Explaining the Black-white depression paradox: Interrogating the Environmental Affordances Model.

The Environmental Affordances (EA) model posits that Black Americans' engagement with unhealthy behaviors (i.e. smoking, alcohol use, eating calorie-dense foods) to cope with stressor exposure may simultaneously account for their observed greater risk of chronic physical illness, and their observed equal or lesser prevalence of depression, relative to white Americans - the so-called "Black-white depression paradox." However, the specific mechanisms through which such effects might arise have been theorized and analyzed inconsistently across studies, raising concerns regarding the appropriateness of existing empirical tests of the model as well as the validity of the conclusions. We specify the two mechanisms most consistent with the EA model - 'Mediation-only' and 'Mediation and Modification' - and derive a priori predictions based on each. We systematically test these pathways using a subset of 559 participants of the Child Health and Development Study who were included in an adult follow-up study between 2010 and 2012 and self-identified as Black or white. Results failed to support either of the two mechanisms derived from the EA model, challenging the validity and utility of the model for explaining racial differences in depression; efforts to develop alternative hypotheses to explain the paradox are needed.

Racial differences in alcohol and tobacco use in adolescence and mid-adulthood in a community-based sample.

PURPOSE: Smoking and alcohol use have been posited as possible contributors to racial health disparities, despite higher smoking and alcohol use among non-Hispanic White youth and young adults compared to Blacks. To further investigate this claim, we aim to assess variation in alcohol and cigarette use across two distinct points of the life course. METHOD: Data are from a subset of 559 (279 male, 280 female) self-identified Black and White participants of the Child Health and Development study. Self-report alcohol and cigarette use were collected between age 15-17 and at mean age 50. Logistic regressions were estimated; supplementary analyses adjusted for maternal age, prenatal smoking, household income, childhood SES, and education. RESULTS: White participants were more likely to drink regularly (Odds ratio (OR) 2.2; 95%CI 1.2, 4.0) and be intoxicated (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.2, 3.2) in adolescence compared with Blacks. In mid-adulthood, Whites remained more likely to currently drink (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.6, 3.4) but among drinkers, less likely to binge drink (OR 0.4; 95%CI 0.2, 0.8). White participants were less likely to smoke in mid-adulthood (OR 0.4; 95%CI 0.3, 0.6), but among smokers, were more likely to smoke ≥ ½ a pack per day (OR 3.4; 95%CI 1.5, 7.8). CONCLUSIONS: Blacks were less likely to engage in drinking across the life course, but, among drinkers, more likely to binge drink in mid-adulthood. Blacks were more likely to smoke in mid-adulthood, but smoked infrequently compared with Whites. These patterns suggest that a reframing of disparities mechanisms to focus on broader structural and social factors may benefit progress in understanding and ameliorating inequities.