The Standardized Inclusive Numeric Academic Index: An Index to Measure Academic Productivity in Plastic Surgery.

PURPOSE: Academic productivity is a poorly defined metric that is commonly used to determine faculty career advancement. While various indices incorporate scholarly activity, no specific index assimilates the perceived importance of a variety of academic accomplishments a physician may make. Herein, the development and validation of an algorithm to generate an academic productivity score based on surveying physicians nationwide are described. METHODS: From 2016 to 2018, an online cross-sectional survey was distributed to faculty members at an academic institution and plastic surgeons from different academic levels nationwide. Respondents were presented with randomized, binary comparisons of 42 different achievements of an academic physician and asked to choose the more important achievement. Descriptive statistics of demographics and "win rates" of each achievement were reported and an algorithm for academic productivity scoring was designed. To validate the proposed index, 30 curricula vitae of academic surgeons were anonymized and ranked in order of increasing academic achievement by 6 volunteers. Interrater reliability was assessed by Krippendorff α (α ≥ 0.800). RESULTS: Survey respondents completed an average of 116 (SD, 97.6) comparisons each, generating a total of 14,736 ranked comparisons. Of the 42 variables, the highest win rates were attained by being the dean of a medical school (0.90) and editor of a medical journal (0.88). The lowest win rates were attained by industry spokesperson (0.1) and members of the local medical society (0.1). Initial validity evidence found the interrater reliability for the 6 rankers to have a Krippendorff α value of 0.843. The interrater reliability between the average rater ranking and the algorithm-generated ranking had a Krippendorff α value of 0.925. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the standardized inclusive numeric academic index may be used as a valid, comprehensive measure of academic productivity. Future studies should assess its application across different medical specialties.

Congenital tooth-bearing tumor of the eyelid leading to lacrimal system obstruction.

PURPOSE: We present an unusual case of a congenital lesion presenting with concomitant chronic dacryocystitis. The clinical presentation, examination, management, and histopathology are reviewed. OBSERVATIONS: A healthy male infant born at 37 weeks gestation presented with an isolated painless 5mm congenital mass of the left medial lower eyelid. Parents also reported episodic epiphora and discharge from the left eye. A surgical excision of the mass revealed an underlying dacryocystitis and the presence of a formed tooth. A dacryocystorhinostomy was performed together with a repair of the soft tissue defect. Histopathology revealed components of disorganized epithelial and mesenchymal tissues including a tooth, skeletal muscle, fat, fibrous tissue, nonkeratinized epithelium, and myelinated nerves. A diagnosis of an odontogenic choristoma of the eyelid was made. Furthermore, a lacrimal sac culture was positive for oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus with pathological evidence of chronic dacryocystitis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Odontogenic choristoma is a very rare finding in the periocular region with only a few cases reported in the literature. Awareness of clinical findings from this case may allow for a more accurate clinical diagnosis and understanding of the embryologic mechanisms underpinning eyelid and nasolacrimal development. Timely management of this condition is critical to ensure normal oculofacial development and prevent future complications.

Perioperative Outcome Differences Between Pain Management Protocols in Cleft Alveolar Bone Grafting.

PURPOSE: Postoperative hip pain is commonly reported after anterior iliac crest harvest for alveolar bone grafting. The goal of this study is to describe our institution's experience and examine the efficacy of our pain management protocols. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed by abstracting demographic, operative, and pain management data from January 2011 to April 2013. Paired t-tests and Fisher exact tests were used to examine differences when comparing 2 groups, while ANOVA was used to examine difference between the 3 protocols for harvest and pain management: trapdoor technique and local anesthetic injection (TD+LAI), TD and pain catheter (TD+PC), and split crest and LAI. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients, 52 males (61.9%), averaging 8.8 years old (±2.9) were included. Postoperatively, 17 (71%) patients in the PC group received IV narcotics compared to 27 (45%) in those without a PC (P = .03). When comparing all 3 protocols, no significant difference was found in IV morphine usage or duration of IV morphine treatment. In subgroup analysis, when patients in the groups TD+PC versus TD+LAI were examined, those in the TD+PC group had significantly shorter hospital stays and were more likely to go home postoperative day 1 (P = .03; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients tolerated alveolar bone grafting well regardless of harvest technique or pain management approach. While indwelling PCs did not significantly decrease IV morphine usage, these patients had significantly shorter lengths of stays.

