Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Hernia ; 28(4): 1457-1460, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869812

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Inguinal hernia repair remains one of the most common elective general surgical procedures. Previous studies have suggested high rates of chronic pain afterwards. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in quality of life after local anaesthetic (LA) inguinal hernia surgery performed in a primary care setting. METHODS: Quality of life (QoL) was measured in all patients both pre-operatively and at 6-months post-operatively using the European Hernia Society Scoring tool. Data was analysed by tertile grouping according to initial symptom score. RESULTS: 497 patients filled out pre-operative QoL forms between June 2020 and May 2022. Post-operative QoL scores were received from 179 patients (164 male (91.6%)). Median pre-operative score was 33 (IQR 20-48). Median post-operative score was 4 (IQR 1-11). Mean improvement in QoL score was 27.8. Nine patients had a worse score at 6-months compared to pre-op (5%). When the data was analysed by pre-op QoL group as expected the low symptom group (score 0-10) had minimal improvement in QoL (0.23) and 5 out of 13 patients (38%) had a worse score. The medium group (score 11-40) had a mean improvement in QoL of 17.25 with 3 out of 92 (3.2%) experiencing a worse score. The high symptom group (score 41-90) had a mean improvement in QoL of 45.4 with only 1 of 76 (1.3%) experiencing a worse score. CONCLUSIONS: LA Inguinal hernia repair improves QoL substantially 6-months after surgery. However, in those patients with low pre-operative scores (< 11) the gain is minimal and rates of chronic symptoms following surgery are very high. We recommend avoiding surgery in this group and instead adopting a surveillance approach.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Hérnia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Adulto
2.
World J Emerg Surg ; 12: 47, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29075316

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opportunities to improve emergency surgery outcomes exist through guided better practice and reduced variability. Few attempts have been made to define optimal care in emergency surgery, and few clinically derived key performance indicators (KPIs) have been published. A summit was therefore convened to look at resources for optimal care of emergency surgery. The aim of the Donegal Summit was to set a platform in place to develop guidelines and KPIs in emergency surgery. METHODS: The project had multidisciplinary global involvement in producing consensus statements regarding emergency surgery care in key areas, and to assess feasibility of producing KPIs that could be used to monitor process and outcome of care in the future. RESULTS: Forty-four key opinion leaders in emergency surgery, across 7 disciplines from 17 countries, composed evidence-based position papers on 14 key areas of emergency surgery and 112 KPIs in 20 acute conditions or emergency systems. CONCLUSIONS: The summit was successful in achieving position papers and KPIs in emergency surgery. While position papers were limited by non-graded evidence and non-validated KPIs, the process set a foundation for the future advancement of emergency surgery.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/cirurgia , Pediatria/métodos , Acidentes por Quedas/mortalidade , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Mundo Árabe , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnica Delphi , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Oriente Médio/epidemiologia , Pediatria/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 106(6): 723-8, 2011.
Artigo em Romano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22308908

RESUMO

A major issue of the surgical anesthetic team is the surgical stress response, with its organ disfunctions, and the postoperative pain with consequences regarding the physiopathologic and socio-economical impact associated with its inadequate therapy. According to the "fast-track" approach, multimodal analgesia has a central place, together with minimal invasive procedures. Opioid-local anesthetic association via thoracic epidural catheter, has become the "anesthetic golden standard", in major thoraco-abdominal surgery. Co-administration of i.v. non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, seriously decreases the inflammatory response to the surgical stress, allowing a faster recovery, an early social rehabilitation, and a decrease in morbidity and mortality associated with major neoplasic surgery.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Abdominais/cirurgia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estresse Psicológico/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Torácicas/cirurgia , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Epidural , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estresse Fisiológico/efeitos dos fármacos , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA