Retrospective study evaluating dental side effects of radiotherapy in patients treated for head and neck cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the seventh most common cancer worldwide with around 600,000 new diagnosis each year. Nowadays, in locally advanced disease, radiotherapy (RT) play an important role, this with or without chemotherapy in organ preservation strategies. More specific for early stage localized disease, RT (or surgery) seems to give similar results on locoregional control (LRC) and choice is made according to the organ preservation issue. Despite the fact that technical improvements have been made to optimize the radiation dose delivery and minimize the normal tissue toxicity, RT is associated with potential early and late toxicities. Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ), especially seen after teeth extraction, is one of the associated toxicities and can significantly impair the patient's quality of life. Because of the fear of developing ORNJ, one is very reluctant to extract or place a dental implant post-radiotherapy, especially in high irradiation dose zones (>40 Gy). Hence, it is important to define teeth at risk of future extraction before initiating RT and to handle those in high-risk irradiation zones. In order to optimise extractions, we created a predictive model of the expected irradiation dose, and thus the need for extraction, to the teeth bearing bones. The aim of this study is to validate our model and to define the potential relationship between the radiation dose received by each tooth and the dental complications observed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2012 and March 2018, patients with HNSCC treated by intensity modulated RT were retrospectively analysed. The mean irradiation dose for each tooth was generated on the administered treatment plan by contouring each tooth separately on each dosimetric scan section using dedicated software (Eclipse, Varian). In order to validate our predictive model, we compared the actual generated/administered teeth irradiation doses with the irradiation doses predicted by our model. RESULTS: Our predictive model was accurate in 69.6% of the cases. In 12.5% of cases the predicted dose was higher than the calculated dose and lower in 17,8% of the cases. A correct- or over-estimation (is the latter being clinically less worrying than an underestimated dose) was achieved in 82% of cases. For the 18% of cases underfitting, the mean margin of error was 5.7 Gy. No statistically significant association was found between the development of caries and doses to the teeth, doses to the parotid glands or dental hygiene. However, a significant association between dental irradiation at more than 40 Gy and the occurrence of dental fractures (p = 0.0002) were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Our predictive model seems to be 82% accurate for dose prediction, hence might be helpful for optimizing/minimizing prophylactic extractions. Indeed, following our model, professionals could decide not to extract damaged teeth in areas not at risk of ORNJ, lowering morbidity during and after RT. Contrary to the literature, no relationship was found between the occurrence of dental caries and parotid irradiation and the patient's oral hygiene. However, for the first time, a highly significant correlation between the occurrence of dental fracture and dental irradiation at more than 40 Gy was observed.

Regorafenib after failure of gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced/metastatic biliary tumors: REACHIN, a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a high unmet clinical need for treatments of advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancers after progression on first-line chemotherapy. Regorafenib has demonstrated efficacy in some gastrointestinal tumors that progress on standard therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: REACHIN was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in patients with nonresectable/metastatic biliary tract cancer that progressed after gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to best supportive care plus either regorafenib 160 mg once daily 3 weeks on/1 week off or placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. No crossover was allowed. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives were response rate, overall survival, and translational analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with intrahepatic (n = 42), perihilar (n = 6), or extrahepatic (n = 9) cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder carcinoma (n = 9) were randomized, 33 to each treatment group (33 per group). At a median follow-up of 24 months, all patients had progressed and six patients were alive. Median treatment duration was 11.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.0-15.9] in the regorafenib group and 6.3 weeks (95% CI: 3.9-7.0) in the placebo group (P = 0.002). Fourteen of 33 patients (42%) in the regorafenib group had a dose reduction. Stable disease rates were 74% (95% CI: 59-90) in the regorafenib group and 34% with placebo (95% CI: 18-51; P = 0.002). Median PFS in the regorafenib group was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.9) and 1.5 months (95% CI: 1.2-2.0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29-0.81; P = 0.004) and median overall survival was 5.3 months (95% CI: 2.7-10.5) and 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.4), respectively (P = 0.28). There were no unexpected/new safety signals. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib significantly improved PFS and tumor control in patients with previously treated metastatic/unresectable biliary tract cancer in the second- or third-line setting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in the European Clinical Trials Register database (EudraCT 2012-005626-30) and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02162914).