Alveolar Bone Grafting and Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review.

Alveolar bone grafting in the mixed dentition stage is an accepted step in the management of cleft alveoli, providing maxillary arch support for dentition and mastication. Points of contention regarding best practices remain, including specific timing, perioperative orthodontic management, bone harvest and substitutes, pain management, and outcomes evaluations. SCOPUS and MEDLINE were searched for articles about alveolar bone grafting, which were read independently by two authors and selected for inclusion on the basis of relevance and merit. Articles on which recommendations were based were rated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria. Three hundred thirty-three distinct articles were found, of which 64 were found to be suitable and relevant for inclusion. The average methodological index for non-randomized studies score was 10.39, with an interrater weighted kappa of 0.7301. Prospective comparative studies about alveolar bone grafting are rare, but available evidence suggests grafting before canine eruption with targeted preoperative orthopedic interventions, the continued use of iliac crest corticocancellous autologous graft, and adjunctive pain control methods. Greater consensus must be reached about valuable outcome measures for research, including use of imaging and indications for regrafting following graft failure.

Economic Analysis of Cleft Palate Repair in International Adoptees.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Major international tertiary care referral center for cleft palate repair. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia who had palate repair performed between 2010 and 2013, excluding syndromic patients, patients undergoing palate revision, and patients with incomplete payment information. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Fees and charges for procedures. RESULTS: Surgeon payment was significantly higher for international adoptees (Δ = $2047.51 [$128.35 to $3966.66], P = .038). Medicaid-adjusted surgeon payments averaged $1006 more for adoptees ([-$394.19 to $2406.98], P = .158). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital and anesthesiology costs for adoptee palate repair were highly variable but did not differ significantly from those for nonadoptees. Partly due to payer mix, surgeon reimbursement was somewhat higher for international adoptees. No difference in total payment was found.

An Assessment of 30-Day Complications in Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A Review of the 2012 ACS NSQIP Pediatric.

OBJECTIVE: This study uses the American College of Surgeons Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP Pediatric), a multicenter database, to identify risk factors for complications after cleft palate repair. DESIGN: Patients undergoing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 42200 and 42205 were extracted from the 2012 ACS NSQIP Pediatric. Patients older than 36 months or those who had undergone an additional surgery that altered the risk were excluded. Outcome variables were combined to create a complication variable. Fisher's exact, Pearson chi-square, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Eligibility criteria were met by 751 patients. Of these, 192 (25.6%) had unilateral clefts, 146 (19.4%) bilateral, and 413 (55.0%) were unspecified. The average age at time of surgery for those without and with complications was 421.1 ± 184.8 and 433.6 ± 168.0 days, respectively (P = .76). Of the 21 (2.8%) patients with complications, respiratory complications were the most common. Risk factors associated with complications included American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3 (P = .003), nutritional support (P = .013), esophageal/gastric/intestinal disease (P = .016), oxygen support (P = .003), structural pulmonary/airway abnormality (P = .011), and impaired cognitive status (P = .009). Patients undergoing concurrent laryngoscopy (P = .048) or other surgeries (P = .047) were also found to be associated with increased complications. The 30-day fistula rate was 0.5%, and the readmission rate was 1.9%. CONCLUSION: Perioperative complications for primary palatoplasty were 2.8% according to the ACS NSQIP Pediatric. Preoperative patient-related factors as well as concurrent surgeries may affect 30-day complication rates. These results help target those at greater risk for complications and allow for appropriate interventions to mitigate risks.

