the response rate to anti-tumor necrosis factor α in rheumatoid arthritis: an approach to a personalized medicine.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is a mild, long-lasting inflammatory disease and, as such, could increase the inflammatory burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study aim was to determine whether obesity represents a risk factor for a poor remission rate in RA patients requiring anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) therapy for progressive and active disease despite treatment with methotrexate or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: Patients were identified from 15 outpatient clinics of university hospitals and hospitals in Italy taking part in the Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Early Arthritis network. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), body mass index (BMI; categorized as <25, 25-30, and >30 kg/m(2) ), acute-phase reactants, IgM rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody values were collected. DAS28 remission was defined as a score of <2.6 lasting for at least 3 months. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-one outpatients with longstanding RA receiving anti-TNFα blockers (adalimumab, n = 260; etanercept, n = 227; infliximab, n = 154), recruited from 2006-2009 and monitored for at least 12 months, were analyzed. The mean ± SD DAS28 at baseline was 5.6 ± 1.4. A BMI of >30 kg/m(2) was recorded in 66 (10.3%) of 641 RA patients. After 12 months of anti-TNFα treatment, a DAS28 of <2.6 was noted in 15.2% of the obese subjects, in 30.4% of the patients with a BMI of 25-30 kg/m(2) , and in 32.9% of the patients with a BMI of <25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.01). The lowest percentage of remission, which was statistically significant versus adalimumab and etanercept (P = 0.003), was observed with infliximab. CONCLUSION: Obesity represents a risk factor for a poor remission rate in patients with longstanding RA treated with anti-TNFα agents. A personalized treatment plan might be a possible solution.

The CC homozygosis of the -174G>C IL-6 polymorphism predicts a lower efficacy of rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Identification of genetic biomarkers of response to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a relevant issue. Being IL-6 a key cytokine for B cell survival, the interleukin-6 (IL-6) -174G>C and the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) D358A gene polymorphisms were investigated in 158 RA patients treated with rituximab (RTX). One hundred and twenty-eight (81.0%) were RF positive and 126 (79.7%) were anti-CCP positive. Response to therapy was evaluated at the end of the sixth month after the first RTX infusion, by using both the EULAR and the ACR criteria. The possible relationship with IL-6 serum levels was also studied. By univariate analysis, lack of response by the EULAR criteria was more prevalent in RA patients with the IL-6 -174 CC genotypes (39.1%), than in the GC/GG patients (18.5%) (OR 2.83; 95%CI=1.10-7.27; p=0.031). A good response was noticed in only one patient (4.3%) with the IL-6 -174 CC genotype, while it was present in 24.4% of GG/GC cases (p=0.06). By stepwise multivariate analysis (including RA duration, baseline DAS28, baseline HAQ, RF status, anti-CCP status and IL-6 genotype as covariates), the IL-6 -174CC genotype was selected as an independent predictor of no response to RTX by both EULAR and ACR≥50 criteria, while the IL-6R polymorphism resulted as not associated. No definite association between gene polymorphisms and IL-6 serum levels was noticed. Present results suggest a possible role for IL-6 genotyping to better plan treatment with RTX in RA, and larger studies are worthwhile.

A2A and A3 adenosine receptor expression in rheumatoid arthritis: upregulation, inverse correlation with disease activity score and suppression of inflammatory cytokine and metalloproteinase release.

INTRODUCTION: The reduction of the inflammatory status represents one of the most important targets in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A central role of A2A and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs) in mechanisms of inflammation has been reported in different pathologies. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the A2A and A3ARs and their involvement in RA progression measured by Disease Activity Score in 28 or 44 joints (DAS28 or DAS). METHODS: ARs were analyzed by saturation binding assays, mRNA and Western blotting analysis in lymphocytes from early and established RA patients. The effect of A2A and A3AR agonists in nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) pathway was evaluated. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) release was carried out by A2A and A3AR activation. AR pharmacological regulation in matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) release was also studied. RESULTS: In lymphocytes obtained from RA patients, A2A and A3ARs were up-regulated if compared with healthy controls. A2A and A3AR activation inhibited the NF-kB pathway and diminished inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6. A2A and A3AR agonists mediated a reduction of MMP-1 and MMP-3 release. A2A and A3AR density inversely correlated with DAS28 and DAS suggesting a direct role of the endogenous activation of these receptors in the control of RA joint inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together these data demonstrate that the inflammatory and clinical responses in RA are regulated by A2A and A3ARs and support the use of A2A and/or A3AR agonists as novel and effective pharmacological treatment in RA patients.

Concomitant rheumatoid arthritis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: report of two new cases and review of literature.