Retrospective evaluation of the safety of low-level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in patients with head/neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The standard therapeutic approach for locally advanced head and neck cancer is optimal use of radiation therapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy. The most common and distressing acute complication of such therapies is oral/pharyngeal mucositis that may be associated with severe morbidity and can interfere with the planned administration of therapy. METHODS: We have identified all patients diagnosed with head/neck cancer between 2005 and 2009, having received radiotherapy with or without cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Radiotherapy consisted of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in all patients. In patients with grade > 2 mucositis, photobiomodulation (PBM) consisted of three sessions of low-level laser irradiation weekly, in accordance with recently published recommendations for PBM. Patients who did not receive PBM were those for whom that approach was not requested by the radiotherapists and those who declined it. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients (62%) received PBM and 139 did not (39%). The patient's characteristics were equally distributed between the two groups. For overall survival, time to local recurrence, and progression-free survival, there was no statistical evidence for a difference in prognosis between patients with and without PBM. In a multivariate analysis, after adjusting for known prognostic factors, we found no statistical evidence that PBM was related to overall survival, progression-free survival, or local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show evidence of no effect of PBM upon overall survival, time to local recurrences, and disease-free survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy.

Does the Prediction Accuracy of Osteoporotic Fractures by BMD and Clinical Risk Factors Vary With Fracture Site?

Several clinical risk factors (CRFs) have been shown to predict the risk of fragility fractures independently of BMD, but their accuracy in the prediction of a particular fracture site has not been extensively studied. In this study based on longitudinal data from the FRISBEE cohort (Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry), we evaluated if CRFs are specific for sites of incident osteoporotic fractures during follow-up. We recruited 3560 postmenopausal women, aged 60 to 85 years, from 2007 to 2013, and surveyed yearly for the occurrence of fragility fractures during 6.2 years (median). We analyzed the association between CRFs included in the FRAX (fracture risk assessment tool) model or additional CRFs (falls, sedentary lifestyle, early untreated menopause, diabetes, use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or proton pump inhibitors) and the first incident validated major osteoporotic fracture (MOF; n = 362; vertebra, hip, shoulder, and wrist) or other major fractures (n = 74; ankle, pelvis/sacrum, elbow, knee, long bones). Uni- and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model were used. For MOFs considered together, the risk of fracture was highly associated in uni- and multivariate analyses (p<0.01) with osteoporosis (T-score < -2.5), prior fracture, age, BMD (assessed by DXA), and fall history (HR 2.34, 1.82,1.71, 1.38, and 1.32, respectively). For each site analyzed separately, prior OF, age, smoking, and total hip BMD remained independent predictors for hip fractures (HR 5.72, 3.98, 3.10, 2.32, and 1.92, respectively); osteoporosis, age, prior OF, glucocorticoids, and spine BMD for vertebral fracture (HR 2.08, 1.87, 1.78, 1.76, and 1.45, respectively); osteoporosis, prior OF, and femoral neck BMD (HR 1.83, 1.60, and 1.56, respectively) for wrist fracture; osteoporosis, prior OF, and spine BMD (HR 2.48, 1.78, and 1.31, respectively) for shoulder fracture; prior OF and diabetes (HR 2.62 and 2.03) for other major fractures. Thus, a prior fracture and BMD were the best predictors of fracture risk at any site. Other CRFs have a weaker predictive value, which is a function of the site of a future fracture. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[Lung cancer: Prognosis in intensive care depends mainly on the acute complication]. / Cancer bronchique : le pronostic en soins intensifs dépendrait surtout de la complication.