Analysis of risk factors associated with 30-day readmissions following pediatric plastic surgery: a review of 5376 procedures.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned surgical readmissions represent a benchmark outcome and pose a considerable cost burden for health care systems. The authors evaluated risk factors associated with readmission following pediatric plastic surgery using a prospective, validated, national database. METHODS: Patients younger than 18 years who underwent primary pediatric plastic surgery procedures were identified from the 2013 pediatric American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.Two cohorts were compared: patients who experienced readmission and those who did not. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, intraoperative details,and 30-day postoperative outcomes, including complications and readmissions,were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with readmission. RESULTS: A total of 5376 patients were included, for an overall 2.40 percent readmission rate. The study cohort was, on average, 5.47 ± 5.21 years old,51.60 percent (n = 2774) were male, and 65.92 percent of cases (n = 3544)were outpatient procedures. The average number of relative value units per case was 10.15 ± 8.01. Patients with medical comorbidities (p < 0.001) and those with a preoperatively contaminated or infected wound were at higher risk for readmission (p < 0.001). Patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (p < 0.001), longer operative times (p < 0.001), and longer hospitalizations (p < 0.0171) were also independently at greater risk for readmission. The most significant independent predictors of readmission were postoperative surgical and medical complications (OR, 6.94 and 11.92,respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results help target patients at greater risk for readmission and afford an opportunity to provide evidence-based interventions to mitigate risk and minimize cost burden for health care systems. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.135: 521, 2015.) CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Clarifying the relationships among the different features of the OMENS+ classification in craniofacial microsomia.

BACKGROUND: The OMENS+ classification is commonly used to describe the phenotypically diverse craniofacial features of craniofacial microsomia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations among the individual components of the OMENS+ criteria. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was performed for patients who presented with a diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral craniofacial microsomia to the craniofacial clinic from January of 1990 to December of 2012. Demographic, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and radiographic data were abstracted for all patients who met inclusion criteria. Associations and correlations were evaluated using the Spearman rank test and a logistic regression model. RESULTS: One hundred five patients (61 male and 44 female) with craniofacial microsomia met inclusion criteria. Eighty-one patients (77.1 percent) had unilateral microsomia and 24 (22.9 percent) had bilateral microsomia. Twenty-eight patients (26.7 percent) had macrostomia. Correlations were all significantly interrelated (p = 0.000 to p = 00.018) between the degree of orbital, mandibular, and soft-tissue deformities. Moreover, the severity of ear deformity and facial nerve involvement were also significantly correlated (p = 0.008). Between these two groupings, there was a significant correlation between soft-tissue deficiency and nerve involvement (p = 0.010). Macrostomia was associated with the individual components of the group orbit (p = 0.008), mandible (p = 0.000), and soft tissue (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The association between structures using the OMENS+ classification may be caused by their branchial arch origin. Structures mainly developed from the first branchial arch (orbit, mandible, and soft tissue) are associated in degree of severity, as are the structures mainly derived from the second branchial arch (facial nerve and ear). CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Patient risk factors for ambulatory cleft lip repair: an outcome and cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify variables that may preoperatively predict successful outcomes in ambulatory cleft lip repair and to quantify the potential cost savings. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent cleft lip repair at a tertiary cleft care center from January of 2010 to May of 2013 was performed. Because inpatient stay is the authors' current practice, overnight desaturations, poor oral intake, and failure to stop intravenous narcotics during the first day were considered indicators of a poor candidate. Charge data were also collected. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 111 patients were deemed likely to fail ambulatory surgery. American Society of Anesthesiologists score greater than 2 (p=0.019), low birth weight (p=0.022), bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate (p=0.003), central nervous system or neurologic diagnosis (p=0.046), syndromic and/or multiple congenital abnormalities (p=0.024), prior emergency room visits (p=0.021), failure to thrive (p=0.046), and age older than 7 months (p=0.028) were associated with poor candidacy. A diagnosis of cleft lip was protective (p=0.015). Fifty-five patients had no risk factors for a poor ambulatory outcome and did not stay more than 1 day. The average savings per patient who met the authors' criteria was $4261. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that 49.5 percent of children may be safely eligible for ambulatory cleft lip repair. Patients with risk factors may be best served by a short hospital admission. This would lead to a national savings of $8,765,183 per year.