Clinicopathologic Features of Severe Acute Hepatitis Associated With Adenovirus Infection in Children.

A recent increase in reports of severe acute hepatitis of unknown etiology in children is under investigation. Although adenovirus has been frequently detected, its role remains unclear, and systematic histopathologic analysis is lacking. We conducted a retrospective study of 11 children hospitalized between October 2021 and May 2022 with unexplained acute hepatitis and concurrent adenovirus infection. Liver biopsies collected shortly after admission demonstrated moderately to severely active hepatitis in 8/11 (73%) cases, characterized by marked portal mixed inflammation, moderate-to-severe interface activity, and milder lobular inflammation. Clusters of plasma cells were present in 6/11 (55%) cases, mimicking autoimmune hepatitis. Semiquantitative scoring of 17 discrete histologic features found that greater degrees of portal inflammation, interface activity, bile duct injury, bile ductular reaction, lobular inflammation, Kupffer cell activation, and hepatocyte focal necrosis were significantly more common in these cases in comparison to the control group of unexplained acute severe hepatitis without adenovirus infection. Liver biopsy immunohistochemistry was negative for adenovirus in all cases. Polymerase chain reaction testing of liver tissue was positive for the enteric adenovirus serotypes 41 (species F) in 10/11 (91%) cases. An immunoprofile study of hepatic infiltrating lymphocytes in 1 patient revealed the presence of large numbers of CD3 + and CD4 + lymphocytes. Nine patients received supportive treatment without steroids and recovered without the need for liver transplantation. In summary, liver injury in children with severe acute hepatitis and adenovirus infection is characterized by a hepatitic pattern that resembles severe autoimmune hepatitis and may represent an immune-mediated process associated with viral infection.

Paediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an approach to pathological evaluation.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming an increasingly important healthcare issue along with the rising rates of obesity worldwide. It is the most common chronic liver disease in the paediatric population and the fastest growing indication for liver transplant in young adults. The pathogenesis is complex with contributions from multiple factors and genetic predisposition. While non-invasive laboratory tests and imaging modalities are being increasingly used, the liver biopsy continues to play a crucial role in the diagnosis and prognosis of NAFLD. Histologically, the assessment of paediatric fatty liver disease requires special considerations with respect to a periportal predominant pattern seen in prepubertal patients, as well as a different set of disease processes in the differential diagnosis. In this review, we provide a summary of current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical course of paediatric NAFLD as well as the clinical guidelines on diagnosis and management. We discuss the indications and limitations of liver biopsy, histological patterns seen in paediatric NAFLD, other entities to be considered in the differential diagnosis, and conclude with appropriate triaging of liver biopsies and essential elements of pathology reporting.

Waitlist mortality and post-liver transplant outcomes of pediatric patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoblastoma in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is offered in cases of advanced disease for both pediatric patients with hepatoblastoma (HBL) and those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current United States organ allocation priorities differ between the two groups. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of pediatric LT candidates with HBL and HCC using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (February 2002 to September 2020). RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-eight children with HBL and 95 children with HCC listed for first LT were identified. Patients with HBL were younger (p < .001), had lower laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD)/Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) scores (p < .001), and had lesser proportion with encephalopathy (p = .01). Patients with HCC had an increased risk of waitlist mortality in univariable (unadjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 4.37, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-9.51, p < .001) and multivariable competing risk regression (adjusted sHR = 3.08, 95% CI 1.13-8.37, p = .03) accounting for age and laboratory MELD/PELD score. Five hundred ninety-five children underwent LT for HBL and 76 for HCC. Patients transplanted for HBL had a significantly higher proportion with status 1B exception (71.3% vs. 7.9%, p < .001). No difference was observed in patient (unadjusted log-rank test, p = .52; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.40-1.48, p = .43) or graft survival (unadjusted log-rank test, p = .93; adjusted HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.42-1.33, p = .32) between HCC and HBL recipients. CONCLUSION: Waitlist mortality for pediatric LT candidates with HCC is significantly higher than for HBL, while posttransplant patient and graft survival are similar. This highlights an opportunity to improve equitable prioritization for children with HCC who may have reduced access to size-appropriate deceased donor organs and less effective bridge-to-transplant therapies.

Management of hepatoblastoma in the United States: Can we do better?

BACKGROUND: Hepatoblastoma is the most common type of liver cancer in children. Refined therapeutic approaches combining risk-adapted chemotherapy along with complete tumor resection has led to improved survival. We aimed to evaluate the current state of management and outcomes for hepatoblastoma in the United States. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 794 children (<18 years) with hepatoblastoma from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). We assessed overall survival by means of Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Median age was 1 year (interquartile range: 0-2) and 170 (21.4%) presented with metastatic disease. Surgical resection was included in the treatment of 614 (77.3%) children (resection in 66.8% and liver transplantation in 10.6%). In the entire cohort, 95.1% of children received chemotherapy. In the surgical cohort, 575 (93.6%) received chemotherapy (34.5% neoadjuvant, 28.7% adjuvant, 30.5% both neoadjuvant and adjuvant). The 5-year overall survival was 76.6% for the entire cohort (no-surgery group: 55.3% vs surgery group: 82.8%). In multivariable analysis for all children, age ≥8 years (P = .009), metastasis (P < .001), surgery only (P = .009), and chemotherapy only (P < .001) were risk factors for mortality. In multivariable analysis for the surgical cohort, metastasis (P = .001), multifocality (P = .02), no chemotherapy (P = .03), and margin-positive resection (P = .02) were risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Excellent long-term overall survival is achievable with a combination of chemotherapy and surgical resection when a negative resection margin is achieved. However, nearly a quarter of children never received surgical treatment, representing a potential opportunity for improvement in care.

Surgical management of pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates overall survival (OS) between liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR), while assessing the effect of margin status, in children with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for children (<18 years) with non-metastatic HCC undergoing surgery. RESULTS: One hundred six children with HCC treated surgically (LT 34, LR 72) were identified. For T1 stage, no difference in OS was observed for LT vs. margin-negative liver resection [LR(-)] (log-rank, p = 0.47). For T2/T3/T4 stage, no difference in OS was observed for LT vs. LR(-) (log-rank, p = 0.08); both subgroups exhibited superior OS vs. margin-positive liver resection [LR(+)] (log-rank, LT vs. LR(+): p = 0.001 and LR(-) vs. LR(+): p = 0.04). On multivariable Cox regression: (i) histology (fibrolamellar vs. not) and T stage (T1 vs. T2/T3/T4) were not associated with OS (both p = 0.06), (ii) chemotherapy and size >5 cm were not associated with OS (both p ≥ 0.42), (iii) when compared to LT, both LR(-) (p = 0.03) and LR(+) (p = 0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of mortality. CONCLUSION: Although margin-negative resection may be obtained with LT or LR, early LT consultation is warranted for children at high risk of LR(+) regardless of Milan criteria due to the negative impact of LR(+) on OS. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.