INTRODUCTION: It has been demonstrated in unselected populations of cancer patients that prognosis in intensive care is essentially dependent on the extent of the acute physiological disturbance caused by the complication precipitating the admission. By contrast, the prognosis after hospital discharge remains dependent on the characteristics of the underlying neoplasm. The aim of our study was to confirm whether this general finding was the case in a specific population of lung cancer patients, since there are no data on this patient group in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients with lung cancer admitted to our ICU between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013. RESULTS: During this period, 180 different patients with lung cancer were admitted into ICU. The simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II) (OR 1.07 ; 95% CI 1.04-1.11), respiratory failure (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.76-9.07) and the presence of therapeutic limitations were the 3 factors independently affecting hospital mortality in multivariate analysis. Considering only patients discharged alive from the hospital, the presence of metastases (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.44-3.65) and limitations on therapy (HR 5,89; IC 95% 3,11-11,14) were the two statistically independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this population of lung cancer patients admitted into ICU, independent predictors of hospital mortality are determined by the physiological perturbations induced by the acute presenting complication. After recovery from this, prognosis is again determined by the characteristics of the underlying cancer.

Predictive factors for cancer-associated thrombosis in a large retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between cancer and thrombosis has been studied for years, but reliable guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in that situation are still unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of 3159 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed solid tumors at Jules Bordet Institute from January 2008 to December 2011. Among them, 99 developed a symptomatic thromboembolic episode and were matched with 2 controls (nested case control). The aim was to identify risk factors of thromboembolic events and to validate in our setting the Khorana score. RESULTS: In the cohort study, nodal status ≥ 2, presence of metastases, and primary tumor site were found to be the most significant predictive factors of a thromboembolic event (n = 99; 3.1%) in the multivariate analysis. In the nested study (n = 265), hemoglobin < 13 g/dL or treatment with a red cell growth factor, CRP ≥ 31.6 mg/L, creatinine level > 0.96 mg/dL, chronic inflammatory disease, and personal or familial history of thromboembolic events were found to be the most significant predictive factors of a thromboembolic event in the multivariate analysis. In our population, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Khorana score were respectively 29%, 93%, 15%, and 96%. CONCLUSION: We confirm the value of the risk factors identified in the literature with the additional presence of nodal involvement, elevated CRP, and creatinine levels, which may be helpful for patient risk stratification and should be considered in future clinical trials. Our results also suggest that the Khorana score might help to identify patients who can safely be spared of thromboprophylaxis.

[Diagnostic approach of an IgM monoclonal gammopathy and clinical importance of gene MYD88 L265P mutation]. / Approche diagnostique d'une gammapathie monoclonale à IgM et intérêt clinique de la recherche de la mutation L265P du gène MYD88.

INTRODUCTION: An IgM monoclonal gammopathy points to a diagnosis of Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Other B lymphoproliferatives disorders should be ruled out but the limits are sometimes difficult to define. The discovery of the L265P mutation of the MYD88 gene simplified potentially the situation. POPULATION AND METHODS: 383 patients of the Jules Bordet Institute with an IgM level above 2 g/L were reviewed. For the 49 who had a monoclonal peak, we analysed the underlying pathology in termes of general, clinical and biological characteristics. We checked if the MYD88 mutation had been detected. The overall survival rate was studied. RESULTS: 5 histological groups were identified: Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (MW, N = 27), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LLP, N = 10), marginal zone lymphoma (LMZ, N = 7), monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance and multiple myeloma (MGUS/MM, N = 5). The MW group was compared to the other groups. Regarding biological characteristics, the IgM level upon diagnosis was statistically higher in the MW group with a median level at 19.5 g/L (2.3-101 g/L) (p-value = 0,0001). Concerning the clinical characteristics, a splenomegaly was more frequent in the LMZ group (p-value = 0,04). The L265P mutation of the MYD88 gene was found in 77 % of patients in the MW group, 60 % of patients in the LLP group and 67 % in the LMZ group (p-value = 0,38). For the 49 patients, the 10-yearoverall survival was 85 % (CI 95 %, 67 % to 94 %) and the 15-year-overall survival was 65 % (CI 95 %, 41 % to 81 %). CONCLUSION: A monoclonal IgM peak suggests a MW but other B lymphoproliferatives disorders should be excluded. Even if the L265P mutation is frequent in the LLP/MW, it is not specific. A precise diagnosis requires collating clinical, histological, immunophenotypical and genetical data.