To describe a rare association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Two new cases of patients with RA who developed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), one receiving anti-TNFα agents, were reported. Only other five cases of this rare association have been previously described in literature. The simultaneous presence of the two diseases represents a difficult diagnostic challenge because RA may mimic some musculoskeletal symptoms of ALS. There is no evidence in favor of a common pathophysiologic mechanism, and thus the possibility of a fortuitous association must be raised. A neurotoxic side effect of various drugs for RA treatment could be considered. Casual or causal association remains a difficult choice. The possibility of a coincidental association must be raised but neurologic side effects of TNFα blockers lead to discussion.

The role of adenosine receptors in rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is the most common inflammatory musculoskeletal disease inducing diminished quality-of-life in the affected individuals and having major impact on society due to decrease work ability. Early diagnosis and immediate, effective therapy are crucial in order to prevent unfavorable outcome. Treatment of RA has progressed during the past two decades thanks to the advent of a large number of new agents targeting different specific molecules and pathways involved in the modulation of the inflammation. In this scenario an important role is covered by adenosine, a purine nucleoside released from a variety of cells in response to metabolic and inflammatory stress, which is considered to be a potent endogenous regulator acting through its interaction with 4 cell surface receptors named as A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). Adenosine receptor stimulation has complex effects on the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines depending on selective receptor engagement. Recent data show the involvement of adenosine pathways in RA and its potential therapeutic implications.

Normalization of A2A and A3 adenosine receptor up-regulation in rheumatoid arthritis patients by treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha but not methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors in lymphocytes and neutrophils from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) as well as from RA patients treated with methotrexate (MTX) or anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha), as compared with those in age-matched healthy controls, and to examine correlations between the status and functionality of adenosine receptors and TNFalpha release and NF-kappaB activation. METHODS: Adenosine receptors were analyzed by saturation binding assays and Western blot analyses. We investigated the potency of typical A(2A) and A(3) agonists in the production of cAMP in control subjects, ERA patients, and RA patients treated with MTX or anti-TNFalpha. In a separate cohort of RA patients, TNFalpha release and NF-kappaB activation were evaluated in plasma and nuclear extracts, respectively. RESULTS: In ERA patients, we found a high density and altered functionality of A(2A) and A(3) receptors. The binding and functional parameters of A(2A) and A(3) receptors normalized after anti-TNFalpha, but not MTX, treatment. TNFalpha release was increased in ERA patients and in MTX-treated RA patients, whereas in anti-TNFalpha-treated RA patients, release was comparable to that in the controls. NF-kappaB activation was elevated in ERA patients and in MTX-treated RA patients. Anti-TNFalpha treatment mediated decreased levels of NF-kappaB activation. CONCLUSION: A(2A) and A(3) receptor up-regulation in ERA patients and in MTX-treated RA patients was associated with high levels of TNFalpha and NF-kappaB activation. Treatment with anti-TNFalpha normalized A(2A) and A(3) receptor expression and functionality. This new evidence of A(2A) and A(3) receptor involvement opens the possibility of exploiting their potential role in human diseases characterized by a marked inflammatory component.

Can tumor necrosis factor receptor II gene 676T>G polymorphism predict the response grading to anti-TNFalpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis?

In this study we analyzed whether the polymorphisms 676T>G in the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) II gene and -308G>A in the TNFalpha promoter gene may influence the response grading to anti-TNFalpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. We enrolled and genotyped 105 RA patients treated with etanercept (n = 55), infliximab (n = 40) and adalimumab (n = 10) for 1 year. The clinical response was evaluated according to the ACR criteria every 3 months. Patients with TNFRII 676TG genotype was significantly associated with lower ACR response compared with 676TT genotype, at 3 (OR 3.78 95% CI 1.07-13.31) and 12 months (OR 4.30 95% CI 1.16-15.99) of treatment. No significant association between TNFalpha -308G>A polymorphism and the clinical response was found. TNFRII 676TG genotype is associated with a lower response to anti-TNFalpha therapy, independently from the specific agent used. This polymorphism could become a useful genetic marker for predicting the different response grading to anti-TNFalpha therapy.

The treatment of the rheumatological manifestations of the inflammatory bowel diseases.

The strong link between the bowel and the osteo-articular system is suggested by many clinical and experimental observations. However, the therapeutic approach is still empirical. For symptomatic therapy it is better to favour the use of steroids and avoid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs because they may induce intestinal ulcerations and can activate inflammatory bowel disease. Second line drugs (sulfasalazine, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine and leflunomide) should be used for selected indications. In some cases (severe spondylitis, severe and persistent enthesopathy) anti-TNF-alpha agents (infliximab) should be considered as first line therapy. In all cases it is mandatory to select the best therapeutic option for each individual patient, considering that the optimal treatment of bowel inflammation may induce "per se" a remission of the musculo-skeletal manifestations.