INTRODUCTION: Une gammapathie monoclonale à IgM évoque généralement le diagnostic de maladie de Waldenström. D'autres syndromes lymphoprolifératifs B doivent être exclus mais les " frontières " entre les différentes entités sont parfois mal définies. La découverte de la mutation L265P du gène MYD88 a potentiellement simplifié cette situation. Population et méthodes : 383 patients de l'Institut Jules Bordet présentant un taux d'IgM supérieur à 2 g/L ont été étudiés. 49 d'entre eux présentaient un pic monoclonal pour lesquels nous avons réalisé l'analyse de la pathologie sous-jacente en terme de caractéristiques générales, cliniques et biologiques et avons identifié si une recherche de mutation MYD88 avait été réalisée. La survie globale a également été étudiée. Résultats : 5 groupes histologiques ont été identifiés : maladie de Waldenström (MW, N = 27), lymphome lymphoplasmocytaire (LLP, N = 10), lymphomes de la zone marginale (LMZ ; tous types confondus, N = 7), gammapathie monoclonale de signification indéterminée et myélome multiple (MGUS/MM, N = 5). Le groupe MW a été comparé aux autres groupes. En terme de caractéristiques biologiques, c'est le taux d'IgM au diagnostic qui est statistiquement plus élevé dans le groupe MW avec un taux médian de 19,5 g/L (2,3-101 g/L) (p-valeur = 0,001). Concernant les caractéristiques cliniques, une splénomégalie est plus souvent présente dans le groupe LMZ (p-valeur = 0,04). La mutation L265P du gène MYD88 est retrouvée chez 77 % des patients du groupe MW, 60 % des patients du groupe LLP et 67 % des patients du groupe LMZ (p-valeur = 0,38). La survie globale des 49 patients est de 85 % à 10 ans (IC 95 %, 67 % à 94 %) et de 65 % à 15 ans (IC 95 %, 41 % à 81 %). CONCLUSION: Un pic d'IgM monoclonal évoque généralement une MW, mais il faut toujours exclure d'autres syndromes lymphoprolifératifs B. Alors que la mutation L265P du gène MYD88 est fortement exprimée chez les patients porteurs d'un LLP/MW, elle n'en est pas pour autant spécifique. Un diagnostic précis nécessite aujourd'hui d'intégrer les données cliniques, histologiques, immunophénotypiques et génétiques.

Clinical significance of CD73 in triple-negative breast cancer: multiplex analysis of a phase III clinical trial.

Background: CD73 is an ecto-enzyme that promotes tumor immune escape through the production of immunosuppressive extracellular adenosine in the tumor microenvironment. Several CD73 inhibitors and adenosine receptor antagonists are being evaluated in phase I clinical trials. Patients and methods: Full-face sections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary breast tumors from 122 samples of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from the BIG 02-98 adjuvant phase III clinical trial were included in our analysis. Using multiplex immunofluorescence and image analysis, we assessed CD73 protein expression on tumor cells, tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and stromal cells. We investigated the associations between CD73 protein expression with disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and the extent of tumor immune infiltration. Results: Our results demonstrated that high levels of CD73 expression on epithelial tumor cells were significantly associated with reduced DFS, OS and negatively correlated with tumor immune infiltration (Spearman's R= -0.50, P < 0.0001). Patients with high levels of CD73 and low levels of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes had the worse clinical outcome. Conclusions: Taken together, our study provides further support that CD73 expression is associated with a poor prognosis and reduced anti-tumor immunity in human TNBC and that targeting CD73 could be a promising strategy to reprogram the tumor microenvironment in this BC subtype.

Are concurrent systematic cores needed at the time of targeted biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: MRI-guided targeted biopsies are advised in patients who have undergone an initial series of negative systematic biopsies, in whom prostate cancer (PCa) suspicion remains elevated. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether, in men with prior negative prostate biopsies, systematic cores are also warranted at the time of an MRI-targeted repeat biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing real time MRI/TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy at our institute between 2014 and 2016. Patients with at least one index lesion on multiparametric MRI were included. All eligible patients underwent both systematic random biopsies (12-14 cores) and targeted biopsies (2-4 cores). RESULTS: The study included 74 men with a median age of 65 years, PSA level of 9.27ng/mL, and prostatic volume of 45ml. The overall PCa detection rate and the clinically significant cancer detection rate were 56.7% and 39.2%, respectively. Targeted cores demonstrated similar clinically significant PCa detection rate compared to systematic cores (33.8% vs. 28.4%, P=0.38) with significantly less tissue sampling. Indeed, a combination approach was significantly superior to a targeted-only in overall PCa detection (+16.7% overall detection rate, P=0.007). Although differences in clinically significant PCa detection were statistically non-significant (P=0.13), a combination approach did allow detecting 7 extra clinically significant PCas (+13.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with elevated PSA and prior negative biopsies, concurrent systematic sampling may be needed at the time of targeted biopsy in order to maximize PCa detection rate. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Intravenous iron therapy for anemic cancer patients: a review of recently published clinical studies.

Based on available literature and on the present review, IV iron administration to anemic cancer patients can increase significantly the level of Hb, probably independently from the precise mechanism of anemia itself. However, in future studies, the benefit should be evaluated taking into account whether the anemia is due to absolute or functional iron deficiency; therapeutic modalities might be different for these two conditions. Along the same lines, it appears important to further evaluate the respective roles of PO and IV iron therapies and the modalities of their use in clinical practice. Until the results of such studies are available, it appears reasonable to propose IV iron therapy to anemic cancer patients as the resulting rise of Hb level may increase their quality of life and performance status and reduce the need for erythropoietin-stimulating agents and/or blood transfusions.

First 200 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic TEPs.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic pre-peritoneal mesh repair (TEP) through single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) permits placement of a large mesh through a final millimetric umbilical scar. This prospective study evaluates the first 200 consecutive SILTEPs performed by a single surgeon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2011 and September 2015, 200 consecutive SILTEPs were performed in 161 patients. The mean age was 49.8 ± 16.3 years and the mean BMI was 24.5 ± 3.4 kg/m2. The technique involved one 11-mm trocar, one 10-mm 0° scope and curved reusable instruments. A supplementary 1.8-mm straight trocarless grasping forceps was percutaneously inserted for perioperative complications or difficulties. RESULTS: A unilateral hernia repair was performed in 122 patients, and a bilateral repair in 39 patients. The total operative time was 57.4 ± 22.3 min, and pure laparoscopic time was 46.6 ± 21.6 min. There was no need for insertion of a supplementary 5-mm trocar, and the need for insertion of 1.8-mm trocarless grasper was 32.9%. Perioperative complications occurred in 73 patients. The mean final scar length was 15.3 ± 2.6 mm. The mean hospital stay was 1.0 ± 0.3 days. Postoperative complications at the access site affected 15 patients and at the hernia site 31 patients. After a mean follow-up of 25.4 ± 12.3 months, there was one asymptomatic, small incisional hernia at the access site as well as one reoperation for recurrent inguinal hernia at 16 months. No other late complications were registered. CONCLUSION: Transumbilical SILTEP permits placement of a large mesh through a final millimetric scar. Getting over the learning curve in conventional multitrocar TEP is mandatory. As per our institute's algorithm, the contraindications continue to be giant inguino-scrotal, incarcerated and recurrent inguinal hernias.

The current use and attitudes towards tumor genome sequencing in breast cancer.

There is increasing availability of technologies that can interrogate the genomic landscape of an individual tumor; however, their impact on daily practice remains uncertain. We conducted a 28-item survey to investigate the current attitudes towards the integration of tumor genome sequencing in breast cancer management. A link to the survey was communicated via newsletters of several oncological societies, and dedicated mailing by academic research groups. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was carried out to determine the relationship between predictors and outcomes. 215 physicians participated to the survey. The majority were medical oncologists (88%), practicing in Europe (70%) and working in academic institutions (66%). Tumor genome sequencing was requested by 82 participants (38%), of whom 21% reported low confidence in their genomic knowledge, and 56% considered tumor genome sequencing to be poorly accessible. In multivariable analysis, having time allocated to research (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.84-6.15, p < 0.0001), working in Asia (OR 5.76, 95% CI 1.57 - 21.15, p = 0.01) and having institutional guidelines for molecular sequencing (OR 2.09, 95% 0.99-4.42, p = 0.05) were associated with a higher probability of use. In conclusion, our survey indicates that tumor genome sequencing is sometimes used, albeit not widely, in guiding management of breast cancer patients.

[The Glasgow inflammatory score and lung cancer: A predictor of admissions to emergency units]. / Score inflammatoire de Glasgow et cancer bronchique : une aide pour hospitaliser aux urgences.

INTRODUCTION: In a first study, we found predictive factors for hospital admission in lung cancer patients consulting at the emergency department. Knowing that systemic inflammation is a prognostic factor in cancer patients, the goal of our study was to determine whether systemic inflammation measured using the modified Glasgow prognostic score can improve the predictive value of our previous model. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients with lung cancer consulting at the emergency department of an oncology hospital between January 1st 2008 and December 31st 2010. RESULTS: Of the 548 emergency department visits, C-reactive protein and albumin needed for calculating the Glasgow score, were available for 291 visits. Multivariate analysis identified three predictors of hospitalization subsequent to a visit at the emergency ward: the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) (OR=2.72; P<0.0001), arrival by ambulance (odds ratio [OR]=21.38; P<0.0001) and the presence of physical signs associated with the complaint (OR=2.72; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The mGPS is an independent predictor for hospitalization in patients with lung cancer consulting at the emergency department.

[Difficulties and limitations in conducting translational research in thoracic oncology. A practical example]. / Difficultés et limites dans la conduite d'une étude translationnelle en oncologie thoracique. Un exemple pratique.

INTRODUCTION: In a first study, we identified signatures of 3 mRNAs (semaphorin 3D [SEMA3D], cytokeratin 16 [KRT16] and UL16 binding protein 2 [ULBP2]) associated to response to a cisplatin-vinorelbin chemotherapy and to survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to develop immunohistochemistry tests for KRT16, ULBP2 and SEMA3D and to test proteins expression for prediction of response and survival in biopsies of the same patients. RESULTS: We were not able to reproduce by the protein expression study the signature predicting response to chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. CONCLUSION: We highlight the difficulties of translational research in thoracic oncology emphasizing the complexity in obtaining adequate tissue samples and the difficulties in conduction and transposing in routine practice high throughput technique for transcriptomic analyses.

Opioid-free anesthesia: what about patient comfort? A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of a pern-operative opioid-free approach on postoperative patient comfort in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From September 2014 to July 2015, 66 female patients of the Belgian Oncology Institut Jules Bordet were recruited. They were randomized into two groups: the first group received anesthesia with opioids for their breast cancer surgery, and the second group received opioid-free anesthesia. Patient comfort was evaluated 24 hours postoperatively through the QoR-40 score, with a difference of 15 points considered as being clinically relevant. Postoperative analgesia was provided through a piritramide patient-controlled analgesia device, during the first 24 hours. The hypothesis of this study was that opioid-free anesthesia would improve quality of recovery after anesthesia. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in postoperative QoR-40 score was observed between groups [Mean (SD) QoR-40 of 182.1/200 (13.9) in the opioid-free group, and 175.6/200 (14.80) in the opioid group; P = 0.04]. The clinical relevance of this finding is questionable, insofar as the difference of 15 points was not met. A statistically significant difference in postoperative piritramide usage was observed (8.1 (6.6) in the opioid-free group, and 13.1 (9.4) in the opioid group; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial shows, for the first time, equal comfort during the immediate postoperative period in patients having received opioid-free and conventional anesthesia for their breast cancer surgery. Opioid-free anesthesia in this indication appears safe, and may be associated with slightly reduced pain during the first 24 postoperative hours.

[Implementation of an oncological care program in a multidisciplinary clinic]. / Implémentation d'un programme de soins oncologiques en consultation multidisciplinaire.

INTRODUCTION: A working group has highlighted guidelines in thoracic oncology in Europe without study of their implementation, due to a lack of data. METHODS: The records of 354 untreated lung cancer patients seen between January 2009 and December 2012 were reviewed. Any new treatment should have been proposed by a multidisciplinary consultation (MDC) in accordance with an oncology care program (OCP) based on the European Lung Cancer Working Party guidelines. RESULTS: For the 354 patients, there were 636 MDC (332, 176, 81 and 47 in 1st, 2nd, 3rd and subsequent lines). For the first line, the MDC rate was 88%, in accordance with the OCP, and 75% of treatments were in agreement with the guidelines. For the 2nd and 3rd lines, the rates were 93% and 92% respectively (MDC), 90 and 89% (OCP), 55 and 63% (guidelines). In the first line, the main causes of non-compliance with the OCP were patient's refusal or doctor's choice and with guidelines a lack of adequate recommendations for specific situations such as comorbidities or the appearance of new treatments. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of patients are the subject of a MDC with a high rate of application of OCP. Guidelines should be updated regularly to incorporate new treatments.

Rate and patterns of ICU admission among colorectal cancer patients: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate, in colorectal cancer patients, the cause of ICU admission and to find predictors of death during and after hospitalization. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including all patients with colorectal cancer admitted in the ICU of a cancer hospital from January 1st 2003 to December 31 2012. RESULTS: Among 3721 ICU admissions occurring during the study period, 119 (3.2 %) admissions dealt with colorectal cancer, of whom 89 were eligible and assessable. The main reasons for admission were of metabolic (24 %), hemodynamic (19 %), cardiovascular (18 %), gastrointestinal (16 %), respiratory (13 %), or neurologic (6 %) origin. These complications were due to cancer in 43 %, to the antineoplastic treatment in 25 %, or were unrelated to the cancer or its treatment in 33 %. A quarter of the patients died during hospitalization. Independent predictors of death were the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (with risk of dying increasing by 42 % per unit of SOFA score), fever (with risk of dying multiplied by three per °C), and high values of GOT (with risk of dying multiplied by 1 % per unit increase), while cancer control (i.e., stage progression or not), compliance to the initial cancer treatment plan, and LDH ≤ median levels had prognostic significance for further longer survival after hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: This is the first study looking at specific causes for unplanned ICU admission of patients with colorectal cancer. Hospital mortality was influenced by the characteristics of the complication that entailed the ICU admission while cancer characteristics retained their prognostic influence on survival after hospital discharge.

[Management of unresectable non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Guidelines of clinical practice made by the European Lung Cancer Working Party]. / Traitement des cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules locorégionaux. Recommandations de pratique clinique de I'European Cancer Working Party.

The present updated guidelines on the management of unresectable non-metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) formulated by the ELCWP are designed to answer the following questions: 1) Is chest irradiation curative for NSCLC? 2) What are the contra-indications (anatomical or functional) to chest irradiation ? 3) Does the addition of chemotherapy add any advantage to radiotherapy? 4) Does the addition of radiotherapy add any advantage to chemotherapy? 5) In marginally resectable stage III is irradiation as effective as surgery? 6) How to best combine chemotherapy with radiotherapy: sequentially, concomitantly, as consolidation, as induction, as radiosensitiser? 7) In case of too advanced locoregional disease, is there a role for consolidation (salvage) local treatment (surgery, radiotherapy) after induction chemotherapy? 8) In 2014, what are the technical characteristics of an adequate radiotherapy? 9) What treatment for the patient unfit to receive a radical multimodal treatment based on radiotherapy? 10) Have targeted therapies a role? 11) What indication for preventive brain irradiation (PCI)?

Controversial issues in early-stage breast cancer: a global collaborative survey, supported by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

BACKGROUND: To explore the current clinical management of early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients, identify areas of controversy, and interrogate how treating physicians implement latest advances. METHODS: We conducted a 27-item survey, disseminated in two stages: paper distribution at selected BC sessions at the ESMO 2012 Congress, and dedicated mailings to ESMO members. Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis were applied to explore potential associations between the demographic characteristics of the participants and replies. RESULTS: A total of 512 physicians from 79 countries participated in the study, accounting for 465 (91%) fully completed questionnaires. The majority of the participants were ESMO members (66%), medical oncologists (86.5%), and working in multidisciplinary teams (91.6%). Heterogeneous results were captured, such as the following: 40.9% of the participants consider no genetic test useful for making adjuvant treatment decisions; 15.3% consider PET-CT a useful imaging modality for staging; 68.8% consider that postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive disease should always be offered an aromatase inhibitor as part of their adjuvant therapy; 78.7% prefer to administer trastuzumab concurrently with the taxane component of chemotherapy; and 27% would consider bevacizumab in the neoadjuvant setting. The logistic regression analysis did not identify any strong predictor of the probability of giving a reply fully compatible with evidence in the literature. CONCLUSION: This survey captures clinical practice and whether the latest research advances are implemented in the treatment of early-stage BC by an extended number of physicians. Significant individual differences were found. Areas of controversy were detected, and they deserve further exploration in order to generate 'tailored' educational tools, with the final goal being the standardization of the treatment of early-stage BC patients.

The landscape of medical oncology in Europe by 2020.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, there will be a shortage of medical oncologists (MO) by 2020. However, this information is not available for Europe. The aim of this study was to assess the current number of MO in the 27 European Union (27-EU) countries and to predict their availability by 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2012 and January 2013, a survey was submitted to health authorities, medical oncology societies, and personal contacts in all 27-EU countries in order to gather annual data on the number of practicing MO. Data were collected by e-mail, telephone contact, or through research on official websites. Data regarding cancer incidence in 2008 and projections for 2015 and 2020 were obtained through Globocan. The mean annual increase in the number of MO was calculated for each country. The total number of MO by 2015 and 2020 was estimated, and the ratio of new cancer cases versus number of MO was calculated for 2008, 2015, and 2020. RESULTS: Twelve countries provided sufficient data. The average mean annual increase in the total number of MO was 5.3% (range 1.8%-8.7%), with Belgium being the lowest and UK the highest. The 2008 ratio of cancer cases versus MO was lowest in Hungary (113) and highest in UK (1067). A favorable decrease in this ratio was estimated in most countries. CONCLUSION: Our estimates, based on incidence and not on prevalence, indicate that MO availability will probably meet the projected need in most of the 12 countries analyzed, provided that: (i) these countries maintain their rate of annual increase in MO; and (ii) no unforeseen changes occur in cancer incidence. Unfortunately, minimal information is available for Eastern Europe. Our data call for the prospective surveillance of the cancer burden and MO availability to ensure adequate and equal care for cancer patients throughout Europe.